h FLDß)]Q

RUSSELL DN/lp Til.us

PEllm0NEPs
SUPBEME OURT
VS. C sE No:, -.___............

MhP,K BoAELLO CIRCtHT CouRT

RESPONDENT
£ASE NO.d ó90lfr CE J0602

£UE10R£0MMRLMEE_oM rnon/

CDMES Nola/) the. PeHvioner, Russen Dchd Tillis, Pro -Se,

he9ere fhe Supreme Court of Florida Üìfh a Petit on For A
Writ of Prohibitìon to prevent, the Pu spondent circu t
Court Ld3e Mark RoreHo, From contln un to exercise
ord.sdicHion as trial jode in the crìmihal proceelínjs
pencl n3 n3a n.st the PeHtioner,Russell David Tillis, in
the Duvu\ County Circuit Court.

When cx cleFenaant Files a moition, in a circuit court,

to cDs ol i fy n jucle thcà is kase-cl on prejuclice and
thejor) e refuses to enter on order cf recusal prohßibn
is the cppropriote reme dy to chuilen e the refu4ual >
See, P>un dy V. Rurici , 366 .so. 2J 9 40 CFla. H 7 8)] >
Management Corp. of /imerica, Inc. v'- Grossmart 396 so.

Pag e 1 0F 4
 ad ll(d (FIo.3d DcA 1981). As prescribed the Petitioner
r es pe ct fully sub mWs His PeHtion For A Writ o f
Prohibition as _Stated in e obove describeri mnnner.

P>eccmse the PetRioner:s cause is a capital case

nwhich a ,sentence. of death mi-3hb nltimoFe.ly be
mpose d, The Suprente Cour t a f Floride has juriscliction >
Art.V § 3 (b)(9), Fla. const.; See > Reino - State,E2 So. 2d
853 ( Fl a.19 T71).

The Pet ition e .statess the. Following ¼ ds that jive rise

to the fore30in3, Petition for a Writ of Prohìbition .

Slb]EMENT OF FâcIS

l.) Tod3e. Mark BoreHo while e,onduc bn3 cx ForeFta

Hear ing on Au3 ast I s, aol s ,d A e ake sto¥ements
to the. effect that created a Feor wifhio the
Petitioner thot He would not receive a fair triol
in front oF Jud3e Poorello-

1) The Petitione.r, ei3ht days later wh¡ile pro-se, Filerl a

otion For Judje's D sy;alificatior .>Sea attacheci
copy of .sn d mofìon.

_. 3) On Au30sf c27,2019 Tur}3e SoreH l) Conceclecl fhe

Petitioner's motion for judge's c s alificoVian

Pac)e 2 O f 9.
 wo.s filed on hu usf 2,3 JOH; oncí 1) Denied the.
PeHHoner's moHon f ochh3 that said mnNon was
legaHy insufficienF pursuanF to secFion 3 8.10,
Flor'cla Statoles, Florida Rules o ? Judicic;I
Adrmnistration.>See oRache-cl Urder Denyin
said rochon,

.3) The PeHHoner .sohmittecl the Forgoin PeHNon

For A Writ OF Prohihihon challe ,3th3 sTudje
oreho's Order Denying the PetiFione.r's A10fion
For k A3e's Dis pol ificc5f ion .

3MdLM ENT.

L d3e ß or ello , in Mis o r der cle nyin 3 the PgHhone c's

)otion For Jud3e's DisgoliFicafion, rolied tipon sech'on
¾lo Florida Stretutes, Florido P,oles of JocJ/cia)
Ac)ministrnfian, oIle i'no .said rootioo i.s lejcJly insu f ficie n f .

Pmle 38.10 elearly prescribes;

"Whenever a porby to any action or proceecÜn
makes and Rles on ofGdovlf .sfahoj Fear that
he or she win not receive a Soir trical in the court
where the. Suit is pencling on account of pr ocJ ce
of the jud e of fhed courF o nins 570
Ybe.
apph'cont"......"Eve-ry such c FicJcwi 040
shol) state
fhe facts and the reasons for the. heJie f

Po3e 3 0F R.
 that cny such bias or prejuhce e<ids and shoß
be accomponied by c r.ertificotc of counse) of
recorri that ,such af fMavit anci capph'cotion ore.
made in 3aod %if h."

3udy Borello's confenHon ) is the cantents of the.

n Fçiclov ìt th e. Pe Pìtione r mad e canc1 f ileci .
AFFIDAvlT OF BUSSELL DlWlD TILLIS (Pro-Sel
PARTY SIGNING
MOTION F08 <TUDGE'S DISQUAL)FlcATION,
Anec not fulfill the. technical re.giire.mont as prescribed a
PMe. 39.10 hetnose the cc>ntenhs cW the e ffMcvit doe.s not
speciOcc state the fact.s nn cl rensons that3ave rise to

the Petitioner s fec,e that He s not c30inn to receive et 9cir

trio) in ?ront 09 Judge ßorello.

The. PeHbone r, while nssemWn3 Hi; rnotion for

ody's cEsyncdHication, followecl the criberct cts
rescribeci in Pmle A-330 Flci.R. Jud. Aminc. Scud motion
trit n3 > (Pua. Ua M CG ) n))eg e.cl specifically the
Fnchs oncJ reasons upon which the mnvnnt relies as
3r oun cls 90 r c) is g) cilificnFio n >( På 3 o M (4 j b e
c>rty sì3nin the mohon under
os_th_>__(JL3 , 33 0 N C3Ú .

The Petìhoner cargues that His

Pc»cye H 099,
 AFF)DAV)7 0F BUSSELL DAVID T)LUS (Prode)
PART V S)GNIN G
MOTION FOR HUf)GE½ D)S GUALIFlcATION
cleorly states in the toption, "PART Y SIGNING", oncl
6 likewise. sworn to under oath

Anle 4.330(c)(3); "be sworn to by f5e party .s nin

the rnotion under ooth or ca seporçte cxfficlovít"

This'Fwle cleocly offords the Petit oner two ophons.

The Fehtioner can either,1) Si3n the ,noHon while
uncler oath swe_arin3 to Fhe fachs on c) o lejotions
therein scairl r%tion are true oncl correct, OA, 2) The
Petitioner con mche a separate c6fïclnvil swear n
unc)or oath, specifically stahn3 the Focès oncl reasons
thcot 3ave rise to the Petifioner',s Fer r that He vvill
n at rec w e ca fa r fried.

Here, the geht oner chose the, first oph'on r sbn the
rootion while uncJer ca¥h and statoc) therein Motion
For Joc}3e's Dispuolification > Pa3e 060
line s 10 throu3h
aa y f he Petitioner was thrno3h the o Fcac.heci c ff)'cloviF
swear n3 the 3counc]s 90r the Fore30inj noofion orose
9rnm the August IS~ aol9 Farefta Heca'in3 nncl.....". The
Petiboner z;sed the cMicJavit of Sussen Dovid T/His
pro-se pµrry s n n rnation for jud e s ejisgualification
as a mecn o es+ h o onf n laiv b oath tho?

. Pa3e roF
 the. PeHhone.r's motion was sáned ond sworn to under
oath as was prescrihed in the First opt on of P>ule
2.33 o cd (3),

Pde 3RJo; that Tuc e Borello »sed nsh prernise to deny

the Petitioner's motion for juc) e's d ì5goal fïcafion, when A ole
38.10 prescribe.s thnt;"Evgry suchnFPicja il shah sfal-e the,
focìs nnd the reasons for the helieL...' 77 is prescrihih3
the crítria when us no option two c9 Pwle a-330 (O

The. PelMoner orgoe.s that His

AFFIDAVIT OF RUSSEtt DAVID TILMS (ProSel
PARTY SIGINING
MOT10hì F06 -TUD(£5 f)l5GjlAU clCATloN
fu½dts the Petitioner!s oblì9ation to assemble_ said Mohon
a
that i.s technicnlly suffident as presaibed in the First
nption of %ìe am06)o) whereupar he Petitioner
did in fact swear uncler oc3th, that ou of the staFements
anct nlle30tions, re stated Berein the. Mot?on For
3ucl3ets Dispolife'cahon are. true onrL correct
Ac]cjifionally. The Petiboner stated under oath, thcd He
hoS a Well founc erÍ fPnf thnt e Wi} not receive a
oír trial n front of Tudae. Oore o ancÀ the Fear
arises 254'ronn
the facts and an ations set Forth,under
__ _ ___ oath n 50 cl Nation.»See. Snid ffidav nes and R
e a onS Se orth rincler on h in So lo On".

