Design Calculation Report PDF

Project Job Ref.
AIR SEPARATION NIGERIA LIMITED ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION &

BLOCK C, ACME ROAD, BEHIND FUMMEC Section Sheet no./rev.
FILLING STATION
PILE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 1 01
OGBA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, IKEJA
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
LAGOS STATE, NIGERIA
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
PILE ANALYSIS
In accordance with EN 1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the UK national annex
Tedds calculation version 1.0.02
Pile details
Installation method; Drilled
Shape; 300 mm diameter
Length; L = 12000 mm
Material details
Material; Concrete
Concrete strength class; C20/25
Part. factor, concrete (EN1992-1-1 cl. 2.4.2.4(1)); C = 1.50
Coefficient cc (EN1992-1-1 cl. 3.1.6(1)); cc = 0.85
Characteristic compression cylinder strength; fck = 20 N/mm2
Design comp. strength (EN1992-1-1 cl. 3.1.6(1)); fcd = cc  fck / C = 11.3 N/mm2
Mean value of cyl. strength (EN1992-1-1 Table 3.1); fcm = fck + 8 MPa = 28.0 N/mm2
Secant mod. of elasticity (EN1992-1-1 Table 3.1); Ecm = 22000 MPa  (fcm / 10 MPa)0.3 = 30.0 kN/mm2
Modulus of elasticity; E = Ecm = 30.0 kN/mm2
Geometric properties
Pile section depth; h = 300 mm
Bearing area; Abearing =   h2 / 4 = 0.071 m2
Pile perimeter; Perimpile =   h = 0.942 m
Moment of inertia; I =   h4 / 64 = 39761 cm4
Fd
2000 mm
qsk1 = 3.35 kN/m2

3500 mm
qsk2 = 4.02 kN/m2

12000 mm
1000 mm
2000 mm
qsk4 = 6.7 kN/m2
1000 mm
5000 mm
qsk6 = 31.49 kN/m2

qbk6 = 18800 kN/m2
q ski = Characteristic value, shaft resistance, qbki = Characteristic value, base
Stratum details
Stratum Geomaterial Thickness, tstratai Characteristic value, Characteristic value,
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
(mm) base, qbki shaft, qski

(kN/m2) (kN/m2)
1 Cohesionless 2000 - 3.4
2 Cohesionless 3500 - 4
6 Cohesionless 5000 18800 31.5
Action details
Characteristic perm. unfav. action, compression; Gc,k,unfav = 74.5 kN
Characteristic perm. fav. action, compression; Gc,k,fav = 0 kN
Characteristic variable unfav. action, compression; Qc,k = 113.1 kN
Characteristic perm. unfav. action, tension; Gt,k,unfav = 0 kN
Characteristic perm. fav. action, tension; Gt,k,fav = 0 kN
Characteristic variable unfav. action, tension; Qt,k = 0 kN
Geotechnical partial and model factors:
Design approach 1:
Model factor on axial resistance; model = 1.00
Permanent unfavourable, A1 (Table A.3); G,unfav,A1 = 1.35
Permanent favourable, A1 (1); G,fav,A1 = 1.35
Variable unfavourable, A1 (Table A.3); Q,A1 = 1.50
Permanent unfavourable, A2 (Table A.3); G,unfav,A2 = 1.35
Permanent favourable, A2 (Table A.3); G,fav,A2 = 1.35
Variable unfavourable, A2 (Table A.3); Q,A2 = 1.50
Characteristic axial resistance

Characteristic axial base resistance; Rbk = Abearing  qbk = 1328.9 kN
Characteristic axial shaft resistance per stratum
Stratum 1; Rsk1 = qsk1  Perimpile  tstrata1 =6.3 kN
Stratum 6; Rsk6 = qsk6  Perimpile  (L - Dstrata6) =74.2 kN
Characteristic total axial shaft resistance; Rsk = Rsk1 + Rsk2 + Rsk3 + Rsk4 + Rsk5 + Rsk6 = 134.8 kN
Axial compressive resistance
Load combination 1: A1 + M1 + R1
Design compression action; Fc,d,C1 = G,unfav,A1  Gc,k,unfav - G,fav,A1  Gc,k,fav + Q,A1  Qc,k
Fc,d,C1 = 270.2 kN
Partial resistance factor, bearing (Table A.NA.7); b,R1 = 1.00
Partial resistance factor, shaft (Table A.NA.7); s,R1 = 1.00
Design compressive resistance; Rc,d,C1 = (Rbk / b,R1 + Rsk / s,R1) / model = 1463.7 kN
Fc,d,C1 / R c,d,C1 = 0.185
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
PASS - Design compressive resistance exceeds design load

