Group 10 Student Outcomes

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT
Design Project Design of Stormwater System at Barangay Calizon, Calumpit Bulacan

Title:
Group Members: Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C. Course Code: CE 509
Course Title: CE Design Projects 2
Freo, Mary Grace P. Sem./School Year: 1st Semester A.Y. 2019 -2020
Langit, Caroline P. Instructor: Engr. Rhonnie C. Estores
Tolentino, Shaira I.
Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to write a design project report that illustrates effective writing in English.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
Content (Substance) The report presents The report lacks The report presents
irrelevant relevant complete and relevant
data/information data/information data/information
Format The report does not The report follows some The report fully
follow the prescribed of the prescribed format complies with the
format prescribed format
Coherence (Logical flow of The report does not Some parts of the The whole report
discussion) present a logical flow of report present a logical presents a logical flow
discussion flow of discussion of discussion
Grammar, Spelling, Writing There are many There are occasional The report is free of
Mechanics (punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors and violations errors and violations
italics, capitalization, etc.) errors, and writing
mechanic violations
TOTAL SCORE
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒
Mean Score = 4
Rating = ( ) 𝑥 100
12
Evaluated by:
ENGR. RHONNIE C. ESTORES Date:

Signature over Printed Name
RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION DESIGN PROJECTS

Design Project Design of Stormwater System at Barangay Calizon, Calumpit Bulacan
Title:
Group Members: Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C. Course Code: CE 509
Course Title: CE Design Projects 2
Freo, Mary Grace P. Sem./School Year: 1st Semester A.Y. 2019 -2020
Langit, Caroline P. Instructor: Engr. Rhonnie C. Estores
Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to write a design project report that illustrates effective writing in English.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
Delivery Presenters mumbles, Presenter speaks clearly Presenter speaks clearly and
mispronounces terms, and a n d loud enough to be heard loud enough for all in the
makes serious and persistent by most of the audience; audience to hear; makes no
grammatical errors throughout makes relatively few grammatical errors, and
presentation. Presenter grammatical errors, and pronounces all terms
speaks too softly to be heard pronounces most terms correctly and precisely
by many in the audience correctly.
Visual Aid There is no visual aid used There is visual aid but does Visual aid enhances
during the oral presentation not enhance the presentation
presentation
Organization There is no logical sequence Presenter follows logical Presenter follows logical
of data/information sequence but fails to sequence and provides
elaborate explanations/ elaboration
Content The presentation covers The presentation lacks The presentation covers
irrelevant data/information relevant data/information complete and relevant
data/information
TOTAL SCORE
Mean Score = 4
Rating = ( ) 𝑥 100
12
Evaluated by:
ENGR. RHONNIE C. ESTORES Date: ___________________________

Signature over Printed Name
RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS

(Engineering Programs)
Student Outcome (b): Identify, formulate and solve complex engineering problems.
Program: BS in Civil Engineering Course: CE 509 – CE Design Projects 2 Section: CE52FC1 1st Semester School Year: 2019 – 2020
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

Performance Indicators Score
1 2 3
1) Ability to identify an engineering The problem is not identified The problem is stated but not The statement of the problem
problem clearly identified has been clearly and fully
(Statement of the Problem) identified.
2) Ability to formulate engineering Unable to formulate an Presents a general approach to Presents a detailed step by step
solutions to a given problem appropriate solution to the solve an engineering problem solution to solve an engineering
(Design/Research Methodology) problem problem
3) Ability to apply the best solution Not able to solve the given The solution to the problem The correct solution to the
to an engineering problem engineering problem has not been fully elaborated problem has been clearly
(Summary and Conclusion) derived and presented
Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

Freo, Mary Grace P.
Langit, Caroline P.
Evaluated by:
ENGR. RHONNIE C ESTORES

Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member Date: _____________________
RUBRIC FOR DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOLUTIONS WITHIN MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS AND STANDARDS
Student Outcome (c): Solve complex engineering problems by designing systems, components, or processes to meet specifications within realistic
constraints such as economic, environmental, cultural, social, societal, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability
in accordance with standards.
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