Po3e. G Of 9.
 The Pehhon er s moHon for jd3e's d syualificcdio n
was in fcact sworn to and 5 ned whill under noth
as pre scribed in the fïrst op¼n o f Rule 2.330 (G CM
cind therefore does not rey re the type 09 Supportin3
affïdovif as pre-scribed in Psule 38.10'cís a means to
make soirl motìon t e c.hnica\)v Au f ficie nt,
J

¯ln addition,
7t is clear the firsh op 060n
in Rule 2.330(c)(i) does
not prescribe any specif c methocl, or prncedure , hy
whirh the, Pehtíoner was to valiclate. that His
Motion For Jod a els Dispolification w as .5w orn to and
sì3ned while. under onth.There is no ) n3voje in .Role
a.330 that mon o es the Febrioner to write the
cerìMicate of oath into said motion or make nn
01/Í t 0h Or / ninQ. Mo on ,hoF
clisyy alification and a}Fach if to the mohon ns a
means to veJidcde the onth rJìrt n facP occure , Bule
2,330 (c) (3) on y moncintes , in H e event the
Pelitioner c hoses to use. the f rsk ophon 09 Role
a.330 (cì (à the motíon .shnif be sworn to and
si3ned. while uncler oath.
And thg. fehtioner cAird exac½ J
what the Rrst
opfion o 9 hule. 2.33 0 (c) (.3) )prescril) eci) He- sw ore to
¾he contents of SQid motion and sboed so d mot on
wh; e under oath . T he.n the Pekihoner mcxcle c n
a davif o oortu sicín c Mo}ÍO a fo f i ()do e'S
/ J
c]isg,olificoNon as a menns to validate the oath cJic)
ih 90ck occore.

C 0 N G1tál0 M
The Petitioner hos fvìfillecl. His oblijation cts prescr berl
in Role a.330 M CO CA CO 60 and assemblecA a
mohon for jud3e's dis alificcdiort tho) is not
enhj techinc.olly soFF/cient it is also lejahy
SFici'ent as if provirles six (G0 3rovocls that
clearly demonstrale Lcl3e- F>oreno is prejoclde
ancl the Pehhoner, as a result of 4ho prejvcHce, hos
a well Founclecl ush9iable §'ear thù He whì not
et ci Fcár tric2) in front of Tud3e P>ore\lo.

WHEREFORE, the Pd Honer resper¥fully regyests

t¼s blonorable Court to enter on orcier thd will
compel 30c c e Rorello to recuse Himse19 from the
PeHHonors cose.

[Àespedfolh>/ SukmìHecA.

OF SERVicE

Ry3sen o cl Tdlis HEREBy CERTI FY , 7; porsv an t

n ku\e k5 6 Fico R Tud, Admîn., have provicled

Paae. a 09 %
I

ßtsponder ¯5ad3e Mark P>orello; on Au30st 30, 2o19,

wi½ a true cancI correcF ro 09 Se. bregoinc

Russel\ Davict Tillis (Pro-se),

dpotS~ ()¡ ygt},
500 Easf Adams S}reef.
acW 254onvíl\Îloriclo.3220
254 2.
 Filing # 94845654 E-Filed 08/27/2019 02:41:43 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO,: 16-2016-CF-10602-AXXX-MA
DIVISION: CR-D
STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
RUSSELL DAVID TILLIS

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGE'S DISQUALIFICATION

This matter came before this Court on the Defendant's pro se "Motion for Judge's
Disqualification", filed on August 23, 2019. This Court has considered the Motion, the record in
this cause, and relevant authority, and, being otherwise fully advised, finds the Motion is legally
insufficient pursuant to section 38,10, Florida Statutes, Florida Rule of Judicial Administration.
Based on the above, it is:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant's Motion for Judge's Disqualification
is hereby DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers Jacks ville, County, Florida thi2£ day
of August, 2019.

M DORELLO '
- -ircuit Judge
Copies to:
Office of the State Attorney
Division: CR-D
Russell Tillis, #2015014211
500 East Adams Street -
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do certify that a copy hereofhas been furnished to the Defendant by United States mail this
27th day of August, 2019.

Deputy Clerk

CCEPTED: DUVAL COUNTY, RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK, 08/27/2019 03:18:13 PM

 AIE QE ELO&DA

h a ct cuit altmatter all v smn.s of

£adua an1 m

££ßSnnS_v p o n W h c dar EBli£S_a5 . _ap

d AficatùnJAeáqtound A &cn & Hodrde.
ns nandatectin_cole a.330 cci) ), Nilla D2f£ntloaLAa
onded 060r0601
HeMLndret væ2f
 fa.cp.g.o_cLAL_

TheloocEs_pteydùe inwacds_1h£._De£eadanLSicsLhefæhar_k a
... olf when the. Defendant was pocsuin3 a clefense in ½e 16aols-
CFO%G9 c.nse. The. Defendant had been pursuinj Hù clefense for
near ayear when the Defendcint,while_ shll being detained
n 040heJohn E Goorie. De.tenhon Facility awaitin3 trial on the
. 096(#1 ca.se.; was chcar ecl wìth Murder lo the. lG2016CF0106
OR cose, 040Le.
instonf cose before. the court. Judje. Borello's
. conduc} cluring 20lf, tuh le. E Delencl.anf was pursuing a.
. defense. For the 0 4GGci case, e ffectively mad e Ad3e. Borello
a wiiness in the. 010602 case. AHhroujh the. Defendant is
not at Iìberìty to disdose. the defa s of exacfly how <Tur) e
P orallo transformeci Himself Scom the Jud3e presidag
ove.c ihe gols' case io n witness in the nstant case before
040he
court, cimid the followin3 grounds, n grounci'c' 143e.
ßore 03 position as a witness in the nstant case before
the cour t becomes evident. . 042

For the. present rooment the. Defendant can only state;

. Froro the very bejinning Tucl3e. Boreho has alway< been a
tness for the clefense in the instant case before_ the
court. Ti is for this ¼½ thc21 Se Defendant has known
d3eßncelloiminrLalghtlleleachuti£eac2esh_oa
knowing the Defendant wdl never 3ef a Fair trial in a
courtroom heçore n Llge. who has a minck sel like.1d e
 . . I b£ D Sendant cas£ heh th£ C Lh£fn3 a capilaLcas£

tLnoheLoientla 3£eub death £nally Ah D£1endanf

clutåplanuaryRa had ha Hacneys_ceptesenha3
aneausJpbìh-atlatoep,î csLcha tæunseLM chne
assen anA-s etand_chair cauas£L7am£s_bylerw£ce. pt él£
awyecsaha-hdAei1-own_pecs»aaLhwJicms-ap£cahn
d£penderdipoLeudulher,»nihath w£r£æppánlecLhyld e
Batekta r£gtesentlh£_Re£endanL

nelsan hear n3 comp6aiay a h courLihn ecanicha c

counsLLnes Ayle LperJ»t ance as d££ù eat

condud£cLan n c d£1e neMelker

render en£&e assata A£ aefendan

AcLd anally tJhyl£ our£cLiktp£1 1 n a cstc lair

counselfuh e a ass£a kewn£jnate L peGån
.... . ..... __... . ... . .. _.._...._ _. .._.__. ._ ......_........ ......_.__._,..___.._,._..__.._..__..,_._......._.._._,,,_.._..
.... ., ___.._......_...... _,..______,,,_____._ .....______ .._... __...___.__,....__. _ _

Jhe De£endad campbhecLluMraoss£a 1hatMcJ39de

pec£armante-was ad±guate&r amatfornepàa capita
cas£ wkec£_thtd£ntkpenally. was h£inysa 3hhMr .
ss en-maàceuuset Sar Ac a9yWs paar gerfarn anc£
 kewùe_mudtexcuses_for _1c) e ßo cella1_gna rin_ylh
Defendanti petìhon . Mr. Bossen assured the. Defenclant that
/vir, [50yle's performnnc.e woold improve. The. unde.rlay
problem was, procrostínahon. Nothth3 was herny Anne. as o
means k prepare the.. Defendant's case. for trial,

r.B>oyle's performance. Aid not improve, to the. contrar

040
30 f worse. /v r. Boyle w as evasive and hnd no explanation
. For he excessive procrastincd or1. Mr.ßossen repeatechy
ctssured the Defendant Mr.i oyle's performance would improve.

