Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
APPRAISALS WITH
(FAIR 2009)
MANUAL
P A 2009 /02-04-09 1
CONTENTS
P A 2009 /02-04-09 2
Summary of the FAIR System
The FAIR system is designed to establish a clear linkage between ratings and
rewards and also serve as a tool for identifying developmental needs of an employee
in his /her current role. It facilitates a meaningful dialogue between the superior and
the subordinate. This system covers all the employees from Supervisory to Tier 4.
The system facilitates the objective setting process through Performance Planning
Workshops (PPW). Each OD / OC / SBU is required to conduct a Performance
Planning Workshop, following the finalization of its annual budget, during which
Business Objectives for the year are to be cascaded. Please refer Annexure B for
PPW guidelines. Thereafter the immediate Superior (IS) and appraisee together
decide on the individual objectives of the appraisee. The key result areas derived
through cascading at the workshop form the basis for individual appraisee’s
objectives. It is recommended that a minimum of three objectives be set and total
number of objectives set do not exceed five. Developmental objectives under the
PODP process are also set simultaneously.
At the end of six months of the appraisal period, the IS holds a performance
feedback and development discussion meeting with the appraisee. This six-monthly
review will help in determining the progress against set objectives and if need be,
initiate remedial action to help achieve the objective by the year-end. Above all it will
facilitate the process of providing developmental feedback to the appraisee. Please
refer Annexure D for aspects of feedback.
At the end of the appraisal period, the IS evaluates the appraisee’s performance. The
IS assigns a 1-8 rating to the appraisee relative to others in the same Tier / Band
keeping in mind role related attributes i.e., speed, volume and quality of work and
internal customer orientation besides achievements against set objectives. The IS is
expected to view the performance of an individual relative not only to those
reporting to her / him but relative to the high level of performance across the OD /
OC. The IS then gives the form to Next Superior (NS) for his/her comments. NS
gives his/her comments and routes the form to Department Head (DH) who forwards
the same with his comments to the Macro View Group. Finally, the Macro View Group
(MVG) reviews the rating given by the DH and moderates it to arrive at relativity
across the SBU / OC / OD as the case may be, to fall in line with the distribution
percentages mentioned in Annexure H.
The ratings finalized by MVG are communicated by HR to the DH who will inform the
IS / NS. IS then gives feedback to the appraisee and conveys the final rating
category. The mutual feedback forms the basis of increasing the level of objectives
set for the appraisee, if required, and making suitable changes to the appraisee’s
developmental plan under PODP.
The appraisee’s relative performance within the band as assigned by the MVG and
the OD/SBU Performance as derived from the applicable parameters of the OD
Performance Metrics will form the basis for computation of corpus and distribution of
annual rewards. The relative weightage to be assigned to the two factors (SBU
Performance & the Individual Performance) will be as decided by the CMC.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 3
A. Objectives of the System
B. Appraisal Period
The appraisal period is from April to March. The performance plans (objectives) are
set for this period and performance is appraised.
C. Coverage
D. Performance Theme
P A 2009 /02-04-09 4
using appropriate methodology (X-Matrix, MBO, Hoshin Kanri, Balanced Score
Card etc.)
Thereafter the IS and the appraisee together decide on the objectives of the
appraisee while ensuring that these are in line with the objectives derived at the
PPW. The Objectives set should be specific and measurable and written down in
Form 1.
PODP form also should be filled during the objective setting exercise. PODP is the
development tool for identifying development needs of the employee in his/her
current role and forms an integral part of the appraisal system. It is to be jointly
drawn up by the IS and the appraisee.
PODP encourages the IS and appraisee to plan for the appraisee’s development
through various training & non-training interventions (refer Annexure E-1 to E-4 for
the list of Competency Based Training Programmes).
In the event the appraisee and the appraiser are of the opinion that the competency
gaps can be met through non-training interventions, the same can be specified in the
PODP form. However, a concrete action plan for the same needs to be drawn up by
the appraisee and IS seeking inputs from the NS.
Total number of objectives set should be five. In exceptional cases the objectives
could be less but should not be less than three and in no case should exceed five.
Based on the importance of the objective, a Weightage should be assigned to it.
Weightage for each objective should be jointly decided by both - appraisee and IS.
After setting objectives and assigning weightages to each objective, the Performance
Plan should be routed through the NS to the OD-HR Department.
