Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A Consultation Document
November 2002
The Radiocommunications Agency is an Executive Agency of the Department of Trade and Industry
The Agency General Enquiry Point/Switchboard telephone number: 020 7211 0211
FOL 1014
The consultation criteria, to be reproduced in all consultation documents
that fall within the scope of the Code of Practice on written consultation,
published by the Cabinet Office in November 2000.
1. Timing of consultation should be built into the planning process for a policy (including
legislation) or service from the start, so that it has the best prospect of improving the
proposals concerned, and so that sufficient time is left for it at each stage.
2. It should be clear who is being consulted, about what questions, in what timescale and
for what purpose.
4. Documents should be made widely available, with the fullest use of electronic means
(though not to the exclusion of others), and effectively drawn to the attention of all
interested groups and individuals.
5. Sufficient time should be allowed for considered responses from all groups with an
interest. Twelve weeks should be the standard minimum period for a consultation.
6. Responses should be carefully and open-mindedly analysed, and the results made widely
available, with an account of the views expressed, and reasons for decisions finally taken.
1. Executive Summary 2
6. Licensing Issues 9
7. Summary of Questions 10
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 In the last few years a number of companies have developed systems that can
provide asset-tracking and remote metering services using Meteor Burst technology.
Proponents of these systems believe that there is a market for these services, which
is not being adequately served by existing mobile data network operators.
1.2 The need to identify spectrum for Meteor Burst services has been recognised at
European level, in a report produced by the European Conference of Postal and
Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)1. Two reports by CEPT’s European
Radiocommunications Committee (ERC) are also relevant2.
1.3 The Radiocommunications Agency (RA) recognises the need to address the issue of
licensing Meteor Burst systems, as this would have clear advantages in terms of
providing a larger market for asset-tracking products. A Europe-wide approach is
clearly the preferred way to develop new markets for radio-based systems, because
of the economies of scale a harmonised European market would offer. Therefore,
notwithstanding any decision to seek a UK solution, RA will continue to promote
the adoption of a European allocation for Meteor Burst systems.
1.4 This consultation document reviews the spectrum issues associated with providing
a UK allocation for these services in line with ERC Recommendation (00)04 (see
Appendix 1), and seeks comments on the proposal to make the 39.0 to 39.2 MHz
band available for the deployment of Meteor Burst systems in the UK. Expressions
are sought from those interested in the award of a licence for the operation of a
nationally based Meteor Burst network.
2 1
CEPT/ERC Working Group Spectrum Engineering (WG SE) report ‘Meteor Scatter Applications’, dated 13 September 1999.
2
ERC Report 93 (Compatibility with TV) and ERC Report 94 (Meteor Scatter Applications). attached below
RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION
2.1 Responses to this consultation should arrive no later than Friday, 14 March 2003.
These should be sent to RA and copied to the Department of Trade and Industry at
the following addresses:
Girish Patel
Public Wireless Networks Unit
Radiocommunications Agency
Wyndham House
189 Marsh Wall
London
E14 9SX
Or electronically to girish.patel@ra.gsi.gov.uk
Or by fax to 020 7211 0117
Gordon Tarrant
BRCII Directorate
Department of Trade and Industry
151 Buckingham Palace Road
London
SW1W 9SS
Or electronically to gordon.tarrant@dti.gsi.gov.uk
2.3 Any comments or complaints about the conduct of this consultation should be
addressed to:
Julia Fraser
Information and Publicity Manager
Radiocommunications Agency
Wyndham House
189 Marsh Wall
London
E14 9SX
Or electronically to julia.fraser@ra.gsi.gov.uk
Publication of responses
2.4 Respondents to this consultation should note that, in the interests of open
government:
3
RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION
in the public domain in printed or electronic format, together with the names and
contact details of authors. Respondents are requested to make it very clear if they
wish to keep some or all of their response confidential;
• the provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 will apply to information supplied.
4
WHAT ARE METEOR BURST SYSTEMS?
3.1 There are countless millions of dust particles in space. Every day the Earth’s
gravitational force attracts innumerable particles the size of a grain of sand. These
particles burn up in the upper layers of the atmosphere and end their existence as a
stream of hot gases.
3.2 In the burning phase, which lasts for less than a second, these small meteor trails
can reflect radio waves. Meteor Burst systems make use of this property by
transmitting short signals into space. If a meteor happens to be in the right place at
the right time, the signal is reflected towards the Earth’s surface and is received by
a remote station. Two-way communication is then set up for the duration of the
burning phase, allowing a brief exchange of messages. Since the typical height of
an ionized meteor trail is about 100 km, this mechanism will support beyond-line-
of-sight communication, typically to a distance of 1,800 km. This type of radio
technology can therefore be used to build a communication network for a number
of specific applications.