On June (ogom ½e. Defendant fïled n second gehhon for

a nelson hear n complain1'n3 ahoot Mr.Boyle's poor performanca.
On pu3e one of the pe.fendanh sec.ond pe4Non the. Defenclant
c;f e d . Howen state > Hardvvick v. state t o in form Joolje
Bocch what was requicecl of the. Courk when a hefencjant
compìnins tha¥ % oppointed counsel is ineffective Adchhonal
the. Defendant cuerl Finfrock f State to acivise Judge P>orello
luce 10 concìvd a ne son hearìn3 is a reve.rsiWe error,

Juc)3e Porello i3noced the seconc) pg.tifiort ancl. ne.ver

held a nelson hearinc) to ingóre whether Mr. P>oyle. was
renderin3 effective. c6sistance to the De.fendard.

Aycin, Messrs. Boyle. nncl P ossen ijn ore a the. De fenclant's

caucLphus
 Ih£ D£f£adanLwish£1_tamtalduh_seuecaLp_oids_atlater_es
£tejn3rouncl B. O Ld3e ßorello is of t he. mind set that He will
nke nn intentinnn\ Áecìdon to ac1 coni£acptu_the lawas__

cescubrd £1acLSelateh'umiaLseLeaahe±hsecreaLas_it
nnifest s itself in His chronic. behavinr.3) The repenfed 6ehnular
denannstcalesEs_miacLsol, that He will act contre ry to the. law, s
ran{inunusly_presenL_________
The obove. describecl ae&nh of nterest can be observeclin
3round a hy paying pnrficular aftenh'on the. fonowin3:
Lage ßorello JiA nnF respond io the. Janonry_
ejitian-noLadminist£r_theJaw as prescrib_ed_,_
Futeænnths_late1 re11o up o n b e in3 c) v Hy
ndvis£cLaf_thepacedure p1£scribecl by law, cJid not
respaadJo_the_June potLn and administer the kw
as_prescrAel___________________
Ihe two totaily -separate occassions, bein3 indepe.ndent nî
each-nther and ve months apart demonstrate, when Ld3e.
arda_£oRello cesgancl to the Icinuary petition it was not an
salated JacidenLlcddnçnE deliberat e. inlen t io n a s To J3 e. ß ore uo,
RamonthsJater_hein3 d Jy advised o¥ the_ proper proegd ure,__
c£p£ded_the e,xacl_same be.havior by not responch'n3 to the
Loe. pe.t;tion anel oAmin ste.nn3 the law cs prescribecL Tu e.
hc£1Les state_otniva tkck & is the aç 3vay thay
ukes nientianni Aerisions to ack r.ontrary to the law as
prestciheLmaáfested it s e I F n Fli.s c h ron ic h e.ha v ìo c,
denmastrin3_£at_1he_anlaaker ludge ac£hipcejudùe____
ministLis rncd a a _ptesent
n

Another paint of jnlerest th£ ne9encLant wähes ta establùL

here in ground_a; Iud3£20rella hos na cancern thata d£fendant n
a cl eot h pe naby case not receiváy compelent, e£££div£
representa¼n. .
A3ain.La_talany separate etcassians,indep£acl£nt aleach
or b£ry Five months_apact. Du cég JanuaryIucjp Bac£&
demonstrated.Ma.had. on-concern thatlhe Ref£ndant_may noth£
recewing effedse assistance-when He énored Ibe D££endant s
complaintlhaL& counsel was ineHet½£7 Rve manthslaten
Jun e 3oJ3£ Sacek repeated-themd same_ h£bnviar, Th e
rninct set t hat. H£ bus na conterctis there3 th£a thenind set
ca n be o bserved aa ße -rep eated-b£ho viar anlihe c hron c
b£haviac demnasicates he ptejudic£ mind set is can¼vaus
resenh

Ihr p£emise Athe D££ealantifear 1bot hte-can not, an1

will not,3eta £aic trinì n udg£ Snreuns caurlcaom resis
ht fact Ihat_Iur13£lar£1Lo s pce u&¿e miaisat,ce3accLl£ss
of how He hngpens in_he expcessin31t,..ar nat£3press n
s continoausly-pces£ahAs u b n Jud3£3ntehls courfrao
there is always-nn adv£rsar atmnsphere_.h£twe£alhe
. D eS£ n clant an d Juc)3£1ate llo Jhat wor bs da. assu ce_lhe
D£¥enciank B£ is_antgning to g_et c £uir trial á Judye
So re\\ o:s-cauctcaa_n.

(2£onochil__
 Ihe_Ddendant's_atio_r_aey_,Michael Bassecykne-elhe_lculknn
He understooA how importnnt LAy P>nconn'3 tes¼ony was
In_brio_prepaciaphele.£endantk_defem_____

On November al,aol8 Mr.ßossen began prepnring the first

hose o¶ the Defendant's defense. canrL fuerl, r)efenciant's h/otice
OF Takin3 Deposihon.s. Therein the. nohce. to take depasit ons Tudge.
oceHo s nome, /Vlork Borgho, di'd oppenc with Se nornes of
ve ot her defense witnesses.

OrtDecember ',2018 the Stcdv Vileci cx, Motion For Protective

neder as a means to stop Mr. Rossen fenm cleposin3 Acl e_ ßoreHo.

On December ll,2018 Xud e Borello held a hearin3 anc1 hened

he State:s ma 060n
for prniective order in full and the Court's
nrder wras to he entered on n hder cln¥e.

During Ihe. hecember ll B hearin /VlEßossen argued before

d 43ac£11a_1.ha}_1 dye B a r e fesla1n9was_ce_
portant piement neerled n pregrarìng ihe Defencjani.'c clefence.
In respone, TvAge Porpilo .staìer( to ìhe.eRecf[Bof not
gooted in verhaHm]J" Icgrfainh would not have any objec.t ons
to bein3 deposed if my teshmany woulcl assist Fir.Tillis n His
del£ose'Etclass£a canHnuerlor_3uin3_tht_imparlante_of_2ud_3e___
Aoreuni f£sion9

eÆaidprJ1etih elec£mb£c _UM£ncà3 o o Daemh e r

 12 M c ass e rt £il ed n, 060lice
Of Strikin g Jùdge Mar k Bac£1L
/-\s Witness in Nntice M-Iohing Depritions. Mn.ßassen iben
app e ace cl ai lh£ lnhn_E_G oa d£_D_efershg n Facility to coasul
wRh i h e D e£e adan LDurin31his-ransubilon f h£ Ae£enda a
was . informe d,JudpBncella_hnisummans£cLfîc40ss e n
aff£r t be Dec.emb£r 11_½_heanh nod»sed Æ_authar itive
pos¾n to. caecce- Mclassen ata ßhylh£ notice to strik£ .
H ì s n a m e ScasthelislaEdefens£..wdn ess£5-fa he. deposed
30 J3 e ar£1Lalutther-in£lu£ncel Mr ß ossea la p ucsue anath er
kne of deleost far thtDe£endnnt

It is cantcary to thehw for ajuc) e.lo_hol d_a_ b ear ing on ck

heac. arguments £arn-maan. o£ which theydge is lh£ sale
subjed oí lh£ ma 060
n-and.wiLLheswifness .fa lhe Lause ducia
the henrin3. . .

