Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
research-article2019
UEXXXX10.1177/0042085919877934Urban EducationKirmaci et al.
Article
Urban Education
1–33
“Being on the Other © The Author(s) 2019
Article reuse guidelines:
Side of the Table”: A sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0042085919877934
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919877934
Qualitative Study of journals.sagepub.com/home/uex
a Community-Based
Science Learning
Program With Latinx
Families
Abstract
Building upon a Freirean notion of dialogic education, the purpose of this
multi-case study was to explore what happened when secondary science
teachers came together with Latinx parents for their children’s science
learning in the context of a community-based science learning program.
Constant comparative analysis of data revealed similarities and differences
among the cases that were analyzed in three categories: recognition,
adaptation, and pro-action. Implications are that in-depth exposure to
content-based cultural immersion programs with parents can be beneficial
for teachers to cultivate a broader vision of science (and other content area)
teaching linked to students’ lives and communities.
Keywords
community-based science learning program, multi-case study, parent
involvement, science education, teacher professional development
Corresponding Author:
Mehtap Kirmaci, Univeristy of Georgia, 630 Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Email: mkirmaci@uga.edu
2 Urban Education 00(0)
It was 7:30 am on a winter’s Saturday morning. The icy wind, forcing the tree
branches to dance in harmony, blew the cold straight into my face. As I
hurried toward the building through the howling wind, I placed several signs
on the brick walls of the building that read, “Steps to College through Science
Bilingual Family Workshop (Pasos Hacia la Universidad A Través de la
Ciencia Taller Familiar Bilingüe),” and “Bilingual Family Conversations
(Conversaciones Familiares Bilingües),” and “Take the Elevator (Toma el
Ascensor).” As soon as I finished this job, I came inside to warm up. I took
the elevator up to the second floor and entered the hall that was crowded with
people. I was surprised to see that there were more than a hundred-people
clustered in the hall despite the inclement weather conditions. I saw Latinx
middle and high school students, parents, siblings, secondary science and
ESOL teachers, and graduate assistants who worked as the project researchers.
Everyone was energetic and excited about the day and seemed genuinely
happy to be actively engaged in the event. The hall was filled with the noise
of families chatting, enjoying snacks and soft drinks, calling out, and lining
up for their turn to sign-in. On the far left, one tall male student wearing a red
hoodie was explaining something to his friends with animation. Next to him,
three groups of families sat on a bench eating their snacks. Further to the
right, four teachers were having a conversation and looking at the agenda that
was attached to their clipboards (Excerpt from field notes of the STC
workshop, February 28, 2015).
schools (Mapp, 2012). However, as Freire (1998) argued, “the school cannot
abstract itself from the socio-cultural and economic conditions of its students,
their families, and their communities” (p. 62). The unfortunate reality is that
the American public school system often seems to function contrary to this
idea. The current climate of public schools in the United States operates
within a framework that insists on measurable and technical principles of
learning, such as standards-based instruction coupled to high-stakes assess-
ments (Nieto, 2014; Sleeter, 2012). Raising awareness of the fundamental
role that minoritized families and communities play in pathways to high-
quality education requires a reevaluation of current educational policy and
practices around family–school–community interactions.
With rapid and continuing cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic diversi-
fication in urban schools (Parker, Horowitz, Brown, Fry, & D’Vera Cohn,
2018), researchers have begun to reconsider how we prepare teachers to part-
ner with culturally and linguistically diverse families and to respond to the
evolving needs and strengths of our changing student population (e.g., Gallo,
Wortham, & Bennett, 2015; Johnson, 2014; Schecter & Sherri, 2009;
Zeichner, Bowman, Guillen, & Napolitan, 2016). However, studies that
examine family–school–community interactions through a content area
focus, such as science, continue to be limited (Hammond, 2001; Ramirez,
McCollough, & Diaz, 2016; Upadhyay, 2009). Building upon a Freirean
notion of dialogic education, in this qualitative multi-case study, we sought to
explore what happened when four in-service secondary science teachers
came together with Latinx parents/grandparents in support of their children’s
science learning in the context of STC bilingual family workshops. The over-
arching question guiding this study was as follows: How did urban secondary
science teachers conceptualize the ways in which their participation in the
workshops influenced their perspectives and practices about working with
their Latinx students and their families?
