Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Nisha
Sunjay Sharma
Literary Criticism
Writing Workshop #5
23 August 2019
Citations from the primary text: Preface to Lyrical Ballads (1800 and 1802) by William
Wordsworth.
“Humble and rustic life was generally chosen, because, in that condition, the essential
passions of the heart find a better soil in which they can attain their maturity, are less under
restraint, and speak a plainer and more emphatic language; because in that condition of life our
elementary feelings coexist in a state of greater simplicity, and, consequently, may be more
accurately contemplated, and more forcibly communicated; because the manners of rural life
germinate from those elementary feelings, and, from the necessary character of rural
occupations, are more easily comprehended, and are more durable; and, lastly, because in that
condition the passions of men are incorporated with the beautiful and permanent forms of
nature.”
Wordsworth denounces the use of artificial poetic diction. He has focused on the original
form of language in the poetry i.e. original poetic diction which focuses on the rustic and simple
state of life. He favors original diction because it ultimately gets ridden into the men’s language
[Type text]
Nisha2
and do not require any further decoration. Neoclassicist treated poetry as 1a sacred and
empathetic form of art. They stressed so much over the poetic diction that language of poetry
became “gaudy and inane”. Uneducated had no access over literature thus the literature was
limited. Ordinary language has no space to acquire. Ultimately the literature of the age became
artificial, stilted, rational and losing all inspiration and ienthusiasm. Here he has giver the reason
“They who have been accustomed to the gaudiness and inane phraseology of many
modern writers, if they persist in reading this book to its conclusion, will, no doubt, frequently
have to struggle with feelings of strangeness and awkwardness: they will look round for poetry,
and will be induced to inquire by what species of courtesy these attempts can be permitted to
As there was decorum of poetry being followed, Wordsworth has shown concerned over the
awkward and strange feeling which could be felt by contemporaries because of his new work in
“The Reader will find that personifications of abstract ideas rarely occur in these
volumes; and are utterly rejected, as an ordinary device to elevate the style, and raise it above
prose. My purpose was to imitate, and, as far as possible, to adopt the very language of men; and
assuredly such personifications do not make any natural or regular part of that language.”
[Type text]
Nisha3
Wordsworth here criticizes the extravagant use of abstract personification in the poetries to
generate a fake excitement which was one of the qualities of neoclassical poetries. The use of
absurd personifications made verses prior to prose. Wordsworth felt that “there is no difference
in the language of poetry and prose” Wordsworth’s personification would be of the common life
and a part of regular language so they would have more reach to the common people’s
understanding and would not be fake or articulated with the heavy use of language.
“poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings: it takes its origin from
By saying this in preface he has completely denounced the artifice and emotionless work of
poetry of 18th century .There was no space for the feeling and emotion in the neoclassical
poetries. In 18th century poetry was divided into various kinds such as epic poetry, elegy, satire
and these poetries had their own different dictions. In that era poetries were basically served to
other thus writing poetry was a communal act so the poet was not free to choose an independent
mode of writing. Poet needed to learn before he writes. He could not offend rules and
“I cannot be insensible of the present outcry against the triviality and meanness both of
thought and language, which some of my contemporaries have occasionally introduced into their
metrical composition; and I acknowledge that this defect where it exists, is more dishonorable to
[Type text]
Nisha4
“The language too of these men is adopted... being less under the action of social vanity they
convey their feeling and notion in simple and unelaborated expression. Accordingly such
language arising out of repeated experience and regular feeling is a more permanent and a far
more philosophical language than that which is frequently substituted for it by poets”
“A very small part of the pleasure given by poetry depends upon the metre, and that it is
injudicious to write in metre unless it is accompanied with the other artificial distinction of style
‘superadded’. Thus he has given expression to his feelings and emotions and
metre is indispensable when the poet is trying to pen down some pathetic and painful situation.
Wordsworth considered metre’s importance for pleasure not for poetry. “metre is hence enable
“There will also be found in these volumes little of what is usually called poetic diction”
He has taken pain to avoid it but has employed a little of poetic diction. This is what he claims in
his preface to lyrical ballade. It seems he is basically concerned about the language and the
subject matter of the poetry. So far few critics have claimed that Wordsworth too followed the
[Type text]
Nisha5
“Pope by the power of verse alone, has contrived to render the plainest common sense
“The truth is an important one; the fact is a valuable illustration of it. And I have the
satisfaction of knowing that it has been communicated to many hundreds of people who
would never heard of it, had it not been narrated as a ballad, and in a more impressive
“My language may frequently have suffered from arbitrary connections of feelings and
“Not from metre, not from language, not from the order of the words; but the matter
expressed in Dr. Johnson’s stanza is contemptible... Dr. Johnson’s stanza would be a fair
parallelism is not to say this is a bad kind of poetry, or this is not poetry, but this wants
“How common is it to hear a person say, I myself do not object to this style of composition, or
this or that expression, but, to such and such classes of people it will appear mean or ludicrous!”
[Type text]