Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Article History: Received 25th September 2012, Revised 26th October 2012, Accepted 27th October 2012.
Abstract: Indonesia is one of the countries with the highest cases of dengue fever in South East Asia. The number of
patient and distribution area increases with increasing mobility and population density. Carica papaya L. (CP) belongs to
Caricaceae family is a widely cultivated plant in Indonesia and has many health benefits. The leaves were believed to
increase platelet count and dengue fever patient benefit, but there were very limited published reports on scientific evi-
dent. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of C. papaya leaves extract capsules (CPC) to dengue fever
patient. The design of this study was randomized clinical trial with a sample size of 80 subjects. These subjects were ran-
domized into two groups of 40, including the control and intervention group (received two CPC three times daily). The
results showed that CPC had significant increased the platelet count (p<0.05), maintained stability of hematocrit in the
normal level, shorten hospitalization (p<0.05) in dengue fever patients, and accelerates the increased in platelet count
compared with control group.
Keywords: Carica papaya; clinical trial; dengue fever; hematocrit, platelet.
http://www.openaccessscience.com
Yunita et al. ijmap@openaccessscience.com
577
Int. J. Med. Arom. Plants The effect of Carica papaya leaves on dengue fever patient
Table 2: Onset of increase in platelet count of all subjects.
Group Examination
2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th
Control n (%) * 3 (7.5) 3 (7.5) 9 (22.5) 3 (7.5) 8 (20.0) 1 (2.5) 13 (32,5)
Intervention n (%) 1 (2) 10 (25) 8 (20) 6 (15) 15 (38) ** ** **
nd
*= At the 2 examination no subject have increased in platelet count
**= At the 7, 8 and 9th examination the subjects have been permitted by the physician to discharge
from the hospital.
It is shown that the platelet count in control group mostly increased in the 9 th examination (5th day),
while in the intervention group is in the 6th examination (3rd day).
Statistical analysis with dependent t test with independent t test showed significant dif-
showed the significant differences of platelet ference in hospitalization period between con-
count (p<0.05) and hematocrit level (p<0.05) trol and intervention group (p<0.05). It is shown
from baseline level to 9th examination (5th day) that the subjects in the intervention group that
during observation periods in the control group. received CPC can reach faster and higher in-
And also significant differences of platelet count crease in platelet count compared to the control
(p<0.05) and hematocrit level (p<0.05) from group. This result are similar to those reported
baseline level and 6th examination (3rd day) dur- by Sathasivam et al. (2009) that CP leaves ex-
ing observation periods in the intervention tract can increase platelet count in mice, and
group (Table 3). also in dengue fever patient as reported by Ah-
Statistical analysis with independent t test mad et al. (2011) and Hettige S. (2008). But this
study used more subjects and all the subjects are
showed no significant differences of platelet
hospitalized and this study used CPC that has
count (p>0.05) and hematocrit (p>0.05) baseline
been standardized and more comfortable for the
level between control and intervention group.
patient. CPC also can maintain the hematocrit
There is significant difference of platelet count
level of the subjects within the normal level.
(p<0.05) but no significant difference of hema-
tocrit (p>0.05) between the 9th examination dur- Tai (1999) reported the hospitalization peri-
ing observation periods in the control group and od of dengue fever is 4.2 + 1.5 days. In this
6th examination during observation periods in study the hospitalization period of subjects in
the intervention group (Table 3). control group are similar to the previous study
as reported by Tai (1999), but it is shorter in the
Table 4: Hospitalization period of the patients. intervention group. It means that as CPC can
Hospitalization Group increase the platelet count faster, so the subject
(days) Control (n=40) Intervention (n=40) who received CPC will be discharged more
3 --- 23 (57%) quickly, which also means that it could mini-
4 --- 15 (38%) mize the hospitalization cost. There are no side
5 29 (72%) 2 (5%) effects found during the observation in this
6 7 (18%) ---
7 4 (10) ---
study.
http://www.openaccessscience.com
Yunita et al. ijmap@openaccessscience.com