This study focuses on the understandings that we gained from the con-
stant comparative analysis and interpretation of interview and participant
observation data collected over the span of 3 years. Our aim was to apply
Freire’s (1998, 2005, 2013) notion of dialogic education to provide a real-
istic portrayal of how urban science teachers can facilitate dialogic science
learning interactions with their marginalized students and families while
functioning within a monocultural and monolinguistic oriented school cli-
mate. The experiences of these teachers highlight valuable lessons for edu-
cators working with immigrant families to support their adolescent
children’s content area learning while also contributing to the growing
body of literature examining how preservice and in-service teacher educa-
tion can better foster the skills needed for robust family engagement in
4 Urban Education 00(0)
Literature Review
Development of Teacher Education on Family–School–
Community Relations
Low-income Latinx families continue to be positioned as unconcerned about
the education of their children and as unqualified to contribute academically
(Dabach, Suárez-Orozco, Hernandez, & Brooks, 2018; Gandara & Contreras,
2009; Valencia, 2015). These deficit views of Latinx families have often orig-
inated in narrow visions of family–school partnerships driven solely by the
schools’ agenda (Auerbach, 2007; Wassell, Hawrylak, & Scantlebury, 2017).
Rather than positioning Latinx families as being in need of intervention,
more critical studies have long invited teachers to identify and build on the
6 Urban Education 00(0)
one study, Ramirez et al. (2016) worked with preservice science teachers to
prepare culturally relevant science activities to be implemented in a univer-
sity-based Family Science Learning Event (FSLE) that was designed for
Latinx families. The families and preservice teachers engaged together in the
scientific study of clay, distinguishing real clay from other sediments, finding
the impact of fire and water on clay, and discussing how clay differs geo-
graphically. The direct experiences these teacher candidates had with Latinx
parents in a specific science learning context changed these future teachers’
conceptions about Latinx parents’ ability to assist in their children’s science
learning while providing new ideas for how to integrate families’ knowledge
into their science instruction.
Similarly, Hammond’s (2001) study of elementary teachers and Mien
parents and children who collaborated on gardening and house building
projects offered insights into connecting community-based practices with
scientific knowledge. Hammond found that participation helped the Mien
students and families accommodate to American school science expecta-
tions while also helping the teachers adapt their view of science teaching
“from that of transmitting Western science to that of cultural broker” (p.
987) assisting students in crossing the borders between different ways of
knowing. Although not focused on Latinx families, Hammond’s study pro-
vided important context for understanding how building a cross-cultural
learning community can lead to mutual adaptations of practices, both in the
school and the community. Our STC workshops represent one of the few
substantive, long-term research projects that focused on teachers’ orienta-
tions to and preparation for working with Latinx families in the context of
science education at the secondary level.
many urban school districts, such policies were driven in part by poor fund-
ing for Stonybrook and Woodstone schools, resulting in limited bilingual
resources and services available to non-English speakers (National Academies
of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017).
Research Design
Research Question
Building upon the Freirean notion of dialogic education, the purpose of
this multi-case study (Merriam, 2009) was to explore what happened when
Kirmaci et al. 9
Participants
In this multi-case study, we focused on a subset of the teacher participants
who experienced the STC workshops and were able to give a rich account of
their experience (Merriam, 2009). We recruited four teachers, each of whom
had extensive experience in working with Latinx students and their families
in the workshops (see Table 1). We purposefully selected these teachers from
a large number of teachers who attended workshops because these four teach-
ers had at least 3 years of consistent attendance at the workshops in a regular
fashion and agreed to participate in the present study.
