Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Compression Members
Outline
1. Introduction.
2. Classification of Cross-sections
3. Types of Equilibrium
on the other hand if this same rod had been subjected to compression,
then the maximum load, which would have been carried, would be
about 0.035 kN, a very big difference.
Cont’d . . .
Failure in the first test occurs by the fracture of the member; in the
second it is due to bending out of the line of action of the load, as
indicated.
As seen above the compression capacity of the rod is almost negligible
this is due to additional stress from moment
Moment results from a number of effects, which make an apparently
axial load acts eccentrically. The causes are:
1. The fact that no member can be made perfectly straight.
2. Imperfection in manufacturing leaving some part of the member with
slightly different mechanical properties from the remainder.
3. Inability to ensure that the load actually acts along the center of area
of the cross-section.
Cont’d . . .
This Chapter will present the assessment and design of structural
members that are acted upon by pure compression forces; i.e., direct
loads with no moments acting simultaneously.
plastic moment resistance (fy times plastic modulus) with the rotation
capacity required for plastic analysis. Only cross sections falling in this
class may only be used for plastic design.
Class 2 cross sections can develop their plastic moment resistance but
Class 3 cross sections are those which can reach their “yield” moment
(fy times elastic modulus) but local buckling prevents the development
of the plastic moment resistance.
Cont’d . . .
In Class 3 sections, the stress in the extreme fibers should be limited
to the yield stress because local buckling prevents development of the
plastic moment capacity.
Cross-sections falling in this group are also known as semi-compact
sections.
Class 4 cross sections, also known as thin-walled cross-sections, are
those in which local buckling is liable to prevent the development of
the “yield” moment; i.e., premature buckling occurs before yield is
reached.
For axial compression members, Classes 1, 2 and 3 become one, and,
in the absence of overall buckling are referred to as "compact"; in this
case Class 4 is referred to as "slender".
Cont’d . . .
According to ES EN 1993_2015, the classification of sections
depends on the classification of flange and web elements.
chapters.
equilibrium.
Cont’d . . .
Now lets apply a disturbing force F at mid-height of a compression
in stable equilibrium.
applied and increased slowly, it will ultimately reach a value 𝑃𝑐𝑟 that
will cause buckling of the column. 𝑃𝑐𝑟 is called the critical buckling
load of the column.
The critical buckling load 𝑃𝑐𝑟 for columns is theoretically given by:
2 EI
Pcr
le2
Where
le is effective length of the column
E is modules of elasticity
I is moment of inertia about axis of buckling
Cont’d . . .
The critical or buckling stress is the average stress over the cross-
𝑃𝑐𝑟 𝜋 2 𝐸𝐼 𝜋2𝐸
𝜎𝑐𝑟 = = 2 = 2
𝐴 𝐴𝐿𝑒 𝜆
𝜆 is referred as the slenderness ratio of the column that measures the
column tendency for buckling.
The variation of the critical column stress versus the slenderness ratio
Figure: Typical column test data compared with Euler strut theory
Cont’d . . .
Therefore columns are distinguished as:-
Large slenderness
Affected by buckling but not due to imperfection buckling
The ultimate failure load is Euler Load and independent of yield
stress
Cont’d . . .
Medium slenderness with characteristics of:-
The design value of the compression force 𝑁𝐸𝑑 at each cross section
𝑁𝐸𝑑
shall satisfy: ≤ 1.0
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑
Cont’d . . .
The design resistance of the cross-section for uniform compression
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = for class 4 cross-section
𝛾𝑚𝑜
𝑁𝐸𝑑
follows: ≤ 1.0
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑
𝜒𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = for class 4 cross-sections
𝛾𝑚1
ҧ 𝑁𝐸𝑑
For slenderness 𝜆 ≤ 0.2 or for ≤ 0.04, the buckling effects
𝑁𝑐𝑟
𝐴𝑓𝑦 𝐿𝑐𝑟 1
𝜆ҧ = = for Class 1,2 and 3 cross-sections
𝑁𝑐𝑟 𝑖 𝜆1
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦 𝐿𝑐𝑟
𝜆ҧ =
𝐴
= for class 4 cross-sections
𝑁𝑐𝑟 𝑖 𝜆1
Cont’d . . .
𝐸 235
𝜆1 = 𝜋 = 93.9𝜀, 𝜀= (𝑓𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑁Τ𝑚𝑚2 )
𝑓𝑦 𝑓𝑦
Local buckling may become the design criterion when the proportions
capacity is limited.
𝑏ത = d for webs
1 compression
2 tension
3 plastic neutral axis
4 neglect
3.7 Buckling length of compression members.
It is a length used to account for the shape of the deflection curve
determined from different method which are given in the next slides.
Cont’d . . .
Method I: The following general recommendation can be used if
support condition can be represented in the figure.
Cont’d . . .
Method II: In these method the effective buckling length manly
depends up on the stiffness of the member that joins at the joint which
intern depends up on the joint distribution factor 𝜂.
Kcolumns
Kcolumns Kbeams
See the frame shown NS, how to find the joint distribution factor .
𝐾𝑐 +𝐾1 𝐾𝑐 +𝐾2
𝜂1 = and 𝜂2 =
𝐾𝑐 +𝐾1 +𝐾11 +𝐾12 𝐾𝑐 +𝐾2 +𝐾21 +𝐾22
Cont’d . . .
Cont’d . . .
