Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
net/publication/326205964
CITATIONS READS
0 210
4 authors, including:
V. Singh
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Dip coated TiO2 Nano Structured thin film: synthesis and application View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Balashanmugam P on 04 September 2018.
The synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts has attracted much attention. In this
study, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were synthesized using the Ginkgo biloba plant-leaf extract
and their antibacterial and larvicidal activities were investigated. AgNPs were characterized using
UV-visible, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX)
spectroscopy and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) analysis. The UV-visible
spectral analysis showed a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak at 430 nm, the FESEM anal-
ysis revealed size of AgNPs between 25–45 nm and the XRD data confirmed the formation of the
AgNPs using G. biloba-mediated green synthesis. AgNPs showed the highest antibacterial activities
against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtills, Enterobacter aero-
gens, Salmonella paratyphi and Escherichia coli. Also, the AgNPs exerted a significant larvicidal
effect on the Culex mosquito larvae.
Keywords: Green Synthesis, Silver Nanoparticles, UV-Visible, Surface Plasmon Resonance,
Cytotoxicity.
422 Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2018, Vol. 10, No. 3 1941-4900/2018/10/422/007 doi:10.1166/nnl.2018.2630
Balashanmugam et al. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Ginkgo biloba and Their Bactericidal and Larvicidal Effects
2.5. Characterization Techniques of the diameters (ISD) were measured. This procedure was sub-
Synthesized AgNPs sequently repeated for a minimum inhibitory concentration
The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption-spectra analy- (MIC) assay. Next, the different concentrations (10, 20, 30,
ses were carried out using the Hitachi U2900 spectropho- 40 L) of the synthesized AgNP solution were added to
tometer (Hitachi, Japan) within the wavelength region the four wells and the plates were incubated at 37 C for
of 300–700 nm. It is shown that the Fourier transform 24 hr. To this end, the lowest concentration that is below
infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded using the Bruker the concentration where the plate did not show any growth
FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) in the transmit- has been considered as the MIC. In this case, the standard
tance mode and within the range of 400–4000 cm−1 . The deviations were recorded using the mean values of 3 repli-
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data were thus acquired cates. The student’s t-test method was used to evaluate the
using the Rich Seifert 3000 diffractometer (Seifert Compa- statistical significance between the test sample and control.
nies, Germany), according to the Bragg–Brentano geome-
try and using the step-scan technique, while a Johansson 2.7. Larvicidal Activity
monochromator was used to produce pure CuK1 radia- To evaluate the larvicidal activity of the green-synthesized
tion (1.5406 Å; 40 kV; 30 mA) from 20–90. The data AgNPs, the Culex larvae were collected from the stagnant-
were matched with the International Centre for Diffraction water area of a pond. Additionally, they were identi-
Data (JCPDS) Card No-087-0720. At this time, the crys- fied by using standard manuals and confirmed with the
talline size was calculated from the full width at half max- expert in that area of specialization. To start a colony,
imum (FWHM) values of the diffraction peaks using the the larvae were kept in plastic and enamel trays con-
Debye–Scherrer formula, as follows: D = 089 / cos , taining tap water. The larvae were then maintained and
where D is the mean grain size, is the X-ray wave- reared in a laboratory. In particular, the larvicidal activity
length for the Cu target, is the FWHM of the diffrac- was assessed using a modified World Health Organiza-
tion peak and is the diffraction angle. To demonstrate tion (WHO) procedure.17 For the bioassay, the test larvae
for the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analy- were stored in separate plates. At different concentrations
sis, a drop of a sample containing the synthesized AgNPs (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 L), 2 mL of the aqueous plant-
was placed on a carbon (C)-coated copper (Cu) grid and extract AgNPs was added in triplicate to each plate. The
then dried under a vacuum. In like manner the TEM water that had been incubated at room temperature was
images were obtained using the FEI TECNAI G2 (T-30) used as the control. In light of this, to avoid the settling
transmission electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scien- of the particles, especially at the higher doses, all of the
tific, U.S.A.) with an accelerating voltage of 250 kV treatment solutions were ultrasonicated for 5 min prior to
and the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) anal- the addition of the solutions to the Culex mosquito lar-
ysis was carried out using the Hitachi S-3400N field- vae. Additionally, the mortality was assessed after 24 hr
emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) from to determine the acute toxicity. The number of dead lar-
Hitachi, Japan. vae was counted after 24 hr of exposure and the mortality
percentages were reported. The standard deviations were
2.6. Antibacterial Activity of the then recorded using the mean values of 3 replicates. Statis-
Green-Synthesized AgNPs tical significance of the variables was measured by using
t-test.