Data Collection
To generate a profound understanding of how teachers’ participation
affected their perspectives and practices about working with Latinx stu-
dents and their families, we relied on multiple sources of data (Merriam,
2009): four focus-group teacher interviews collected during the annual
LISELL-B teacher professional development sessions, 16 hr of participa-
tion observation with field notes from the STC workshops, and eight indi-
vidual teacher interviews.
The first author conducted two individual semi-structured interviews with
each teacher participant during Summer 2017. We developed an interview
guide for both of the individual interviews based on Patton’s (2002) matrix of
interview questions. The first individual interview provided contextual infor-
mation about the teachers that supported an understanding of their experi-
ences in the STC workshops in relation to their own social, cultural, and
historical locations. The second individual interview focused particularly on
teachers’ experiences in the STC workshops, their learning across the years,
and how their participation informed their practices in working with their
Latinx students and families. Interviews lasted between 1½ and 2 hr and were
transcribed verbatim.
The teacher focus-group interviews were facilitated by the second and
third authors and other members of the research team during the annual
10
Table 1. Summary of Participants.
Source. Data are derived from aGADOE (2017) and bGADOE (2016).
Note. ESOL = English for speakers of other languages; GADOE = Georgia Department of Education.
Kirmaci et al. 11
Analytical Approach
For this multi-case study, we incorporated Charmaz’s (2014) constant com-
parative method (CCM), using a data-driven inductive strategy with several
coding strategies. The types of coding included initial coding, focused cod-
ing, and theoretical coding. We used the Qualitative Data Analysis Software
(QDAS) program, ATLAS.ti 8.0, to navigate the analysis process. As a first
step, we performed initial coding, labeling segments of data by incident
(coding events) using the open code component of ATLAS.ti 8.0 program.
While coding, we made an effort to preserve the actions, using the gerund
form as much as possible so that our initial codes better captured the data
(see Table 2).
As the next step, we used focused coding to refine our initial codes.
Charmaz (2014) called this process “coding initial codes” to synthesize and
analyze the coded segments of data. We merged our overlapping codes into
single codes to generate exhaustive and mutually exclusive codes. Next, we
grouped our focused codes to develop categories related to the studied phe-
nomenon. For this purpose, we used the code groups component of ATLAS.
ti to organize all related codes into a code group that we deemed as a cate-
gory. Ten categories were generated as a result of this process. Appendix A
provides an example of analysis for the category of pro-action using the
network component of the program. Following the focused coding process,
we performed theoretical coding to connect the categories to generate
themes regarding the studied phenomenon. The ATLAS.ti program does not
have a component to show the link between categories. We used prefixes in
a way that the name of each category began with a prefix indicating the
corresponding theme. Using the same prefix for the interrelated categories
allowed the ATLAS.ti program to sort these categories together as a group
12 Urban Education 00(0)
13
(continued)
Table 3. (continued)
14
Themes Categories/code groups Codes
Note. ESOL = English for speakers of other languages; STCW = step to college workshop; LISELL = Language-rich inquiry science with English
language learners.
Kirmaci et al. 15
as related to the teachers’ work with their Latinx students and families (see
Figure 1 for visual representation of research findings).
We employed triangulation and member checking techniques to enhance
trustworthiness of our research findings (Merriam, 2009). We constantly
compared and cross-checked the data that were collected through individual
and focus-group interviews and participant observations to develop better
understanding of and provide multiple sources of evidence of how teachers’
participation in the program influenced their perspectives and practices. In
addition, we incorporated the strategy of member checking by sharing our
findings with our research participants and asking them to comment on our
interpretations of them. All four participants approved our findings except
one participant who pointed out our mistake regarding the location where she
started teaching.
16 Urban Education 00(0)
Findings
In this first portion of the findings section, we present details from two of the
four case study teachers to provide additional context for our categorical
description of teacher learning in the STC workshops. In the second portion
of the findings section, we present a cross-case analysis of the four teachers’
evolving pedagogical perspectives and practices in light of Freire’s (1998,
2005, 2013) principles of dialogic education.