3.3 Until recently, there was no way to detect and take advantage of a usable trail before
it dissipated, so communication by way of meteor bursts was a curiosity,
occasionally used by radio amateurs but with very little practical application. The
advent of modern, low-cost digital technology and high-speed numerical processing
equipment has brought about a rapid evolution of Meteor Burst technology that is
commercially available and can provide reliable beyond-line-of-sight
communications when other media fail.
3.5 A typical Meteor Burst network consists of one or more master stations and a
number of remote stations. The master stations can communicate with remote
stations or with other master stations. Communication between remote stations must
be relayed through a master station. Once a usable trail is detected and its quality
determined, a packet of digitized data is transmitted in a high-speed burst. The
existence of a usable trail is determined by the reception of a probe signal,
transmitted by a master station to another station in the network. When a station
receives the probe signal, it transmits back an acknowledgement to the master
station, indicating that a usable trail exists and it is ready to exchange data. This
‘handshaking’ uses a considerable portion of the trail’s useful life and takes place
5
WHAT ARE METEOR BURST SYSTEMS?
each time a burst of data is transmitted - often several times during the life of a trail.
This validation process improves system reliability at the expense of data rates.
Typical transmission data rates vary from a few kilobits per second to over 100
kilobits per second, depending on the duration of the trail.
3.6 An important precondition for Meteor Burst technology is the choice of frequency. Skytel: No, the
A viable system can be developed only in the low VHF band (38 to 52 MHz), where lower limit is
there is the right combination of receiver sensitivity and reflecting capacity of the closer to 30
MHz. Sub-40
meteor trails. The frequencies most commonly used for Meteor Burst systems are MHz, per
between 38 and 60 MHz. While these are not hard limits, frequencies outside this some tests
range have limited applications. Below 38 MHz, effective communication is and papers,
has
hampered by atmospheric and galactic noise, physical antenna size and attenuation advantages
due to the D layer (an intermediate layer of the ionosphere). Above 60 MHz, a trail’s where
useful duration is limited by phase dispersion due to multipath. The propagation coverage
sought is
loss also increases proportionally (following a square law) with frequency. closer in: 500
miles or so.
SkyTel has 43
and 35 MHz
throughout the
US to use for
MBC, and for
some
supporting
terrestrial links.
6
THE CURRENT DATA MARKET
4.1 Four licensed operators currently provide mobile data services in the UK: Cognito
Ltd, Transcomm Ltd, Vodafone Ltd and Siemens Datatrak Location and Information
Systems. Tracker Networks (UK) Ltd and Quiktrak (UK) Ltd provide an automatic
vehicle location (AVL) system. Cellular GSM/TETRA and Public Access Mobile
Radio (PAMR) also provide data functionality in their service provision, but data
transmissions currently account for only a small percentage of the total traffic (voice
and data) capacity. The four data networks cover approximately 90% of the UK,
with approximately 200 base stations in each network. Since services were launched
in 1993, the overall public mobile data market has grown to approximately 65,000
subscribers.
4.2 As well as providing an efficient, low-cost solution for both private vehicle and fleet
operations, mobile data systems also lend themselves to such applications as home
security, telemetry/telecommand, industrial plant and equipment.
7
SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF METEOR BURST SYSTEMS
5.1 The need to identify spectrum for Meteor Burst systems has been recognised at
European level, in a report produced for the CEPT/ERC Working Group Spectrum
Engineering (WG SE).
Question 1: Do you agree that the 39.0 to 39.2 MHz band should be made available
for the deployment of Meteor Burst systems in the UK?
5.3 A maximum of seven channels of 25 kHz bandwidth can be identified within the
harmonised frequency band for Meteor Burst applications.
Frequency
39.0 MHz 39.2 MHz
Channels
A B C D E F G
5.4 ERC Report 94 recommends using two 25 kHz channels for a Meteor Burst
communication system. If a single frequency channel is used for the entire network
communication, the master stations are very likely to interfere and disturb the
communication with the remote stations. By identifying a single transmitter
frequency channel and a single receiver frequency channel for the master stations,
the interference between two master stations can be omitted and the Meteor Burst
communication link can be used more efficiently. The two channels are used by the
remote stations in reverse order.
8
LICENSING ISSUES
6. LICENSING ISSUES
6.1 Expressions are sought from those interested in the award of a licence for the
operation of a nationally based Meteor Burst network within the UK.
