Sei sulla pagina 1di 35

TOWARD

  A   P EDAGOGY   O F   D ISCOVERY  
FOR   A LL   S TUDENTS

MOUNT  ROYAL  UNIVERSITY  


NOVEMBER  15,  2010  
Susan  Elrod,  PhD
ExecuCve  Director,  Project  Kaleidoscope  
h"p://www.aacu.org/pkal            elrod@aacu.org

Friday, February 4, 2011


PROJECT KALEIDOSCOPE (PKAL)
Leading  advocate  for  building  and  sustaining  strong  undergraduate  
programs  in  STEM  since  1989  
PKAL’s  work  engages  faculty  and  leaders  at  colleges  and  universiIes  
through  an  extensive  naIonal  network  of  >5000  STEM  faculty  and  
leaders  at  over  750  colleges  and  universiIes  in  the  U.S.  and  Canada

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


PKAL’S   G UIDING   V ISION   . ..  
“...  Science  and  mathema.cs  educa.on  works  wherever  it  takes  
place  within  an  ac.ve  community  of  learners,  where  learning  is  
ac+ve,  hands-­‐on,  inves+ga+ve,  and  experien+al,  and  where  the  
curriculum  is  rich  in  laboratory  experiences,  steeped  in  the  methods  
of  scien.fic  research  as  it  is  prac.ced  by  professional  scien.sts.  This  
approach  works  for  women,  for  minori.es,  for  all  students.”  

-­‐-­‐  Dan  Sullivan,  1991,  PKAL  Volume  I:  Building  Natural  Science  Communi@es  

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


A  kaleidoscope  creates  a  mul1tude  of  
pa3erns  in  response  to  change,  so  the  PKAL  
agenda  encompasses  a  mul1plicity  of  
approaches  that  can  be  adapted  to  specific  
circumstances  and  ins1tu1onal  
environments.  

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


PKAL’S CURRENT PROJECTS
INTERDISCIPLINARY   Integrating Environmental Studies into the Liberal Arts Experience

LEARNING
DePauw University, Greencastle, IN
Carol Steele and Jim Benedix

Abstract Hot Tip!


The original goal of this project was to infuse environ- Developing a new ID program and want to start attracting
mental studies into our institution as a whole, and in par- students? Build a website before the program is done to
ticular into our liberal arts curriculum. The project has highlight what is already available on campus that relates
started slowly, in large part due to the initiation of what to the planned program.
could be a complete restructuring of our academic pro-
gram. In the fall of 2008 our new president charged the
faculty with the task of reconsidering intellectual life, with
the goal of making whatever changes deemed necessary
to enhance the experience of students and faculty and
increasing the quality of the institution as a small, liberal
arts university. While this is currently slowing the devel-
opment of what we hope will be a broad environmental
studies program, it may also provide an opportunity
because the restructuring we are likely to experience in
the next couple of years may allow us to weave our new
program into the curriculum as it is being reshaped. We

ACS
are considering a three-pronged model in which the uni-
versity-wide program would have two academic/curricular
areas, environmental science (natural sciences) and
environmental studies (social sciences and humanities),
and a policy/administrative area focusing on campus
sustainability. All three of these have been developing on
their own, and so one of the tasks at hand is to construct
an organizational system that will formalize them, con-
nect them, and allow a high level of interaction between
them. Barriers
- Ongoing reconsideration of academic program and

NAGT
intellectual life at the University has stalled the
development of new programs.
- Current financial situation will continue to limit what can

En S
e tal
be done.

vi tu
nc n
ie me
- Potential clash of departmental interests with plans for

r o di
new program; difficult to get some departments to buy in.

nm es
S c r on

en
vi

ta
En
Survey of 300+ DePauw Students

l
REGIONAL  
- 93% say that they are concerned about environmental
issues.
- 29% of respondents say that they are interested in a

AIBS
career dealing with environmental issues.
- 56% say that they are not satisfied with the environ-
mental education they receive in their DePauw classes.
- 76% respond that they would like more classes about
the environment to be offered.
Sustainability
Intitiative

NETWORKS ...
Accomplishments
- Presidents‘ Climate Commitment signed and Campus
Sustainability Initiative created (includes a project which
will measure DePauw’s carbon footprint) .
- Survey of DePauw students completed which gauges
interest in environmental studies, along with a study of
environmental programs at comparison schools and of
current environmental courses at DePauw.
- Environmental science/studies website developed.
DePauw Environmental Policy
Project Receives Award
- Continued development of the co-curricular DePauw The Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) named the
Environmental Policy Project to include courses as well DePauw Environmental Policy Project (DEPP) their
as summer internships. “Environmental Organization of the Year,” saying that the
- Aquatic Ecosystem specialist becomes newest Biology group “confounded the expectation of what can be

LEADERSHIP  
faculty member, strengthening the environmental faculty. accomplished on a college campus.”