Donald
Donald’s background. Donald defined himself as “living a military life” trav-
eling around to different states in the country and living a few years in Japan
during his childhood. His early experience of living in another country
seemed to give Donald an interest in learning about other cultures and how
this might influence his approach to culturally diverse students.
Teaching in Creek Middle School for 10 years, Donald enjoyed working
with Latinx emergent bilingual students. However, linguistic and cultural dif-
ference remained the most challenging factor he had to face in his science
classroom. Donald had Latinx students in the previous schools where he
taught, but it was the first time for him teaching Latinx students whom he
perceived to speak fluent conversational English but who seemed to struggle
with reading and writing ability, which he felt made it hard for them to make
sense of academic science. Donald had no formal preparation for working
with emergent bilingual students and families. He typically had little personal
communication with most of his Latinx students’ parents as they spoke
Spanish and little English, and he spoke little Spanish, making teacher–par-
ent communication a challenge.
What Donald learned from the STC workshops. The STC workshops were a
space for Donald to conceptualize science teaching in new ways:
I’m a white male, middle class, whatever it is . . . so it’s rare, that experience
[of] not being the predominant one. So, I think that, more than anything, is
what I get out of the workshops, is that being on the other side of the table.
It gives you a different sense of just what the entire environment is. It gives
you a feeling that we don’t all see everything the same way. We don’t
always experience everything the same way. (Individual interview, August
13, 2017)
During the Bottle Car Derby Activity Donald worked with a family at a table
as they were designing racecars using everyday recycled materials. The aim
of the activity was to design the fastest possible racecar by experimenting
with different weights and wheel sizes. While Donald was making holes in
the center of bottle caps that would be used as the wheels of the bottle
racecar, a father was filling the bottle with beans and rice, planning its
weight to run it down the ramp fastest. (Field note from the STC workshop,
February 25, 2017)
I like watching the students taking the leading role. It wasn’t that parents were
sitting back and waiting for their kids to do it but they were actually getting in
there and working together—a couple of fathers in there that wanted to have
the winning cars. So, it was just fun to watch the interaction between the
students and the parents. That, to me, is the most revealing and rewarding part
of it that we provided some kind of an environment for them to interact on an
academic level. (Individual interview, June 6, 2017)
I think it worked very well and our administration saw that, and they brought
that up in one of the overall school meetings that we had at the end of the year.
He’d walked in, and the kids were making slushies and saw that there were a
lot of people involved and having a good time, and so he made a point of
bringing that up. (Individual interview, August 13, 2017)
As the family program had a pretty good turnout, Creek Middle School
decided to keep the new format of the Latinx night that Donald restruc-
tured. Donald also noted a marked improvement in his ability to give stu-
dents more autonomy when carrying out science experiments in his
classroom. Observing his students’ efforts working together while he inter-
vened less was a difficult experience for Donald, partly because he was
accustomed to providing students with direct instruction on how to carry
out science experiments. Observing the project researchers facilitating the
science investigations with families in the STC workshops provided
Donald with an alternative model for how to give students more control in
his classroom.
Jennifer
Jennifer’s background. Jennifer, a mother of two children, was born and
raised in a small town a 1-hr drive from the Stonybrook School District
where she now resided and taught. She grew up in a European American,
middle-class, two-parent household with extended family nearby. Jenni-
fer’s strong sense of family-oriented life was also centered around the
Kirmaci et al. 19
What Jennifer learned from the STC workshops. Reflecting on her experiences
in the STC workshops, Jennifer claimed that the workshops contributed to
her own professional growth in a number of ways. For example, she found
that Latinx parents had strong interest in their children’s science learning that
Jennifer had not previously grasped due to her limited interactions with
Latinx families. Jennifer observed that her Latinx students had strong family
dynamics, which were rooted in a foundation of unity, that mirrored her own.
