Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
INTRODUCTION
OF NOISE & LEGAL
REQUIREMENT
OBJECTIVE
SCOPE OF PRESENTATION
01 Background
04 Legal Requirement
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
ENFORCEMENT
STANDARD SETTING
• Early Detection- NICE
• ICOP
• Proactive – NCaPP
• Guideline
• Reactive - Nforce
PROMOTION
& PUBLICATION
• Best Practices
Compilation
• Courses
HUMAN RESOURCE
• Empowering OSH
practicioner
NET
BACKGROUND
LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE
• Volume (loudness)
• Frequency (pitch)
• Exposure time
HEARING MECHANISM
• The human ear can distinguish sound pressure within a very large area.
• The human ear is capable of responding to frequencies ranging from 20Hz to 20kHz.
• The ear is less efficient at low and high frequencies.
• 500Hz to 4kHz is most sensitive.
DEFINITION OF NOISE
in Industrial Hygiene field
• Noise is defined as the sound that can cause hearing loss if workers are exposed while
doing their job.
TYPES OF NOISE
STEADY-CONTINUOUS NOISE
• Noise which has
negligibly small
fluctuations of
sound level within
the period
of observation
FLUCTUATING NOISE
TIME
IMPULSIVE NOISE
• Rapid rise (<0.5 sec)in sound level that involve a peak at intervals of greater than one
per second
INTERMITTENT NOISE
• Steady-Intermittent Noise
• Fluctuating-Intermittent Noise
Steady-Intermittent Noise
Sound level which suddenly drop to the ambient level several times during the period of
observation and the time during which the level remains at a constant value different from
that of the ambient level being of the order of one second or more
Fluctuating-Intermittent Noise
Sound level which suddenly drop to the ambient level several times during the period of
observation and the time during which the level is fluctuating is different from that of the
ambient level being of the order of one second or more
Operating forklift 87
Cutting Wood 93
Cutting lawn 94
Welding 98.4
Grinding 99.7
Lathe 81
Rotohammer 97.8
Temporary
hearing loss
Short term
exposure to high
noise levels
Ringing, buzzing ● Increased heart rate
or whistling in the
ears, when there is ● Increased breathing rate
Acoustic trauma
no external sound ● Hypertension
Short term
exposure to very
● Sleep disturbance
high noise levels
● Lack of concentration
Psychological effects
- Stress
- Anxiety
- Reduced concentration
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
EMPLOYER’S RESPONSIBILITIES
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
EXPOSURE MONITORING
• Employer shall conduct employee exposure monitoring to determine if any employee may
be exposed to noise level at or above the action level .
• Assessment conducted by Competent Person using equipment of IEC standard.
• EXPOSURE MONITORING
Reg 9 - INITIAL MONITORING
Reg 10 - POSITIVE INITIAL EXPOSURE MONITORING
Reg 11 - NEGATIVE INITIAL EXPOSURE MONITORING
Reg 12 - ADDITIONAL MONITORING WHENEVER CHANGES IN
Production, Process , Equipment, Control measures,
Personnel
• EMPLOYEE NOTIFICATION -Within 2 weeks
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
NOISE CONTROL
NO COST ~ EMPLOYEES
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
AUDIOMETRIC BOOTH
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
2. Every year for an employee whose baseline audiogram shows hearing impairment or
annual audiogram show standard threshold shift.
3. Every two years for an employee exposed to noise level at or above the Action Level but
less the limit prescribed in Reg.5.
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
AUDIOGRAM (NORMAL)
AUDIOMETRIC TEST
A chart, graph or table resulting from an audiometric test RECORDS
showing an employee’s hearing threshold levels as a
function of frequency • Name & job location,
date audiogram, name
of person conducting
the test, model, make
& serial number of
equipment, date of last
calibration
shifted by 25 dB
or more
LEGAL REQUIREMENT
dB
>>10
CONCLUSIONS
Participant will be able to:
INTRODUCTION TO
NOISE CONTROL
SESSION OUTCOMES
By the end of this session the participants should be able to:
• Understand the overall concepts of noise control
• Use noise control methods based on Hierarchy of Control in order to improve workplace
from noise hazard.
Regulation 15 – the occupier shall reduce and maintain exposure to noise level below
the limits by:-
engineering control as far as reasonable practicable
Contouring Zoning
Source: personal.city.edu.hk
Source: Info@CitySoundproofing.com
HIERARCHY OF CONTROL
ELIMINATION
• Physically removing the hazard
• The most effective hazard control which can be done by changing a work process in a
way that will get rid of a hazard
SUBSTITUTION
• The second most effective way to control a hazards
• Involves removing something that produces a hazard (similar to elimination), and replacing
with something that does not produce a hazard.
e.g.: substitute quieter process / equipment for noisy ones.
