Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
12579
~ oz1,2, A Yan
C Cartes1,2, A Isla1,2, F Lagos1,2, D Castro1,2, M Mun ~ ez1,2, D Haussmann1,2,3
and J Figueroa1,2
1 Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
2 FONDAP Centre: Interdisciplinary Centre for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), O’Higgins, Concepcion, Chile
3 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Santo Tomas, Valdivia, Chile
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 3
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
random primer (500 lg mL 1), 1 lg of total diluted in fresh liquid medium until reaching an
RNA and 14.5 lL nuclease-free water. The mix- OD600 nm of 0.2. Finally, the bacteria were incu-
ture was incubated for 10 min at 60 °C and bated with and without EtBr 0.5 lg mL 1 (a
cooled in ice. Then, we added 1 lL of reverse concentration which does not affect viability or
transcriptase, 4 lL of 59 enzyme buffer and cell function (Viveiros et al. 2008)), in darkness at
0.5 lL of RNAse inhibitor (rRNAsin, Promega). 18 °C with moderate stirring. We collected ali-
The mixture was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C quots of 1 mL at different times. Each aliquot
followed by 10 min at 70 °C and the cDNAs was centrifuged at 2500 9 g for 10 min. We
were stored at 20 °C until usage. washed each sediment twice with PBS 1X, and
these were finally resuspended in 300 lL of PBS
1X and placed on black 96-well plates for quan-
Expression analysis of P. salmonis genes by
tification (Synergy 2 microplate reader, BioTek),
qPCR
by measuring EtBr fluorescence within the bacte-
Having obtained the sequences for the genes to be ria at 485/620 excitation/emission. Afterwards, we
analysed using the described bioinformatics tools, placed the same sample in a 96-well plate to read
we designed qPCR primers for these genes, using OD600 nm in the same microplate reader.
the PerlPrimer software described in Table S1. The results were expressed using the fluorescence/
We performed the expression analysis of the genes absorbance ratio.
defined in the genomes of P. salmonis strains
using the cDNA from the samples taken at each
point of the kinetics described above as reference. Results
We used the real-time GoTaq qPCR Master Mix
In silico prediction of antibiotic resistance
kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s
genes in Chilean isolates of P. salmonis
instructions. The qPCR was performed in Strata-
gene MX3000P and MX3005 equipment. The We used the LF-89 reference strain genome (Pul-
equipment was programmed with the following gar et al. 2015) and two sequenced (but not
cycles: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, closed) genomes from field strains of P. salmonis
45 cycles at 94 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 15 s and isolated in the south of Chile. The total numbers
72 °C for 20 s. We also added one step in each of antibiotic resistance genes present in each
run to produce the dissociation curve, with 95 °C strain were classified according to their subcellu-
for 20 s, 63 °C for 10 s and 95 °C for 1 s. Fluo- lar locations, which were relatively similar among
rescence was measured at the end of each of the the three analysed strains. For example, the genes
45 cycles and during the last temperature increase, that are probably involved and encode for pro-
for the elaboration of the dissociation curve. We teins located in the cytoplasm vary between 42
used the rpoD gene from P. salmonis as the nor- and 44, whereas those located in the outer mem-
malizing gene. Each quantification was performed brane vary between 2 and 3. For their part, those
in triplicate. We calculated the baseline for each corresponding to proteins located in the inner
sample’s cycle threshold (ct) by the MxPRO pro- cell membrane fluctuate between 80 (LF-89) and
gram (Stratagene) using the LMS (least mean 85 (IBM-034). We also identified one gene for a
square) algorithm and the same program that protein located in the periplasm (LF-89 and
delivered the ct data. We performed the relative IBM-034) and three to four genes for proteins of
quantification according to the ‘DDct’ formula unknown function. Globally, we determined 133
(Pfaffl 2001), plotted the data and performed a genes for the LF-89 strain, 134 genes for the
Student’s t-test using the program Sigmaplot 11.0, IBM-009 strain and 137 genes for the IBM-034
selecting P < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and strain (Table 1). Subsequently, we classified these
P < 0.05 as significant (*). genes for each analysed strain, according to the
response they produce against the mechanisms
different antibiotics produced. This analysis was
EtBr accumulation test
performed using the ARDB tool and can be
The P. salmonis strains grew in liquid medium summarized in the following way: interfere syn-
under the same conditions as above, until reaching thesis of cell wall (49 genes for LF-89, 51 genes
the exponential phase. Subsequently, they were for IBM-009 and 54 genes for the IBM-034
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 4
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Table 1 In silico prediction of subcellular location of antibiotic Table 2 In silico prediction of antibiotic resistance genes
resistance genes
No. genes found in
Cellular Localization LF-89 IBM-009 IBM-034 Piscirickettsia salmonis
strains
Cytoplasm 44 44 42
Membrane external 2 2 3 General Action Mechanism LF-89 IBM-009 IBM-034
Extracellular 2 3 3
Membrane cytoplasmic 80 82 85 Interfere synthesis of cell wall 49 51 54
Periplasm 1 1 Inhibition of DNA gyrase 7 7 4
Unknown 4 3 3 Interfere synthesis of folic acid 2 2 2
Total 133 134 137 Interfere protein synthesis 45 47 43
The total number of genes per strain is indicated. Analysis with the tool Classification according to bacterial response against inhibition
PSORTb v3.0.2. mechanisms of various antibiotics. Analysis with ARDB tool.