She observed that the Latinx students were highly engaged in science activi-
ties when they got to make collective decisions, and that they were interested
in exploring and utilizing their parents’ knowledge about the science con-
cepts they were studying. As she described it,
I kind of already knew a little bit but not from a true, emotional connection.
It’s not just head knowledge; it’s personal now. Someone can tell you
something all day long, but until you experience it, it’s not the same. They
can tell you “That’s cold” but until you touch and you see, it’s not cold.
That was huge because, from my personal background, I didn’t have a lot
of that interaction with people different from me. (Individual interview,
June 16, 2017)
Jennifer was taking a tour across the science demonstrations along with her son
and one of her students, and that student’s mother. They stopped in front of one
science booth where Jennifer’s son and her student were interacting with the
college students and burning an old penny with 95 percent copper versus a new
penny that is mostly zinc with only 2.5 percent copper. They used a torch to
explore reactions of these two different materials to heat. Jennifer and the
mother stood back and smiled at each other as they watched their children
engaged with the science activity. The mother held a smart phone and recorded
every moment of the experiment that her daughter and Jennifer’s son conducted.
Then she leaned toward Jennifer and showed her the video. (Field note from
the STC workshop, March 18, 2017)
learning and college preparation, Jennifer indicated that she started to hold
higher expectations for her Latinx students to achieve more in science:
Working with the kids just becomes more valuable. And like I had this one
child, and he’s very smart, but he was lazy. And his parents showed up to the
family workshops a few times with his siblings, and he didn’t get away with
being lazy anymore in my class, there was no way. When he’d try to sit back
and not do his work, I’d look at him and say, “I know where your value system
is” and I wouldn’t have to say much and he’d get back to doing it. (Individual
interview, August 18, 2017)
According to Jennifer, she also gained new insights from the STC work-
shops that led to changes in her broader teaching practices, such as providing
more time for peer discussions and addressing problem-solving skills that she
noticed were critical components of science learning. “Watching the LISELL
staff do it and implement it and watching how different it could be than what
I was taught, that’s what changed my lesson plans” (Focus-group interview,
June 9, 2016). As she articulated, readings and lectures might be valuable in
some ways, but having facilitators modeling for the teachers was the most
important element that supported her enactment of new practices.
Recognition
We have seen evidence that all four teachers developed a critical conscious-
ness and broadened view of science education and their own responsibility to
do more in their work with Latinx students and families as they recognized:
22 Urban Education 00(0)
The value of working with the community. Through participation in the STC
workshops with Latinx emergent bilingual students and families, the focal
teachers began to question their views of teaching that had previously
focused on the student within the boundaries of classroom, ignoring the
importance of making connections with their families and communities.
For example, Donald recognized that “You focus [only] on the student, you
ignore the influences the family has or in a lot of ways the support that the
family could give” (Individual interview, August 13, 2017). Jennifer real-
ized the need for “understanding their [students’] family dynamics, which
helps a lot [in] how to best be with them in the educational setting” (Indi-
vidual interview, June 16, 2017). Julie stated that “the workshops really
taught me to go beyond what I think of a student and what I think of a fam-
ily” (Focus-group interview, June 4, 2015). Allyson changed her thinking
on the role of teachers “to build community with our students and their
families to be a safe space for a student to come to when they’re troubled or
need guidance” (Focus-group interview, June 9, 2016). The teachers under-
stood that “it takes building a relationship with those kids and families on
an individual basis to give them [students] the confidence to make learning
attempts in the classroom” (Julie, Individual interview, June 12, 2017).
Teachers came to see working with families as key to improving their work
with individual students. As they started to work more effectively with stu-
dents who attended the program, the focal teachers recognized that
Kirmaci et al. 23
Parents are learners with their children. Another way the teachers demonstrated
critical consciousness was through their recognition of Latinx parents’ poten-
tial for involvement in their children’s school science learning and in the
broader school community. Before their involvement in this project, all four
teachers had doubts about Latinx parents’ abilities to help their children with
school science because of what they perceived to be the parents’ limited edu-
cational backgrounds, language difficulties, and financial challenges.