It is recommended that the annual objectives once set should not be revised or
changed. However, in certain exceptional cases e.g. when there is a change in the
job profile, objectives should be suitably reviewed and revised in consultation with
the IS and the NS / DH. In case of revision in budget, the revised objectives should
be in line with modified budget. In such a situation, a fresh copy of the objectives set
should be sent to the OD HR Department. HR Department will maintain the copies of
P A 2009 /02-04-09 5
both the forms - the form in which objectives were initially set and the other form
with the changed objectives.
At the end of six months of the appraisal period i.e. in the month of October the
employee should review her / his performance to take stock of where she / he stand
vis-à-vis objectives set.
The self-review form is to be sent to the IS. IS discusses the six months performance
with the NS and capture the comments on Form 2 and returns both forms (Form 1
and Form 2) to the appraisee. IS sends the copy of Form 2 to OD HR Department.
In case the review indicates that there is a shortfall in achievement with respect to
target in the six month period, the IS should be able to guide on how to make up for
the shortfall in the balance six months.
In April OD / OC HR Heads shall declare the composition of the various MVGs. While
doing so, personnel who are to be considered as DH, for the purpose of Performance
Appraisal, shall also be declared.
Care should be taken to ensure MVGs are constituted such that employees rated by a
particular MVG fall within the line of sight of the members of that MVG. Members of
the MVG shall be within 2 to 3 reporting levels of the employees being appraised This
would ensure that MVG members are more keenly aware of the performance of the
employees they are rating.
• For Supervisory and Executive Bands and Tier 1, MVG should be chaired by
an employee in Covenanted Grade M3-C or above (preferably SBU Head /
DH),
• For Tier 2 and Tier 3 Bands, MVG should be chaired by an employee in Tier 4
or above
• For Tier 4, MVG should be chaired by OD/OC Head
P A 2009 /02-04-09 6
Step 4: Assessment process
• At the end of the year, the appraisee records what has been his achievement
for the year against the objectives set and forwards to his IS.
• IS appraises the performance and rates on a 1-8 scale based on her / his
evaluation of the performance of the appraisee on his achievement vis-à-vis
set objectives, the volume of work undertaken, quality of output generated,
the speed with which the assignments are handled and Internal Customer
Orientation, relative to his/her peers in the Department. In the event the IS
does not have sufficient number of reports he may consider consulting the NS
before rating the appraisee. Since the NS would have visibility to the
performance of larger number of appraisees this would enable the IS to rate
her / his reports closer to the required distribution percentages.
• IS routes the Form 1 with the score and his/her comments to the NS.
Comments of IS may cover the context and the situation in which the results
have been achieved. IS comments may also include other significant
achievements of appraisee.
• NS adds his comments and routes the form upward to the Department Head.
NS’s comments should not only include his overall evaluation of the
performance and contribution of the appraisee but also remarks on the
comments of IS.
• The DH arrives at a normalized rating (on a scale of 1-8) after considering the
relative performance and contribution of the appraisee, vis-à-vis her / his
peers in the same band, across the department. The comparison should
include aspects of speed, volume, quality of work, internal customer
orientation in relation to his/her peer group. Department Head gives
comments on the basis of the normalized rating and on the inputs received
from IS and NS and sends it to OD HR Department. In case there is a
difference of 2 points or more on the 1-8 scale between the ratings given by
the Department Head and that given by the IS, then the Department Head
discusses with the IS and explains the rationale for the difference.
• The DH should ensure that all employees are relatively slotted as per the
recommended percentage limits specified in this manual.
• The MVG reviews the rating given by the Department Head and moderates it
to arrive at relativity across the OD / OC /SBU as the case may be, to fall in
line with the recommended distribution percentages. Role related attributes
such as speed, volume and quality of work are given due consideration when
the MVG pens down the ratings and the comments on the form. The
comments are necessary in case there is a large difference between their
ratings and that of the Department Head.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 7
• The form is then handed over to the OD HR Head. OD HR Head routes it back
to the IS through the reporting route. MVG discusses with the Department
Head and if need be with NS / IS where there is a large difference (of two
levels or more in rating scale of 1-8) between their rating and Department
Head’s rating. Department Head suitably conveys this to the IS.
After IS receives the Form 1, he / she should discuss the rating and category given
by the MVG with the NS /DH. The IS then gives feedback to the employee and
communicates to him his performance category.
For the purpose of feedback, all appraisees in a band who are rated on a 1-
8 scale will be clubbed into 4 categories
IS while giving feedback on these lines, may also explain the process that was
followed while evaluating. This feedback session should lead to discussions on how
to improve the ratings for the next year and ways and means to achieve the same.