6.2 This network will require licences under both the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949 and
the Telecommunications Act 1984. Depending on the results of this consultation,
RA will be in a position to consider a Wireless Telegraphy Act (WT Act) licence
award process. However, before a WT Act licence can be awarded, RA will need to
obtain clearance from CEPT to use two 25 kHz channels in this fashion.
Question 2: Are you interested in the award of a licence for the operation of a
nationally based Meteor Burst network?
9
SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS
7. SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS
Question 1: Do you agree that the 39.0 to 39.2 MHz band should be made available
for the deployment of Meteor Burst systems in the UK?
Question 2: Are you interested in the award of a licence for the operation of a
nationally based Meteor Burst network?
10
APPENDIX 1
INTRODUCTION
Meteor Burst or scatter refers to a unique means of long distance communication, ranging
from 500 up to 1500 kilometres, via reflections by ionised gas trails in the upper
atmosphere. These gas trails are generated by the burn up of small meteors impacting on
the earth’s atmosphere. The typical meteor trail is only available for a few hundreds of
milliseconds. Due to this nature communication is only possible in short intervals. The
delay between the appearance of two consecutive trails ranges from seconds to minutes,
depending on the time of the year and the time of day. Meteor scatter communication is
feasible using frequencies between 30 and 50 MHz.
Such networks can support a variety of data communication services for road transport
and telemetry applications. Services like fleet management, two-way data
communication, tracking, alarm messaging and remote measuring can be offered.
Individual CEPT administrations were faced with the request from manufacturers and
service providers to open up spectrum for such an application. Due to the requirement for
free circulation and cross border operation of mobile equipment it became indispensable
to identify a harmonised band for Meteor Scatter Applications.
In order to introduce this type of service and category of equipment within CEPT, the
ERC decided that harmonised conditions should be developed, as far as possible.
The designation of a harmonised band will form the basis for the free circulation of
Meteor Scatter terminals within Europe and will furthermore facilitate the mutual
recognition of conformity assessment, where relevant.
11
APPENDIX 1
considering
a) that Meteor scatter applications can provide for low cost data services over long
distances and in remote areas;
b) that there is a need for a European-wide harmonised frequency band for such type of
applications;
g) that the compatibility of systems having technical conditions different to those given
in Annex 3 may be studied within CEPT which may result in inclusion of additional
technical conditions in Annex 3 to this Recommendation;
h) that in accordance with ERC Report 25 in the “major utilisation” column the band
39.0-39.2 MHz is noted for meteor scatter applications;
i) that due to the pan-European communication distances possible with meteor scatter
communications, it is not practical for frequencies to be shared between meteor scatter
systems in the same service area;
12
APPENDIX 1
recommends
1) to designate the band 39.0 – 39.2 MHz for the use of meteor scatter applications with
a channelling arrangement as given in Annex 1 to this Recommendation;
2) that the ERO shall keep a record of assignments of meteor scatter systems as given in
Annex 2 to this Recommendation and make this information publicly available e.g. on
the ERO web site;
5) that the base and auxiliary stations should be licensed by the administration on whose
territory they are located and that administrations should notify the ERO if the license
is cancelled;
6) that Meteor Scatter applications should comply with the technical conditions as given
in Annex 3 to this Recommendation;
7) that administrations should permit the free circulation and use of remote mobile
stations of systems that have been co-ordinated and licensed in accordance with
Recommends 3, 4, 5 and 6;
8) that remote mobile stations, which are permitted free circulation and use, shall not
claim protection from other systems.”
Note:
Please check the ERO web site (www.ero.dk) for the up to date position on the implementation
of this and other ERC Recommendations.
13
ANNEX 1
Annex 1
Channelling arrangement
Frequency
39.0 MHz 39.2 MHz
Channels
A B C D E F G
14
ANNEX 2
Annex 2
With regard to Recommends 2, the following list comprises the minimum data held by
ERO and made publicly available e.g. on the ERO web site:
– Country
– Operator
– License period
– Channels
– Center frequencies
– Type of stations (including ERP)
– Geographical co-ordinates of base- and auxiliary stations
– Coverage area
– Designation of emission
– Burst duration
15
ANNEX 3
Annex 3
Within CEPT the compatibility of a Meteor Scatter application at 39 MHz with TV-
broadcasting reception, cordless telephones and wireless microphones has been studied.
The results of the studies show that no harmful interference is expected to the systems that
were under investigation if the Meteor Scatter application is operated in accordance with
the technical conditions and the guidelines listed below:
16