Although Donald, Julie, and Allyson continued to articulate concerns about
parental limitations by the end of the project, they all recognized the possi-
bilities for parents’ involvement in their middle-aged and high school–aged
children’s learning, given sufficient opportunities and resources.
For example, Donald was intrigued by “watching students work with
their younger siblings or with their parents trying to figure out and solve the
science problems. It makes me think about [how] we should have [more]
available for them” (Individual interview, June 6, 2017). For Julie,
“LISELL-B helps me understand that it’s my job to make sure that parents
are comfortable to interact with their child academically or I need to give
them the resources” (Focus-group interview, June 4, 2015). Each focal
teacher reported the value of providing an environment for students and
family members to interact on an academic level in their schools. Observing
the parents joyfully practice science inquiry activities with their children in
the STC workshops was a catalyst in their thinking about their abilities as
teachers to establish a more supportive approach for parents to be lifelong
learners of science with their children.
time to reflect so that they can hopefully have more truer science learning that
will be long standing” (Individual interview, August 26, 2017). Jennifer
observed “a huge spark in a lot of students. The drawing and then writing it
and describing their drawing using their vocabulary cards [written in English
and Spanish with an illustration] seem to help a lot” (Focus-group interview,
June 4, 2015).
This critical consciousness offered focal teachers new views of science
teaching, situating students at the center of their teaching practices. Learning
from and with students and families seem to widen teachers’ views of possi-
bilities for making instructional decisions in their science classrooms. As
Freire (2013) indicated, critical consciousness leads to action, and in the fol-
lowing sections we present how teachers’ recognition of new possibilities in
their work with their Latinx students and families turned into caring practices
or/and proactive actions.
Adaptation
We view teachers’ openness to new instructional strategies they saw modeled
in the STC workshops as a demonstration of their humility and their adapta-
tion of these strategies that they observed in the program as a testimony of
their caring for their Latinx students. Freire’s caring principle of dialogic
education became visible in the four focal teachers’ practices as they put
aside the view of science as an isolated system of knowledge that is free of
cultural values. Creating spaces for debriefing sessions, providing increased
student agency and freedom when implementing labs, and connecting school
science with students’ real-life science experiences are evidence of the focal
teachers’ caring for their Latinx students and families. According to Freire
(2005), caring is not about “coddling” (p. 25), reducing teaching to a therapy
process. Caring in education entails teaching practices based on the assets
and learning needs students bring to the classroom. In this sense, caring is
about designing learning environments based on the context in which learn-
ing takes place, and students’ articulations of their needs and interests, rather
than standardized instruction.
Donald’s adaptation of STC workshops’ science inquiry format in his
school’s Latinx night eventually influencing the school community, Jennifer’s
heightened expectations for her Latinx students as she pushed them harder in
the classroom, Allyson’s efforts to help her Latinx students use their multi-
cultural and multicultural resources, and Julie’s strong ties with Latinx par-
ents including her voluntary participation in conversations between Latinx
parents and other teachers, are each examples of teachers’ adapting practices
from the STC workshops to care for their students and families in their
Kirmaci et al. 25
Pro-Action
Although Donald, Jennifer, Julie, and Allyson embodied some practices that
they observed in the STC workshops, they differed in terms of proactive
practices that they developed to extend their work with families in the context
of science education. These differences may be due, in part, by divergences
in the contexts of their individual schools. For example, Donald and Julie
were most encouraged by their heightened awareness of the possibilities for
creating a dialogue-based science learning community by including their stu-
dents’ families in their children’s science learning. Donald personally began
sending take-home science kits for students to practice science inquiries with
their family members. Julie was working with families around dinner discus-
sion questions and science word games for family members to learn science
concepts with their children. These two teachers also received support from
their school administration for their enactment of these proactive practices
and were able to influence their school communities in this regard.