Based on this feedback, the objectives set for the appraisee may be reviewed to set
a higher level of objectives and / or make suitable changes to the developmental
plan under PODP.
F. Non-Standard Variations
P A 2009 /02-04-09 8
Performance Review In Case Of New Employees and Transferees
New employees will be covered if they have completed 90 or more days of service
before 31st March. However such employees for whom PLR has been committed at
the time of recruitment will be kept out of the FAIR system for a period of one year.
The PLR committed shall be honoured in the first year.
Transferees will go through the PA exercise in the departments where they have
worked for more than 90 days. The DH with whom he/she is working at the time of
appraisal will decide the final ratings after taking into account the inputs from the
employee’s IS / NS in the previous department(s).
Where an employee has worked for more than 90 days in a department before being
transferred , he/she should write down his/her achievements in the form and obtain
IS ratings and comments. In the new Department he should set his objectives in
another PA form along with his new IS. At the end of the year both the forms i.e. for
the previous department as well as the new department should be forwarded to the
department head for evaluation.
Periodic reports (suggested in May, August and November) on the status of FAIR vis-
a-vis the schedule drawn up shall be presented to the Divisional / OC Board for their
review by OD / OC HR. Among other details percentage completion and the quality
of process may be reported. Please refer Annexure F.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 9
Annexures
P A 2009 /02-04-09 10
Annexure A
P A 2009 /02-04-09 11
Annexure B
• Highlights progress during the last year and the strategic focus areas for the
current year.
• Participants
o OC / SBU Head,
o Department Heads,
o Section Heads and
o Others as required
• Methodologies such as Balance Score Card, X matrix, Hoshin Kanri, MBO etc.
to be used for cascading during workshop
P A 2009 /02-04-09 12
Annexure C
Sample Objectives
Any person who has a subordinate reporting to him/her will be assessed on the focus
on ensuring competency development of his subordinate (as per the Performance
Oriented Development Plan). In other words, an IS will be assessed on the extent to
which he/she has aided his/her subordinate in implementing their PODP
At the end of the PODP cycle, the filled in forms are sent to the Next Superior. This is
to assist the NS in appraising the IS against the Subordinate Development objective.
Note: Strategic parameter needs to be suitably broken down into annual activities
and the annual objectives set up on this basis.
Manufacturing Objectives
• Reduce cost of Rework from 5% to 1%
• Reduce time overruns of major items from 10% to 2%
P A 2009 /02-04-09 13
o Position criticality. Implication of keeping vacant
P A 2009 /02-04-09 14
Sample Objectives/Evaluation Criteria for Service Departments:
P A 2009 /02-04-09 15
Annexure D
Aspects of Feedback
To Employee
From Employee
Midterm
Aspects of feedback
Review
1 Job content Y
2 Role clarity Y
3 Resources Y
4 Recognition Y
5 Departmental Support / Team work Y
6 Learning & Growth Opportunities Y
7 Other Facilitating / Hindering Factors Y
P A 2009 /02-04-09 16
E1 – E5: Competency-based Training Programmes
Annexure E-1
SUPERVISORY BAND
COMPETENCY DEFINITION Programs being offered
i Customer Service Proactively understands customer
(internal/external) requirements and seeks to
Orientation exceed customer expectations. Is highly quality Customer Focus
conscious. Builds beneficial customer
relationships.
ii Planning & Works in an organised and systematic manner. Resource Optimisation
Anticipates constraints. Prioritises and effectively Problem Solving & Decision Making
Execution utilizes resources and achieves end results.
iii Communication Listens, understands and interprets accurately. Communication Certificate Program
Conveys information (technical / functional) and Effective Business Communication
ideas in a clear, structured and credible manner. Skills for Effective Communication
vi Self Is confident, decisive and action-oriented.
Assumes ownership and responsibility for the job.
Empowerment Self Empowerment
Is committed, resilient and energetic and has a
clear sense of what needs to be done.
v Functional Has a good grasp of his job and related
processes. Can evaluate job related information To be conducted by respective ODs
Knowledge for its practical application
vi Interpersonal Involves others, interacts effectively and is a
committed team member. Understands others
Skills Interpersonal Skills & Personal
and is able to deal with them effectively. Shares
Effectiveness
information and ideas and seeks to resolve
conflicts.
vii Improvement Seeks, suggests and implements new ideas for
continuous improvements. Can think of innovative Fundamentals of Creativity
Orientation (out of box), multiple options.
viii Positive Attitude Is positive in his outlook towards work and the
environment in general. Enthusiastic in accepting
Lifestyle Programs
new initiatives / challenges and demonstrates a
feeling of optimism and energy.
ix Analytical Ability Is able to identify and diagnose key issues, seek
relevant information, draw accurate conclusions / Problem Solving and Decision
inferences in order to find the appropriate Making
solution.
x Adaptability Is open and adapts to different situations quickly. This competency will be better
Accepts change willingly. developed , by methods other than
class room training.
