Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
This model is STRICTLY OPTIONAL. Neither students nor instructors need to go through it. However, if someone wants to practice with Excel, then the model can be useful. Also, on the tabs
we show solutions for the within-chapter self-test questions.
This spreadsheet model sets up common size balance sheets and income statements for Allied (2010 and 2011 statements) and conducts a full ratio analysis of Allied's financial statements.
Common Size Analysis is not illustrated in the text, but we show it because it is so easy to do with Excel. The common size balance sheet shows each asset and liability item as a percentage of
total assets, and the common size income statement shows the other items as a percentage of sales. Common size statements are useful for getting an idea of how the various statement items
match up, and they are especially good for comparing companies that differ in size.
2011 2010
Year-end stock price $23.60 $26.00
Shares outstanding (in millions) 50 50
Tax rate 40% 40%
PER-SHARE DATA
2011 2010
Earnings per share (EPS) $2.35 $2.44
Dividends per share (DPS) $1.15 $1.60
Book value per share (BVPS) $18.80 $17.60
The DuPont equation shows that a firm's ROE depends on three essential components: (1) the profit margin, (2) the total assets turnover, and (3) the equity multiplier.
Net income /
x Sales / Total x
Sales
ROE = assets Total assets / Equity
ROE = 3.9% x 1.5 x 2.13 = 12.5%
Trend analysis allows you to see how a firm's results are changing over time. For example, Allied's ROE has been declining for the past 3 years, and it is now below the industry average. Not a
good sign.
Business Conditions
Good Expected Bad
Sales revenues $150.0 $100.0 $75.0
Oper. costs Fixed 45.0 45.0 45.0
Variable 0.4 60.0 40.0 30.0
Total operating costs 105.0 85.0 75.0
Operating income (EBIT) $45.0 $15.0 $0.0
Interest 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earnings before taxes (EBT) $45.0 $15.0 $0.0
Taxes 18.0 6.0 0.0
Net income (NI) $27.0 $9.0 $0.0
27.0% 9.0% 0.0%
ROEU
Business Conditions
Good Expected Bad
Sales revenues $150.0 $100.0 $75.0
Oper. costs Fixed 45.0 45.0 45.0
Variable 0.4 60.0 40.0 30.0
Total operating costs 105.0 85.0 75.0
Operating income (EBIT) $45.0 $15.0 $0.0
Interest 5.0 5.0 5.0
Earnings before taxes (EBT) $40.0 $10.0 $-5.0
Taxes 16.0 4.0 0.0
Net income (NI) $24.0 $6.0 $-5.0
ROEL 48.0% 12.0% -10.0%
ROE
Firm U Firm L
Good $150.00 27.0% 48.0%
Expected $100.00 9.0% 12.0%
Bad $75.00 0.0% -10.0%
Effect of Leverage
ROE
30.0% Leveraged
Unleveraged
4a. A company has current liabilities of $500 million, and its current ratio is 2.0. What is its level of current assets?
4b. A company has current liabilities of $500 million, and its current ratio is 2.0. If this firm’s quick ratio is 1.6, how much inventory does it
have?
5a. A firm has annual sales of $100 million, $20 million of inventory, and $30 million of accounts receivable. What is its inventory turnover ratio?
5b. A firm has annual sales of $100 million, $20 million of inventory, and $30 million of accounts receivable. What is its DSO?
4a. A company has $20 billion of sales and $1 billion of net income. Its total assets are $10 billion, financed half by debt and half by common equity. What is its profit margin?
4b. A company has $20 billion of sales and $1 billion of net income. Its total assets are $10 billion, financed half by debt and half by common equity. What is its ROA?
4c. A company has $20 billion of sales and $1 billion of net income. Its total assets are $10 billion, financed half by debt and half by common equity. What is its ROE?
Answer: Yes, because with less debt, interest would be lower, hence net icome would
be higher. That would raise the ROA.
4e. Would its ROE increase if the firm used less leverage?
Once we have this information set, we can calculate the necessary ratios for this analysis.
a Industry average ratios have been constant for the past 4 years.
b Based on year-end balance sheet figures.
c Calculation is based on a 365-day year.
a. Assess Corrigan's liquidity position and determine how it compares with peers and how the liquidity
position has changed over time.
