100%(1)Il 100% ha trovato utile questo documento (1 voto)
543 visualizzazioni3 pagine
The document discusses perspectives on the self from philosophy and sociology. Philosophically, the self has been viewed as the soul or essence (Socrates, Plato), as defined by its relation to God (Augustine), as the thinking mind (Descartes), and as arising from experience (Locke). Sociologically, Mead saw the self developing through social interaction, with the "I" responding to the internalized perspectives of others, the "me." Postmodern views see the self as narrative, digitalized, and pluralized in modern society.
The document discusses perspectives on the self from philosophy and sociology. Philosophically, the self has been viewed as the soul or essence (Socrates, Plato), as defined by its relation to God (Augustine), as the thinking mind (Descartes), and as arising from experience (Locke). Sociologically, Mead saw the self developing through social interaction, with the "I" responding to the internalized perspectives of others, the "me." Postmodern views see the self as narrative, digitalized, and pluralized in modern society.
The document discusses perspectives on the self from philosophy and sociology. Philosophically, the self has been viewed as the soul or essence (Socrates, Plato), as defined by its relation to God (Augustine), as the thinking mind (Descartes), and as arising from experience (Locke). Sociologically, Mead saw the self developing through social interaction, with the "I" responding to the internalized perspectives of others, the "me." Postmodern views see the self as narrative, digitalized, and pluralized in modern society.
THE SELF FROM VARIOUS PERSPECTIVES schemes A. PHILOSOPHY Topographical Model - The individual person may both know 1. SOCRATES and do not know the certain things at the same time “Know Thyself” Structural Model Knowing thyself is true wisdom - self in three different agencies 2. PLATO - ID o aka primitive or instinctive component The essence of knowledge is self- - EGO ( I ) knowledge o part of the id which has been modified by the direct influence of the 3. ST AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO external world defined self or sense of self is his relation - SUPEREGO ( Above I ) to God both in his recognition of God’s o synthesizes the morals, values and love and his response to it - achieved systems in society in order to function through self-realization as the control outpost of the instinctive desires of the id 4. RENE DESCARTES 9. GILBERT RYLE “I think therefore I am”(Cogito ergo sum) dualist Positive View in his “Concept of the thinks that ethereal mind hold the seat Mind” of consciousness stern critique of Descartes’ dualism cannot rely on senses coz our sense of “I” is just a “ghost in the machine” perception often deceive us believes that self comes from behavior doubt everything bundle of behaviors caused by the physical workings of the body 5. JOHN LOCKE 10. PAUL & PATRICIA CHURCHLAND self is comparable to an empty space (tabula rasa) eliminative materialism experience is needed to have sense believe that nothing but matter exists data it is the physical brain not the imaginary mind that gives the sense of self 6. DAVID HUME 11. MAURICE MERLEAU-PONTY Bundle Theory the idea of self is an illusion believed that the physical body to be self I just a bundle of perceptions an important part of what makes up the all ideas are derived from impressions subjective self there is NO self treats perception as a casual process perceptions are caused by the intricate 7. IMMANUEL KANT experiences of the self, and process Transcendental Unity of Apperception intellectually while distinguishing truthful self is always transcendental perceptions from illusory self is taken as a phenomenon of the self is not in the body, it is even outside the qualities of the body whole-a Gestalt understanding of perception synthesis 8. SIGMUND FREUD
regarded the self as the “I” that
ordinarily constitute both mental and physical actions SOCIOLOGY The following are the manifestations:
1. SOCIOLOGICAL VIEWS OF THE SELF o Information Technology dislocates the
self, thus, self is “digitalized” in 1.1 The Self as Product of Modern Society cyberspace Among Others o Global migration produces multicultural with modernization, the self becomes a identities “delocalized self” o Post-modern selves are “pluralized” Clifford Geertz believes that struggle for selves one’s individuality is only possible in Social Construction of the Self modern society where: - religio-theological are gradually Self is not discovered; it is made replaced by rational and scientific through socialization process calculations “Ikaw ang gumagawa ng kung ano ka” - intimate personal affiliations are replaced by exceedingly impersonal 1.4 Rewriting the Self as an Artistic Creation associations Nietzche states that the unity of the self modernization “delocalizes” the self is not pre-given but accomplished This poses certain problems as: through conscious effort - transform self through beautiful work of art. We can o The newfound freedom threatens the recreate ourselves. very authenticity of the self (e.g. love) Rorty: contingencies of selfhood - o Alienation (Marx) - human beings conceal the “ugly” by reinterpreting the haunted by the very images they overall aesthetic contours of the self. have created 1.5 Self Creation and Collective Identity o Objectification of the body (e.g. medical practice) Memories play significant role in o Dehumanization of self creating the self and identity. Solution: For the individual discover the “true” 1.6 Self Creation and the Struggle for Cultural and “authentic” part of himself/herself to Recognition realize his/her potentials, there is no need to abolish repressive social constraints. challenge of self-identity amidst recognition of racial and ethnic 1.2 Self as Necessary Fiction identities Self for Nietzche, is the sum of Beyond Self Creation individual’s action, thoughts and feelings quest or search for self-identity Self is nothing more than a metaphor, a to pursue self-creation within pre-given, representation of something abstract; not willfully chosen social circumstances symbolic 2. Mead’s Theory of Self unity of experiences give rise to a concept of the self George Herbert Mead maintains that the conception a person 1.3 Post Modern View of the Self holds of himself/herself in his/her mind Self is: emerges from social interaction with others a narrative, a text written and rewritten 2 components: the “I” and the “ME” a story The “ME” represents the expectations dynamic and attitudes of others organized into a a product of modern discourse that is social self; organized set of attitude of historically and socially imprisoned by others which an individual assumes what is acceptable by norms The “I” is the response to “ME”, or the “digitalized” in cyberspace, a virtual persons individuality; is response of an version of who we are individual to the attitude of others 2.1 Mead’s 3 Stages of Development of Self
Stage 1: The Preparatory Stage (0-2)
- children mimic those around them
- no idea of what they do, just mimicking
Stage 2: The Play Stage (2-6)
- children play “pretend” and do not
adhere to the rules of organized games
Stage 3: The Game Stage (7-onwards)
- children begin to understand and
adhere to the rules of games - begins taking perspective into account
2.2 The Looking-Glass Self: Our Sense of Self is
Influenced by Other’s View of Us
how we see ourselves comes from
perception of how others see us (Charles Horton Cooley) sometimes the influence of other’ appraisals to us may be so strong that we end up internalizing them when we are repeatedly labeled, then self-labeling may occur in these types of situation, those who self-label may come to experience internal prejudice, which occurs when individuals turn prejudice directed toward them by others onto themselves.
2.3 Social Comparison Theory: Our Sense of Self
is Influenced by Comparisons with Others
Self-concept and self-esteem are also
heavily influenced by the process of social comparison (Buunk & Gibbons, 2007; Van Lange, 2008) Social comparison occurs when we learn about our abilities and skills, about the appropriateness and validity of our opinions, and about our relative social status by comparing our own attitudes, beliefs, and behavior with those of others.