The Family Code in defining and limiting marriage between a man and a woman is unconstitutional

because it violates Section 11 of Article 2 of our Constitution

Article 1 of the Family Code states that a “Marriage is a special contract of permanent union between a
man and a woman entered into in accordance with law……..”

Under Article 2 Section 12 of our Constitution provides that “The State values the dignity of every
human person and guarantees full respect for human rights”

Every human regardless of their gender Identity and orientation must be equally protected by our
Constitution thus marrying a person with their same sex is their inherent right as a human and as Art. 2
Section 12 ×××××…..and guarantees full respect for human rights in which the Family Code clearly
violates when they excluded and limiting the marriage between a man and a woman.

The Family Code in defining and limiting marriage between a man and a woman is unconstitutional
because it violates Section 06 of Article 2 of our Constitution

We cannot agree more that the Family code is guided by the teaching principle of the Church (Villegas
B.) wherein it clearly violates the Article 2 Section 6 of our Constitution “The separation of Church and
State are inviolable”. In the Non-establishment clause what the Government calls is neutrality in
Government matters, paragraph 4 states that “Government action must not result in excessive
entanglement with religion because this too can violate voluntarism and breed interfaith dissension”.

The Family Code in defining and limiting marriage between a man and a woman is unconstitutional
because it violates the very meaning of what law is.