DISCIPLINARY  
DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY  
COLLABORATIONS
+  Conferences  &  Resources  on  STEM  EducaAon
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


PROJECT KALEIDOSCOPE
Join  us:  
✦ AAC&U  Annual  MeeAng  on  Global  Posi*oning:  Jan  26-­‐29,  2011  
-­‐  San  Francisco  **  PKAL  sessions  on  Interdisciplinary  Learning  
plus  Symposium  on  the  Integra@ve,  Inten@onal,  Global  
Curriculum  
✦ PKAL-­‐AAC&U  Engaged  STEM  Learning:  From  Pervasive  to  
Promising  Prac7ces  Conference:  March  24-­‐26,  2010  -­‐  Miami,  
Florida  
✦ Join  the  PKAL  conversa*on  on  STEM  higher  educa*on:    
Email  news/updates,  TwiXer,  Blog,  Facebook  page  

More  at  h<p://www.aacu.org/pkal    

Upcoming  Project  Kaleidoscope  Events


Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


UNDERGRADUATE   R ESEARCH

Ques1ons  to  address:  


✦ What  are  characterisAcs  of  undergraduate  research?
How  does  it  benefit  students?  
✦ What  does  it  look  like  on  campus?  
✦ How  do  we  know  it  is  successful?
✦ What  are  the  next  fronAers  in  undergraduate  
research?    

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


HIGH   I MPACT   P RACTICES

Educational  experiences  that  result  in  “deep  learning”  


(Kuh,  2008  -­‐  http://www.aacu.org/leap/hip.cfm)
✦ Increase  time  on  task  
✦ Interact  with  faculty  and  peers
✦ Experience  diversity  
✦ Get  more  frequent  feedback  
✦ Discover  relevance  of  learning  with  real  world  applications

Study  abroad Learning  communities  


Research  with  a  faculty  mentor  (#1)  
Writing  intensive   Service  learning  
Capstone  experience
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


GLOBAL  HEALTH
CLIMATE  CHANGE

These  kinds  of  problems  necessitate  graduates  from  different  


disciplinary  backgrounds  who  are  scientifically  literate  -­‐  adept  
consumers  of  scientific  information  -­‐  as  well  as  socially  responsible,  
culturally  responsive  and  globally  aware.    
ENERGY
FOOD  SECURITY

GENETICS  &  DIVERSITY

Science  Magazine  Covers  -­‐  BIG  GLOBAL  ISSUES  

Friday, February 4, 2011


!"#"$%&'()'*+,-'./012%'341252"&'
*+,-'./012%'041252"&'14"'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
0(&+56"78'1&&(2+1%"9':+%-;'
•  3"4&+&%"#2"'1#9'<3=''
•  *+,-"4'41%"&'()'&%>9"#%?)12>7%8'+#%"4125(#'
•  .#24"1&"&'+#'24+5217'%-+#@+#,A':4+5#,'&@+77&A''
•  <4"1%"4'1004"2+15(#')(4'9+6"4&+%8'
•  *+,-"4'&%>9"#%'"#,1,"/"#%'(6"4177'
Bronwell, J & Swaner, L (2009). High Impact Practices: Applying the Learning
Outcomes Literature; Kuh (2008)

Kinzie,  J.  From  AAC&U  Undergraduate  Research  Conference  Panel,  Nov.  12,  2010

Friday, February 4, 2011


WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT
LEARNING
 Learning  builds  on  exisIng  knowledge;  is  
built  progressively
 Learning  requires  acIve  cogniIve  
challenges;  transiIons  novices  toward  
expert  thinking  &  frameworks  
 Knowledge  and  understanding  are  
constructed  by  the  learner
 Learning  occurs  best  in  context  &  when  it  is  
relevant  to  the  learner    
 ReflecIon  (metacogniIon)  promotes  
learning
National Research Council. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A.
L., & Cocking, R. R. eds (2000). How People Learn:
 Learning  is  an  acIve,  social  process     Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded
Edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


WHAT ARE
CHARACTERISTICS &
BENEFITS
OF UNDERGRADUATE
RESEARCH?
Think:  What  makes  undergraduate  research  such  a  rich  
experience  for  students?  
What  are  its  characterisAcs  and  the  benefits  to  
students?  
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


"Undergraduate researchers learn tolerance
for obstacles faced in the research process,
how knowledge is constructed,
independence, increased self-confidence,
and a readiness for more demanding
research. These benefits are an advantage in
any career path."