1 2 3
1) Apply appropriate Less than three constraints are applied Three constraints are applied in More than three appropriate
constraints in the design in the design process the design process constraints are applied in the design
process process
2) Apply appropriate standards Appropriate standards and codes are Appropriate local standards and Appropriate local and international
and codes in the design not applied in the design process codes are applied in the design standards and codes are applied in
process process the design process
3) Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options were used in Three options were used in the More than three options were used in
final design choice the trade-offs to determine the final trade-offs to determine the final the trade-offs to determine the final
design choice design choice design choice

Freo, Mary Grace P.
Langit, Caroline P.
Evaluated by:

RUBRIC FOR MODERN TOOL USAGE

Student Outcome (e): Use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice in complex engineering activities.
Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory

1 2 3 4
4) Apply appropriate Fails to identify any Identifies modern Identifies modern Applies the most appropriate
techniques, skills, and modern techniques to techniques but fails to techniques and is able to modern technique in
modern tools to perform perform discipline- apply these in performing apply these in performing performing discipline-
a discipline-specific specific engineering discipline-specific discipline-specific specific engineering task
engineering task. task. engineering task. engineering task. exceeding the requirements.
5) Demonstrate skills in Fails to apply any Attempts to apply modern Shows ability to apply Shows ability to apply the
applying different modern tools to solve tools but has difficulties to fundamental procedures most appropriate and
techniques and modern engineering problems. solve engineering in using modern tools effective modern tools to
tools to solve problems. when solving solve engineering problems.
engineering problems. engineering problems.
6) Recognize the benefits Does not recognize the Recognizes some Recognizes the benefits Recognizes the need for
and constraints of benefits and benefits and constraints of and constraints of benefits and constraints of
modern engineering constraints of modern modern engineering tools. modern engineering modern engineering tools
tools. engineering tools. tools and shows intention and makes good use of
to apply them for them for engineering
engineering practice. practice.
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score / 3)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 12) x 100%

Evaluated by: Freo, Mary Grace P.
Langit, Caroline P.
ENGR. RHONNIE C ESTORES Tolentino, Shaira I.
RUBRIC FOR ETHICS

Student Outcome (h): Apply principles of ethics and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities.
Performance Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

Score
Indicators 1 2 3 4 5
1. Understand the Student is not Student is aware of Student is aware of Student understands Student understands
code of ethics aware of any codes the existence of the existence of and abides by the and abides by the code
relevant to the for ethical behavior code of ethics code of ethics and code of professional of professional ethics
practice of the other bases for ethics and becomes part of his
profession ethical behavior personal values system
2. Evaluate the Student shows no Student shows Student is aware of Student knows the Student is aware of the
ethical extent of a awareness of limited awareness of the ethical extent of ethical extent of a ethical extent of a
discipline-related ethical extent of a the ethical extent of a discipline-related discipline-related discipline-related
problem discipline-related a discipline-related problem problem and its problem and knows how
problem problem implication if not to address it
addressed
3. Apply relevant Blames others for Does not recognize Recognizes the need Takes personal Takes personal
principles of his own issues and the need to take to take personal responsibility for all responsibility for all of
ethics problems personal responsibility for his his actions his actions and exerts
responsibility for his actions effort to make amends
actions
Total Score
Langit, Caroline P.
RUBRIC FOR INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM WORK

Student Outcome (i): Function effectively as an individual and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multidisciplinary setting.
Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

1 2 3 4 5
1. Take responsibility as an Does not perform Performs very little Performs nearly all Performs all Performs all
individual or as a team assigned task of the assigned assigned tasks assigned tasks assigned tasks and
member fulfilling appropriate tasks extends help or
roles to assure team success. support to other
team members
2. Contribute useful inputs in Does not Contributes to the Contributes to the Contributes Consistently and
relation to the team’s contribute to the group only when group with knowledge, actively contributes
objective. group even when prompted occasional opinions, and skills knowledge,
prompted prompting without prompting opinions, and skills
3. Communicate freely to Does not share Shares Shares Shares Consistently and
teammates, give and provide information, information, information, information, actively shares a
feedback and suggestion to feedback, or feedback, or feedback, or feedback, or great deal of
improve team outputs. suggestions even suggestions only suggestions with suggestions information,
when prompted when prompted occasional without prompting feedback, or
prompting suggestions
Total Score
Langit, Caroline P.
RUBRIC FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

Student Outcome (j): Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with various communities including engineering experts and society at
large using appropriate levels of discourse.