• To be an effective control, the new product must not produce another hazard.
i) ‘Change of process’ – same outcome, different mechanism
ii) ‘Change of technique’ – same objective – different way of getting there
iii) ‘Change of equipment’
Replacing a large New gen set during purchase New compressor heatless dryer –no
jackhammer with a middle built in silencer (reduce <85dB) intermittent purging (reduce <70dB)
range one reduce the noise
level by 10 dBA.
BEFORE AFTER
Individual vacuum pump install at production Installation of centralize vacuum pump at facilities plant
machine (40 units) . Noise level (90 dB) building complete with noise absorption material (rockwool
with cement board). Noise level reduce to avg < 70 dB
ENGINEERING CONTROL
• Engineering controls are defined as: “Methods that reduce noise exposure by decreasing
the amount of noise reaching the employee through engineering design approaches.
Engineering controls isolate the noise from the worker through noise reduction” (adapted
from NIOSH, 1996a).
• The next best approach to use when a hazard cannot be eliminated or a safer substitute
cannot be found.
• Physical changes to the work area or process that effectively minimize a worker’s exposure
to hazards.
• These controls focus on eliminating or reducing that actual source of the hazard.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL
Definition
Administrative controls are defined as: “Methods that reduce exposure by limiting the time a
worker is exposed to noise through administrative approaches. Administrative controls isolate
the worker from the noise by reducing exposure” (adapted from NIOSH, 1996a).
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL…CONT’D
• Provision of HPD should only be considered when all other control methods are impractical.
• What might be some drawbacks of reliance solely on HPD to protect workers?
HPD REQUIREMENT
• Performing a “hazard assessment” of the workplace to identify and control physical and
health hazards.
• Identifying and providing appropriate HPD for employees.
• Training employees in the use and care of the HPD.
• Maintaining HPD, including replacing worn or damaged HPD.
• Periodically reviewing, updating and evaluating the effectiveness of the HPD program.
TYPES OF HPD
Single-use earplugs
• are made of waxed cotton, foam, silicone rubber or fiberglass wool.
Pre-formed or molded earplugs
• disposable or reusable
Earmuffs
• require a perfect seal around the ear
• Glasses, facial hair, long hair or facial movements such as chewing may reduce the
protective value of earmuffs.
TRAINING HPD
Employees must be trained to know at least the following:
• When HPD is necessary.
• What HPD is necessary.
• How to properly put on, take off, adjust and wear the HPD.
• The limitations of the HPD.
• Proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of HPD.
Source : www.mscdirect.com
The NRR describes the average sound level reduction (attenuation) provided by a
hearing protection device (HPD) in a laboratory test. It doesn’t take into consideration
on:
• the loss of protection that occurs when hearing protectors are not fit properly
• they are not worn for the entire time that the wearer is exposed to noise
average amount of
attenuation
“experimenter fit”
method results in
rating as high as 33
dB
effectiveness of an
HPD by Reducing
the NRR
SNR
WHY HPD?
FACTS TO KNOW?
• Percentage of workers who wear HPDs can vary from 0% to more than 49% (Suter, 2002)
• 34% of workers exposed to noise never used hearing protection (Tak, et al., 2009).
FACTS TO KNOW?
• Federal regulations issued by the EPA mandate that hearing protectors be labeled with
a noise reduction rating (NRR), which was designed to predict the amount of protection
98% of wearers would achieve by wearing the devices correctly.(EPA, 1979).
• Research has shown that fewer than 5% of workers actually receive the protection
predicted by the NRR (Berger, et al., 1994).
CONCLUSION
NOISE REDUCTION
THROUGH
ENGINEERING
CONTROL
OBJECTIVES
Noise Reduction
• Substitution
• Engineering Control
Exposure Reduction
• Administrative Procedures and Arrangements
• Use of Hearing Protection Devices
NOISE REDUCTION
Substitution
• Change to quieter methods of work
• Replacing equipment with less noisy ones for both production & material handling
DIRECT INDIRECT
SOURCE RECEIVER
PATH PATH
CONTROL CONTROL
CONTROL CONTROL
10 to 25 dB 10 to 25 dB
6 to 8 dB 4 to 6 dB
& up & up
Source: Info@CitySoundproofing.com
CONTROL AT SOURCE
• Pump
Before After
CONTROL AT PATH
CONTROL AT PATH
Source:www.hse.gov.uk
• Machines - contain cams, gears, reciprocating components and metal stops (often located
in reverberant areas)
• The type, amount, configuration and placement of absorption material depends on the
specific application.