The antibacterial activity of the biologically synthesized
AgNPs was determined using an agar-well diffusion
method. The bacterial cultures from fresh colonies were 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
inoculated in a Mueller–Hinton broth. At that time the cul- 3.1. Spectral Characterization
tures were then allowed to grow until the optical density The change of the aqueous-solution color from pale yellow
(OD) reached 0.2 at 600 nm, where the OD of 0.2 cor- to brown, as is evident in Figure 1(b), is due to the sur-
responds to the medium concentration of 108 CFU mL−1 face plasmon resonance (SPR) of the AgNPs at 430 nm,
and then 20 mL of a sterilized nutrient-agar medium was which appears in Figure 2(a). It is noted that the AgNPs
poured into petri plates. At that time, the medium was exhibited the SPR band due to the combined vibrations of
allowed to solidify and the culture broths in each petri the AgNP electrons that was in resonance with the inci-
plate were cotton swabbed. Four wells were made in the dent light wave (Priya et al., 2011). The aqueous AgNO3
medium using a gel puncture. The antibacterial test was solution was mixed with the G. biloba extract, and then
performed by loading the biologically synthesized AgNPs incubated at 37 C. The formation of the AgNPs was mon-
into the well “A”, the plant extract into “D”, the antibiotic itored using the UV-vis absorption spectra. Therefore, the
(streptomycin) into the well “C” and 30 L of a 1-mM UV-vis analysis revealed that the formation of the AgNPs
AgNO3 , which served as the control, was loaded into the occurred after 6 hr; the SPR-band intensity was increased
well “B”. Notably, the plates were then incubated at 37 C up to 72 hr, as shown in Figure 2(b); and after 72 hr, the
for 24 hr. After the incubation period, the inhibition zone intensity remained constant, indicating that the G. biloba
Table I. Antibacterial activity of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles. Table II. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of silver nanopar-
Standard Deviation (±) showed the mean values of 3 replicates. The ticles against bacterial pathogens. Standard Deviation (±) showed the
results are statistically significant with p value <0.05. mean values of 3 replicates with statistical significance (p value <0.05).
Table III. Larvicidal activity of silver nanoparticles on Culex mosquito showed a significant larvicidal activity against the instars
larvae.
