Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Pricing Decision and placing the product with a case study @ DASHEN
BREWERY S.C
1. Anwar Muhammed--------------------------PGR(P)/025/12
2. Amare Azmeraw------------------------------PGR(P)/023/12
3. Anteneh Solomon----------------------------PGR/(P)024/12
4. Lealem Addis--------------------------------PGR/(P)046/12
Debre Berhan,Ethiopia
November 2019
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thank our teacher, SHIFERA. B (PHD) for giving this assignment and for his
assistance and advice to developed and finalize this study .We also wish to express appreciatio n
to manager and employees of DASHEN BREWERY SHARE COMPANY who gave us necessary
data relevant source information and document.
Finally we wish express our heart full thanks for our family friends and secretary who supported
us necessary materials, financial support.
Abstract
Price is the amount of money charged for a product or service. Of all marketing
mix elements price is the only one which generates revenue for the company. Price
is said to be the most flexible element of the marketing mix as it can be changed
quickly. Price to a large extent depends on the number of competitors and level of
competition.
The price is the amount a customer pays for the product. The price is very important as it
determines the company's profit and hence, survival. Adjusting the price has a profound impact on
the marketing strategy, and depending on the price elasticity of the product, often; it will affect
the demand and sales as well. The setting of a price should therefore complement the other
elements of the marketing mix.
Pricing is usually not considered as an exciting part of a marketer’s job. As such, prices are
not varied enough for different product items, market segments and purchase occasions by
most Ethiopian firms. These companies handle pricing in a variety of ways which makes it
important to achieve their sales and targeted profits. They are not able to adopt the right pricing
strategies that will enable them adapt to the competitive pressures posed by Foreign Service
firms.
Chapter 1
1. Pricing Decisions
Every company’s pricing decisions are characterized by a number of internal and external
factors. Before setting prices, the company must decide what it wants to accomplish with such
a product or service. Internally, a company's pricing decision can be based on its marketing
objectives, marketing mix strategies and costs. ( Feargal, 1990).
Return on Investment (ROI) –A firm may set as a marketing objective the requirement that
all products attain a certain percentage return on the organization’s spending on marketing the
product. This level of return along with an estimate of sales will help determine appropriate
pricing levels needed to meet the ROI objective.
Cash Flow –Firms may seek to set prices at a level that will insure that sales revenue will at
least cover product production and marketing costs. This is most likely to occur with new
products where the organizational objectives allow a new product to simply meet its expenses
while efforts are made to establish the product in the market. This objective allows the marketer
to worry less about product profitability and instead directs energies to building a market for
the product.
Market Share –The pricing decision may be important when the firm has an objective of
gaining a hold in a new market or retaining a certain percent of an existing market. For new
products under this objective the price is set artificially low in order to capture a sizeable
portion of the market and will be increased as the product becomes more accepted by the target
market. For existing products, firms may use price decisions to insure they retain market share
in instances where there is a high level of market competition and competitors who are willing
to compete on price.
Maximize Profits –Older products that appeal to a market that is no longer growing may have
a company objective requiring the price be set at a level that optimizes profits. This is often
the case when the marketer has little incentive to introduce improvements to the product (e.g.,
demand for product is declining) and will continue to sell the same product at a price premium
for as long as some in the market is willing to buy. (Kotler etal,1997)
1.1.3 Costs
Many companies before starting product’s price is to first determine how much it will cost to
get the product to their customers. Obviously, whatever price customers’ pay must exceed the
cost of producing a good or delivering a service otherwise the company will lose money. When
analyzing cost, the marketer will consider all costs needed to get the product to market
including those associated with production, marketing, distribution and company
administration (e.g., office expense). These costs can be divided into two main categories:
Fixed Costs -Also referred to as overhead costs, these represent costs the marketing
organization incurs that are not affected by level of production or sales. For example, for a
manufacturer of writing instruments that has just built a new production facility, whether they
produce one pen or one million they will still need to pay the monthly mortgage for the
building. From the marketing side, fixed costs may also exist in the form of expenditure for
fielding a sales force, carrying out an advertising campaign and paying a service to host the
company’s website. These costs are fixed because there is a level of commitment to spending
that is largely not affected by production or sales levels.
Variable Costs –These costs are directly associated with the production and sales of products
and, consequently, may change as the level of production or sales changes. Typically variable
costs are evaluated on a per-unit basis since the cost is directly associated with individual
items. Most variable costs involve costs of items that are either components of the product
(e.g., parts, packaging) or are directly associated with creating the product (e.g., electricity to
run an assembly line). However, there are also marketing variable costs such as coupons, which
are likely to cost the company more as sales increase (i.e., customers using the coupon).