Yel. T hat inexadly what Judg£ ßnc£1!n did dg£ ß ar£

macle. an intentionald£c slact to_ad_ contcary lo_f b£ Jaw_an
hear fhe Stde's matinn 1bat Hthew fu!Lw£R11£ was lh£
sole_ suhje£ln£ nacLwnuld ban_wilness lh£ raus1.lucin h
hearing . Asle_was.

The .Defendnnt has a tonstitubaot cight fo_pcep»ce-o.

J eleos e n£1!is_ch ait£Jc£e_£cacLgav£cnoaant_int e usion .

£ nc£!1a mad£an atentianald£c s on fn_nc

conicary to the low and intrude nta the. De.9enclent s
 £ ar£114a£t£r_h£nr n autha t o
act-£eal an3 He was 3dn3 +n be a saness in th Defendant's
c as£ know £_cauld n ot ente r a n o rJ e r into _th_e_r_e.carl,_H_e.
pursu£rL_the only oìher opUnn ovnilable He.summoncgct Mr.

nss£n,_used_Hä_.author;hve pas tion as a jud3e A ntrude J

alo-lhe-fle£eadan t 's A e fe nse ; co e re ing M r. Bo s s e n inh x Fr nun
lis_aam£_£tom f he lì st of witnesses in he àepos g å
abandnainpthe DeAndan ts d efense, and porso n3 .som e
other hne of clefense that, withoul Judge ßorehos te.sfimon
auld -inedfablify l ack the true and accurato_acconat_of_ße
facls_]£aclé3_up-tah a ll eg e d co n ço ss io n t h at is t h e te s
chàLcasa pisl_th£-D_efendcA

AAdìF onally.The ver a redo beca

success£ caercá3_Br Bosse n nb Aoin3 whn} Iod3e Sor n
wanted H to do, cà Sat very moment, Judge. Borello
demonsicnteci Ha had no concern that the Defendant, who
s Eoc ng-execub'an,dicLaat have compo3ent, e.ffedive,
pr1sentahon possgsscn3 ¼ valor needeel to subdue the
Couch 'ntimidaHon and ohnsive unjust intrusic>n in6 the
DdendanEs_Mel£ns e.

Zudge ßscek£s_adIans_ns d g s ccih e d h e r e n 3r oun 4 c;

húg_ ao_intentiond decision fn act contrary to Meh
1Hs_£1agtaaLabuse of nothor ty, demonstraMn3 He has_an
coacaca-that_Defendan n+torney s neffective, cnosecUh
 e Gnk . a . £4VRcw e roe.c WÍÌ C eS p a if , .

G cnun cL D

on zooaacpaa s1sesensaan
a nelsea h£atingcorap aiainylhat Juà £ 8ar£02 had
c o e rcect Mr.-ßmss ea in to a baad ania 3 th£ D£fe n d ont s
olefe as e, ie., MlsBassen was_nnt.£Heche en aupf o
wMhdand Tudje hacello'sJnhidatlan and. proat'd£ the .
compelentlegresentcM»n needect hat would baue.
p rated£ol thtD£1endaall-defeas£, M r. Boss£n_shw d
have. i mmedùtr y reyact cLIudge Bore lln s ontaw£vt
nc Han s to Jhr prag£c..auf hatit .

On Tan»«cy MGMh£h»ttlack elsa 060cks,

efendant AggaaEante WalMedflhe' D£fenclant di1 n a
oubrhe a wa Wer a£ Hls appearante. Mcaoss£a ref ec
tetLtheaeS£ndant-vihp_th£-R£f£ndanLwas nnt
.aßn wed indh£-caution o a »a_ Tanuar_yEL

The Defendantwas allowect to enter the. courfcoon

Janua zq1wh£reugun-Iud3£_ß»cek £ crne
.dh£-D££eadant lheAucfmas_yni91a toaducta ne]3
h entin3-inlesponsela.lhe D££endanti _ Ianuar 7
pethn Judge ßnte a lhenpoccl£ted th£._D£9£ndc t
042 .remain-SilenLducisphe_nelsanM3" Th£_Ddeadant____
understood Jud3e. BoreRo's order to mean, if the Defendant
aid _anylhing_durin3 040
h e n elson h e arin He w oul d be remove d
£caco_ihe to o r fro o m .

Iud3£2orellapompHy Jenied the repuest.sot,3ht there n

1h£ De£endaatigelItinn-endlo3 ih£-n eJ5on_hearig_wi1M
allowinj_th£J1e fen dan t to arg ue , on r e co rci, & emer F s o f
11à-pehr and or offer eWJence thereo9 reMn3 any
rebuttal from &e oJuersary

et on HL the Ddeach h he Defendant

a 61 1h£Atacne d r££ardar th£ La.J J ardo
060fkely
ocaer£d_th£_auarney of record the oefenannt, to
tanA mute, wh Je the. coort heard Mr.Bossen's response to
h£_ntle tons raised in the pehh'on without aHowing the
aflarne a££erard,_the DebAnnt, the apportonlyAqEer a
rab»tta nc _eddense_,_fht ef } d Ivklass£n:s a sp ons e
a th£ a e3ations.

s kh 2ing the Defendant and he Defendon s_nn

knowled3enMe enou3h of the law,and how ha use the law to
kp-lh1_anslaught_of abuse, nor does the. Defendant have
compeknLrepresenta 060n
as a means to defend&df
a3anst Judje BoreHos pre ud ce mind set. Tud3e30c£h
utWzes the Defendants winerahiUty by keepm3. control
over the De£ertdant s utfneney c£nd£rin3 the Defendant
helpless. Mrdass£a.lefused-the_Defendet'txeguesi to have
c)3e. breh_disggalified_whea Tudgelorah Presid e£ave
h e st a te's matàrt for protecliv£_ order and-insisl£d th£ce
as n o thing. Alc 523uld_he_dont_
tis top Tudy£. ßore I to. &.
ßossen again-bled ic-pcatect the-Defendo 1 when Mr.
Bossen succumb£ri talud3£ Bnrek t coecc on an1Labandon
he Defendon1 s defense Mrlus£a re£vsed klah adan whe
he D e£e n dand £am pJained abou an Boyle's ine££ectiv e
Sststome and th£ caurt né respnnding to.the Defendant
wo petibcns..2ul3t3weh.effecììvely assists Mrfbzcab

n11aco ey Iegese nb nyth e D e£endant . b ecaus e udge aar e

a3oinst A.s.A. / 060n

Mizrah
compdent representatha 1hol pssesses h£ a to fake
Rrm sfond onl deleni-th£ Da£endalft,

ndànsJhot furanthe-Daf£ndant s £ear to.-despn

Caroun çl E :