Even though Julie and Donald had conflicts in their schools due to pres-
sure regarding state-mandated standardized assessments and lack of time
for family engagement, they were able to align dialogic family engagement
practices with the relevant science standards in ways that made these prac-
tices acceptable in their school contexts. We view Julie’s and Donald’s pur-
suits of proactive practices with their students’ families as demonstrations
of hope in their abilities as teachers to make a difference for their Latinx
students. Hope, Freire (1998) wrote, is an essential asset in human beings
in that we can intervene in the world to the extent we believe that change is
possible. It was hope that mobilized these two teachers, despite a range of
pressures that they could not control. They were hopeful about the roles
they could play in their students’ pursuit of science education and science-
related career pathways and their role in supporting parents to become
active participants in those pathways.
In contrast, Jennifer and Allyson received little school administrative sup-
port for their work with Latinx families. Allyson was not appreciated for her
proactive adaptations, such as teaching science and English through garden-
ing, as these approaches were seen as being outside of her school’s focus on
improving assessment results. After receiving a poor end of year evaluation
26 Urban Education 00(0)
from the school administration Allyson quit her job and found a teaching
position in a different school with more like-minded school leadership. She
remained hopeful in her capacity to make a difference with her students,
seeking out new community-based science learning programs after the STC
workshops ended. Jennifer was the least optimistic of the four focal teachers
in terms of the potential she saw for continued work with Latinx parents at
the school level. She came to believe that her individual engagement with the
families of her students was the most that she would be able to accomplish.
In addition to the lack of resources to overcome what she saw as the language
barrier, the lack of time, and the lack of administrative support, she felt that
the grade level she taught (11th and 12th grade) was an additional obstacle to
parental engagement. Thus, Jennifer felt little optimism in her potential to
implement and sustain work with her students’ families through community-
based science programs or schoolwide family science events.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant No. 1316398.
30 Urban Education 00(0)
ORCID iD
Mehtap Kirmaci https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-5068
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Note
1. In this article, we use García, Kleifgen, and Falchi’s (2008) term emergent
bilingual students to refer to learners whose home language is not English and
who are in a dynamic process of developing competencies to be able to func-
tion in their home language and that of school to emphasize the learners’ bilin-
gual identity and positive characteristic of bilingualism as potential resource to
be used at schools.
References
Aikenhead, G. S., Brokofsky, J., Bodnar, T., Clark, C., Foley, C., Hingley, J., &
Strange, G. (2014). Enhancing school science with indigenous knowledge:
What we know from teachers and research. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada:
Saskatoon Public Schools.
Auerbach, S. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing
parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of
color. Urban Education, 42, 250-283.
Buxton, C. A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Kayumova, S., Aghasaleh, R., Choi, Y., &
Cohen, A. (2015). Teacher agency and professional learning: Rethinking fidelity
of implementation as multiplicities of enactment. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 52, 489-502.
Buxton, C. A., Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Rivera, C. (2012). Science, language, and
families: Constructing a model of steps to college through language-rich sci-
ence inquiry. In J. Bianchini, V. Akerson, A. Calabrese-Barton, O. Lee, & A.
Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice,
and policy in science education (pp. 241-250). New York, NY: Springer.
Calabrese-Barton, A., Tan, E., & Greenberg, D. (2017). The makerspace movement:
Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth
in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 11-44.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London, England: SAGE.
Chinn, P. W. (2015). Place and culture-based professional development: Cross-hybrid
learning and the construction of ecological mindfulness. Cultural Studies of
Science Education, 10, 121-134.
Dabach, D. B., Suárez-Orozco, C., Hernandez, S. J., & Brooks, M. D. (2018).
Future perfect? Teachers’ expectations and explanations of their Latino immi-
grant students’ postsecondary futures. Journal of Latinos and Education, 17,
38-52.
