Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable Frequently led 4 3 3.50 0.262
Services Planning colleagues, teacher March 2019 participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was collaborative reviews
and learner feedback LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown of teacher and
to plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
enrich teaching teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as evidenced by the
practice. feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the MOV submitted
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable Frequently advised 4 4 4.00 0.300
Services guided colleagues in March 2019 advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was colleagues in the
the selection, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown selection,
organization, organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
development and use development and development and development and development and development and
of appropriate appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and learning teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
resources, including learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
ICT, to address as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
specific learning 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
goals.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 teaching
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was and learning
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown resources as
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by evidenced by at least
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the 1 of the acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked June 2018- Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable Frequently reviewed 4 4 4.00 0.300
Services and Reporting collaboratively with March 2019 reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was collaboratively
colleagues to review collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown assessment tools
the design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as with colleagues as
organization and use with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
of a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted submitted
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted submitted
7.5%
and summative
assessment Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
strategies consistent assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
with curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
COMPETENCIES
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new
4 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the ability
to succeed with minimal resources.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performance. Examples
may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality,
costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY
RATINGS
PETENCIES
4.00
NAME OF TEACHER Lee D. Carinan POSITION MT1-SHS
NAME OF SCHOOL TANGOS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DIVISION NAVOTAS CITY REGION : NCR
SCHOOL YEAR 2019-2020
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies ( PPST )
KRA 5 Objective 13 KRA 1 Objective 2
Performed various Collaborated with colleagues in Learning and Development Team
Conduct complete and disseminate
related activities that contribute the conduct and application of research to June 2019 -March 2020 Supervisor/ School Head DepEd Funds
action research with colleagues
to the teaching -learning enrich knowledge of content and Local Funds
process pedagogy.
KRA 4 Objective 12
Applied skills in the effective
communication of learner KRA 2 Objective 4
needs, progress and Worked with colleagues to model and Learning and Development Team
Conduct collaborative reviews of
achievement to the key share effective techniques in the June 2019 - March 2020 Supervisor/ School Head DepEd Funds
teachers and learner feedback.
stakeholders , including management of classroom structure to Local Funds
parents/guardians . engage learners.
sources Needed
evelopment Team
hool Head DepEd Funds
evelopment Team
hool Head DepEd Funds
evelopment Team
hool Head DepEd Funds
Name of Employee: LEE D. CARINAN Name of Rater: MS. WILFREZA P. BALAGOSA
Weight
Weight Numerical Ratings
per
KRA per Objectives Score
Objecti Q E T Ave
KRA
Objective 1 ve
7.5% 4 4 4.00 0.300
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 1 1 0 1.000 0.080
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Facto 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating 3.835
Adjectival Rating VS
Department of Education
Position Title Master Teacher I - SHS Salary Grade SG- 19
Parenthetical Title LEE D. CARINAN
Office Unit TANGOS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Effectivity Date 16-Jun-16
Reports to WILFREZA P. BALAGOSA Page/s 6
Position Supervised CLASSROOM TEACHER
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Management University of San Carlos
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSBA with Doctoral Degree in Educational Management ( Complete Academic Requirements )
Experience 6 Years
None
Eligibility LET PASSER