Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
LanguageWithin a PtagmaticFramework
GEETAHERLEKAR
NationalInstituteof MentalHealth
and\t euro-Sci ences' Bangalore
and
PRATHIBHAKARANTH
'1tlIncliaInstitutettf SpeechandHearing'A'[1'sore
INtRopur:t(rx
Acloselookatthestudiesoflanguageacquisitionreportedduringthe
beena major shift in the
pastcoupleof decades'en'ealsttrit ttrerehas
measures to-sYntaxandmorerecentll"to
ioorr. u ifrn fro* vocabulary asno\\'
oflanguageThetask oflanguage acquisition'
pttg*;ti. aspects
tnuch rnorethan patterns of sound'
viewed.requirestt',at"itita'In learn to talk
in whjch childrenlearn
g;;;;;t and .'ocabulanThe context
contribxting factor influenctng
[u, U..n recognizedas a signihcant
(Carrirv-Woolfolk-and L'vnch1982:Gallagher
languagedevelopment
and to pragmatics
s1'ntax
andPrutting1983).Thi; ,hift fto* t'otabulary realization
testlng The
considerabll"
hasinJluenced thefieldoflanguage
a number of pragn-raticfuncttons
that childrenma-vhaveto'o*luttd ot'er
atatimervhentheirr,ocabularyandS\'ntaxarelimitedorr.icer'ersaled
toelaboratiorrofcertainlanguageassessmenttechniquestoinclude
pragmaticmeasures (Jate tqSO:iund andDuchan1988)Pruttingand
theimportance of pragmaticframel'orksin
Kirchner(1987)emptrasized
the studvof languagedisorderedpopulations'
language use structtlres
in additionto langrrage
This emphastson
language do'elopment.t:11tt'
hasalsogivenrtseto a ntimolr of earh'
n'hichproudequalitati\€informationaboutchild'scomntunicatireabilittes'
::]::----_
Melroo
Subjects
Ninefl normalchildrenin the agerangenine monthsto threevears
sen,edas subjects.None of the subjectshad any pre or post-natal
complications. No onehadany sensory or motoricdisabilities.All the
subjectsbelongedto urban middle classsocio-economic group.The
subjectsweredividedinto nine agegroupsoften each.pertinentsubject
informationis zummarizedin ThbleI
J L,tric;rr.tcE Aci2urstlro^-TtsT
199
Proceclure
The data \\'as obtainedfrom parcnts/close
associatesof trre chirdren br
adminisleri'g the questio'nairein indi'idual
home setting,
creche/darcarecerlres i'M'sore and Hubli ";;;
in the stateotkoruuirro
Basedon the exacl chronologicalagc. itents
fron the ror.rponAing og.
groups*erc askcdfirst and their performance
on other itenis ato.,.Jaio
belo* *'as also e'altntcd. Specificafv,responses
*,ere checkedfor trvo
consecullYeage groups above and belo*,
that of the child. f.rt,ng
continuedin the lower agegroupsuntil t*o positi'e
scores,',... .".ord.l
and in the higher groups until tu,o negatire
scoreswere obtai'ed. The
responscs uerc ratedon a threc_pointscale.r.iz.,plus (+).
minus t-) and
plus-rrinus(+) dependingon *hcther
that particularaspectorrrngrog.
'as attatncd.not attainedor onh.parliall] .
attainedrespectir,.ell,"
All the plus responscs *crc gi'cn a ciedit of t*,o points.plus_minus
responsesrecei'ed one point and nrinus responses.
zero points. Ra*,
scoresuere calculatedseparatch.foreachof thethree
dimensionr.M;.
