Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
People are happy that a blade can generate torque in most positions around its circular
path because they know that sail boats can manage to sail upwind by "tacking" at an
angle to the wind. Everyone accepts that no torque is generated facing directly upwind.
People are even more happy that sail boats can sail downwind provided that the wind is
traveling faster than the boat. The intuitive understanding breaks down when the blade is
travelling downwind and much faster than the wind and yet the mathematicians say that
the blade is still generating torque rather than consuming it!
The following diagram shows a top view of this downwind motion scenario. The head
wind is produced due to the movement of the blade. The real wind is blowing from
bottom to top. When the two winds are vector added to produce the apparent wind, the
strength of the wind is less and it is now at a shallow angle to the blade such that the
blade is not stalled and will generate lift at right angles to the average direction angle of
the apparent wind before and after deflection by the blade. This lift vector can be
resolved into two components, one component accelerates the blade forwards and the
other component is along the boom connecting the blade to the axis of the turbine.
Why is the lift vector almost at right angles to the apparent wind? The wind is deflected
through a small angle by the blade but not very much slowed down because the airfoil
has a very low drag. The force to deflect the flow is at right angles to the average angle of
the flow before and after deflection. If the deflection angle is small, then this is almost the
same as at right angles to the incoming airflow (true angle is tilted backward by a few
degrees). The ratio of lift to drag for an airfoil can be between 10 and 100 which is why
the drag components do not defeat us until the incoming airflow angle drops below a few
degrees. Thus the vertical axis wind turbine generates power at all blade positions except
when the blades are nearly aligned with the wind (upwind or downwind).
Building your own vertical axis wind turbine
Now that you know how it works, you will want to build one. Here are some guesses for
experimentation.
Airfoil: NACA63-4-021
Big commercial eggbeater type turbines may use symmetric airfoils such as NACA0015
to avoid a pitching moment, but a home built H-rotor (it looks like an H from a distance)
with more rigid blades and booms can possibly use a cambered airfoil such as NACA
4415. This has a flat side for easier attachment to the boom and the vector analysis done
shows that using camber or increasing angle of attack will produce more torque on one
half of the cycle than the other but possibly more overall (See
http://home.inreach.com/integener/ for the reasoning behind this.). Also, even if you want
a symmetric profile relative to the wind, the headwind is already actually slightly curved
due to the circular path of the blade and so a symmetric profile is not ideal. You will
instead need a symmetric profile distorted to fit to a mean camber line which is a pure
circular arc of the same diameter as the rotor. Here is a table of the % camber needed for
various blade width to diameter ratios.
Blade chordwidth to rotor diameter Needed camber (pure circular arc) when rotating fast
ratio (chord/diameter) (0.5/(chord/diameter))*(1-cos(chord/diameter))
*100% (arguments to cos in radians)
0.4 10%
0.2 5%
0.1 2.5%
0.05 1.25%
Note that these cambers can be significant and are within the range of conventional
cambered airfoils (although standard airfoil camber is not a pure circular arc). I have my
doubts that use of an angled blade is beneficial since it is already difficult to keep the
angle of attack below stall over the whole cycle and I would need to do a computer
integration round the whole cycle to be convinced.
Meanwhile, I recommend to use a fat symmetric profile such as NACA63-4-021, with
additional pure circular camber (so that it is symmetric with respect to airflow when
rotating fast). The large radius leading edge on the profile will give a wide low-drag
bucket between Cl of +0.4 and -0.4 and even when completely stalled and side on to the
wind, the large radius leading edge may deflect the wind to give some starting
propulsion. When the wind is flowing the wrong way (from sharp edge to blunt edge)
again the large "nose" will now contribute drag which is what we want when the machine
is starting up and is below a TSR of 1. The fat thickness fraction (21%) gives a stiffer
blade than the thinner sections such as NACA4415 (15%).
Club Cycom's blade design tool is able to produce plots of NACA63-4-021 of any chord
width and cambered to a circular arc with camber of 0%, 1.25%, 2.5%, 5% and 10%.
Even though the tool is designed for horizontal axis wind turbine design it is possible to
vary parameters to get the plot we want. Here is how. Plot section through blade tip and
alter lift coefficient until chord is the length that you want it. Adjust angle of attack to get
final setting angle of 0 degrees. Ensure that "Draw X as cylinder surface distance" is
ticked (true)) and that the airfoil with the right amount of additional circular camber is
specified. A Young low drag body 60% laminar flow, 30% thickness could be used for
booms and struts. Subscribers will be able to load the scenario darr025.zip to see a plot of
NACA63-4-021 pure circular cambered at 2.5% (designated as NACA63-4-021025). A
screen shot is shown below.