Sei sulla pagina 1di 7

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Knowledge applications of content and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services and Pedagogy knowledge within and effective applications of content knowledge
across curriculum within and across curriculum teaching areas
teaching areas. 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting integration
of content knowledge within and across subject
areas
3. Instructional materials developed highlighting
effective application of content knowledge
within and across subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in Efficiency
demonstration teaching highlighting integration
of content knowledge within and across subject
areas
5. Results of assessment used in demonstration
teaching highlighting mastery of lessons
learned
6. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with 1. Copy of the research proposal focused on Quality
Education colleagues in the conduct enriching knowledge of content and pedagogy
Services and application of 2. Proof of participation and/or contribution to a
research to enrich collaborative research (e.g. e-mail, actual
knowledge of content and output submitted, terms of reference, etc.) Efficiency
pedagogy. 3. Certified completed collaborative research
focused on enriching knowledge of content and
pedagogy
4. Proof of dissemination of research findings with
colleagues Timeliness
5. Proof of utilization of research findings
6. Others (Please specify and provide
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

annotations)
Basic 3. Developed and applied 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education effective teaching and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services strategies to promote using effective teaching strategies to promote
critical and creative critical and creative teaching, as well as other
thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills
higher-order thinking 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting different
skills.
teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or other HOTS
3. Instructional materials highlighting different Efficiency
teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in the
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education Environment colleagues to model and and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services and Diversity share effective techniques sharing effective techniques in the
of Learners in the management of management of classroom structure
classroom structure to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
engage learners, demonstration teaching highlighting effective
classroom management strategies that engage Efficiency
individually or in groups,
learners in activities/tasks in different physical
in meaningful exploration,
learning environments
discovery and hands-on 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing on
activities within a range of effective classroom management techniques
physical learning 4. Instructional materials used in demonstration
environments. teaching
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 5. Exhibited effective and Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education constructive behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services management skills by effective teacher management of learner behavior
applying positive and non- using the following strategies:
violent discipline to 1. Providing motivation
ensure learning-focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive feedback
3. Setting house rules/guidelines
environments.
4. Ensuring learners’ active participation
5. Allowing learners to express their Efficiency
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting one’s Quality
Education colleagues to share sharing of strategies on differentiated and
Services differentiated, developmentally appropriate opportunities to
developmentally address learners’ differences
appropriate opportunities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
to address learners’ strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities to
differences in gender,
address learners’ differences
needs, strengths,
3. Corresponding instructional materials showing
interests and differentiated and developmentally-appropriate Efficiency
experiences. opportunities to address learners’ differences
4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from
colleagues of the lessons/insights gained from
the Master Teacher's sharing)

Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality
Education and Planning effective strategies in the and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services planning and using effective strategies in implementing
management of developmentally sequenced teaching and
developmentally learning process
sequenced teaching and 2. Results of learners’ assessment during the
actual teaching
learning processes to
3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
meet curriculum Efficiency
demonstration teaching highlighting
requirements and varied developmentally sequenced teaching-learning
teaching contexts. process
4. Instructional materials showing effective
strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process
5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan Quality
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of teacher
learner feedback to plan, and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice
facilitate and enrich with proof of attendance
teaching practice. 3. Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and guided 1. colleagues and critiqued on their alignment to Quality
Education colleagues in the learning goals
Services selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in terms
development and use of of the alignment of the teaching and learning
resources to the indicated learning goals and
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

appropriate teaching and appropriateness to the target learners Efficiency


learning resources, 3. Others (Please specify and provide
including ICT, to address annotations)
specific learning goals.

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative review if the test is Quality
Education and Reporting collaboratively with designed based on its purpose (e.g. diagnostic,
Services colleagues to review the formative and summative)
design, selection, 2. Any proof of collaborative review of the
organization and use of a alignment of the test with the curriculum
range of effective 2.1. formative test attached to a lesson plan Efficiency
2.2. summative assessment with TOS
diagnostic, formative and
2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS
summative assessment
3. Others (Please specify and provide
strategies consistent with annotations)
curriculum requirements.
Timeliness
Basic 11. Interpreted 22.5% 1. Collaborative interpretation of the index of Quality
Education collaboratively monitoring mastery obtained from 1 class
Services and evaluation strategies 2. Collaborative interpretation of item analysis of
of attainment data to quarterly examinations
support learner progress 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of
and achievement. performance assessment Efficiency
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk signed Quality
Education effective communication by parents and corresponding evidence of
Services of learner needs, improvement
progress and 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

achievement to key conferences and corresponding evidence of Efficiency


stakeholders, including improvement
parents/guardians. 3. Anecdotal record communicated to and signed
by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement
4. Sample of learners' test results signed by
parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
performance task and corresponding evidence
of improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher
conference
7. Signed report cards of students at risk with
corresponding evidence of improvement
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other modalities (e.g. e-
mail, SMS, etc.) and corresponding evidence of
improvement
9. Learners’ performance record
10. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 10% 1. Served as reliever of classes in the absence of Quality
Education related works/activities teachers
Services that contribute to the 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the principal
teaching-learning 3. Represented the principal in meetings and
process. conferences
4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III
5. Assisted the school selection committee in the
evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers
6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation
7. Certificate of Training
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

8. Certificate of Speakership Efficiency


9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
11. Book or Journal Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
13. Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
15. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Potrebbero piacerti anche