1 2 3 4 5 Score
Indicators
7) Express ideas Does not communicate his Communicates Communicates important Clearly communicates the Clearly and effectively
clearly ideas clearly information as isolated information but not a clear main idea or theme and communicates the main
ideas in a random fashion theme or over all structure provides suitable support idea or theme and
and detail provides support that
contains rich, vivid, and
powerful detail
8) Effectively Does not demonstrate the Presents information in a Presents information in a Presents information in a Presents information in a
communicate with ability to adjust tone or style and tone style and tone inappropriate style and tone consistent style and tone that
diverse audiences style for different inappropriate for both for the audience’s level of with the audience’s level effectively capitalized on
audiences audience’s level of interest interest or the audience’s of interest and level of the audience’s level of
and level of knowledge level of knowledge knowledge or interest and level of
understanding knowledge or
understanding
9) Effectively Uses only one method of Uses one method and Attempts to use two Uses of two different Uses multiple methods of
communicate in a communication when correctly applies the methods of communication, methods of communication, applying
variety of ways more than one method is conventions and rules of but does not apply the communication, applying the conventions and rules
clearly needed or that method conventions and rules of the conventions and rules of those methods in highly
requested and does not those methods of those methods in creative and imaginative
correctly apply the customary ways ways
conventions and rules of
that method
Total Score
Langit, Caroline P.
RUBRIC FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Student Outcome (k): Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a
member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

Score
1 2 3
4. Understands engineering and Team members do not Team members demonstrate Team members are
management principles demonstrate awareness of some knowledge of knowledgeable about
any engineering and engineering and management engineering and management
management principles principles principles
5. Applies engineering and Team members do not Team members accept a Team members accepted and
management principles to an demonstrate willingness to designated role in an assigned executed with full competence a
assigned task and in assume a designated role in task and in multidisciplinary designated role in an assigned
multidisciplinary environments a group project environments but the expected task and in multidisciplinary
output was not fully completed environments beyond the
expected output
6. Manages assigned projects in Project does not meet Project meets the minimum Project exceeds the minimum
multidisciplinary environments minimum requirement requirement and shows some requirement and demonstrates
and/or shows insufficient evidence of good management consistent, efficient, and
evidence of good skills. thoughtful use of time and skills.
management skills.
Total Score
Percentage Rating = (Total Score /9) x 100%

Langit, Caroline P.
RUBRIC FOR LIFELONG LEARNING

Student Outcome (l): Recognize the need for, and prepare to engage in lifelong learning.

Score
Indicators 1 2 3 4 5
7. Learn independently Shows no interest to Requires detailed or Requires minimal Completes a task Completes an assigned
complete a task step-by-step guidance to complete without supervision or task independently beyond
independently instructions to a task guidance what is required and
complete a task identifies best practices
8. Acquire relevant Relies on classroom Begins to look Looks beyond Looks beyond Educational interests and
knowledge from instruction only beyond classroom classroom classroom pursuits exist and flourish
outside sources to requirements, requirements, requirements, outside classroom
solve problems showing interest in pursuing additional pursuing substantial requirements,
pursuing knowledge knowledge and knowledge and knowledge and/or
independently showing interest in actively pursuing experiences are pursued
independent independent independently, and applies
educational educational knowledge learned into
experiences experience practice
9. Recognize one’s Unable to recognize Recognizes Recognizes Avoids committing Learns from mistakes and
weaknesses or own shortcomings or weaknesses or weaknesses or mistakes practices continuous
mistakes as learning mistakes mistakes but does not mistakes and exerts improvement
opportunities exert effort to address effort to address them
them
Total Score

