Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Shirley Paxtor
Sociology 1010
Introduction:
In recent years, school seems to be providing equal opportunities for all students
regardless of economic class or race. Most people don’t see beneath the surface where policies
and procedures would affect low income students of color. We are currently in the era of the
prison pipeline where children are conduction into being send into prison by harass punishment
of the schools and the unfair treatment of the staff. There were some questions I had after I did
some research. Why are there more students of color not getting a higher education? Why are
white students having higher test scores and are more likely to excel well in higher education
In 1954 there were five separate cases brought in by the supreme court concerning issues
of the separation in the pubic schools. Each of the cases have different issues but they all
regarded to the state sponsored the separation of race in their education system. The National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) were there to support the ones
going against the school board to persuade changes from the supreme court to give equal rights
to people of color. Also they were there with the help of education funding to handle theses
cases. The US District Court ruled in favor of the school boards. The clients went to the US
Supreme court.
Paxtor 2
Around 1952 the cases were presented in front of the supreme court. They ut all five
cases and it the “Brown Vs. Board of Education.” Marshall argued in front of the court and
explain how it goes against the fourteenth amendment “Although he raised a variety of legal
issues on appeal, the most common one was that separate school systems for blacks and whites
were inherently unequal, and thus violate the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (United states courts) ” The people on the court realized
how unequal they are to the people who is against the school board but instead of the court ruling
in favor of the browns’ cases, they asked the schools to send their plans for submitation for the
Prison pipeline:
The “school-to-prison pipeline,” a disturbing national trend wherein children are funneled
out of public schools and into the juvenile and criminal justice systems. (ASLC)
Schools are training children in lower income families the same as a prison system. In
jail they have rules that are based on authoritarian structure, dress code, negative punishment,
reinforcement, walk in lines, metal detectors, mass produced processed food, emphasis on
silence and order, random searches, assigned seating, standardization and cameras, set times
enforced for walking, breaks, and eating,etc. (ACLU) The rules are similar to the prison system.
As a child I remember that my Special Education teacher would let the students know
that if we failed the CRTs exam, the school will closed down and we would have to go elsewhere
to get an education. The CRTs used to be the standardized testing given through the public
schools around five years ago before they replace it with the STAGE test. I always remember
Paxtor 3
taking the test and I remember that I never learned any of the things on the exam because the
schools I went to were underfunded while I went to elementary and middle school. The teachers
would be under staff so most of the time I would be in the same class with my peers from
preschool.
Zero tolerance:
There was an African-American child, who would get in trouble for minor stuff like for
example if he got up to use the bathroom he would get punished while someone else
would get a warning. In a conference I went to Save the Kids event, the speaker who was
an expert on racial inequalities in the public schools would talk about how the zero
tolerance policy would send up barriers for African-American student to be ten times
more likely to be suspended or expelled than a white student. If a white student is found
with weed on them they are more likely not to get punished than a black student who did
In conclusion:
By being more educated on the inequalities of the children getting their education and
not having the same resources as a rich white student. We can start letting our representatives
know that the kids in low income family deserves equitable rights for an education. Being more
lenient on the on the GPAs for college applications for those students who have tried to do their
best but due to currentances they can't filled their requirements. The less we jude on the
underprivileged the closer we become together to fight off inequalities in our school system.
Paxtor 4
Citations:
www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/history-brown-v-board-
education-re-enactment
https://www.aclu.org/issues/juvenile-justice/school-prison-pipeline