𝐾𝑐 is the column stiffness coefficient = 𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙ൗ𝐿
The values of the slenderness ratio 𝜆 shall not exceed the following:
For members resisting self weight and wind loads only 250
𝑙𝑐𝑟 2
= 0.5 + 0.14 𝜂1 + 𝜂2 + 0.055 𝜂1 + 𝜂2
𝐿
structural shapes are to act as one unit rather than as individual units),
the following conditions must be satisfied.
design.
a/ri does not exceed ¼ of the governing slenderness ratio of the built-
up member. This provision is provided to prevent component shapes
buckling from occurring between adjacent fasteners before the built-
up member buckling overall.
Cont’d . . .
According to ES EN 1993 three types of built up members are allowed.
𝑒𝑜 = 𝐿ൗ500
Figure 6.8: Lacings on four sides and buckling length 𝐿𝑐ℎ of chords
Cont’d . . .
5. Checks should be performed for chords using the design chord
forces 𝑁𝑐ℎ,𝐸𝑑 , from compression forces 𝑁𝐸𝑑 and moments 𝑀𝐸𝑑 at
mid span of the built-up member.
6. For a member with two identical chords the design force 𝑁𝑐ℎ,𝐸𝑑 ,
should be determined from:
𝑀𝐸𝑑 ℎ𝑜 𝐴𝑐ℎ
𝑁𝑐ℎ,𝐸𝑑 = 0.5𝑁𝐸𝑑 +
2𝐼𝑒𝑓𝑓
1
𝑁𝐸𝑑 𝑒𝑜 +𝑀𝐸𝑑
Where: 𝑀𝐸𝑑 = 𝑁 𝑁
1− 𝑁𝐸𝑑 − 𝑆𝐸𝑑
𝑐𝑟 𝑣
𝜋2 𝐸𝐼𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝑁𝑐𝑟 = is the effective critical force of the built-up member
𝐿2
𝑁𝐸𝑑 is the design value of the compression force to the built-up
member
Cont’d . . .
𝑀𝐸𝑑 is the design value of the maximum moment in the middle of the
built-up member considering second order effects
1
𝑀𝐸𝑑 is the design value of the maximum moment in the middle of the
built-up member without second order effects
ℎ𝑜 is the distance between the centroids of chords
𝐴𝑐ℎ is the cross-sectional area of one chord
𝐼𝑒𝑓𝑓 is the effective second moment of area of the built-up member,
see 6.4.2 and 6.4.3
𝑆𝑣 is the shear stiffness of the lacings or battened panel, see 6.4.2 and
6.4.3
Design steps for loading compression members:
1. Determine the axial load, Nsd.
NSd = 2880 kN. Both sides are pinned. Check the resistance of the
column. Steel grade S 275 is used.
Cont’d . . .
Step 1: Axial load, NSd = 2880 kN.
Step 2: Buckling length L = 4000 mm (pinned in both sides and Frame
is non-sway mode).
c/ tw ≤ 42ε ⇒ 244Τ
9.1 = 26.8 < 42 ∗ 0.92 = 38.64 𝑜𝑘
ҧ 𝜆𝑦
𝜆𝑦 = ൗ𝜆1 = 29.63Τ86.8 = 0.341
𝜆
𝜆ҧ𝑧 = 𝑦ൗ𝜆1 = 62.89Τ86.8 = 0.725
Step 6: Determine the appropriate column curves (Table 6.2 ES EN-
1993).
ℎൗ = 310ൗ
𝑏 254 = 1.22 > 1.2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑓 = 16.3 < 40
Use curve a for buckling about y-axis and curve b for buckling about z-axis.
Cont’d . . .
Step 7: Determine the value of χ.
1
but 1.
2
2 0.5
2
𝜙 = 0.5 1 + 𝛼 𝜆ҧ − 0.2 + 𝜆ҧ
10∗2003
𝐼𝑧 = 𝐼𝑧𝑤 + 2 = 44.5 ∗ 106 + 13.3 ∗ 106 = 57.8106 𝑚𝑚4
12
𝐼𝑧 57.8∗106
𝑖𝑧 = = = 62.08
𝐴 15000
4000 64.43
𝜆𝑧 = = 64.43 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜆ҧ𝑧 = = 0.742
62.08 86.8
find the buckling curve: for 𝑡𝑓 ≤ 40𝑚𝑚 use curve C about Z-axis
Solution:
Step 2: Buckling length = 3000 mm.
Step 3: The section is given.
Step 4: Determine the class of the cross-section and check for local
buckling.
Cont’d . . .
For S 355 steel grade fy = 355 N/mm2. Thus, 𝜀 = 235Τ = 0.814
355
c / tf ≤ 14ε ⇒ 72.4Τ
10.9 = 6.83 < 14 ∗ 0.814 = 11.4 𝑜𝑘
Therefore, the flange satisfies at least Class 3 requirement, but the web
is Class 4.
407.6Τ
∴ 𝜆ҧ𝑝 = 7.6
= 1.116 > 0.673
28.4∗0.814 4
Cont’d . . .
𝜆ҧ𝑝 − 0.055(3 + 𝜓) 1.16 − 0.055(3 + 1)
𝜌= = = 0.698
ҧ
2
𝜆𝑝 1.162
𝐿𝑒𝑧
Slenderness ratio about z-axis: 𝜆𝑧 = ൗ𝑖𝑧 = 3000Τ31.1 = 96.46
Cont’d . . .
Hence, the non-dimensional slenderness ratio is determined as:
ҧ 𝜆𝑦
𝜆𝑦 = ൗ𝜆1 = 16.76Τ76.43 = 0.22
𝜆
𝜆ҧ𝑧 = 𝑦ൗ𝜆1 = 96.46Τ76.43 = 1.26
2
𝜙 = 0.5 1 + 𝛼 𝜆ҧ − 0.2 + 𝜆ҧ
𝜒𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦 0.447∗5714.44∗355
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = = = 906.8𝑘𝑁
𝛾𝑚1 1.0