Variable costs, especially for tangible products, tend to decline as more units are produced.
This is due to the producing company’s ability to purchase product components for lower
prices since component suppliers often provide discounted pricing for large quantity
purchases. Campbell and Viciera (2002).Epstein and Schneider (2007) observe that
determining individual unit cost can be a complicated process. While variable costs are often
determined on a per-unit basis, applying fixed costs to individual products is less
straightforward. For example, if a company manufactures five different products in one
manufacturing plant how would it distribute the plant’s fixed costs (e.g., mortgage, production
workers’ cost) over the five products? In general, a company will assign fixed cost to
individual products if the company can clearly associate the cost with the product, such as
assigning the cost of operating production machines based on how much time it takes to
produce each item. Alternatively, if it is too difficult to associate to specific products the
company may simply divide the total fixed cost by production of each item and assign it on
percentage basis. (Epstein and Schneider, 2007)
What are the prices of competitors and how is the product competing on quality
Economic conditions (factors such as boom or recession, inflation, rates of interest in the economy,
government policies etc
1.3Pricing Methods / Approaches
In general there are three pricing methods
- Under this method Price of a Product is determined keeping the demand concept into the
mind :
- Following Policies are popular under this strategy :
- What the Market can Bear Pricing: The highest price that the consumers are willing to pay
for the product under a specific situation, that price is fixed.
- Skimming Pricing (For New Products): Keeping high initial Prices to skim the high end
customers and then settle to low prices later on. Penetration Pricing (For New Products):
Seeks penetration in the Market with Low Prices. Appropriate for large sales of no frill
products.
Price Skimming
If the objective of pricing strategy is to build market share, low penetration pricing is often
recommended however, if the goal is to capture as much of the customer perceived value as
possible, “price skimming” might be the method of choice. Price skimming relies on the
assumption that different customers value an offering at different prices. The technique involves
introducing a new offering at a high price and lowering the price over time, so that as much as
possible of each consecutive level of valuation is captured. Price skimming can be a brief
process, but sometimes premium prices are drawn out over years.
Customized prices
While customized pricing in consumer markets is at best slow, and at worst, illegal, it is common
practice in markets. Clients may have such large differences in needs that a firm must provide a
different solution to every customer. Due to this reality, the use of customized prices is also
widely accepted, even expected, of firms. When the usage of the offering is what provides the
value, a customized price can be built which reflects this unique value.
Group/ Segment based pricing
Buyer grouping or segmentation allows a company to offer an appropriate price to groups of
customers with differing willingness to pay. Each level is carefully separated using a number of
different tactics. If taken to an extreme segmentation can be illegal, but many legal methods are
available. Segments do not separate themselves, but require careful consideration by the firm to
distinguish differences in what customers value and how.
Chapter two
Hence, a distribution channel can also be referred to as a set of interdependent intermediaries that help
make a product available to the end customer.
According to Guepta (1999:190) distribution objective are defined for a product market I terms
of availability of the product (for example, percentage of total outlets reached).
Most Companies do not explicitly set distribution objectives of those that do, distributio n
objectives often have no linkage to end customer requirements.
To develop objective that support the organization’s overall marketing goals. How can distributio n
work with the other elements of the marketing mix to increase profits? To increase market share?
To increase volume of sales? In general, the overall objective of and in the quantities customers
want at the minimum cost. More specific distribution objectives, however, depend on the
characteristics of the product and the market. (Stuart and other 2006:437)
Distribution channels provide time, place, and ownership utility. They make the product available
when, where, and in which quantities the customer wants. But other than these transactiona l
functions, marketing channels are also responsible to carry out the following functions.
2.1.1 Logistics and Physical Distribution: Marketing channels are responsible for
assembly, storage, sorting, and transportation of goods from manufacturers to
customers.
2.1.2 Facilitation: Channels of distribution even provide pre-sale and post-purchase
services like financing, maintenance, information dissemination and channel
coordination.
2.1.3 Creating Efficiencies: This is done in two ways: bulk breaking and creating
assortments. Wholesalers and retailers purchase large quantities of goods from
manufacturers but break the bulk by selling few at a time to many other channels
or customers. They also offer different types of products at a single place which is
a huge benefit to customers as they don’t have to visit different retailers for differe nt
products.
