REVIEW OF JORNAL:-

Paper Title Author and Year Journal Goal

A semi-automated Benjamin Mack Taylor and Use of high spatial Resolution(<=30m) data for
approach for the Patrick Leinenkugel, Francis for advancing Earth Science and to support
generation Claudia Kuenzer Decision Making and view of this process.
of a new land & Stefan Dech preprocessing chain integrating data
use and land cover acquisition, radiometric, atmospheric,
product for topographic and also temporal and spectral
Germany based on feature extraction.
Landsat time-series
and Lucas
in-situ data
Data and Methods Accuracy Future
Reference Data : 85 – 87% Further Research should Focus on evaluation of samplepoints
The 2012 Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey Artificial land and water neighbourhood info directly from the data.
(LUCAS) (LUCAS-2012 2013) was used as class has high level of
reference data. accuracy i.e 90%
It classified the land into 9 different types.
artificial land, cropland, coniferous wood-
land, broadleaved woodland, shrubland,
grassland, bare land, water and wetlands.
Training and Testing Datasets were taken from
The LUCAS samples.
Test dataset was carried out random
Stratification procedure.
The well-known Fmask algorithm
was applied to all images to create cloud
and cloud-shadow masks.
Methods :
 The usage of spectral–temporal metrics not only solves the problem of data gabs related to clouds but also allows exploiting specific
temporal patterns in the data that can be attributed for example to seasonal vegetation dynamics or different land use types. For each
pixel, the 25th,50th, 75th and 90th percentiles were calculated from all clear observation

Classification Method :
 The classification procedure followed two steps: First, with the training set and a Random Forest classifier with 500 trees, an initial
classification was conducted for identifying large areas of high uncertainty.
 Used vote Entropy to calculate Uncertain Areas with a maximum threshold of 0.75*ln(9) where 9 is the highest entropy due to 9
classes,3*3 moving window we applied inorder to identify all areas based on segmentation procedure.
 Based on the confusion Matrix we could calculate the score and the areas which could not be identified were ignored.

SEMI AUTOMATED CLASIFICATION FLOW DIAGRAM

LANDASAT ----------------> Automatic Filter(Training) ----------------> Classification(Entropy) -------------> Segmentation(Uncertain areas) ------------
(Reference data)

----> Sampling(training data2) ---------------> Classification(LCLUC) ---------------> Validation ----------------> Manual Adjustment(Test set)
Review2:

Paper Title Author and Journal Goal Data Methods Accuracy Future
Year

Land use/land Josephine ELSEVIER This study assessed The images of 30 m resolution The The The study recommends
cover Obodai a, the pattern of Land covering the study area were preprocessed Overall a revision of the
dynamics Kwaku use/cover changes, obtained through the United multi-spectral accuracy Integrated Water
using landsat Amaning and the possible States Geological Survey(USGS) Landsat was 0.94 Resources
data in a gold Adjei, Samuel drivers of change, in Landsat Look Viewer imagery were ± 0.01. Management (IWRM)
mining basin- Nii Odai, the basin. The study (https://landsatlook.usgs.gov/). input into the plan of the River Basin
the Ankobra, Mawuli Lumor used multi-spectral SCP(Semi- by the Water Resources
Ghana b Landsat images of 30 Automated Commission of Ghana
m resolution for the Classification to capture the current
2018
years 1991, 2002, Plugin) for the LULC dynamics for
2008 and 2016. classification sustainable
process. management and
development. In
addition, further
research should be
conducted to assess the
impacts of the changing
LULC on water
resources.
REVIEW 3:

Paper Title Author and Year Journal Goal Data Methods Accuracy Future

Comparison of Phan Thanh Noi MDPI (i)Comparing the Sentinal 2-A, level 1 The following steps 90% to Deploy more ML
Random Forest, and Martin classification techniques was taken from were performed, 95%. Algorithms and
k-Nearest Kappas SVM,KNN and RF on a 30 United States 1)Sentinel-2 image come with case
SVM
Neighbour, and * 30 sqkm within Red Geological Survey 2)Training Samples study to better
produce
Support Vector River Delta of Vietnam 3)Testing samples understand how
The training data s high
Machine for the remote sensing 4)Parameter tuning every classification
(training and testing OA
Classifiers for images, for the Sentinel- 5)Classification algorithm works on
samples) was 93.85%
Land Cover 2 Multispectral Imagery. Algorithms the Remote sensing
collected based on
Classification 6)Optimal Models datasets.
(ii) to assess the effects the manual
Using Sentinel-2 7)Classified Images
of the training samples interpretation of the
Imagery 8) Accuracy
size,strategies, and type original Sentinel-2
Assesment and
(balanced/imbalanced) data and high-
Comparision Analysis
on the accuracy of the resolution imagery
classification results of available from Google
the three Earth.
aforementioned
classifiers.

Sentinel 2 has free access and Global Coverage