between Erahssen_nnd_the D£fendant usaresulto

 d hyluky.lo ceb1_pre
nktacoxy cLèaL1eta 060iedug
was for 6eyons reconcilia+;on.
e Defrnclant head fifec) a bar. complaint complaininj
ahuutMn&o_sszeo_Jæyardinga_wriflæn_codracL&hssan
nacLlhe Defendant hacl erdered that premised on +ke
n9terment,-i.L2La B o ss e n'.s pe r fo r m c,nc e A id n of 1mp rove
Lss_en_waoLLan_Es own eof on withdravv from the
castJLt._bass1n's cepresentaèion was so .shocidy the
Defendant had reyueded Mr. ßossen honor the contrad and
ilkdxn»1 Mrx33sssea_r_ehs ed .T he hcar complai nt en <v erL___
Tudgelo22h_bd__been meide ovocare of Mr. Bosse
shq-cenesæniation an d e nte r n a a c o n t r o gr
odn-b£1_ter 3uJ3e Boredo had no concero Mr.3ossen
e ræsentalàa-wmAgaar_Fle_waaldA2ato__sd
contra£L as a consepence of re.fusin3 to honor the
con 040
rac t , t k e oefend ant s co mplo int to th o glor id a h ar
regacding +he maDec,the S¼<k hac had,onoççicanyoà ea
ftr._3 o s sæRe_aee_d_eiL_h_baas_S1_chatcatL an d w i k040c raw.
1E_SJJDU LD ß E NO TED MEM : T h e D eSend onT i s
describè3 Hnp polity aç'representat{on bein3 provided to
r-apitaL_case w hero t),e state i s see __
he Rfrof ±h_e_Defendant.And. LJ3e Borello knovvin
allnw£rLibis_5ort o f shoddy representa tion to y o on ,
On-January 2 20 / 9 /Vl r, 8ossen filed a mo Non to
ßhckcan_Judye Borello promphy heard said motion on
aaantp2-8½0 m anal den ed the. mo Non ,
is_to_the_D_efæn_dankLrne mo ry , c 060vy
k t he o eSenda a
 s nol_suæM_lkelate lht_D1Eende n LlLof_the_heJieE71t- --
was_cLucig_lh_it,_Jengarp M ,_heatiopwh e re o e o n Fu d3 e.
forvilo heard /vir.Bosse.n'< rnoh'on to vvithdraw, that Mr
Mr.Roo.e.n inGemed JùJ3e ßoreno not He, Ftr. Rossen..had
been în confact with }he Dorida bar one) the bar had
oc)vìÇPr1 |-lim He needer) to withdraw- From the. case..

r. Sossen on febrvory J 20lci Qed so esmended

-mo oB_lìL_½nthdram_____________.-____...-____________

On Febroory 116 .Tud e. Borello beard Mr. Bossen's

nrnendeci moh'on to withe)cow. TuJ3e Borello woulel not
role on the mot,'on of this t me. as the order would he
entered Icater,

The. Defendant's memory is chollenged,it may have. been

dur n3 this February 14* hearinj thc,} Mr. Bossen In¥ormed
Judge borello that He, /vir.Bossen ho'd been incontact wth
hthar_and_fhthathad_adväerl_d in_withdraw_£caa_
the case. [The Defenclant 'reguest the Supreme court to
cnosulthnth_tht1toasc_rlpts7f1tfranscngh_fro m Ibr_Innua£y
Arn hearing and the transcr gts from the February Ha
hear'n to Fully on Jer.ston J exadly whor r r. Bossen kM
Tocl3e breho sotin both of the heario, s]The point the
De Fen d . 1 is try i to make i< : The a&cney chent
relahon.ship had broke. dovvn to such on e>den¥ the.re.
rould be norernranHnn behneen Nr.30ssen anci the.

ap_ ELddl
Defendant ancLNc Bossen understnod this.A aresult of the
círcumstan£es #1c, Bassenrwas 2macLenoujh to understanct He
could not efter.fiv ely_c£ presenLthe D efendant_in a d enth
penalfy case. when su£hscan£id was pr£5£ntand lie.was
pursving fht_nppropriate_caurstalAchioo,wilhhaw_Ern
b e_ cas a._ ß uth paint the lldendanth try_i'n3 to m ak£
layn ot in Mlt ß»ssen's ochons7i¾ ky in Judge. brellvs
ctctions. Jud3£ Sorejlo was alsa aware, aHb£Jrreconciliable
sues betwe£nMr.&ass£n and the Defendant and Jud3e
had no conceraAtEnAossen.mi3ht noth£ able to
ef f'ective re present the_ Defendant un de r 1ha circumstances
Tudge horeuo was .determined ta force Mr ßassen to repcesent
t he D efen danLce3acclless a f f ha guahty o Lfepres en tab a lhe
DefendanLwauld be receivir3.[Eor the ¼reme Cauct to consult
f he beacing transccipts.fcan_f helonv a ry Ra hna februar
4%alino towithdraw Aeurin Isl iht CourtwiRste Jud3e
ceu as _ d£+2cmiantlaa._La-keephraasse a on &_c ase] The
Defendud canlends,Judge Barello wanteA_Mranssen_ an
the case. because.Mr,Anss£n was 3vd3£ ßncedo's way la
retas cantrahnver. the Del£ndaal s cost. 3udge Porello 1
cAederminalian far cuatroldfhe cas£..wiLLhecam£ evicient
inlhe Allowin3_grauart

Mr.Aassen am£ad£L no 060n-ta.withdramwos

nde
advis e m£nt.la Ma cchA 3-th£_r2e£ea2Lanl_ £n£cL a 52
f ty s even Lpag e petitlan_far_ n n e lsna.. h eatin3. .

Baye DfR
 Os Ratchlo,20A_3ud_c3£_åor_ellagrunhed-Mn
ànssen's - anaendecLeafian_uarlMr£ossen__was en
envz_ta withc) caw . _______________________

loduppact_ 060
Defencianh auejotions that Juc)3e BoraHo
vvas nct, anci is not, conccscnect thc2t the Defencinnt is not
r eceWing e 9 ective repres enkt on the Defenc)nnt o ç fer s
he_£allawin3

OnJDdober 10,20m 30cl3e. Borello conclocted a nelson hearin .

Duña3_.-1hisl£acut3_3uJ-3£.lateelle-state4_in_v£rhatim_µL, h a s e d .
nn n1Lthe_inlo cm_atian_be£ace_th£_cauct,lam_gaug_¼o Fin el
hcat Mr,30ssen and Ms. Jamàson ore boß representlny Ms.
Mlk_la_a_campeted fashion, they nre cloinj whal [hey
ne£d_lo_deiSe_ajpge a, ne 25- ond µ$e 27,1 nes ) throu3h 4,
AEsnl£LHenc n3 Transcripts. ________ ___________
E c ßauen hcid been on t he D e feo¼nt s_case_D£t eecdmL_
2nanihs_wheAll£_wnspa_Leage_ta_witMtaw_Macdt20,M I
er_ay£nn_WJ_h£n_1he n e d a t torn ey w a s o pp oint e d t o t h e cos e
Ae.g-n_AacìL5_zó_d,.la_n tex f ' messc23e to t h e. pr ivate nves h afor
staked "Mdhághas been clone on fke case." This tert messaye
wi1LA£ evid£n cm in the. Following 3cooncl.

. ._...__Eff.doSsen cAcl been Work n on Ýbe (c25e for /5 months

W R W Åh of n ad bepn c one on e Coçe , e
Joc)3e ßorello vvac aclamendy cJefendín3 Mr.3ossen's
£chcmanrCJhy. Durin the sc me D< tobe r la tb nelson
hearing Lc)3e Bore% is seen to be cUsocientoci ,confuse
 o GOW _baW pn 254
Endon 5 CoSe had been
efore the. Court
30che 30£R D1 Concerû Joy not w jfh mok n .Sure_..the....

prescrìLed he_[1dendack n 3,u2,ætcc¡ny.

ev dentà fke SacLRrlassen skayed on k c se
MOD 570
5 Rhd Ád .naf Ín pr£ nre fhe CG5£30r.Ëf u
OfeM o '5. p i MCLE .. £0 a cef0 o W3kb logia} . co n fa [ o v 254
r
case; picßing-ruid chaasin when He wonh-to and whe
He does nalycmtradminisfer-lhe law. cis prescrib ed a
254VÉdeni
n £ pr£VÍaus £0Var15 d accl D,
ud3e ßoredoS control ov£r the Defendant s cose J d
Joce O .mnhlhpandnYea lana det op 10 ac confror a
the ad3£2areun-1 or±er t ck of.conce
e C o 5. £Ì. ferei¥ Q o mpt en e £elen{o} on
d e m o n s traiectin dhe-faßnwing round

. ... .. .. £0Up E

W horles E£tcher capresent b D££endan

essage lens k p n est 040oc o

cas e . .Ath aphæb£en da lh£ use & ext
affach£d_h£r£1o_ 060_farn and aisædc £ £

A d n es13atìVe-serväes c n-be contacl£d t can

 L£nh'city_oLib£1£A_____

After be n on the. case for only th een (B) day, h n

1( knowle3e nothin3 had been done on the case, anc
hefore Mr. Fletcher had ße. be- ancl opportunH7 to
arize. Himself with the ense, on Aprìl tao19,Mr.
Fletcher rappeared be fore Tud3e. P ocetto anat ,sfated in
pen courl,_an the record, the c.ase woolcl .soon be.on
cac%-ae a n n Fa s F Tracl< .

