Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Department of
of Agricultural
Agricultural and
and Biosystems
Biosystems Engineering
Engineering
Katherine Edwards
Graduate Research Assistant
Nutrient
loss Nutrient
loss
Ash Pelletization
Feed Pellet Mill
8,000 dry tons of ash
would be produced
from a 50 MMG/yr
Ethanol Plant powered
by gasifying corn
stover.
Binders Ash Origin:
Combusted CDS
Biotechnology Byproducts
DDGS
CDS
Experimental Design
Predictive
Feed Pellet Mill Face Centered Response Surface Design
Binder Type: CDS, Bonemeal, DDGS
Binder Level (%): 3 levels Explanatory
Moisture Content (%): 3 levels 2 Way factorial ANOVA
blocked by binder type
Test for effects binder level, binder,
and moisture content
Binder Level
Binder Level
11 30
5 15
15 19 23 15 30 40
Moisture Content (%) Moisture Content (%)
Bonemeal
45
Binder Level
30
15
15 20 25
Moisture Content (%)
Pelletization
Ash Binder
* Significance p<0.10
Mean binder response: 2way ANOVA
Dried
Condensed
Tests Bonemeal Distillers
Distillers
Grains with
Solubles
Solubles
Durability (%) 80.52 (a) 18.24 (C) 51.66 (b)
pH 10.79 (b) 11.78 (a) 11.13 (b)
ECCE- Lime equivalence 115.01 (b) 441.84 (a) 321.17 (a)
4-Mesh (% pass through) 31.10 (b) 85.14 (a) 86.10 (a)
Water
Degradability 8-Mesh (% pass through) 20.75 (b) 82.62 (a) 80.66 (a)
50-Mesh (% pass through) 18.62 (b) 63.16 (a) 48.84 (a)
Bonemeal –
Total C (%) 8.17 (b) CDS
7.04 did
(b) not create
16.19 a
(a)
higher durability viable pellet because
Total N (%) 0.88 (b) 0.38 (c) 1.40 (a)
DDGS – durability is below
higher degradability commercial pellet values
Predictive Models
Response Surface Designs
Fit of 2nd order response surface predictive model
Bonemeal
45
Binder Level
30
15
15 20 25
Moisture Content
ECCE
Opposing Trends dependent
on water
Liming Capacity and Durability degradability
Nitrogen Carbon
Conclusions
• Biomass ash can be pelletized using multiple binders
This material is
based upon work
supported by the
National Science
Foundation under
Grant No. 0424700
Dr. Carl Bern, ISU Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or ISU Center for Crop
recommendations expressed in this material are those
Biomaterials Research Lab of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of
Utilization Research
the National Science Foundation