• An absorption coefficient :
- close to (1.0) means the material will absorb all sound impinging randomly on the
surface
- close to (0) means the material will absorb little acoustic energy.
Frequency (Hz)
Material
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Fibrous glass
1 inch thick 0.07 0.23 0.48 0.83 0.88 0.80
2 inch thick 0.20 0.55 0.89 0.97 0.83 0.79
4 inch thick 0.39 0.91 0.99 0.97 0.94 0.89
Polyurethane foam (open cell)
¼ inch thick 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.20 0.45 0.81
½ inch thick 0.05 0.12 0.25 0.57 0.89 0.98
1 inch thick 0.14 0.30 0.63 0.91 0.98 0.91
2 inch thick 0.35 0.51 0.82 0.98 0.97 0.95
Hairfelt
½ inch thick 0.05 0.07 0.29 0.63 0.83 0.87
1 inch thick 0.06 0.31 0.80 0.88 0.87 0.87
Carpet 0.02 0.06 0.14 0.37 0.60 0.65
Frequency (Hz)
Material
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Brick: Glazed 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
Unglazed 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
Unglazed, painted 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
Concrete block painted 0.10 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.08
Concrete / terrazzo 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Wood 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.07
Glass 0.35 0.25 0.17 0.12 0.08 0.04
Gypsum board 0.29 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.09
Plywood 0.28 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.10 0.11
Absorption
Insulation
Distance
Silencer
Vibration isolation
Damping
Absorption
Examples: ABSORPTION
Insulation
• When sound meets a wall or partition, only a small proportion of sound energy passes
through, most are reflected back
• A wall of 10dB insulation allows 10% of the sound energy to pass through
- 20dB corresponds to 1%
- 30dB corresponds to 0.1%, etc.
Examples: INSULATION
Distance
Attenuation by DISTANCE
• Sound that propagates from a point source in free air attenuates by 6dB for each doubling
of distance from source
• For indoors, attenuation is less due to contributions to the total sound level from reverberant
sound brought about by reflection from walls and ceilings
Examples: DISTANCE
Simple Method of knowing how much sound SPL2 = SPK1 - 20 log r2/r1
is reduced by DISTANCE
SPL2 = Noise level at distance r2
SPK1 = Noise level at distance r1
= 83.97 dB
Source:OSHA Technical Manual
Silencer
Use of SILENCER
• The length, diameters of the chamber and opening determines the frequency and level of
attenuation respectively
• Use of absorption and insulation principles
Examples: SILENCER
Vibration isolation
Damping
• Reducing the amplitude of vibration reduces resonance peaks hence reducing the noise
radiated
• Stiffening the vibrating surfaces with metal, spray-on damping material, hardboard
Examples: DAMPING
Before Treatment – 91 dB(A) After Treatment – 83 dB(A)
Cooling Towers
Ventilation Fans
Vacuum Chamber
Acoustic Barrier
Reciprocating compressor
The Problem
A reciprocating air compressor has been in use for several years,
both in a workshop and in mobile noise control demonstrations.
Noise levels measured 94dB at 1m and clearly noise reduction was
required.
The Solution
The noise reductions were all through maintenance. Initial work
involved improving the valve seating. The old valves were observed
to have a rough surface and to seal poorly to the casing. New valves were purchased and
observed to be similarly rough.
These were then dressed (polished) to achieve a much-improved seal. An oil additive
(molybdenum disulphide) was added to the lubricating oil to “smooth out” the surface
finish in the cylinder, thus helping to cushion “piston slap”.
The Results
The average reverberant noise level was reduced by 6dB to 87dB and the operators’
noise exposures were reduced by 4dB.
The Problem
A manufacturer of tube fittings used conveyors to transport
components through the manufacturing process, and to deposit
components into hoppers. In one case the metal products
would drop through some 3m, partly along a metal delivery
chute, before landing in the hopper. The noise level associated
with this was 96dB.
The Solution
- The angle of the conveyor was reduced, to reduce the drop
height and the section of the delivery chute was removed.
The Results
The noise level was reduced by 7dB to 89dB.
The Problem
A noise assessment revealed that the noise level at the operators
position of a metal cutting guillotine was 92dB.
The Solution
- The guillotine was fully serviced and its hydraulics repaired.
- A collecting tray was fitted with rollers and covered with carpet, to
reduce the impact of falling off-cut metal.
The Results
The noise level at the operator’s position was reduced by 8dB to 84dB.
ENGINEERING MEASURES