On April H .20t9 the Defendant was éonsolh'n3 with

. Eletch_enand Ianis Eldrìdje, the privafe inve.chynfor
ancLRlt,_El£1cher_leJ11_Ms. Eldrl13_e_ £_casr_woul
£ady_£ar tr'al in lede fall. See attached ten where
lekher tells Ms, Eldr'A e. the c.ase woold be ready for
clalla_La±e_0cL - Dec ,

af ߣ cho £ Gaadt n ete t on Fo ty fhe Def en dan t

roon£canted_McJ letche r wlf h t he foHow n3 :
d -for ars nothin3 has been Jone on the
as£
2) uc)den Fletcher Shows and in /3 days

ells_J_od _krel n_op£ctro rt Ib e £nse_w

nauhn_£rd____ ________
by gractly was Mr. Fletcher so interest, and
cLeker_cniascL)eksi_t£adfy_a e a e _th_a±_H

Page. I 8 of c2.9,
 ow.s_absohtely_nolbio3don
4) And how exactlyAd AReich£r_£xp cLf
prepore o enpifed case of thi's mayn de in
5% months yvhen He konws nothin about the
case., onel nothin3 has been done on the ca.se.
s) The DeSendant demanded to know what was
mnHvnHn3 Mr. Fle tc.her.
M r. Fletcher reac) il y con fe sseck, Tudg e Sore\\o had
ndrocted Him·bo fad track the case oncl3e4 0 off the
court raigndar. He was only doin3 what 1clyeAr_eHa__
6 acLtücLb-kala.
When the Defendant cgesh'oneci Mr. Fletcher ab_9ath
hdendnnt3 defense that Nr. Bossen hoc) cabancione.cLan
November 20l2 Mr. Fletcher assurect the Defendant tha
Mr.F(atcher, w as n or yin3 Fo n eglect any d e tails aL
the case wMle propncing the Defendann defense.

On Apru 30,.2om the Defendant cdnsulted with /%1_Lelche

ansidt.lhe aitocnç£hànLmtersiew__cons at f h e. cou et hoo s e
yht prior to appeacin3 before JoJ3e P ore|(0. The DefendunL
again guesNoned Mr. Flolcher about the Defendant's defense.
Mr, Fletcher became evasive and stated He-MmLknow
He cootJ use the. defense Nr.80ssen was a+temehn3 fo use
because He,nc, Fletcher, cKJ not know how Joc)3e BoreLLo
wcu 3nin3 to react. Mr. Fletcher then ad Wsed the.
Defendant it would probably be eH£r_fa_c_onsider an
cdfernaHve clefense.
 During a consultaba wth Mr. Belcher onhy /5/0K
at ße Toh c1_ Edonde. D elenhanlacility, Elt. B£1che c
odvised .fhe DefendaaLìhe fa£f1»nd circumstances-lhA
ec) 042ue
to and rceatecLihe r£2son-£or lhe_alleged
tanfessihn was nalgolo3 ta brpacinf fhe_De£endanfL
d eGense.

The. fads d£maastratedith £ore a og have esMbshed

f he follow n
I e Defendnali case has 1een h££ore lhe caurt

2) Dut 3 £hat Myears nathio3 has keen Jane_ on

b cas£ f prepare EfacJr al.
3) . Fletcher 5 assiynec( fo he.case foc_2days an1He

cas an1Anzingit- readyloc Idal nAc

nant hs .
Attached_heraio_lhe_foregoing_theh £ nAt£osnip
/3 o E a franscrip1, Th£ 1concriptpy£ w«s lakea from lhe
tanscrigf1 mLìhe OctokerhAmn£1son_hencio3,. Láe1
£1hr&ugh 13 ahelafe n dont_kiellinglucl e Bo r£lla
.whath g in3d happ£n_la.th£_£dute
The attorney wid procrasHoate on&.nothin3
Ake daae-an_the c astja prepacitlor _ldaL
d- Ib£_fourtwiRntder_fh£ cas£ tal£pto a fast

by Ao Lu
 and pre.pare a cursry rÉefense.
The Defendant,ten 001 mon½s ago durin3 the October 2018
nelson hearin3 was clesceihing what would belis happenin
n3ht novv, here in Avjust Jon.
Yet. Back in October 20l8 the Defendant never thought
ucl3e Sorello would first orAer the Defendant's atforney
to abandon the. Defencianh defen.se,then four months later
Judge Borello yvould order the Defencjant < attorney to Fast
track the case and get it oH the. Court calendar,
The. Defendant .has a wel| founcled fear He. will neve.r
ge} n fair tri'ol in Judge Borello's courtroom becaoce Judye
íborello is keeping control over the. Defenclant's clefense.
JoA3e Anrollo is not 3oin3 to let the. De.fendant's n+torney
prepace. the part of the. Defendord's defense tha¥ will
show the. jury the. FacAs and círcumsFances leacJin up to
the oHegecl confession bein a hoax. WithouF he.orin3 cdl
of the. truth the jury wiß be ill informed causing ray
conv¡chinn ond subseyent e.xecoh'nn.
The. Defenc)onì's fear is ceo), well founded, present,
with Tud3e Borello doin3 what He is doing the. Defencjant
will not receWo n Foic trial , be convicted and execute a for
a murder He e#c) not commih

Ground G:

Pursuant to Bule 2.3.30 (e) Time, Flo-R.Jud.Admin., A

naction to dispolMy .shall be. Faled within a reasonnble time

Paqe al 0F 2°i,
 n o t to ac eedAdoys after.Mistove ry of lha bitcoasliMin
fh e 3roun d5 for lh t mation. anrLshol! he pcamptlpp res ented
3 to the fourtface mm£diate. culin3; . . .. . ..

n.tamplyinywith rule aaafelike ££endant asserts

OnlugusL15 2 M uc ehre1La £onducled nJareffa

b£a r inyf egncd 3 the Re£en daats wölf es Mohan fo waiv£
couns eL
o The 0efendantllEߣM, thraugh the alkthedarfidouil
swears the fads conshtuffayth£gravncis Sar h£-faregoth3
oti» n arose-bm lh e Au usU s¯ a omfa cetta h e a nh3
3 a11 aRet 060fs-ancLav£nts
slated n saiA ma Won th ed a no
occure duriny 040h£
Av3usUS~ a Foret ta hearin3 are offered
as s apparhhg_£vidence_1hatihl£ent-thatlhhtRelend anL
n leeïs-as a c£sulLaLkke.hgusLLs%Sac ±±aA aràçs rea
R 9cesant and overwhteminyan&3ad arek à set
R that created-th£_adv£csary_otmosphere_durlaylb£ £uc£1ta hear a3
20 h as b e£n-£v£r-pres£ntmind. set af prgüdieJMliano Dy. n£
23 pr£j»die_miacLS£Lcædemanstrol£d_indhe supportàygrounds
aa s hakaunl,gainynLhas_A£o£t been presa al..as fac
as baA as_1he ic20ts-cro y eáci castas slal£d nike._abov£
24 coundA
25'

. XLshu!Lb£_noleLh£rr. Ththef£nAuntàc rr e nt h
bell,wilhau_tbal,_inlhe loba_f2 ande £1£ntionfocility
28 and has nn_eledranit_access_talbe£erh LCasrl-lac th£

