Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SCE4310
Lesson Analysis
Introduction
Throughout their career, teachers will teach thousands of lessons. An important part of
the process for finding the best-fit lesson, teachers must be critical of the activities they bring
into the classroom. This is especially significant when teaching science lessons. As such, I have
found a science lesson that I will analyze in the remainder of this report to determine what to
alter so that it is ready to be taught to students in a way that addresses scientific content,
scientific process, and the nature of science. As emphasized by Molly Weinburgh, these three
“legs” of science lessons should be repetitiously and always used together so that the lessons
might be “much stronger than those with one or two legs missing” (Weinburgh, 2003).
The lesson I have selected was found on Cpalms.com, a website that houses the Florida
State School Standards. Meant to be taught in a second-grade classroom, this lesson focuses
on identifying the various states of matter. The lesson allows is split into two sessions, but for
Science Content
matter. In regards to whether or not this content is appropriate for second grade, I decided to
consult the standards. Within the state of Florida, standard SC.2.P.8.2 requires that students
learn to “identify objects and materials as solid, liquid, or gas,” while in the second grade
(“States of Matter”). In a more broad sense, the Next Generation Science Standards include
standard 2-PS1-1 which addresses the fact that students need to be able to “plan and conduct
properties” (“Structure and Properties of Matter”). In both cases, these standards fall under a
larger category within the second-grade curriculum, termed Properties of Matter (“States of
Matter”). Thus, based on this research I would be confident in saying that this content in
grade-level appropriate.
Taking a deeper look at the content, I would believe it to be partially accurate yet
well-rounded. The states of matter addressed by the lesson are solid, liquid, and gas. I used the
term partially accurate as some types of matter were not mentioned in the lesson such as
2019). Despite this, the second session of the lesson does address, oobleck, which acts as both
a liquid and a solid. The lesson also addressed how particles within the three states appear
which is also validated by livescience.com, specifically the particles that make up gases “have a
great deal of space between them,” the particles that make up liquids “are more loosely packed
than in a solid and are able to flow around each other,” and the particles of a solid “are packed
tightly together” (Bagley, 2019). Overall, the content being taught by the lesson is accurate and
grounded.
To summarize, this lesson provides opportunities for students to understand the concept
that matter can be classified by different states such as a solid, liquid, and gas.
Within this lesson, I felt that the main skills required were listening, classifying, and
inferencing. The majority of session one of this lesson was geared towards listening to and
absorbing the information taught by the teacher as well as classifying objectives using
inferences based on the information gathered from the lesson. This is illustrated in the lesson as
the main task was having students sort pictures of various objects into groups based on what
students’ believed their state of matter to be. This did not allow the students to physically
interact with the objects, instead, they were left to classify objects based on their own private
knowledge. That being said, I do not believe that students were “doing science” in this lesson.
Karen Sullenger would most likely agree with me as she believes that science is “going on when
scientists’ work and the ideas, theories, and debates generated by scientists’ activities are the
basis for goals and objectives” and when “learners can tell you why they trust and question the
work of scientists” (Sullenger, 1999). While this lesson is centered around the work scientists
have done to determine the states of matter, it is not providing explorations that would allow for
I would argue that this lesson is not requiring students to use skills, specifically listening,
classifying, and inferencing, for a scientific purpose. In fact, I believe that more skills such as
experimenting, observing, and data recording could be included in this lesson in a way that
could be made explicitly clear that it is for a scientific purpose. Sullenger suggests that such
skills are simply life skills unless they are being used within the mindset of being a scientist
(Sullenger, 1999). Building off of that, students were not given the opportunity to act as
scientists in the lesson and as such, they could not “decide for themselves if the evidence
provided by the science community is sufficient to accept their ideas and theories” (Sullenger,
1999). I will go on to suggest that in this lesson students should be given the chance to
In short, this lesson contains life skills that are not being used for a scientific purpose
I would move to say that the lesson as it stands currently does not address hardly any of
the various natures of science. For example, the sorting activity in this lesson appears to be
done at an individual level when it could easily be a group assignment which would, in turn,
encourage discussion and address the nature of science in that is would be a complex social
activity. Also, the sorting activity is very superficial in that students are sorting various objects
into the categories of solid, liquid, and gas according to inferences made by information
provided to them by a powerpoint. This ignores the fact that science demands evidence. The
students would be unable to provide evidence that shows the reasoning behind why they have
been classified in a certain manner. In addition to science demands evidence and is social, this
lesson could also lend itself to being a blend of logic and imagination. As it is currently, the
lesson does not allow for any creativity as students are asked to answer questions, not pose
them. The only nature of science that could be mentioned already in the lesson is that the world
is understandable. This is because by allowing students to classify and sort objects into the
different states of matter, they are, in a way, making sense of their world. Despite this, that is not
enough to be sufficient in teaching the nature of science. There are methods that the nature of
Randy Bell suggests that in order to teach the nature of science, teachers must be
“explicit” in letting students know what aspects of the nature of science are being used in a
lesson (Bell, 2014). For example, the demand for evidence could be explicitly taught by asking
students something along the lines of “‘How do you know that? Give me some evidence’”
(Weinburgh, 2003). With this in mind, I will aim to create modifications that will address the lack
I will include my modifications within the lesson plan itself in the pages below. The
- States of Matter -
Learning Objectives:
1. The students will be able to investigate the properties of matter and their changes.
2. The students will be able to identify the three common states of matter and pose
3. The students will be able to recall information and content presented and apply it in
4. Students will be able to recognize that science is social, imaginative, and demands
evidence.
Prior Knowledge: What prior knowledge should students have for this lesson?
1. The students must have prior knowledge that all living things are made of matter and
that they can be classified by their physical properties. With guidance, the students must
Guiding Questions: What are the guiding questions for this lesson?
*These questions will be posed to the class at the beginning of the lesson. Rather than being
asked to the whole group, give students four post-it notes each and write each of the four
questions on separate pieces of poster paper around the room. Allow students about 5 minutes
to use the sticky notes to add their thoughts to each question before taking about 8-10 minutes
to discuss their answers. This would be a great opportunity to explicitly point out that they are
using social interactions in the form of a discussion to better understand scientific ideas. (This
would serve the purpose of incorporating and purposefully pointing out the nature of science,
specifically that of science is social. Also, it would serve as a sort of formative assessment for
3. By keeping it in a container of the same shape and size, not breaking or tearing
it.
Teaching Phase: How will the teacher present the concept or skill to students?
Session 1
1. The teacher will review that there are tiny particles that make up all states
Matter. Rather than using this powerpoint to show the particles in the
website:http://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/states-of-matter/latest/states-of
Allow them to manipulate the website and discuss the results. (I would
a concept without being able to visualize it. Thus, this website not only
changes.)
Guided Practice: What activities or exercises will the students complete with teacher
guidance?
Session 1
1. Students will each be given the Matter Sort handout. Tell students that
they have been tasked with classifying objects based on their state of
liquids, and gases. Acting as scientists, they must provide evidence for
through which they may test and record their own data. (This instructional
allows for imagination in that students may test the objects to determine
their state using whatever method they believe would be accurate and
feasible.
2. Students will need to cut out each of the 3 states as well as the objects.
4. At the top, they will write the title States of Matter and underline it.
5. Under the title, the students will lay outthe 3 types of Matter in 3 columns:
Solid (suitcase) first, next to it Liquid (fish bowl) and then Gas (hot air
balloon). The students may also choose to show their classifying of the
6. Students will now be asked to take draw the objects they cut out have
7. Students would also need to record the various attributes they believe to
Activity #2 -
unanswered, inform them that they will be able to find out for sure through
Closure: How will the teacher assist students in organizing the knowledge gained in the
lesson?
Session 1
1. Once students have completed their Matter Sorting, have them share with the
class and articulate why they placed their objects where they did.
2. Rubric for journal. Both of these seem to be quite superficial; instead, simply post
students’ work around the room after the Gallery Walk. Also have them write their
“textbook page” in their science journal. (By writing a “textbook page” students
connection!)
Summative Assessment
● The teacher will use a rubric (attached) to assess students' knowledge in the Matter Sort
Tree Map and Science Journal. I do not believe a summative assessment is yet
necessary, students can be summatively assessed after completing activity #2 and the
Formative Assessment
● The teacher will use a matter sorting hands-on activity. Students will record data in their
Science Notebook after performing a solid, liquid and gas investigation. Also, the post-it
note discussion in the beginning and the Gallery walk towards the end can serve as
formative assessments.
Feedback to Students
● As students are completing their Matter Sort, the teacher will circulate and ask:
Bell, R. L. (2014). Teaching the Nature of Science Three Critical Questions. Best Practices in
oooooScience Education.
Bagley, M. (2019, August 21). Matter: Definition & the Five States of Matter. Retrieved from
ooooohttps://www.livescience.com/46506-states-of-matter.html.
ooooohttps://www.cpalms.org/Public/PreviewResourceLesson/Preview/46667.
ooooohttps://www.nextgenscience.org/topic-arrangement/2structure-and-properties-matter.
2–26.
Sullenger, K. (1999). How do you know science is going on. Science and Children, 2
Weinburgh, M. (2003). A Leg (or Three) to Stand On. Science and Children, 28–30.