of C. quinquefasciatus at the concentrations of LC50 =
No of dead larvae after 456 mg/L and LC90 = 1314 mg/L and for the larvicidal
the incubation period activity against Anopheles subpictus, the concentrations of
Concentration of AgNPs 4h 8h 12 h 16 h 24 h LC50 = 514 mg/L and LC90 = 2568 mg/L were sufficient;
moreover, it showed that the fourth instars are significantly
Extract-control – – – – 2 more susceptible.35 In addition, the NPs that were synthe-
5 L – – – 2 5
10 L – – 2 5 7
sized from the fresh leaves, dried leaves and green berries
15 L – 1 3 7 9 of Solanum nigrum were separately subjected to larvicidal
20 L 1 4 5 8 10 bioassays on the second and third instar larvae of C. quin-
25 L 3 4 6 8 10 quefasciatus and Anophele stephensi at the concentrations
30 L 4 5 7 10 10 of 2.5, 5 and 10 ppm. To this end, the 10-ppm concentra-
Water-control – – – – –
tion of the fresh- and dried-leaf synthesized NPs resulted
in a 100% mortality in both the second and third instars
extract showed a slight effect, while the distilled water of A. stephensi, while the 10-ppm concentration of synthe-
showed no effect on the larval mortality. Although it is sized berry NPs resulted in the mortality rates of 96.65%
noted that the higher concentrations of the aqueous plant and 100% for the second and third instars of A. stephens,
extract alone caused no larvae deaths until the 24 hr of respectively. Additionally, in the case of C. quinquefascia-
exposure had passed in that case (Table III). Addition- tus, the mortality rates of 100%, 96.65% and 85% were
observed when the combinations of AgNPs/dried leaves,
ally, after 12 hr of exposure, 20 L of the AgNPs slightly
AgNPs/fresh leaves and AgNPs/berries were used, respec-
decreased the survival of the larvae to 50%, while a 100%
tively. The results of the present work are in sound agree-
mortality of the larval population was observed with the
ment with those that were reported by the Rawani et al.36
AgNP-solution concentration of 30 L after 16 hr. The
study, confirming that the mortality rate in all forms of
AgNPs (15 L) killed the larvae slowly and a mortality
larvae decreases with the decreasing of the NP concentra-
of almost 90% was found after 24 hr of exposure. It is
tion. The values of the results showed the statistical sig-
noted that the maximum efficacy is evident at 30 L of
nificance (p value <0.05) between the control test and the
the AgNPs (Table III). It is possible that the mechanism
treatments.
that causes the death of the larvae is the capability that
Comparatively, there are numerous reports are avail-
allows the NPs to penetrate through the larval membrane.
able on the use of plant extracts for larvicidal activity.
As a consequence, the AgNPs in the intracellular space A very low mortality percentage was observed accordingly
can bind to the available sulfur (S)-containing proteins or in each of the following four solvents: petroleum ether,
phosphorus-containing compounds like deoxyribonucleic water, acetone and ethyl acetate. As a consequence, the
acid (DNA), thereby leading to the denaturation of a num- aqueous extracts of G. biloba (0.125%) showed the least
ber of organelles and enzymes. Subsequently, the decrease mortality compared with the other solvents, but the same
of the membrane permeability and the disturbance of the extract with a 1% (w/v) concentration provided the highest
proton motive force, cause a loss of the cellular function mortality percentage, while a 1% (w/v) concentration of
that is shown to eventually result in cell death. the ethanol extract of G. biloba showed the highest mor-
Correspondingly, the Sundaravadivelan et al.29 study tality of 39%.37 Additionally, the mortality rate of 21%
suggested that the noted higher AgNP doses facilitate was noted for the first instar larvae for which a treat-
greater uptakes of the NPs by the larval bodies. Con- ment of 6% (w/v) Leucas aspera extract was applied; how-
sequently, the AgNP penetration into the treated larval ever, it increased to 85% with a 14% treatment of the
membrane causes an interaction with the cell molecules L. aspera leaf extract.38 The Muthukrishnan et al.39 study
that result in larvae death. In addition, it is noted that observed that the LC50 values of the ethyl acetate extract of
the AgNPs reach the midgut epithelial membrane, inacti- L. aspera regarding the first, second, third and fourth instar
vate the enzymes and generate peroxide, thereby leading larvae of C. quinquefasciatus are 75.40, 93.09, 132.20 and
to cell death.30 31 In like manner, the penetration of the 138.60 ppm, respectively.39
AgNPs that is promoted by the attraction of a positive In this instance, the selected plant extract of G. biloba,
Ag+ with a negatively charged cell membrane was demon- contained two kind of bioactive compounds (flavonoids,
strated by Kvitek et al.32 and Liang et al.33 The Raman terpenes), which indicate several desirable medicinal prop-
et al.34 study reported that the Pithecellobium dulce medi- erties including use as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory
ated extracellular green-synthesized AgNPs, which showed and cell regeneration therapy. The leaf extracts of the plant,
a significant larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefas- L. aspera exhibited higher mortality rates, especially dur-
ciatus at the concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/L. ing the molding process and the subsequent melanization
The Rajakumar et al.35 study synthesized the AgNPs by and tanning processes.40 The Murugan and Jayabalan41
utilizing the aqueous extract of Eclipta prostrate, which study reported the exhibition of a 90% larval mortality
with a 4% leaf-extract concentration against the fourth 8. A. Ingle, A. Gade, S. Pierrat, C. Sonnichsen, and M. Rai, Curr.