standardde'iations and coefficicntof correlation,
,.,.r. .o.;;;;;.'*'-'
Rl si-'t-is..txoD tsr:r_.ss
io:i
tln"eedimensirnt'sfordiffererttagegt"oups
'fable2:\leattartdSl)sol '\coresortlhe
C Cosntlton
l:: Ilxprcssioll'
R: Rcception:
ScorCS agaillstthe l'arious ?se crou|:
It can be Seenfronl tlrc nrean
a lincar itlcreasein scorcs\\ith increaseln
git.n * ioUf. Z ,t.'otthere is
ig.fo,...'pt':llylil"'i,"TLT:rt'i:lJH:"t'fl:',3Ht;'"*'l'if*:
$i::';:':l:3il':Hi:J'"J#'ffi#'",;i'::':l::r.:11,,?''5,'l:
Onceagain'a linearrelationship
if there
sec un'
existed diffcrences'
"t
u'asnotedu'itnflgfnAuesofcoeffrcientofcorrelation(greaterthan0T6)
sexdifferences ln
usedto further-explore
TheMann-WhitnelU i* ttot and 38 0 for
3ll'5for expression
scorcs. TheU valuestili;;;t*ption' and girls wasnot
cognitionsuggested 'ftot tftt pttformallceof thebovs
l$'els' Therefore'the
ott-'t'at all tl-rree
signihcantllO,ffe'entitom citt' nineage
OataUaseo-on-to't' Uo" andgirlsrvithineachof the
compositc inFigureI (p 201)'
groups areplottedrntneformof abargraph differentagegroups
or the scores of children-from
A comparison on
that for the first trro groups'scores
undereacltdimensionreveals ali$t":^t:'
cognitionandrcceptton arcbetterthanthoseon expression'
group III onlvards'receptlon scores
differences arenot srgnificantFrom 1i1'ltl-lL,1n)'
out\\,eish those on .t;;;rJ;" anaJoenillnrhere:?: This obsen'atton'
scores onexpression and cognition
differences betrueen in consonance
relative to exDressiottis
t'i2., better,ao"' o" "teption develop earlier than
reccpti'e abiiities
rvith the rvell attestedfaci that
expressir'cskillsinn**orchildren.Thcresrrltsalsosrrggestthatduring of
aird three1'ears'development
earll' childho"Outt*tt-'J"tn ""t go t''andin hand'Althoughthis
expressive runguugtoii tog"itit't skills
t-
a,
=
=
o
Hao -
O v.
=
.Ero
q
2
!) J
v
O
(n
N)
AVERAGII AGII
1l\rD IN
lt\ MONil{S
lvluN I lls
_ 7._,..r7
I RECEPnoN
IL-J I-_l r
EXPRESSION CoGNtrroN
LJ f
Figure | : performanrc,,rfrariu^ age
groups,,, ,rrrr|r, expresnonontrcognitr.n
u
TI
202 Gssle Hlnt-ur,^'R & PRA,rlrteH'\KARAN
ThcnormsprcscntcdinTables3..tand5canbeuscdinroutineclinical
until two
q,aluation as follorvs.The test itcms should be administered
failed b-va given child can be
consccutivcfailures arc noted Thc itcm
to verifl language age of
checkcdagainstthe norms on eachdimcnsion
thcclrlld.Fortttstance.ifachildfailsanitemrvlrichg0%ofnormalchildrcn
in languagcdevelopment
oitrirlt ., age passed.then a significant delav
the highest itcm passedbv the
mav be suspected.Thc age leve-lat rvhich
as that individual'slanguage
child u,hoobtarnsa 90,/nicorenu]- be takcn
strictly linear order is not present
agc.Horvcvcr.in viervofthe fact that a
3-D L.lxcuacr Ac.qursir.rox
Tr,sr
ztt t
amongtheitemsof thistest.calculation
of exactlanguage ageof a given
childmayha'eto a*ait re'isionof
the.-irii"g rormatof thistesi.once
thatis donc.cachchild.sreccplirc language
age'.
e*prcssi,c langtrage age
cosnirire ranguageagc can be
11d deteimrned.*hich '.it ha'e
considerabrediagnostic andtherapeutic'0t,,.in additron,o
the.content'alidih'of .r,otiirt*g
thistest.iiis atson...rru,r-ro test
andotheraspccrs thereliabilit'
of srandardizalion *i"g ; ;;;; rargersampre
alreadydoneanddescribed rhanthar
in thispapei
Tahle 3. 7'otal santple narntsfr.tr
Rt:ception
I
2 1 00
3 1 00 13.1
10,0 I l.(r l3.l 15 . 8
4 u.n 1.8 12.8 t 40 I9.6
5 il.0 l 8 128 14.0 19.6
6 10.6 t.1 12.6 1 - tI 15 . 8
7 1.1.1 l.l 0 t4.8 15.8 19.6
8 I3.3 1.1.8 15.6 18.2 22 1
9 I-r.I f.i.0 I .t..t I5.0 I5.8
IO t 55 17..3 l9.4 2t.a )))
l l r6 . 8 18.2 19.6 2 1. 0 )))
t2 1.1.1 15.1 16.3 t8.5 22.2
l3 17.9 19.(r 20.(t 22.2 250
t4 14.9 16.6 18.6 22.8 282
t5 15 . 9 17.6 I9.6 ) J ) 3 l. 3
l6 t9.0 205 2t1 222 25.0
t7 2 1. 2 221 2-1.0 26.0 ?R]
i8 20..1 209 21.7 22.9 25.0
I9 2 1. 9 22.9 ) J ) 26.0 lQ f
20 22.9 239 24.8 26.0 28.2
2l 2 11 24.0 26.8 29.1
22 23.8 "1.1.7
lb. ) 288 30.2 lt -3
23 238
1.1
28.8 30.2 3l .j
2 3. 8 zo.) 28.8 30.2
25 3l .-3
. 30 . 0 .JI.J 3 3r.