-- David Lopatto from Undergraduate Research as a High-Impact Student


Experience in Peer Review (Spring 2010)

Friday, February 4, 2011


First Round Interviews:
Faculty and Student Positive Observations on Gains from UR
30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

Career Clarification
Personal/Professional

Preparation

Skills
Working Like a

"Becoming a

Other gains
"Thinking and

Enhanced
Scientist"
Scientist"

Faculty observed gains (n=2243) Student observed gains (n=1230)

Laursen,  Hunter,  Seymour,  Thiry  and  Melton,  2010,  Undergraduate  Research  in  the  
Sciences,  San  Francisco:  Jossey-­‐Bass.  

Friday, February 4, 2011


Thinking and Working Like a Scientist

45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% Applying critical

Understanding

relevancy of
Increases in
questions/design

coursework
Understanding

knowledge
how research is

Understanding
the nature of
thinking skills

Increased
knowledge

how to frame
scientific

research
done

Faculty observations (n=527) Student observations (n=294)

Laursen,  Hunter,  Seymour,  Thiry  and  Melton,  2010,  Undergraduate  Research  in  the  
Sciences,  San  Francisco:  Jossey-­‐Bass.  

Friday, February 4, 2011


Becoming a scientist

60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Demonstrated Understanding Understanding Increases in
gains in the nature of how scientists confidence in
attitudes and research practice their "feeling like a
behaviors (including profession scientist"
temperament)

Faculty observed gains (n=450) Student observed gains (n=150)

Laursen,  Hunter,  Seymour,  Thiry  and  Melton,  2010,  Undergraduate  Research  in  the  
Sciences,  San  Francisco:  Jossey-­‐Bass.  

Friday, February 4, 2011


HIP  ParCcipaCon  by  Major  
(NSSE,  2010,  Annual  Report
hVp://nsse.iub.edu/html/annual_results.cfm)

Friday, February 4, 2011


Student Contributions to the Research Project

Kinzie,  J.  From  AAC&U  Undergraduate  Research  Conference  Panel,  Nov.  12,  2010

Friday, February 4, 2011


WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE
ON CAMPUS?

Friday, February 4, 2011


Council  on  Undergraduate  Research  (CUR)  @  cur.org

Friday, February 4, 2011


MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
CORE  2.0  Inquiry  Courses

All  students  must  also  take  at  least  one  (1)  


approved  Research  &  Creative  Experience   • Arts  (IA  or  RA)
course.  Students  may  take  an  approved   • Humanities  (IH  or  RH)
Research  &  Creative  Experience  course  in   • Natural  Sciences  (IN  or  RN)
of  the  four  areas  listed  below,  or  they  may   • Social  Sciences  (IS  or  RS)
take  a  separate  Research  &  Creative  
Experience  course  in  any  discipline,  
including  the  Undergraduate  Scholars  
http://web1.msu.montana.edu/wwwus/core20.html
Program  (USP  489/490).  All  students  must  
also  take  at  least  one  core  course  in  each  
of  the  following  areas:

Friday, February 4, 2011


THREE   Q UESTIONS
STUDENTS INSTRUCTORS

What  do  they   What  should  they    


know?   know?
How  will  they   How  will  we  
know?   know?  
 How  will  they   How  shall  we  
learn? teach?
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


Frosh Senior

General  EducaCon  

Major  

Co-­‐curriculum  

Capstone  

 
?
Think  -­‐  Pair  -­‐  Share:  Where  do  research  or  
“research-­‐like”  experiences  already  occur  within  your  
curriculum?  Where  might  they  be  more  intenAonally  
placed?  
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


COSTS   A ND   B ENEFITS
Costs  and  benefits  to  faculty  of  conducting  research  with  
undergraduates:
✦ Inherent  and  ongoing  difficulties  of  authentic  undergraduate  research  
work  with  students  -­‐  53%  of  all  costs  and  benefits
(e.g.,  balance  faculty  research  productivity  needs  w/  professional  
objectives)
✦ Additional  strains  raised  by  the  changing  institutional  situation  in  which  
undergraduate  research  is  undertaken  -­‐  21%  of  all  costs  and  benefits
(e.g.,  difficulties  w/  requiring  all  students  to  do  UR)
✦ Benefits  of  doing  research  with  students  -­‐  26%  of  all  costs  and  benefits
(e.g.,  intrinsic  benefits)  

Laursen,  Hunter,  Seymour,  Thiry  and  Melton,  2010,  Undergraduate  Research  in  the  
Sciences,  San  Francisco:  Jossey-­‐Bass.  