instar larvae of A. stephensi. In this case, the hexane Nanosci. 4, 141 (2008).
9. T. Youdeowei and M. W. Service, Pest Control and Management,
extract of the plant showed the highest larvicidal activ-
Longman, Singapore (1983).
ity against two of the mosquito vectors, followed respec- 10. C. F. Curtis, Med. Vet. Entomol. 8, 107 (1994).
tively by the results from the chloroform and ethanol. The 11. F. H. Collins and S. M. Paskewitz, Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40, 195
LC50 values of L. aspera against the first, second, third (1995).
and fourth instar larvae of C. quinquefasciatus are 122.50, 12. S. A. Radhika and K. Sahayara, J. Biopest. 7, 152 (2014).
13. C. B. Wandscheer, J. E. Duque, M. A. De Silva, Y. Fukuyama, J. L.
149.97, 193.43 and 230.71 ppm, respectively, while the Wohlke, J. Adelmann, and J. D. Fontana, Toxicon 44, 829 (2004).
LC50 values against Aedes aegypti are 77.40, 144.00, 14. S. S. Nathan and K. Kalaivani, Biological Cont. 34, 93 (2005).
199.72 and 257.17 ppm, respectively.42 15. M. Frederich, J. M. Dogné, L. Angenot, and P. Mol, Curr. Med.
Chem. 9, 1435 (2002).
16. P. Balashanmugam and P. T. Kalaichelvan, Int. J. Nanomed. 10, 87
4. CONCLUSION (2015).
The AgNPs were synthesized using a simple, low-cost, 17. A. A. Rahuman, G. Gopalakrishnan, B. S. Ghouse, S. Arumugam,
and B. Himalayan, Fitoterapia 71, 553 (2000).
nontoxic and ecofriendly green approach for which the 18. T. C. Prathna, N. Chandrasekaran, A. M. Raichur, and A. Mukherjee,
G. biloba plant-leaf extract was utilized. The nanoconju- Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 82, 152 (2011).
gate of the G. biloba AgNPs showed an effective antibac- 19. S. P. Dubey, M. Lahtinen, and M. Sillanpaa, Process Biochem.
terial activity as noted against the P. aeruginosa compared 45, 1065 (2010).
with the results of the other bacteria. However, the MIC 20. P. Balashanmugam, S. Santhosh, D. J. Mukesh Kumar,
S. Anbazhakan, and P. T. Kalaichelvan, Indo American Journal of
of the AgNPs is 10 L for the inhibiting of the P. aerugi- Pharmaceutical Res. 4, 475 (2014).
nosa, S. aureus, B. subtills, E. aerogens and S. paratyphi, 21. J. M. Martinko and M. T. Madigan, Brock Biology of Microorgan-
while it is 20 L for the E. coli. It has been proved that the isms, Prentice Hall, Illinois (2005).
nanoconjugate of the G. biloba–AgNP extract is an effi- 22. S. Shrivastava, T. Bera, A. Roy, G. Singh, P. Ramachandrarao, and
D. Dash, Nanotechnology 18, 225103 (2007).
cient alternative source of the chemical larvicidal agents
23. T. Maneerung, S. Tokura, and R. Rujiravanit, Carbohyd. Polym.
that are identified to presently cause environmental pollu- 72, 43 (2008).
tion. Equally important the present investigation facilitates 24. E. L. Yu-sen, R. D. Vidic, J. E. Stout, C. A. McCartney, and L. Y.