Load combination 2: A2 + M1 + R4
Design compression action; Fc,d,C2 = G,unfav,A2  Gc,k,unfav - G,fav,A2  Gc,k,fav + Q,A2  Qc,k
Fc,d,C2 = 270.2 kN
Partial resistance factor, bearing (Table A.NA.7); b,R4 = 2.00
Partial resistance factor, shaft (Table A.NA.7); s,R4 = 1.60
Design compressive resistance; Rc,d,C2 = (Rbk / b,R4 + Rsk / s,R4) / model = 748.7 kN
Fc,d,C2 / R c,d,C2 = 0.361
PASS - Design compressive resistance exceeds design load
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
COMBINED FOOTING FOR AIR COMPRESSORS 1 01
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS (EN1997-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the UK National Annex
incorporating Corrigendum No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.15
Pad foundation details

Length of foundation; Lx = 5800 mm; Width of foundation; Ly = 5537 mm
Depth of foundation; h = 350 mm; Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 500 mm
Level of water; hwater = 300 mm; Density of water; water = 9.8 kN/m3
Density of concrete; conc = 25.0 kN/m3
21.7 kN/m2 20 kN/m2

9 11
7
8 10
6 17 23 29
5 16 22 28
4 15 21 27
3 14 20 26
2 13 19 25
y
1 12 18 24
23 kN/m2 21.3 kN/m2
Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 200 mm; Width of column; ly1 = 100 mm
position in x-axis; x1 = 920 mm; position in y-axis; y1 = 672 mm
Column no.2 details
Column no.3 details
Column no.4 details
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Column no.5 details

Column no.6 details
Column no.7 details
Column no.8 details
Column no.9 details
Column no.10 details
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Soil properties
Density of soil; soil = 18.0 kN/m3; Net ultimate bearing pressure; nf = 30 kN/m2
Friction angle; k = 15 deg
Foundation loads
Self weight; Fswt = 5.8 kN/m2; Soil weight; Fsoil = 9.0 kN/m2
Column no.1 loads
Permanent load in z; FGz1 = 0.8 kN; Variable load in z; FQz1 = 7.2 kN
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Column no.2 loads

Column no.3 loads
Column no.4 loads
Column no.5 loads
Column no.6 loads
Column no.7 loads
Column no.8 loads
Column no.9 loads
Column no.10 loads
Column no.11 loads
Column no.12 loads
Column no.13 loads
Column no.14 loads
Column no.15 loads
Column no.16 loads
Column no.17 loads
Column no.18 loads
Column no.19 loads
Column no.20 loads
Column no.21 loads
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Column no.22 loads

Column no.23 loads
Column no.24 loads
Column no.25 loads
Column no.26 loads
Column no.27 loads
Column no.28 loads
Column no.29 loads
Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)
Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis; Fdz = 690.5 kN
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis; Mdx = 1976.1 kNm; Moment in y-axis; Mdy = 1891.1 kNm
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity in x-axis; ex = -38 mm; Eccentricity in y-axis; ey = -30 mm
Pad base pressure
q1 = 23.0 kN/m2; q2= 21.7 kN/m2; q3 = 21.3 kN/m2; q4 = 20.0 kN/m2
2
Minimum base pressure; qmin = 20.0 kN/m ; Maximum base pressure; qmax = 23.0 kN/m2
Presumed bearing capacity
Presumed bearing capacity; Pbearing = 30.0 kN/m2
PASS - Presumed bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination1
Partial factor set; A1
Permanent action; G = 1.35; Variable action; Q = 1.50
Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1

Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; R.v = 1.00; Sliding; R.h = 1.00
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 5724 mm; Effective width; L'y = 5461 mm
Effective area; A' = 31.260 m2
Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fdz = 30.7 kN/m2
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination2
Partial factor set; A2
Permanent action; G = 1.00; Variable action; Q = 1.30
Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2

Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing; R.v = 1.00; Sliding; R.h = 1.00
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = 5725 mm; Effective width; L'y = 5435 mm
Effective area; A' = 31.116 m2
Pad base pressure
Design base pressure; fdz = 23.9 kN/m2
FOUNDATION DESIGN (EN1992-1-1:2004)

In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the UK National Annex
incorporating National Amendment No.1
TEDDS calculation version 3.2.15
Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class; C20/25; Char.comp.cylinder strength; fck = 20 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete; C = 1.50; Maximum aggregate size; hagg = 20 mm
2
Design compressive strength; fcd = 11.3 N/mm ; Design tensile strength, plain; fctd,pl = 0.8 N/mm2
Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength; fyk = 410 N/mm2; Partial factor for reinforcment; S = 1.15
2
Design yield strength; fyd = 357 N/mm ; Nominal cover; cnom = 50 mm
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Shear diagram, x axis (kN)

53.8
34.4 37.6
20.5 17.3 26.1
12.2
3.1 1.2
-17.5
-30.6 -33.6
-45.2
-52
Moment diagram, x axis (kNm)

