Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Commentary
References
Beaudette PC, Chlup M, Yee J, Emery RJN. 2007. Relationships of root
suppression of Lp (Markhart et al., 1979) are consistent with more conductivity and aquaporin gene expression in Pisum sativum: diurnal patterns
recent reports of ABA suppression of Kleaf, with such effects noted and the response to HgCl2 and ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 1291–
when at least 10 lM ABA is supplied. 1300.
Christmann A, Weiler EW, Steudle E, Grill E. 2007. A hydraulic signal in root-to-
While limitations of space prevent a more complete consider-
shoot signalling of water shortage. The Plant Journal 52: 167–174.
ation of the sensitivity of transpiration to xylem-supplied ABA in Correia MJ, Pereira JS. 1994. Abscisic acid in apoplastic sap can account for the
detached leaves, it seems that stomatal closure may be more restriction in leaf conductance of white lupins during moderate soil drying and
sensitive than decreases in hydraulic conductance (cf. Fig. 1a,b). rewatering. Plant, Cell & Environment 17: 845–852.
However, Kleaf and transpiration are directly related as defined Dodd IC, Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA. 2008. Apical wilting and petiole xylem vessel
diameter of the rms2 branching mutant of pea are shoot controlled and
earlier. Furthermore, in all calculations of Kleaf that rely on
independent of a long-distance signal regulating branching. Plant and Cell
measuring leaf water potential (Ψleaf) and transpiration rate of Physiology 49: 791–800.
detached leaves, ABA feeding has not statistically changed Ψleaf Hose E, Steudle E, Hartung W. 2000. Abscisic acid and hydraulic conductivity of
(Shatil-Cohen et al., 2011; Pantin et al.) irrespective of how Ψleaf maize roots: a study using cell- and root-pressure probes. Planta 211: 874–882.
Markhart AH, Fiscus EL, Naylor AW, Kramer PJ. 1979. Effect of abscisic acid on Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1992. Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of
root hydraulic conductivity. Plant Physiology 64: 611–614. current plant water status. Plant Physiology 98: 540–545.
Mittelheuser CJ, van Stevenick RFM. 1969. Stomatal closure and the inhibition of Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, McKee JMT, Hilton HW, Horridge JS,
transpiration by (RS)-abscisic acid. Nature 221: 281–282. Farquhar GD, Smeeton RC, Smillie IRA, Black CR et al. 2007. Overproduction
Morillon R, Chrispeels MJ. 2001. The role of ABA and the transpiration stream in of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic
the regulation of the osmotic water permeability of leaf cells. Proceedings of the conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiology 143: 1905–1917.
National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 14138–14143. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 1997. Xylem sap pH increase: a drought signal received at
Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa J, Renaud J, Muller B, Simonneau T, Genty the apoplastic face of the guard cell which involves the suppression of saturable
B. 2012. The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytologist 197: 65–72. ABA uptake by the epidermal symplast. Plant Physiology 113: 559–573.
Sack L, Melcher PJ, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM. 2002. The hydraulic Zhang J, Davies WJ. 1991. Antitranspirant activity in xylem sap of maize plants.
conductance of the angiosperm leaf lamina: a comparison of three measurement Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 317–321.
methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 2177–2184.
Shatil-Cohen A, Attia Z, Moshelion M. 2011. Bundle-sheath cell regulation of Key words: abscisic acid (ABA), hydraulic conductance, signal transduction,
xylem mesophyll water transport via aquaporins under drought stress: a target of stomatal conductance, water relations.
xylem-borne ABA? The Plant Journal 67: 72–80.