zo 3.1.8
32.7 -1.J . ) -34.1 348
27 3 5 .I
-r0 0 327 14.1 -3.18 3 5 .I
201 GEEr'i HEnrexan & PnarHIsF{.l KARA}'rFI
I n.2 l3.l
2 lr.-r t2.1 l3.l
3 10.8 r
13. 15.0 19.6
4 10.3 10.6 11.8 l3.l 15.8
5 ll.l t2.l 13.1 16.2 19.6
6 11.0 t2.l 1.1.6 17.3 19.6
1 13.I 1.1.5 15.3 t7.1 19.6
8 t2.1 l-1.I l6.l 18.7 222
o 11.7 16.6 18.3 2t.t 28.2
10 I /.J 18.9 z l --'t 2.1.8 28.2
ll l-5.5 16.2 t7.9 19.8 22.2
12 1.t.3 15.5 19.(r 21.6 n.2
l3 19.9 21.5 z).+ 25.8 28.2
t l
t+ 21.5 22.9 2+.8 26.7 28.2
l-s 18.0 20.-l 2-5.8 28.2
l6 23.1 25.6 28.3 31.3 31.7
t1 21.9 23.1 25.2 28.3 31.3
l8 20.ti 22.2 z+.2 26.9 3l.3
lq 25.0 26.8 28.5 -) -) .L
3D-LATTESTITEMS
Rrr--unot Expnr:ssrox Cclcxmoru
I. 9-ll months
l. Does the child point to or indicatethe l. Does he point to and name father or l. Does he engagein structuredplay?
object(whichis in immediatereach)being mother sometimes? e.g.Hide and seek,throwinB/kickingball
named?e.g..'Whereis the light'? with vocalization.
2. Doeshecomprehend simplecommands 2. Does he ask for desiredthings by 2. Does he make attemptsto sing?
such as. 'Say good bye' or 'sit down' pointing,stretching handaccompanied
etc.? by commandslike 'give'? 3. Does he engagein role plaving with
3 . D o e s h e s a y ' f i n i s h e d ' t o s i g n i f y dolls with accompanyingvocalization?
3. Doeshe mime when an actionis namod? completionof an action? e.g.Gettingthe doll to sleep. -l
e.g. 'How doesa car go?'
4. Does he expressneedby saying 'give' 4. Is he interestedin looking at picture
II .12-14 months or naming the object he wants? books?Does he pretend to read? n1
4. Does he point to body parts when 5. Doeshe nameobjects.animals,eatables 5. Does he
show increasedactivity in
named? etc? manipulatingobjects(e.g. radio).
6. Does he show better structureddance
e"
5. Does he point to himself when asked 6. Does he describean event by naming
in play? e.g. rina-a-ring-a-
questlonssuch as 'whosc shirt is this?' the person involved? e.g. says Daddy q
::;r".."ntr ]
6. Does he fbllow simpieoommandsthat and waves his hand to indicate Daddy F
requireactionor verbalizationon his part? has goneout.
e.g.'Goodbye,'bring your shoes'. x
I5-17 months
{
V 21-23 ntonlhs
ca
A ( ' K \ | \ \ l . H r ( ; l : \ l l r I\
'l
h i s s t r r t h \ l t s r t t t t l c r l l t k o tht r t h c l i r s t a u l h o r a s a
d i s s c r i u t i o r rL r r r t l ctrh e g u i t l a r r c e
.l llrc scc.rrtiirurlr.r r. p:r't lirllllr'crrt .l'Maslcr.l'scioncc
(Spccchu,rd II"nri,',g)
( l c g r c c l r j ( l t l l r c l l l c t l l so l ' 1 h c A l l I r r d i a
Institutcol'spccch untl IIearing. tinir,ersii\
, , 1M' \ \ ( ) t cr r r l , t X r ,
R l , r ' i , n l . i l ,' r , s
!
I