Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
4. Can the usufructuary recover his expenses for useful or luxurious improvements? Is there an exception?
A: No. Exception if it can be removed without damage on the form and substance of the object
6. When the usufructuary did not conduct the survey to determine the boundaries of the land in usufruct for the 1st 10 years, is the usufruct
extinguished although the period of usufruct was set at 50 years with the provision that the usufructuary shall determine the boundaries of 7
hectares as a subject of the usufruct?
A: No.???
7. Can a usufructuary lease his rights to the property w/o the consent of the owner?
A: YES, pero maeextinguish pag nag extinguish na yung usufruct
8. Who has the right to choose the tenant of a building: the owner of the building or the usufructuary who is entitled to the rentals?
A: The usufructuary
10. X gave the naked title of her fishpond to her sister, Y, and the usufruct to her 14 nieces. When the 3 of the 14 nieces dies, who gets their
share?
A: Usufruct remains the multiple usufructuary up to the death of the last one of them
EASEMENTS
3. Mr Aquino allowed people to pass through his land connecting it to the highway . He charged a “toll fee” for vehicles but passers-by can
use it for free. Mr Bernabe owned a “Tuba” saloon across the highway. Mr. Aquino’s workers using the road to get drunk in Mr. Bernabe’s
tuba saloon. Can Mr. Aquino prevent Mr Bernabe from driving his truck through his land even if Mr Bernabe was willing to pay the toll fee?
A: No
4. There are 2 images below. Which one is a positive easement? Which one is the negative easement?
A: NOne??
7. Where do you find the basis for the easement in the picture below?
A: Title
10. How is the distance of the easement of rainwater falling between two houses determined?
A: Puruganan v. Paredes
NUISANCE
1. Select the paragraph in Art 694 that best describes the nuisance in the photograph below:
A: Public nuisance because it affects a group of people or community - hospital and school
8. Are piles of sand and gravel near a construction site considered as an attractive nuisance?
A: YES because it encourages young children to play while it is dangerous because there are heavy equipment, tools and construction
materials like nails and screws that may injure them
10. When can a person be liable for filing a court action against a nuisance?
A: when proven that the action was filed for harassment
1. MISSING
2. What MODE of acquiring ownership did Goldilocks invoke against the 3 bears? Is she correct?
A:
A: Tradicion brevi manu – one who possesses a thing by title other than ownership, continues to possess the same under a new
title, that of ownership
Tradicion constitutum possessorium – owner alienates the thing, but continues to possess the same under a different title e.g
depositary, pledgee, or tenant
A: Traditio symbolico
6. What is the share of the pirate of the treasure he found on an uninhabited island after correctly deciphering the secret code in the Treasure
Map “X Marks the Spot”?
A: 1/2
9. Can the sudden change in course of the river on the eastern boundary of your property, creating a new course in the middle of your land
be considered a mode of extinguishing ownership? Explain.
A: Avulsion. No it still belongs to the owner of the land.
10. Can the Ifugao Indigenous People claim ownership of the mountains where their rice terraces are located and maintained since time
immemorial?
A: NO? Regalian doctrine.
DONATION:
3.A. What kind of donation rewards past services? Remuneratory 1st kind
3.B. What kind of DONATION imposes a burden of the donee? Remuneratory 2nd kind
5. Mr. A read the will of his grandfather, who was undergoing dialysis, and found out that his grandfather is donating the ancestral home to
him. What should A do to make sure the donation is not invalidated?
A:
6. Can a mistress be made a beneficiary of the life insurance of a man whose legal wife is still alive and not aware of the illicit relationship?
A: Yes
9. Mr X donated 100 shares of stock to her 2 sons, A and B, in equal shares. A did not accept the donation. Can B get the other half for A?
Why or Why not?
A: No. Genato v Genato. “Since by appellants' own version, the donation intended was a joint one to both donees, one could not accept independently
of his co-donee, for there is no accretion among donees unless expressly so provided (Art. 637) or unless they be husband and wife.”