30 --Pa-wRDS2
 purpose nf fHin3 motlons with the Coyrt. /45 such, the
.Aefæaduat_is helcà to rely solely upon the. U.S. posfa) service
anc1_coust give the fore30in3 mohon to a correctional oSF cer
ac-lhe moding, by U.S. postal servìce, h3 the ClerK_of (avrh
H It_1bt_D_elencíant relies upon the mnhbox rule regardi
nc.orcerated clefendant9 fihin3 enotions to the Court pursuant
o_d£adl ie, gule a.330(e). Herein the. fore3oinj rnotàn_
e_rzis-a_CE'RTJFICATE OF SENICF, he orn to under
onth_throojh and by the aHached AFf dag f, that esfnblishes
bLliha3_dA for the forejoin3 motion as afforcled the
DA£endant in he mcálbox culA. The facbs consHfuting the
.draunds_Snc_the__£oregoing_malion occoced on Ao30.st lø the
ar_e3ai_n3 CERTIFICATE OFSEPdlCE is dcAed prior to
Defenclont asse.rts the. Forejoinplioc__
has m farl_heen filed in a timely m_anaer os prescribed in

The Fonow n s ent is a descriphon of events that occured

dur ng_Se_Au3u a ref he h ear in3 , he. Fact s an d ev e n b
.lhat constihked the rnands for the- Foregoing_solion,

LL3e_brello 3ranted the. foreFra hearin3 thereb

lach3_an_Order upon the record Sn} the. CoorF wi
neto_3nùe_the__D_eSend o rd a s a Prn - S e Ut i a n t .
After bein3 desi3nated Pro-Se, ToJ3e. Borello aclv sed the
££e±dant_of_flut£oll_o
in_%1venL_Lhe neçenaant aedaes to use a àe ense

Page_23 of a
3 J3e doreBo-wittihen take the Defendan Rco se
status and-tuca-lhe_cns£ aver_fo thelw a a f a£ys w o
are appaint£cLasMandby_couns£1s
Ihe De£enAant-immedüteLynsklud3z-61cella alLli
ad v isene nt,ce3aca 3 th1Dz£eadaaL)ns yRis pro-se
status Jac attempila3_to o £ an unaufhncheddel£nse h
anythin3 to dn-with thtDelendants pr£viaus_aitarney,
cha el hnssenØ&çanat he _tedepnse xad areno e
n Rot &.ludg£ Aarella stafel is aduùam£nLhac1 noth
do wiß-Mranssen attemp 060tolepose Hien,Es
was ccstandacci"æduisement ht h jova Jurin3 nR
£are&. h£arà3s.

evecalmations pend leforeJhe coucLanLre cdtess o

wh e thec- the. D££en clanLaclapheith£mnhons-or a at J k nd 6
co vaseLuunaliac u£ lhtmo± ans a th£ D£fendant 's .
h£hal£.- Her£_th£ £1encianLplace19 n»bgecián a n Jh e
r ecocL ohj clic9_ta cauct_ùppiùatek cwns wxcyo3 a
afe ndnattras£. L J3eArch_hfacmel the e£enano L1he
caurthairulel,mnLoxec-the]££end oh ab c¼ngnur
AppoInteLSlanclhy_caans£Lwnd b£ eµes entà3-lha.
££endant n aligendá3_mahns he£art the c t

any advisa ent te acdàylkefourthavin sanction

 £_d£1e_rge_{hE_OEfen d an t ch o o s e.,Í h e D ef e o dod rep r e S e n fed
060zH_
_2aw_ia_Lk3uomusc

cLcp-£cLnot-9 523_-any-Suchrisement re a rJ n3 t h e
coucU1einytn_son c Ho n t h e. D e.fen A a nt c) e fe ns£
]-he_l)_eleadant hael fNed a m otion fo waive, coung(_thLwas
an_r£cord. 3ud3e Boreh coolci not placg on ordende
efendonì·'s motion on record yel He has no in¥en¼
ett 'n3 the De.f endad pursuehome d efense #1rass en
was pursuin3 vòhen Mranssen fdeci the nohce to fake 70dye
Acrehi_derodtíon. That is w hy :Tudge ßoreHo 3eve the
acMsecuudphen_ehr_n££enJanF star Ls ta parsoe f he same
cleJense A?r,ßo s sen wa s pursuiny Tucije ßorello in ten ds on
cdíing__[h£_D£1endanll_plo-5e s tafas awny fron t_h_£
A££endant-ancLiv2_ning f h e r a s e o a e r t a 1h1-wt

can-b£-Sten r nr c ear hy exo n3 the 4Fached p

18-n£1he Rdnher 201Llatetta hearin3 when Tua3e eoreun
£xg12ined fa the neFenannt what a sa
ault nLdLfor_thz_DLfnn_d»_sùJ¿e1_Rikcugh_aK n9
ng£M_des_dh£_inM_exor.Hy whd Judy r30reHo dded

ledendant oppoétg. 6tand cou nse l is 30 n to

 dL_dùmned n Ho h en z s6te,5a7 so.ad 300 (r/a.lege
hd ves rise to the Ddendann fear is Jud3e Snrges
amastancy-rSE-0-*AM-Cuúo-tr_ational decidon when to act
cantrnty _± theLosa_as_pces crib ed.. T h e D ef and a oaks_fa
he-br or Jedséns tha)- are connsFont w th the Icsw

The Defendanh ¥ear that He win not recehfoir fr a

has£1 as_the Defendant ha co pl ed w he ¼eche c

recpiremenks anA leyd rey remen re c bed thereMJe

Ao12Llor ranitary o ne aw, and haspen rho 10

h£-Delencianh_£ear that He wiu not receive a fair fr al
o 7,13e Aar£1Lú-ch. _thd_he í n; in Januar of

wo pef;&n (i) for a nelson_lleering. Seeyound B). A3nin

a_late a o %-7 e Bar1LLama, oän3 co o trn ry to the
aw when He ade. e n inten 060nal
decis on to pres de
and a wifhess-thercio._It was only b£couse of Me
De£endanti_laeH£clive_asásfonc£ a£-cauns el that Tudy e

he 1 e. ee_grounLc) ¯Iud3£3nreka lutfbac ogg cwaled

e vapstackma by-using ns pas k n a f au F hoc

DefendanlLsaund defens£.ifee youn d c).J o d w h e a 1h e

He knewl agrArena ognin jemns cated s

prejuJ e sethy ncdecing fke aefendao t la rena ne
silent dur th£_nelson headn_3.£1ee puoloksa e
Bore Uo. cant naed- an showin3_aa_cancern that th e
DefendanLmay.no Lke ce eivinge ççec w e ass ish,c
capikaL,deak-p eaalkytast_hy-cefusingta n ho»wl eA e
lhe D££endanLaarttEs-chcney_Aaireached na
cceconcilahle-canELwhereupan th£ nitaraey cavid no
on9xt1FleÃùely reyes_enLthe DziendanbD£e g ravad±
A J3 e ßocellnLaindSef o f prejudé e fow ards_ihe D efe n dnoC
co nsisfanl,unahal1d rightan_info_Macchd20 Rwher£
ontes_th£1o£1-ant½ÿhas-heenMno£ na_the_D£fendant's
cas£la_preput _it£urltintas_Iua3 2nraRo order
cJ1e±chitewhn-isæ£n_to-the-case-anLAnaws o olhing
houl_1h£-case folo_st Irock_tb1_res£ anAg£1A aEf
h£ costi- calendardtere_th£_D£fe ndant_has a usMiabl£
eetc- khaL1u ha hashLy peparrLàefense_wiLLteaLlo
haw, in the Later pad» 3 erdy aak hs à
b o re\ l o ag a in AenaastratesJ s-prejudée màd sel. towards
h£.. D efe ndanl_vsáth ol£atimal caoRicL3 nstr v han
epr£ng ih£2nle_of Mandby rounseL ILis-evident 060
he De£cadanLra».nat bk a lh Cour1Ac_ft Ih£uunes
In furtherenc£,ld3e3 aatello advice to_th£ D£fendant
f bcd th e Caurh 523»st
sna cha 1h e .Relendaal defense
a mer e. continuÆon oUh£ abosive aut hority lodg£ aor£e a
sed 1o coer ce WirJhass£n la abundomn3 t h£ D£fendaal
bel e n5 e . OLÅeSrÚÀecL ingraund c 15 ergraunA &

