Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Mollaahmadi, L., Keramat, A., Ghiasi, A. y Hashemzadeh, M. (2019). The relationship between
semen parameters in processed and unprocessed semen with intrauterine insemination
success rates. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, pp. 1-7. doi:
10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0089
Ezugwu, E., Eleje, G., Iyoke, C., Mba, S., Nnaji, H., Enechukwu, C. y Nkwo, P. (2018).
Preference for anonymity in sperm donation for artificial insemination: an experience from low-
resource settings in nigeria. Patient Preference & Adherence, pp 499-504. doi:
10.2147/PPA.S152868
Sánchez, J., Randi, F., Passaro, C., Mathew, D., Butler, S. y Lonergan, P. (2018). Effect of
human chorionic gonadotrophin administration 2 days after insemination on progesterone
concentration and pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. In Journal of
Dairy Science, 101(7):6556-6567. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14058
Kuriya, A., Agbo, C. y Dahan, M. (2018). Do pregnancy rates differ with intra-uterine
insemination when different combinations of semen analysis parameters are abnormal. Journal
of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, pp. 57-64. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0082
Niles, A., Fricke, H., Carvalho, P., Wiltbank, M., Hernandez, L. y Fricke, P. (2018). Effect of
treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin 7 days after artificial insemination or at the time of
embryo transfer on reproductive outcomes in nulliparous Holstein heifers. In Journal of Dairy
Science. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15588
Huang, D., Song, S. y Liao, A. (2016). Short-term safety evaluation of the offspring conceived
by 7272 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoon. Andrologia, pp. 817-823. Doi:
10.1111/and.12517
Persaud, S., Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Slutsky, J., Kramer, W., Steele, M., y Golombok, S.
(2017). Adolescents Conceived through Donor Insemination in Mother-Headed Families: A
Qualitative Study of Motivations and Experiences of Contacting and Meeting Same-donor
Offspring. Children & Society, pp.13-22. doi: 10.1111/chso.12158