Evolution of Use of Power in International law

“The only Justification in the use of force is to reduce the amount of force necessary to be
used”

The use of power by one nation against another is one of the oldest types of global activity. Prior
to states, even before geographic nations, inborn social affairs of people would try to affirm their
will over different people groups using violence . As time passed by, Diplomacies were created,
diplomats were conveyed, delegates conveyed settlements of harmony, understandings were
marked, fringes were characterized, yet at the same time, when all was said and done, each
nation still felt that it had an inborn right to utilize power against its neighbors in the event that it
so wished.

Since the oldest times, the international legal system has been preoccupied with one important
question: When is the use of force legal? Legal regulation of the use of force has gone through a
considerable evolution; starting with the “just war” doctrine in the ancient times, continuing with
the complete liberty to use force from the seventeenth to the twentieth century and ending with
the general prohibition of the use of force in the United Nations Charter.

This Research work examines the role of international law in preventing war and armed conflict.
It begins by looking at how the International Humanitarian law has evolved during the course of
time. It then considers some of the features of the United Nations system that were drawn from
the League of Nations experience, including enforcement, dispute resolution, rule of law,
prohibition of the use of force, and self-defense. The paper also analyses how the UN Security
Council deals with armed attacks undertaken by non-state actors, such as acts of terrorism. At
long last, it plots new difficulties to the law on the utilization of power, especially the new
potential for equipped clash following the finish of the Cold War, the issue of helpful mediation,
and cases to the authorization of worldwide network esteems.

Toward the start of the new millennium, International law faces the troublesome errand of
finding another harmony among security and equity in International relations, remembering the
peril of maltreatment by the states. Furthermore, since any war causes immense grief to the
people concerned and is subject only to the limited rules of International law, one may question
whether war is suitable means for achieving justice at all. In legal terms, this relates to the
problem of proportionality of means employed.

Key Words – Diplomacies, Dispute Resolution, United Nations, Rule of law , Mediation,
Authorization, Esteems, Justice.