Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Destiny Juarez
Humanities 310
18 November 2018
Throughout the history of mankind and since the beginning of civilizations, war has
always been present. War has been fought for many different reasons and almost every war is
different in its own way. Some wars are fought for control and power while some are fought over
pride and selfishness. However, the one thing that has always been constant is that war has
always had a major impact on the people touched by the war. Stories of humans impacted by war
and tales of war have been passed down as long as literature has existed. Some examples of early
stories of war are the Iliad and The Trojan Women. The Iliad, written by Homer, was a story of
the war from the perspective of the male warriors and heroes who fight for honor and pride. On
the other hand, The Trojan Women, written by Euripides, was a story that showed the war from
the perspective of women who experience tragedy as a result of it. Furthermore, stories of war
have also been told through other mediums besides literature, such as paintings. One of those
paintings is called Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring, painted by the British painter Laura
Knight. The painting depicts a young woman working in an industrial plant as part of the British
effort during World War II. All three of these pieces of literature and art can be used to draw
inferences about how wars had impacted the people of the time. Moreover, the painting, Ruby
Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring, can be used to show how war has impacted women and how that
impact on women has changed compared to that described in the Iliad and The Trojan Women.
2
First of all, women have historically been oppressed and have had very few freedoms
compared to men in many societies throughout human civilization. As a result, women have
historically had very little say in how the wars would impact them. For example, as stated by
Bernard Cook in Women and War: a Historical Encyclopedia from Antiquity to the Present,
“more frequently and throughout history, women have been victims of war. They have been
forced to grieve slain husbands and children. They have been brutalized and killed. Women have
been viewed as property to be seized in war and enslaved” (Cook 31). Moreover, women have
often been on the less misfortunate end of wars. As a result of their lack of freedoms, women are
often not thought of during times of war and any negative impact on them is just considered to be
a normal part of wars. This is noticeably apparent in both the Iliad and The Trojan Women. For
example, in the Iliad when Achilles’ captive woman is stolen from him, Achilles exclaims, “And
now my prize you threaten in person to strip from me, for whom I labored much, the gift of the
sons of the Achaians. Never, when the Achaians sack some well-founded citadel of the Trojans,
do I have a prize that is equal to your prize” (Homer). In other words, Achilles is referring to this
captive woman that was taken against her will after a battle as his prize. Furthermore, he refers to
her as a gift that he rightfully owns as a result of his dedication and success on the battlefield.
This mistreatment and cruelty towards women were typical for soldiers and warriors during the
Trojan War and it strengthened and continued the male dominance over women. In addition, it is
apparent that the Trojan War was tragic for women when Hecuba, the Queen of Troy, states “Lo,
I have seen the open hand of God; And in it nothing, nothing, save the rod of mine affliction, and
the eternal hate, beyond all lands, chosen and lifted great. For Troy!” (Euripides). Furthermore,
Hecuba, the Queen of Troy, is expressing her pain and sorrow over the fall of Troy just as she is
3
about to become captive and enslaved. Moreover, the Queen of Troy is forced into slavery and
considered another prize just as in the Iliad. In short, this shows how war can impact the women
in a society when they are not fortunate enough to avoid becoming captive or enslaved by their
enemy.
In modern times, women have been fortunate enough to able to take on a different role in
wars, besides being victims, in certain scenarios. For example, Maurine Weiner Greenwald
explains in the book Women, War, and Work: The Impact of World War I on Women Workers in
the United States, that during World War I, “in response to the wartime labor shortage,
corporations experimented with training programs for women. At the same time, the federal
government created agencies to establish safe and sanitary working conditions for women, to
oversee the introduction of women into male-dominated work, and to monitor male-female
relations on the floor” (Greenwald 47). In other words, during World War I, women were able to
take on male roles and jobs and were encouraged to do so by the federal government. This was
as a result of the shortage of men available to work because of the war and caused women to fill
many roles that may not have been traditionally female. Moreover, as stated by Lois Ann
Lorentzen in The Women and War Reader, “during both world wars, there was a huge influx of
women into munitions factories. Recruitment propaganda called on women to do munitions work
previously done by men” (Lorentzen 10). Moreover, women were called to do very demanding
armaments and equipment that soldiers needed to fight in the war. Although it was a very
demanding job and potentially hazardous, they served a very important role in the outcome of the
war.