Kirmaci et al. 31
Dixon, T. L., & Williams, C. L. (2015). The changing misrepresentation of race and
crime on network and cable news. Journal of Communication, 65, 24-39.
Evans, M. P. (2013). Educating preservice teachers for family, school, and commu-
nity engagement. Teaching Education, 24, 123-133.
Flecha, R., & Soler, M. (2013). Turning difficulties into possibilities: Engaging Roma
families and students in school through dialogic learning. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 43, 451-465.
Flores, G. M. (2011). Latino/as in the hard sciences: Increasing Latina/o participation
in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) related fields. Latino
Studies, 9, 327-335.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Freire, P. (2007). Daring to dream: Toward a pedagogy of the unfinished. Boulder,
CO: Paradigm.
Freire, P. (2013). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Bloomsbury
Publishing.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South
Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Gallo, S., Wortham, S., & Bennett, I. (2015). Increasing “parent involvement” in the
New Latino Diaspora. In E. T. Hamann, S. Wortham, & E. Murillo, Jr. (Eds.),
Revisiting education in the new Latino diaspora (pp. 263-282). Charlotte, NC:
Information Age.
Gandara, P. C., & Contreras, F. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The conse-
quences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
García, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to
emergent bilinguals (Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1). Retrieved from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524002.pdf
Georgia Department of Education. (2016). Free and reduced priced meal eligibility.
Retrieved from https://oraapp.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_frl001_pub-
lic.entry_form
Georgia Department of Education. (2017). Enrollment by ethinicity/ race and gen-
der. Retrieved from https://app3.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_ethnicsex.
entry_form
Giroux, H. A. (2014). When schools become dead zones of the imagination: A critical
pedagogy manifesto. Policy Futures in Education, 12, 491-499.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing
practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Hamann, E., & Harklau, L. (2015). Revisiting education in the new Latino diaspora.
In E. Hamann, S. Wortham, & E. Murillo, Jr. (Eds.), Revisiting education in the
new Latino diaspora (pp. 153-170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
32 Urban Education 00(0)
The White House Office of the Press Secretary. (2017). Executive order: Enhancing
public safety in the interior of the United States. Retrieved from https://www.
whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/presidential-executive-order-
enhancing-public-safety-interior-united
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of
community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91.
Yuen, T. T., Bonner, E. P., & Arregun-Anderson, M. G. (2018). (Under)Represented
Latin@ s in STEM: Increasing participation throughout education and the work-
place. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Zeichner, K., Bowman, M., Guillen, L., & Napolitan, K. (2016). Engaging and work-
ing in solidarity with local communities in preparing the teachers of their chil-
dren. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 277-290.
Author Biographies
Mehtap Kirmaci is a post-doctoral fellow in the Department of Educational Theory
and Practice at the University of Georgia and a former elementary school teacher. Her
current research interests include empirical explorations of teacher learning in work-
ing with culturally and linguistically diverse families, content-based and cross-cul-
tural family learning programs, and dialogue-based pedagogies. Mehtap supervised
field placements for preservice early childhood educators and worked as a research
assistant on a NSF funded research project, which focused on science and ESOL
teachers, their middle and high school Latinx students and their families.
Cory A. Buxton is a professor in the College of Education at Oregon State University
and a former high school science and ESOL teacher. His most recent work is on creat-
ing spaces where students, parents, teachers, and researchers can engage together as
co-learners while strengthening their academic relationships, their knowledge of sci-
ence and engineering practices and careers, and their ownership of the language of
science. His research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, the U.S.
Department of Education, and several private foundations.
Martha Allexsaht-Snider is an associate professor in the Department of Educational
Theory and Practice at the University of Georgia. Her research interests include: fam-
ily-school-community interactions in diverse settings including Latinx communities
and rural México; professional development and equity in mathematics and science
education; and creative approaches to teacher education in diverse contexts. She has
worked with national and international grants in the areas of science and math educa-
tion for immigrant students and families and teacher education for rural and indige-
nous teachers in México.