Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Table 1. Patient Rejection Scale: Responses of a New York sample and a German sample
according to DSM-II1 (American questionnaire's intrusive statements, the schizophrenic patient more than
Psychiatric Association 1980). The such as, "I wish she had never been cultural, ethnic, or religious factors
item statistics of this German form born." Even if this objection is that could be confounded with the
are almost identical with Kreisman's correct, however, the conformity in first ones.
original data of (single) family the use of defensive responses in New
members of 133 discharged schizo- York City and the Federal Republic
phrenic patients in New York City. of Germany appears to be
References
Response distributions and item-total remarkable.
correlations of both samples are Furthermore, the Camberwell American Psychiatric Association.
listed in table 1. Spearman rank Family Interview results in a score DSM-III: Diagnostic and Statistical
correlations between New York and combining critical comments, Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed.
German response frequencies, calcu- hostility, and emotional overin- Washington, DC: The Association,
lated across the 11 items, separately volvement. This last component is 1980.
for each scale point are rho = .97, not represented in the PRS. Thus, the
rho = .81, and rho = .95. The cultural or ethnic differences between Brown, G.W.; Birley, J.L.; and
agreement is so convincing that the EE studies may be induced by differ- Wing, J.K. Influence of family life on
statistical tests could have been ences in emotional overinvolvement, the course of schizophrenic
omitted. As an estimate of scale while the correspondence of the PRS disorders: A replication. British
reliability, coefficient alpha for the responses could reflect similar critical Journal of Psychiatry, 121:241-258,
American version is .78; for our attitudes in New York City, England, 1972.
German translation it is .72. and the Federal Republic of Brown, G.W., and Rutter, M.L. The
The similarity in these distributions Germany. measurement of family activities and
may appear surprising in view of the Finally, because of the lack of relationships. Human Relations,
studies mentioned earlier showing detailed descriptions of the families 19:241-263, 1966.
cross cultural, differing rates of studied, we cannot exclude a third Kottgen, C ; Sonnichsen, I.; Mollen-
expressed emotions assessed by the possibility. Factors such as family hauer, K.; and Jurth, R. The family
Camberwell Family Interview. This size, living space, and social relations of young schizophrenic
discrepancy may be due to defensive networks (Lukoff et al. 1984) may patients: I. Results of the Hamburg
verbal stereotypes induced by the generally determine attitudes toward Camberwell Family Interview study.
238 SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
International Journal of Family familial stress, and coping in the replication. Schizophrenia Bulletin,
Psychiatry, in press. developmental course of schizo- 8:425-426, 1982.
Kreisman, D.E.; Simmens, S.J.; and phrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin,
Joy, V.D. Rejecting the patient: 10:258-292, 1984.
Preliminary validation of a self-
report scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vaughn, C.E.; and Leff, J.P. The