Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Whether or not Edrines has jurisdiction to try the crew of the Ochan vessel.
Edrines has jurisdiction to try the crew of the Ochan vessel. Based on the resolution
of conflicts regarding the attribution of rights and jurisdiction in the exclusive economic
zone, Article 59 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
provides that In cases where the Convention does not attribute rights or jurisdiction to the
coastal State or to other States within the exclusive economic zone, and a conflict arises
between the interests of the coastal State and any other State or States, the conflict should
be resolved on the basis of equity and in the light of all the relevant circumstances, taking
into account the respective importance of the interests involved to the parties as well as to
the international community as a whole.
Since the collision took place within Edrines’ exclusive economic zone and the
injured parties are from Edrines, Edrines has clear jurisdiction over the collision. Hence,
despite the lack of an extradition treaty between them, Ocha must surrender the crew of
the F/B KIROMI to Edrinean custody.
2. Whether or not the activities of Ochan vessels are considered illegal fishing.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Applicant, the Federal States of Aves, respectfully requests ICJ to adjudge and declare
that:
1. That the Edrines be declared to have jurisdiction to try the crew of the Ochan vessel.
2. That the activitites of F/B Kiromi be held illegal and only Edrinean be granted to fish
within the area of Scor Guyot Edrines