32.5
0.4 4.2 3.5

7.5 10.6
1.2
24.5 20.6
25.5 24.7
35.7
Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)

Design bending moment; MEd.x.max = 32.5 kNm; K = 0.004; K' = 0.207
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Tens.reinforcement required; Asx.bot.req = 2189 mm2
Tens.reinforcement provided; 28 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c); Asx.bot.prov = 3167 mm2
2
Min.area of reinforcement; As.min = 2189 mm ; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 62457 mm2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control (Section 7.3)
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm; Maximum crack width; wk = 0.025 mm
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)
Design shear force; abs(VEd.x.min) = 30.6 kN; Design shear resistance; VRd.c = 611.1 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Shear diagram, y axis (kN)
55.0
74.8
42.7 49.5
23.3
8.4 9.5
7.1
-4.9 3.9 -2.1 3.8
-12.3 -5.6
-24.2
-53
-61.4
-79.7
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
Moment diagram, y axis (kNm)

78.7
2.6 -3.2 -1.4 -0.4

10.9 13.3 12 7.9
1 0.3
14.4
60.6 59.1
75.1 79.8 74.9

Design bending moment; MEd.y.max = 78.7 kNm; K = 0.008; K' = 0.207
Tens.reinforcement required; Asy.bot.req = 2390 mm2
Tens.reinforcement provided; 29 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c); Asy.bot.prov = 3280 mm2
Min.area of reinforcement; As.min = 2390 mm2; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 68208 mm2
Design bending moment; abs(MEd.y.min) = 3.2 kNm; K = 0.000; K' = 0.207
Tens.reinforcement required; Asy.top.req = 2293 mm2
Tens.reinforcement provided; 24 No.12 dia.bars top (250 c/c);Asy.top.prov = 2658 mm2
Min.area of reinforcement; As.min = 2293 mm2; Max.area of reinforcement; As.max = 65424 mm2
Rectangular section in shear (Section 6.2)
Design shear force; abs(VEd.y.min) = 61.4 kN; Design shear resistance; VRd.c = 640.1 kN
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Punching shear (Section 6.4)
Maximum shear resiastance; vRd.max = 3.128 N/mm2; Punching shear resistance; vRd.c = 0.391 N/mm2
Column No.1 - Punching shear perimeter at column face
Punching shear perimeter; u0 = 600 mm; Area within shear perimeter; A0 = 0.020 m2
Max.punching shear force; VEd.max = 11.7 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Max.punching shear stress; vEd.max = 0.101 N/mm2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress
Column No.1 - Punching shear perimeter at 1d from column face
Design punching shear force; VEd.1 = 7 kN
Punching shear stress factor;  = 1.500; Design punching shear stress; vEd.1 = 0.015 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds increased design punching shear stress
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Design punching shear force; VEd.1 = 2.7 kN
PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds design punching shear stress
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

PASS - Design punching shear resistance exceeds design punching shear stress
Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019

Project Job Ref.
FILLING STATION
KG 17/08/2019 EOB 17/08/2019
9 11
7
8 10
29 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c)

6 17 23 29 24 No.12 dia.bars top (250 c/c)
5 16 22 28
4 15 21 27
3 14 20 26
2 13 19 25
1 12 18 24
28 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c)

23 No.12 dia.bars top (250 c/c)

Design Calculation Report PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Design Calculation Report PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Project Job Ref.

AIR SEPARATION NIGERIA LIMITED ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, INSTALLATION &

qsk1 = 3.35 kN/m2

qsk2 = 4.02 kN/m2

qsk4 = 6.7 kN/m2

qsk6 = 31.49 kN/m2

q ski = Characteristic value, shaft resistance, qbki = Characteristic value, base

(mm) base, qbki shaft, qski

Characteristic axial resistance

PASS - Design compressive resistance exceeds design load

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS (EN1997-1:2004)

Pad foundation details

21.7 kN/m2 20 kN/m2

23 kN/m2 21.3 kN/m2

Column no.1 details

Column no.5 details

Column no.19 details

Column no.2 loads

Column no.22 loads

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2

FOUNDATION DESIGN (EN1992-1-1:2004)

Shear diagram, x axis (kN)

Moment diagram, x axis (kNm)

0.4 4.2 3.5

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)

Moment diagram, y axis (kNm)

2.6 -3.2 -1.4 -0.4

Rectangular section in flexure (Section 6.1)

Column No.6 - Punching shear perimeter at column face

Max.punching shear force; VEd.max = 7.3 kN

Column No.14 - Punching shear perimeter at column face

Max.punching shear force; VEd.max = 11.7 kN

Column No.22 - Punching shear perimeter at 1d from column face

Design punching shear force; VEd.1 = 7 kN

29 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c)

28 No.12 dia.bars bottom (200 c/c)

Potrebbero piacerti anche