Note: CHRP T&D also offers program on Economic Environment of Business which
aims at enabling elementary multifunctional thinking / business acumen.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 17
Annexure E-2
EXECUTIVE BAND
COMPETENCY DEFINITION Programs being offered
P A 2009 /02-04-09 18
Annexure E-3
TIER 1
Note: CHRP T&D also offers programs on Economic Environment of Business &
Finance for Non-finance which aims at enabling elementary multifunctional thinking /
business acumen.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 19
Annexure E-4
TIER 2
COMPETENCY DEFINITION Programs being offered
P A 2009 /02-04-09 20
x Networking Collects, interprets and shares information
effectively. Interacts, liases and builds Corporate Etiquette
relationships with a diverse range of parties Interpersonal skills
both internal and external to the organisation.
xi Influencing Makes an impact and puts his/her ideas and
views across clearly. Establishes credibility,
Behavioral Skills for Negotiation
gains acceptance and converts resistance to
acceptance.
xii Entrepreneurship Identifies business opportunities. Considers
Share Holder Value Creation
various options in terms of developing
Corporate Entrepreneurship
business, supported by data, analysis of
Economic Environment of Business
resources required, detailed plans, time-lines
Finance Management
and critical performance parameters. Pursues
Strategy & implementation of
the opportunity with passion and
Strategy
determination.
xii Empowering Creates an environment where people have
the confidence to assume responsibility and
Employees ownership of the job. Supports ongoing
Basic Counseling Skills
feedback and development and helps
employees to realise their full potential
through appropriate interventions.
xiii Drive Is committed to the job and works hard for
the long term good of the organization. To be developed by methods other
Takes on responsibility and accepts than classroom training
challenges
P A 2009 /02-04-09 21
Annexure E-5
TIER 3
P A 2009 /02-04-09 22
vi Influencing Is able to impact upon, gain the acceptance
of, and effect behaviour changes in
individuals, groups and large audiences either
-
through directly presentational skills or
liaising, negotiating, setting examples,
networking and indirect influence.
x Entrepreneurship Identifies business opportunities. Presents an
effective case for starting a new business or
turning around an existing business,
supported by data, analysis of resources Corporate Entrepreneurship
required, detailed plans, time-lines and critical
performance parameters. Pursues the
opportunity with passion and determination.
xi Organisation Initiates and supports a continuous process of
increasing the skill base and systems and
Development process improvement. Makes optimal
utilisation of various people management Management Planning & Control
Orientation
techniques for effective recruitment, reward Systems
and development. Sets goals and objectives,
monitors progress and responds rapidly when
required.
xii Drive Fully internalises the L&T philosophy of doing
business and acts as a role model and To be developed by methods other
example. Does whatever he/she believes to than classroom training
be right in spite of pressures to the contrary.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 23
Annexure F
P A 2009 /02-04-09 24
Annexure G
Essential Features
3. Normalised Curve: Band wise normalized curve based on the rating (1-8)
given by IS, DH & MVG will help in reviewing DH & MVG ratings as per the
corporate guidelines.
6. Training & Non Training Intervention: The PODP form should capture
the Strengths and Areas of Improvements. The employee should choose to
develop one or two competency either through a Training program and/ or
through Non Training intervention such as Job Rotation, research, reading,
Mentoring/Coaching etc. The Non Training Intervention should be displayed
to the IS at the time of approving objectives & PODP. IS should then assign
timelines & responsibility for enhancing the said competency.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 25
g. Report for OC Board Meeting
Optional Features
11. If the rating assigned by the Department Head is different from the rating
assigned by IS and if the difference is of 2 points or more, then the
system should allow the Department Head to record the explanation and the
same should be triggered to the IS.
P A 2009 /02-04-09 26
Annexure H
Distribution Percentage
Fair 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Rating
Tier 2
Fair 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Rating
Tier 3
Fair 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Rating
Tier 4
Fair 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Rating
P A 2009 /02-04-09 27
Annexure I
Legend
IS : Immediate Superior
NS : Next Superior
DH : Department Head
P A 2009 /02-04-09 28