Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
-versus- for
X------------------------------X
COMMENT / OBJECTION
COMES NOW, accused through the undersigned public attorney, unto this
Honorable Court, most respectfully submits her Comment to the Formal Offer of
Exhibits by the Prosecution, to wit:
Exhibit “A” and sub-marking (Sworn Statement of PO2 Christian Boy Aranza)
Comment: These 2 exhibits and their sub-markings are objected for being
IRRELEVANT as evidence. It was not convincingly proven that the accused was legally
arrested and neither was it proven that the subject matter of said documents were
confiscated from the accused.
Comment: Said two (2) documents are Objected for being INCOMPETENT
and INADMISSIBLE as evidence. There was NO Strong Proof that same were duly
coordinated with the PDEA.
Comment: These exhibits and sub-markings are all objected to for being
PURELY SELF-SERVING;
Exhibits “Q” to “U” and sub-markings (Five (5) Plastic sachets containing alleged
Marijuana)
Exhibit “V” (Red plastic bag of National Bookstore with marking “CGA”)
Comment: Said six (6) exhibits are Objected for being INADMISSIBLE as
evidence being the “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree”. The accused was illegally arrested
and any evidence obtained in violation of her right shall be inadmissible against her.
Other reliefs, just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
By:
GREETINGS:
Copy furnished:
Office of the City Prosecutor
Batangas City