The Defendantba51t a Lang ½e ,£ven b dart. Ranuary

20!B Cyw nd21rfeareLRemi1Lnot _ceceiveAfoir fcial
m Iod3£ &acellaLo»cl£aoa bu) the.D££eodaat hs anL
beers akltto _addr ess itis_Sea es_as_pr£scalectin Aule
A.3 3 0 BoAlvJ. Adah._unlitnau.._Th e D£f£n_lanL
respecWLLyreguesks tkehà.¼hear Kninck, zu d
Bol ella lsAwdnessin-fke-inslanLZase before lhe £auch
L5ee groundAL

lesged£utty_SnhmMed.
. _1Ludf_L -

u.xuac.au..o.ë..g,eae
a ssetaa cLntt s,Ao se,2t££catc£nsr,-th a anct
by tbt a 060cherLswnca_aMdauil
lhat I_p!ù£cLibe.
 corredioncd ofh er, nside ¼2 John E. Goode Delenh
cc b c the rno n3 by U.S. postcd service to the D
nebLcourt , rol we.st An roe. Stred, Jack ony

PROIT Of 4)|l.
5 00 Ead Adaù s D'reet.

" .....

O p O(p
 Ex00D EA111LAFRDAvlT
.M1.(SlfLA.R.JUD. A DRIN,
. I he D Efendan), AusseJL Drav id lilli.5, pro s e, cas att» c ney.»£_ rec ard in f he
r atter hefoceAtLuc1,½J0!MTDl%DA,henapntinnn£y_£or party
and rnovard SirnullanenuslyL
. Pursu ant laÅu)LAllûlc)±!1fla.1,ÃÃ 575c)mingIhtal_ta£ney_for_par} .
ß USSAll D avic11LllisMEo-a,11£ BER£EB11ElES...Ihóntt32icg3%1iaafar
ocjg e.3 . D iipalifi£ation"isanadtonrLSubmitted to lbr£Leckaf foue t,nn
. oli other por ties of inter£51; inMÛ EALRL".
Pursuant Fo ßulta.R0hl(41fla.R.LAAdmin.,.the a½cney for par ty .
Assell Davict li]]isMca a,1LEREBl£ERllflEí.lheAcly,AusseLL David
Tillis' statem ents7anci allegdinns,os.nr e h b£ founilherein 1he Ad
"Molìon For Iudges Dúgualdkatinn" ar£ madeja "600L1 EA LTtI"

The. above. withia name7attorney o££erard7auneJLDavid Iillis, pro -.5e, he

alturney Sotpnriy_and Maventsimullaaeov1Ly7pe£5anallyapp_eared helare .. ... .
me,Ihemnder.sisped_nolary_pukh and heinçdullysw_acairt_under._ oalh, c
swear to, undec.»sth,lbf thtabnve stated facinart_ true anA2acte£
Dated this 788 May o olot.

. no ure o Aff ion f.

.. ... Siale_Qi brida7Conn qE.Duvalguh5.crihed_taarMfirmedh1 o£LInedbis . .......

day al T A0 by affair RusseH havid Tillù,..who producerl,...

.. Y e o f .I cl on e n ¥ in n '. . . .. . . . ....._ ....... ..... . ........ .. ._
KAREN B. SWAIN
_ __..s.- -NWapWM
My Comm. Expires 11/02/20
n a u re o f Nd y fu c
 AFFIDA\/\T OF RUSSELL DIWID TILLIS (Pro-Se)
PâE3.X_.JLdMB fa_
MOTIOM EPR ;TUDGE'S DISQUAUFICAT10N
3
hehenclant, Russe.Il Dnvid Tillis,prn-se,pormanf tn Rule 2.330fc)
alEla- BJoA. Admin.;heln3 the. pnety who s ned the Fore30in3ßotion.
nt_,Tudje's Di.spnìì firnh'on, doe s HEREBY S h(EAP under nnl(that
addthe_statements,and nue3ations,as 5tnied therein the /tootion For
d3eis_DgoHíicotion.,ore true. nnd corre.ct. AAd/Ronnuy.RuueH
oxirl_Tillis doe.s HEREßY SWEAR, onder onth,that He. ha.s a well
0 aunded_£ent that he will not recFive a fair trial n front of Jud e
ncelL0_,.nnd._IhfLlear arises from fhe. facf5 on nlle nb'anS_Sat______
. achhymncl££_nath, in S ai d Motion. ________

heabave »ükkia_aatneA,atforney aç recorA, 060ssell

nas,'A n co-s

he2h3_al for parFy and movant dmoltane.ouslyy persnnal op enr

--- .h££art .uncler signed nn¥nry publirjand being dully,sworn under

..nath_7did-Swear-to_;_under oath; that the above_ stntad facts are true. and
Lozzer.k.-_--_-______-_____
Datelkhis  do n¥ ÁufVSf 20 .

nature of Af 060nt.

_a n[ hoVal Sohscribed fo or offirmed before me. th.s

ny o . ... ,201 hy affinnt Ros.s_el) Dav d Tillis , who producee
Å Lieati£ cah'a n : ADI b O l%LJ/
KAREN B. SWAIN
7 7 My Comm. Expires 11/02/20
 13

and Ir it seems that she would be attentive to this

2 case considering the circumstances and the

3 consequences that are being faced, you know. What

4 I'm getting is a total disregard.

5 What's happening in this case, Your Honor, is

6 that Mr. Bossen has procrastinated, and what he

7 does is he's going to wait until the Court forces

him and puts him on a fast track to prepare my

defense. Just as the State was just talking about

e November date, then what happens, Mr. Bossen
11 has to hastily scurry around and --

12 THE COURT: Okay.

DEFENDANT: -- prepare a cursory defense.

14 THE COURT: Stop.

15 THE DEFENDANT: I know, I'm referring back to

16 Mr. Bossen and I shouldn't be.

17 TÈE COURT: Correct.

18 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

THE COURT: Is there anything else with

20 Ms . Jamieson that you haven ' t told me?

21 THE DEFENDANT: No, sir.

22 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Bossen, first let's

23 address the petition for a Nelson hearing that

24 Mr. Tillis originally filed, and I know we had had

25
a discussion at one of the previous court dates

0FFICIAL REPORTERS, INC.

 10:481
ñH LTE (K)

Chuck >

res¢he
, othing has been done E/drid e n work
in the case so much on & c
later in the year maybe case for
Oct-dec.

Tue, Apr 9, 4:26 PM

Still waiting for the file

I gotit on Monday !

Wow, I have to say l'm

a little surprised...but
glad.
I know.
 48

1 THE COURT: Okay. So having said all these

2 things to your are you sure you wish to go forward

3 with this decision?

4 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. I'm moving forward.

5 THE COURT: And you understand that if I allow

6 you to represent yourself then I can appoint

7 standby counsel to represent you?

8 THE DEFENDANT: The standby counsel would only

9 be in affect if in the event that I got to a

10 proceeding that I didn't feel comfortable handling

11 myself; is that...

12 THE COURT: They're going to do absolutely

br 13 nothing on your case. They're not going to get

14 prepared. They're not going to do any research.

15 They're not going to talk to any witnesses. They

16 are going to -- they would not do any work

17 whatsoever. They would simply be standby and, as

18 you said, the middle of trial you decide you need

19 some help, it's probably going to be way too late

20 by then and, again, they'll be there, but they're

21 not going to have prepared anything. That's what

22 standby counsel is.

23 THE DEFENDANT: My question would be, would it

24 be one of these two counselors?

hr 25 THE COURT: Yes, sir, because I've already

0FFICIAL REPORTERS, INC.