Friday, February 4, 2011


"Colleges and universities have generally not yet managed to
find fair, appropriate ways to value mentoring of
undergraduate research in the tenure and promotion
process. Even more challenging, many faculty see a clash
between the demands of personal scholarship and an
institutional urge to promote undergraduate research. "

--David Evans from The Challenge of Undergraduate Research, Peer Review (Spring
2010)

Friday, February 4, 2011


HOW DO WE KNOW IT
WORKS?

Friday, February 4, 2011


ASSESSING UNDERGRADUATE
RESEARCH
NSSE  -­‐  NaAonal  Survey  of  Student  Engagement  
(hXp://www.nsse.iub.edu)  

SURE/CURE  -­‐  Summer  Undergraduate  Research  


Experience/Classroom  Undergraduate  Research  
Experience  (hXp://www.grinnell.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/dl/
surecure)

RISC  -­‐  Research  on  Integrated  Science  Curriculum


 (hXp://www.grinnell.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/dl/risc)

URSSA  -­‐  Undergraduate  Research  Student  Self-­‐


Assessment  (hXp://spot.colorado.edu/~laursen/accessURSSA.html)  

Rubrics  -­‐  On  various  aspects  of  UR,  plus  TBD  by  you!  
Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


LopaXo,  et  al.  2008  Science  322:684-­‐5

Friday, February 4, 2011


AAC&U’S VALUE RUBRIC ON
INTEGRATIVE LEARNING

Moves  meaningfully  between  


academic  and  real-­‐world  knowledge

Synthesizes  facts  from  more  


than  one  field  into  a  coherent  whole
Adapts  concepts  gained  in  
one  situaCon  to  new  situaCon

Envisions  a  future  self  by  building  on  


experience  across  mulCple  and  diverse  contexts  

h@p://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/index_p.cfm?CFID=31123376&CFTOKEN=86341390

Friday, February 4, 2011


WHAT ARE THE NEXT
FRONTIERS IN
UNDERGRADUATE
RESEARCH?

Friday, February 4, 2011


THREE   U NANSWERED   Q UESTIONS
How  do  we  best  support  and  reward  faculty  for  their  
involvement  in  undergraduate  “research”?  

Interdisciplinary  research  experiences  -­‐  what  do  they  


look  like  and  how  do  we  encourage/support  them?  

How  do  we  build  it  (inquiry,  research-­‐like  


experiences)  effectively  and  appropriately  into  the  
curriculum  at  various  levels  to  reach  more  students?  
How  will  we  know  it  is  working?

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


QUESTIONS   F OR   C AMPUSES

What  is  the  value  for  our  students?  Where  does  it  fit  
within  the  context  of  learning  goals/outcomes?  

How  does  it  fit  with  the  institution’s  mission  and  


context?  How  might  the  institution  benefit?  

What  are  the  most  realistic  and  appropriate  


mechanisms  for  implementation,  for  both  students  
and  faculty/staff?  

How  will  you  know  you  are  having  the  desired  impact?  

Copyright  2010  by  Susan  Elrod.  All  rights  Reserved  

Friday, February 4, 2011


From  PKAL’s  Leadership  for  Interdisciplinary  Learning  Project  (2010)
hXp://www.aacu.org/pkal/kecknaAonalcolloquium.cfm

Friday, February 4, 2011


Carl Wieman, et al., (2010) Transforming
Science Education at Large Research
Universities, Change, March/April 2010

It  takes  a  village,  which  includes  leadership  beyond  


the  department.  Five  core  strategies  common  to  
transforming  insAtuAons:  1)  senior  administraAve  
support,  2)  collaboraAve  leadership,  3)  flexible  
vision,  4)  staff  development,  and  5)  visible  acAon.  
(Eckel  and  Kezar  (2003)  Taking  the  Reins:  Ins.tu.onal  Transforma.on  in  Higher  Educa.on)

* Achieving the necessary commitment and


coordination across more than two or three faculty
teaching the same course at the same time has been
difficult.

Friday, February 4, 2011


What  is  one  lesson  learned  this  morning  
that  will  be  useful  to  your  work  at  
Mount  Royal  University?  

ONE  MINUTE  WRAP  UP  

Friday, February 4, 2011

Potrebbero piacerti anche