a consideration of the application of the AgNP-conjugated Victor, Water Res. 32, 1997 (1998).
biomolecules in integrated vector control programs. 25. C. N. Lok, C. M. Ho, R. Chen, Q. Y. He, W. Y. Yu, H. Sun, and
C. M. Che, J. Proteome Res. 5, 916 (2006).
26. V. S. Kumar, B. M. Nagaraja, V. Shashikala, A. H. Padmasri, S. S.
Conflict of Interest Madhavendra, B. D. Raju, and K. R. Rao, J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest in the 223, 313 (2004).
performance of this study. 27. C. M. Santoro, N. L. Duchsherer, and D. W. Grainger, Nanobiotech-
nology 3, 55 (2007).
28. K. H. Cho, J. E. Park, T. Osaka, and S. G. Park, Electrochim. Acta
Acknowledgments: This work was carried out with 51, 956 (2005).
the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agri- 29. C. Sundaravadivelan and M. Nalini, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed.
culture Science and Technology Development (Project 2012, 1 (2012).
30. G. D. Shockman and J. F. Barren, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 37, 501
No. PJ012550032018) Rural Development Administration,
(1983).
Republic of Korea. 31. M. Raffi, F. Hussain, T. M. Bhatti, J. I. Akhter, A. Hameed, and
M. M. Hasan, J. Mat. Sci. Technol. 24, 192 (2008).
32. L. Kvitek, A. Panáček, J. Soukupova, M. Kolar, R. Vecerova,
References and Notes R. Prucek, and R. Zboril, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 5825 (2008).
1. P. Mohanpuria, N. K. Rana, and S. K. Yadav, J. Nanopart. Res. 33. Z. Liang, A. Das, and Z. Hu, Water Res. 44, 5432 (2010).
10, 507 (2008). 34. N. Raman, S. Sudharsan, V. Veerakumar, N. Pravin, and K. Vithiya,
2. C. N. Lok, C. M. Ho, R. Chen, Q. Y. He, W. Y. Yu, H. Sun, P. K. Spectrochim. Acta A 96, 1031 (2012).
Tam, J. F. Chiu, and C. M. Che, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 12, 527 (2007). 35. G. Rajakumar and A. A. Rahuman, Acta Trop. 118, 196 (2011).
3. M. A. Farooqui, P. S. Chauhan, P. Krishnamoorthy, and J. Shaik, 36. A. Rawani, A. Ghosh, and G. Chandra, Acta Trop. 128, 613 (2013).
Dig. J. Nanomat. Biostruct. 5, 43 (2010). 37. V. Karthikeyan, K. Sivakumar, A. Gokuldas, and
4. N. Ahmad, S. Sharma, V. N. Singh, S. F. Shamsi, A. Fatma, and S. Mohanasundaram, Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 5, 189 (2012).
B. R. Mehta, Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2011, 454090 (2011). 38. K. Kovendan, K. Murugan, S. P. Shanthakumar, S. Vincent, and J. S.
5. G. D. Wright, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 1451 (2005). Hwang, Parasitology Res. 111, 1481 (2012).
6. S. Pal, Y. K. Tak, and J. M. Song, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1712 39. J. Muthukrishnan, E. Pushpalatha, and A. Kasthuribai, Insect Sci.
(2007). Appl. 17, 389 (1997).
7. J. S. Kim, E. Kuk, K. N. Yu, J. H. Kim, S. J. Park, H. J. Lee, S. H. 40. R. W. Mwangi and H. Rembold, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46, 103 (1998).
Kim, Y. K. Park, Y. H. Park, C. Y. Hwang, Y. K. Kim, Y. S. Lee, 41. K. Murugan and D. Jayabalan, Curr. Sci. 769, 631 (1999).
D. H. Jeong, and Y. K. Kim, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnol., Biol. 42. Maheswaran, S. Sathis, and S. Ignacimuthu, Int. J. Integr. Biol.
Med. 3, 95 (2007). 2, 214 (2008).