2.1.4 Sharing Risks: Since most of the channels buy the products beforehand, they also
share the risk with the manufacturers and do everything possible to sell it.
2.1.5 Marketing: Distribution channels are also called marketing channels because they
are among the core touch points where many marketing strategies are executed.
They are in direct contact with the end customers and help the manufacturers in
propagating the brand message and product benefits and other benefits to the
customers.
2.2 Types of Distribution Channels
Channels of distribution can be divided into the direct channel and the indirect channels. Indirect
channels can further be divided into one-level, two-level, and three-level channels based on the
number of intermediaries between manufacturers and customers.
According to Anderson and Vincze (2000:286), the distribution system is composed of channel
intermediaries (wholesalers, retailers and other merchants or agents) that provide a link between
producers and final customers. The ideal marketing system uses channels that maximize efficie nc y
and effectiveness, minimize costs, and deliver the greatest customer exchange payment,
information; titles and ownership. Channels are structured differently for consumer and
organizational goods because of the nature of transactions and customer needs
When a manufacturer involves a middleman/intermediary to sell its product to the end customer,
it is said to be using an indirect channel. Indirect channels can be classified into three types:
One-level Channel (Manufacturer to Retailer to Customer): Retailers buy the product from
the manufacturer and then sell it to the customers. One level channel of distribution works best for
manufacturers dealing in shopping goods like clothes, shoes, furniture, toys, etc.
When a manufacturer uses more than one marketing channel simultaneously to reach the end user,
he is said to be using the dual distribution strategy. They may open their own showrooms to sell
the product directly while at the same time use internet marketplaces and other retailers to attract
more customers.
Selection of the perfect marketing channel is tough. It is among those few strategic decisions
which either make or break your company.
Even though direct selling eliminates the intermediary expenses and gives more control in the
hands of the manufacturer, it adds up to the internal workload and raises the fulfilment costs.
Hence these four factors should be considered before deciding whether to opt for the direct or
indirect distribution channel.
Direct channels suit businesses whose target audience lives in a geographically confined area, who
require direct contact with the manufacturer and are not that frequent in repeating purchases.
The buying patterns of the customers also affect the choice of distribution channels. If customers
expect to buy all their necessaries in one place, selling through retailers who use product
assortment is preferred. If delivery time is not an issue, if the demand isn’t that high, the size of
orders is large or if there’s a concern of piracy among the customers, direct channels are suited.
If the customer belongs to the consumer market, longer channels may be used whereas shorter
channels are used if he belongs to the industrial market.
Understanding consumer behavior is essential for deciding the most effective marketing channel
for the business.
Perishable goods like fruits, vegetables and dairy products can’t afford to use longer channels as
they may perish during their transit. Manufacturers of these goods often opt for direct or single
level channels of distribution. Whereas, non-perishable goods like soaps, toothpaste, etc. require
longer channels as they need to reach customers who reside in areas which are geographica lly
diverse.
If the nature of the product is more technical and the customer may require direct contact with the
manufacturer, direct channels are used. Whereas, if the product is fairly easy to use and direct
contact makes no difference to the number of sales, longer channels are used.
The unit value of the product also decides whether the product is sold through a direct channel or
through an indirect channel. If the unit value is high like in the case of jewellery, direct or short
channels are used, whereas products like detergents whose unit value is low use longer channels
of distribution.
A company having a large amount of funds and good management expertise (people who have
sufficient knowledge and expertise of distribution) can create the distribution channels of its own
but a company with low financial stability and management expertise has to rely on third-party
distributors.
The companies who want to have tight control over the distribution prefer direct channels.
Whereas, those companies to whom such control doesn’t matter or those who are just interested in
the sales of their products prefer indirect channels.
A company has consider many factors related to the market and customers. It shown situation, the
product and the competitive environment. All these factors have a strong bearing on the type of
distribution selected. A company should be very deliberate in deciding up on a distribution channel
once it is established because interests of independent intermediaries are involved. Gupta
(1999:20) argued that, marketing managers face two sets of decisions when considering marketing
channels. The first set of decisions leads to a selection of one or more channels. The second set
deals with the selection criteria and examines the three level of distribution. The final step is plan
finalization. Havaldar and Cavale, (2007: 8.11) recommended that, the distribution channel
strategy could by looking at some of these factors.
- Defining customer service levels. This is critical factor in designing the channel strategy.
The customer’s service level is what the customer is most interested in and hence requires
extra case in defining
- Defining the distribution objectives to achieve this service level.
- Outlining the steps or activates required to achieve the distribution channel objectives.