Corrigan's liquidity position has improved from 2010 to 2011; however, its current ratio is still
below the industry average of 2.7.
b. Assess Corrigan's asset management position and determine how it compares with peers and
how its asset management efficiency has changed over time.
Corrigan's inventory turnover, fixed assets turnover, and total assets turnover have improved from
2010 to 2011; however, they are still below industry averages. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio
has increased from 2010 to 2011--which is bad. In 2010, its DSO was close to the industry average.
In 2011, its DSO is somewhat higher. If the firm's credit policy has not changed, it needs to
look at its receivables and determine whether it has any uncollectibles. If it does have uncollectible
receivables, this will make its current ratio look worse than what was calculated above.
c. Assess Corrigan's debt management position and determine how it compares with peers and how its
debt management has changed over time.
Corrigan's debt ratio has increased from 2010 to 2011, which is bad. In 2010, its debt ratio was right
at the industry average, but in 2011 it is higher than the industry average. Given its weak current and
asset management ratios, the firm should strengthen its balance sheet by paying down liabilities.
d. Assess Corrigan's profitability ratios and determine how they compare with peers and how its
profitability position has changed over time.
Corrigan's profitability ratios have declined substantially from 2010 to 2011, and they are substantially
below the industry averages. Corrigan needs to reduce its costs, increase sales, or both.
e. Assess Corrigan's market value ratios and determine how its valuation compares with peers
and how it has changed over time.
Corrigan's P/E ratio has increased from 2010 to 2011, but only because its net income has declined
significantly from the prior year. Its P/CF ratio has declined from the prior year and is well below
the industry average. These ratios reflect the same information as Corrigan's profitability ratios.
Corrigan needs to reduce costs to increase profit, lower its debt ratio, increase sales, and improve
its asset management.
f. Calculate Corrigan's ROE as well as the industry average ROE using the DuPont equation.
From this analysis, how does Corrigan's financial position compare with the industry
average numbers?
ROE = PM x TA Turnover x Equity Multiplier
2011 2.22% 0.43% 2.31 2.21
2010 11.47% 2.64% 2.18 1.99
Industry Avg. 18.20% 3.50% 2.60 2.00
Looking at the DuPont equation, Corrigan's profit margin is significantly lower than the industry
average and it has declined substantially from 2010 to 2011. The firm's total assets turnover has
improved slightly from 2010 to 2011, but it's still below the industry average. The firm's equity
multiplier has increased from 2010 to 2011 and is higher than the industry average. This
indicates that the firm's debt ratio is increasing and it is higher than the industry average.
Corrigan should increase its net income by reducing costs, lower its debt ratio, and improve its asset
management by either using less assets for the same amount of sales or increase sales.
g. What do you think would happen to its ratios if the company initiated cost-cutting measures that
allowed it to hold lower levels of inventory and substantially decreased the cost of goods sold? No
calculations are necessary. Think about which ratios would be affected by changes in these
two accounts.
If Corrigan initiated cost-cutting measures, this would increase its net income. This would improve its
profitability ratios and market value ratios. If Corrigan also reduced its levels of inventory, this would
improve its current ratio--as this would reduce liabilities as well. This would also improve its inventory
turnover and total assets turnover ratios. Reducing costs and lowering inventory would also improve
its debt ratio.
Table 4A.1 Allied: Common Size Income Statements
2011
Industry
Income Statement: Composite 2011 2010 Industry 2011 2010
Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 407,333 3,000 2,850
Operating costs excl. deprec. & amort. 88.0% 87.2% 87.6% 358,283 2,616 2,497
Depreciation & amortization 2.0% 3.3% 3.2% 8,317 100 90
Total operating costs 90.0% 90.5% 90.8% 366,600 2,716 2,587
Operating income (EBIT) 10.0% 9.5% 9.2% 40,733 284 263
Interest 1.7% 2.9% 2.1% 6,789 88 60
EBT 8.3% 6.5% 7.1% 33,944 196 203
Taxes 3.3% 2.6% 2.8% 13,578 78 81
Net income 5.0% 3.9% 4.3% 20,367 117 122