Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Case:
A Petition for Certiorari seeking the reversal of COA Decision No. 2014-311 dated November 10,
2014, which denied the Petition for Money Claim of herein Petitioner, Mario M. Geronimo,
doing under the name and style of Kabukiran Garden against the Department of Public Works
and Highways (DPWH)
Facts:
Petitioner alleged that the DPWH, through the officials and then Secretary Florante Soriquez,
asked him to do several landscaping projects along Ayala Boulevard, Padre Burgos St., Roxas
Boulevard, Osmeña Highway and other major thoroughfares within Metro Manila in connection
with the 112th Inter Parliamentary Union (IPU) Summit in Manila.
The parties involved did not execute any written contract due to time constraint. Upon
completion, Petitioner alleged that he incurred a total amount of ₱14,245,994.20. Despite such
completion and several demands, DPWH failed to pay Petitioner compensation for the services
rendered. Hence, Petitioner filed a Petition for Money claim before the Commission.
He attached in his Petition several letters and memoranda signed by the officials of DPWH, as
well as photographs of the completed projects to support his claims. DPWH, on the other hand,
denied the liability arguing that there was no written contract between him and the
department. It further argued that Petitioner cannot claim compensation based on quantum
meruit as there was no proof that the landscaping projects have been completed in accordance
with the approved plans and specifications by the DPWH, and that the public benefited
therefrom.
The Commission ruled that the principle of quantum meruit is applicable. However, it still
denied the Petition and ruled that the Petition lacks supporting documents that would
substantiate the project accomplishment and the reasonableness of the cost thereof, pursuant
to PD No. 1445 which requires the submission of complete documents in claims against the
government funds.
Issue:
Whether the Commission erred when it denied Petitioner’s claim despite its finding that
DPWH’s liability in favor of Petitioner exists
Page 1 of 3
Ruling:
The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that the Commission erred when it denied the Petition for Money
Claim. The SC directed the Commission to determine and ascertain with dispatch, on a quantum
meruit basis, the total compensation due to Petitioner.
1
RG Cabrera Corp., Inc. v. Department of Public Works and Highways. 7977 Phil 563, 569-570 (2016)
2
Dr. Eslao v. Commission on Audit. 273 Phil 97, 107 (1991)
3
Royal Trust Construction v. Commission on Audit. G.R. No. 84202, November 23, 1988.
Page 2 of 3
/APG
March 12, 2019
Page 3 of 3