- Deciding one the structure of the network to implement these activities to achieve the
distribution objectives.
- Clearly defined policy and procedure for the network to carry out its daily activities to
achieve objectives to achieve objectives.
- Stating the key performance indications.
- Understanding the critical success factors to make the distribution strategy effective.
Moreover Doyle (2002:317), recommended that two aspects of strategy should be central in
selecting channels: the market segments targeted by the supplier and differential advantage it seeks
to exploit. First, it is crucial to choose a channel that experience and creditability in dealing with
the target markets that the supplies seek to serve. The channel selected should have the capability
to understand the needs of target customers, and the sales personnel and distribution facilities to
match their requirements properly. Second, the channel must be capable of effectively presenting
and supporting the supplier’s differential advantage
Chapter three
3. Case study
To get the industry experience of pricing decisions and placing the product, the company that our
group has chosen is DASHEN BREWERY SHARE COMPANY DEBRE BIRHAN PLANT.
- The main objective of this study was to assess the product pricing and distribution
channel practice of Dashen Brewery Share Company and compare with the theories.
Currently, the Company has state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities in DEBRE BIRHAN and
GONDER. All these incorporate latest automated machines manned by some of the best in the
business. This invariably leads to technologically upgraded products.
A strong marketing network is the key to any successful business. At the core, DASHEN
BREWERY has a team of professionals in Sales and Marketing who work towards set goals. Over
the years, DASHEN BREWERY has developed an extensive and tangible network of dealers,
distributors and sales agents. This network spread over ETHIOPIA makes the products available
from north to south and from east to west.
As a part of its marketing strategy, DASHEN BREWERY has developed a force of After Sales
Service professionals as well. Qualified engineers are at the back and call of consumers, who face
even the slightest worry with DASHEN BREWERY products.
DASHEN BREWERY has become synonymous with Quality and has won certificates like ISO
9000. The products are comparable with the best international brands. Each of the products is
subjected to a series of rigid quality control tests before it reaches the consumer.
Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989) “ The Marketing Mix Strategies”. 3rd ed., New York. McGraw
Hill.
Goldstein and Guembel (2008) “Managing Customer Relationships”. 2nd ed., New York.
Macmilan.
Kotler, P. (1995), “Principles of Marketing”, USA, Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. et al (1997), “ Marketing Management”, USA, Prentice Hall
Kotler, P. and G. Armstrong (1998), “Principles of Marketing”, USA, Prentice Hall.
Mailath, G., and A. Sandroni (2003): “Market selection and asymmetric information,”
Review of Economic Studies, 70, 343–368. Across The Board” USA
Anderson and Vicze (2000). Strategic Marketing Management: Meting the Global
Marketing Challenge Boston: Houghton Mittlin
Bagavathi (1987) Modern Marketing: New Delhi: Indian by Rasendra Ravindra
Printer.
Bagavthi (2005). Modern Marketing: . New Dalhi, India by Rajendra Ravindra
Doyle (2002) Strategic Marketing. Printed and Bound by Ashford Colaus.
Etezel and Others, (2004) Marketing 1 edition. New Delhi: Seaul Singupore Syndey.
Gupta (1999). Sales and Distribution Management. New Delhi : Tata Graw- Hill
Publishing Company Limited.
Gupta. SL (1999). Sales and Distribution Management: New Delhi: Excel Books.
Havaldar and Cavele (2007). Sales and Distribution Management. The McGraw – Hill
Havaldask and Cavcue V.(2007) Sales and Distribution Management. New Dihi.Tata
Companies. Graw- Hill Publishing Company Limt
Hair and Others (2000) Marketing Research. New Dheli Mc Graw- Hill Publishing
company
Kummar and Mittial (2001). Marketing Management. New Delhi: Excel Books .
Kotler P.(2005).Marketing. Printed and Bound in Great Britain, by Omnia Books
Limited Glaspow.
Maltora, N (2007) Marketing Research. New delhi prentice Hall of India private limited
company.
Perreautt and other (2002). Basic Marketing. A division of the McGraw Hill
Companies.
Sherilekar (2003) Modern Marketing, Himalya publishing House.
Saxena(2008). Marketing Management (2nd ed.) New Delhi: Tata Mc- Graw-Hill
Publishing Company Limited.
Stuart and other (2006). Marketing by Pearson Education, Education, Inc, upper Suddle
Fiver, New Jersay.
Stanton and others (1999). Fundamental of Marketing (5 th ed) New York: McGraw hill.