4
Laura Knight’s painting, Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring, exhibited a woman
working in a munitions factory and showed women that male-dominated jobs can be done by
women. Laura Knight was a British painter who was commisioned by the War Artists’ Advisory
Committee, a British government agency with the aim of documenting the history of Britain
throughout World War II, to help boost female recruitment into manufacturing jobs, such as a
munition factory. The painting itself was made in the Royal Ordnance Factory, a munitions
factory, in Newport, South Wales. Furthermore, the painting shows Ruby Loftus working on a
component, called a breech ring, that is used on a Bofors anti-aircraft gun. As described by the
Imperial War Museum, “Making a Bofors Breech ring was considered the most highly skilled
job in the factory, normally requiring eight or nine years training. Loftus was aged 21 at the time
of the painting and had no previous factory experience. Her ability to operate the machine
presented a considerable publicity coup at the time. However, it has been suggested that she was
placed at the machine precisely for this reason” (“Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech-Ring.” n.d.).
In other words, this task demands a high level of skill and concentration for if the task is done
wrong the entire gun could be destroyed once it is fired. It is stated that this may be why Ruby
Loftus was chosen for the painting because it showed that women are highly capable of doing
exceptionally difficult and challenging tasks. In addition, the painting was then reproduced in
eighth British newspapers and subsequently spread throughout Britain. As a result, the painting
was viewed by almost every woman in Britain and helped support a woman's ability to take on
male roles during times of war. In short, the painting helped shed light on women's abilities to do
more than traditional female roles and gave women confidence that they can do anything that
By examing Laura Knight’s painting we can see how the impact of war on women has
evolved from the times of the Trojan War and as told by the Iliad and The Trojan Women. First
of all, Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring shows a less vulnerable and more tenacious side of
women during times of war than as dictated historically. On the other hand, the Iliad portrayed
women as powerless objects that were taken advantage of and enslaved during wars. In addition,
The Trojan Women built further on the idea that women were helpless and taken advantage of
during wars. By showing the Queen of Troy reduced to becoming a prisoner and being enslaved,
it gave the impression that during the Trojan War, all women were negatively impacted by the
war and suffered. Furthermore, Laura Knight’s painting showed how the opportunities and
freedoms for women had changed during the World Wars compared to the time of the Trojan
War. The painting portrays women taking a more assertive approach to wars and also a more
liberal approach by stepping out of traditional gender roles that have existed for centuries. For
example, women began to participate more directly in wars, such as by working in munitions
factories and providing munition to soldiers on the battlefield instead of watching them unfold
and being helpless to the outcome. In addition, women also began to gain more freedoms by
disregarding gender roles that had traditionally shaped society. In other words, women were no
longer being forced to adhere to their role as a wife or mother, which started a movement that
would soon lead to the Women’s Movement after World War II. This portrayal of women during
times of war was divergent from all previous portrayals of women during times of war, in that it
no longer portrayed women as being victims and helpless. Moreover, it shows how far women
have come and that they are just as capable as men. In addition, women can do the tasks and jobs
that traditionally have been reserved for only men and their experiences during times of war can
6
take multiple shapes instead of just the single stereotype that all women are victims. In short,
Laura Knight’s Ruby Loftus Screwing a Breech Ring shows how women's experiences during
times of war have changed compared to those expressed in the Iliad, by Homer, and The Trojan
Women, by Euripides.
7
Works Cited
Cook, Bernard A. Women and War: a Historical Encyclopedia from Antiquity to the Present.
ABC-CLIO, 2006.
Euripides, and Gilbert Murray. The Trojan Women of Euripides. Literary Licensing, LLC, 2014.
Greenwald, Maurine Weiner. Women, War, and Work: The Impact of World War I on Women
Lorentzen, Lois Ann, and Jennifer E. Turpin. The Women and War Reader. New York Univ.
Press, 1998.
www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/15504.