Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 5
CSTP 1: Engaging All
Students
• In what ways were I thought that students did a
students engaged? How Teacher opened her lesson with a strong great job following along and
were students not Students repeated the six traits of
engaged? anticipatory set. She took out the big “six participating in the review of
• How did students writing as the teacher pointed
contribute to their traits of writing” chart and had her students the writing traits out loud.
and stated them out loud. All
learning? repeat after her as she read the different They were able to hear each
• How did teacher and/or students were actively
students monitor traits of writing. This allowed all students to others input and bounce ideas
learning? participating and following along.
• How were the focus orally participate and focus. or words off of each group
students engaged and member.
supported throughout
the lesson?
Students were able to listen to
Students knew what the
my expectations for group
CSTP 2: Effective The teacher was very well organized and did expectations were before they
work that I gave in the
Learning Environment
• How did students and a great job explaining what the activity was went into their groups. Almost all
beginning of the lesson and
teacher contribute to an going to be and how they were expected to students were behaving and
follow through. Each group
effective learning
environment? act when in groups. following directions when doing
was placed around the room
the activity.
so that they had enough room
to work.
Students worked well with
CSTP 3: Organizing their peers in each group.
Subject Matter When students were asked what
• What actions of the NT Each group decided together
contributed to student I thought that the lesson was very organized the five senses were, many of
who would write and who
assimilation of subject and thought through. The teacher did a great them raised their hands right
matter? would read the words out
• How did students job with setting it up and allowing students to away to share. They were able to
construct knowledge of loud. They did a great job
think and participate in a variety of different use prior knowledge to answer
subject matter?
collaborating and working
• What misconceptions did ways through the lesson. the question and participate in
students have and how together, as well as working
were they addressed by the activity.
the teacher? independently when they
needed to be focused.
Students used each other to
help them think off descriptive
The teacher was very good at words or phrases for the given
In the opening of her lesson, the teacher used
CSTP 4: Learning walking around and checking for word. They were able to
Experiences a visual (the traits chart) to support her EL
• How were students understanding of the lesson when participate and help their
and focus students. They were able to
supported through her students were drawing and group think of as many
differentiated visually see what the teacher was talking
instruction? writing in the hand on their “alternative’ words as the verb
• How did students about. The teacher also did a great job with
paper. She would tell them great I gave them. It was very
participate?
modeling how to add sensory details to her
• How did the NT job, or have them read the interesting to hear the
contribute to student own writing so that students had a good
learning? descriptive words that they wrote students who do not usually
example.
out loud. participate out loud in class,
talk and give their input within
their group.
Students demonstrated their
CSTP 5: Assessing I noticed that some of the achievement of this lesson by
Student Learning students during the group activity correctly filling in their 5
• How did students
demonstrate Students demonstrated achievement of the were leaning on other students descriptive sensory details on
achievement of lesson
objectives?
lesson because they were able to participate for support. After doing a few their hand-paper. I looked
• In what ways did in the activity and take what they had learned “rounds” of the activity, those over each paper as students
students struggle or
demonstrate limited and apply it to their won writing in their students were able to think of were editing their own
understanding? personal narrative. examples on their own and did personal narrative and almost
• What teacher actions
contributed to student not need the assistance from all students understood and
achievement?
their peers. demonstrated proficiency
within this lesson.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
After the lesson concluded, I think that students understood what a verb and sensory detail was and could apply
To what degree did students this knowledge to their own writing. Many students displayed their newly learned skill by raising their hand and
achieve lesson objectives? sharing what they might write in their own personal narrative.
To what degree did focus Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 5
students achieve lesson My student with the 504 plan, My focus student did a
objectives?
did a good job participating in wonderful job in her group.
his group activity. I made sure I had placed her group close
I think that my focus English language learner
to check in with this group to the board where I was
was able to complete the activity and work in a
more frequently to ensure that able to monitor her effort
group setting with minimal help from others.
my focus student was working and participation. I think she
This student was able to correctly trace their
well with others. My focus rally understood what was
hand and label different sensory details on
student was able to give great being asked of her and when
their paper.
input and did a good job in I walked around I saw tat
completing his hand-drawing she has done her paper
description paper. correctly.
What would you do Next time, I would give the groups a little more time and put the timer up on the board so that groups are able
differently next time? to self-monitor their own time.
1. having students work on cooperative, organized groups where each student was participating
What were three top Lesson 2. giving clear directions about what was expected of each group
Strengths? 3. giving students the opportunity to see how I used sensory details in my own paper so that they had a
good example to work off of
1. time management
What were three top areas
for improvement? 2. picking groups ahead of time
3. walking around during the activity to ensure that students know what they are supposed to be doing
What are next steps? Next, I will meet with each student to go other editing process of their personal narrative paper
Other Comments/Notes
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 5