Langit, Caroline P.
ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT TOOL
Design Project Title: Design of Stormwater System at Barangay Calizon, Calumpit Bulacan
Group Members: Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C. Course Code: CE 509 ___
Freo, Mary Grace P. Course Title: CE Design Project 2 ___
Langit, Caroline P. Sem./School Year: 1st Semester A.Y. 2019-2020
Scale
SOs Addressed by the
Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary Score
Course
1 2 3
Identify, formulate, and solve Identify an engineering The engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem
complex engineering problems problem and/or satisfy a and/or need is unidentified and/or need is identified and/or need is clearly and
(student outcome b) need specifically identified
Formulate engineering The engineering solution to a The engineering solution to The engineering solution to
solutions to a given problem given problem and/or need is a given problem and/or a given problem and/or
and/or need not formulated need is partly formulated need is correctly and
completely formulated
Solve the engineering The engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem
problem and/or satisfy the and/or need is unsolved and/or need is solved by and/or need is innovatively
need adopting existing solved by adopting new
technologies, systems, technologies, systems,
components, or processes components, or processes
and methods and methods
Solve complex engineering Apply appropriate constraints Less than three constraints Three constraints are More than three
problems by designing in the design process are applied in the design applied in the design appropriate constraints are
systems, components, or process process applied in the design
processes to meet process
specifications within realistic Apply appropriate standards Appropriate standards and Appropriate local Appropriate local and
constraints such as economic, and codes in the design codes are not applied in the standards and codes are international standards and
environmental, cultural, social, process design process
societal, political, ethical, applied in the design codes are applied in the
health and safety, process design process
manufacturability, and Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options were Three options were used in More than three options
sustainability in accordance final design choice used in the trade-offs to the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs
with standards determine the final design the final design choice to determine the final
(student outcome c) choice design choice
Scale
SOs Addressed by the
Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary Score
Course
1 2 3
Use the techniques, skills, and Identify appropriate Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and
modern engineering tools techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools modern engineering tools modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering modern engineering tools are not clearly identified in are well identified in the are appropriately identified
practice in complex necessary in the design the design process design process in the design process
engineering activities process
(student outcome e) Use appropriate techniques, Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Appropriate techniques,
skills, and modern modern engineering tools modern engineering tools skills, and modern
engineering tools in the are not appropriately used in are appropriately used in engineering tools are
design process the design process the design process accurately used in the
design process
Apply principles of ethics and Demonstrate ethics by Design project submitted or Design project submitted Design project submitted or
commit to professional ethics submitting or presenting a presented does not cite or presented partly cited presented completely cited
and responsibilities design project that cites references references based on references based on
(student outcome h) references Turnitin results Turnitin results
Demonstrate professionalism Design project is not Design project is submitted Design project is submitted
by submitting or presenting submitted or presented on or presented on schedule or presented ahead of
the design projects on schedule as planned as planned schedule as planned
schedule as planned
Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral
complex engineering activities presentations Use the mean score from the rubric for oral presentation of design projects
with various communities
including engineering experts Write a design project report
and society at large using that illustrates effective Use the mean score from the rubric for design project report
writing in English
appropriate levels of discourse
(student outcome j)
Total Score
Percentage Ranking = 𝑥 100
12
Evaluated by:

Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member Date: __________

Group 10 Student Outcomes

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Group 10 Student Outcomes

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

Design Project Design of Stormwater System at Barangay Calizon, Calumpit Bulacan

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

ENGR. RHONNIE C. ESTORES Date:

RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION DESIGN PROJECTS

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

ENGR. RHONNIE C. ESTORES Date: ___________________________

RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS

Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

ENGR. RHONNIE C ESTORES

Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

ENGR. RHONNIE C ESTORES

RUBRIC FOR MODERN TOOL USAGE

Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory

Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

RUBRIC FOR ETHICS

Performance Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

RUBRIC FOR INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM WORK

Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

RUBRIC FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

Performance Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

RUBRIC FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary

Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

RUBRIC FOR LIFELONG LEARNING

Performance Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Exemplary

Cloma, Niña Jennielyn C.

ENGR. RHONNIE C ESTORES

Potrebbero piacerti anche