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 5
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Table 4 In silico analysis of amino acidic identity of proteins putatively involved in oxytetracycline and florfenicol resistance with
other bacterial species
Amino acidic
Putative protein BLASTP Microorganism Seq. Identity Query Coverage Accession Number
The putative genes possibly involved in conferring resistance to florfenicol and tetracycline found by GenDB 2.2 software in Chilean isolate strains of
P. salmonis. The highest percentages of homology with respect to NCBI sequences are shown.
oxytetracycline, because it is present in all the genomic or pathogenicity island; however, in its
analysed strains of P. salmonis. Subsequently, genetic environment, the presence of transposases
through domain analysis (SMART), we could was observed, which could provide evidence that
determine the transmembrane domains, two for the gene is part of a transposon. Finally, we found
Tet-1 transporter, and one for Tet-C and the that the tet-2 transporter gene is not part of a
tetracycline 2 transporter (Tet-2 transporter). genomic island; however, we did observe other
Additionally, we were able to determine a con- putative resistance pumps located near this gene.
served domain of the MFS family, to which the It could be seen that genetic environment, com-
Tet proteins Tet-C, Tet-1 transporter and the prising a block of genetic homology analysed
Tet-2 transporter also belong (Bolhuis et al. 1997; through the software MAUVE, is the same in the
Schwarz et al. 2004), which corroborates that per- three analysed strains.
haps membrane proteins confer resistance. These results indicate that the three oxytetracy-
Another characteristic worth mentioning is that cline-specific resistance genes found in the gen-
the tet-1 transporter gene is found to be present in omes of these strains are oxytetracycline
a pathogenicity island, which is present in the two transporter pumps, something already seen in pre-
analysed field strains of P. salmonis and in the LF- vious work on other bacteria, where it has been
89 strain which shows evidence of how the bac- described that in Gram-negative bacteria, the pre-
terium might have acquired this resistance gene dominant resistance mechanisms to tetracyclines
(data not shown). are the drug carrier pumps (Poole 2005). In addi-
In the case of the tet-C gene (strain IBM-009), tion, this type of tetracycline resistance by trans-
it was not observed that this gene be present in a porter pumps has also been observed in other fish
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 6
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 7
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Figure 1 Oxytetracycline and florfenicol MIC in strains of Piscirickettsia salmonis. Bacteria were grown in supplemented CASO liq-
uid medium, in 96-well ELISA plates with different antibiotic concentrations, incubated for 5 days. We measured their absorbance
at 600 nm. MICs for oxytetracycline are shown at the top of the figure; the LF-89 strain shows a value of 0.125 lg mL 1, while
the IBM-034 strain evinces the same value and the IBM-009 strain a markedly higher value (1 lg mL 1). Meanwhile, determining
CIM for florfenicol shows a similar situation, that is the LF-89 and IBM-034 strains show the same values as for oxytetracycline
(0.125 lg mL 1), whereas the IBM-009 strain showed a higher resistance value (4 lg mL 1).
for the gene tet-C and the results showed that the time points (Fig. 2b). The three analysed genes
strain with the highest quantity of transcripts was are present in the genomes of the three strains;
the reference strain LF-89 at the three analysed however, we also analysed genes which were not
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 8
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Figure 2 Determination of the tetracycline transporter gene transcript levels. The relative expression of three genes involved in resis-
tance to tetracycline and florfenicol was assessed by RT-qPCR. (a) The results show that for the tet-1 transporter gene, we deter-
mined that the strain with highest transcript levels is the IBM-034 strain at 2 hpt at the three analysed time points. (b) The results
show that for the tet-C gene, the IBM-009 strain was determined to be the only strain that revealed transcripts for this gene, ratify-
ing the bioinformatic genome analysis. No significant changes in the transcripts levels were determined for any of the times analysed.
(c) Meanwhile, the determination for the tet-2 transporter gene showed that the strain with highest expression is LF-89 at all three
times post-treatment. We used rpoD as the normalizing gene. We used n = 3; the bars indicate standard error. We considered
P < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and P < 0.05 as significant (*) according to Student’s t-test.
found in all genomes in the bioinformatic and IBM-034 strains, only in the IBM-009 strain,
analysis, such as the gene tet-C (Table 3). The which showed slight increases in transcripts that
results of this analysis show that indeed, no tran- were not significant with respect to the control,
scripts were evinced for this gene in the LF-89 being only 1.8 times higher at 2 hpt (Fig. 2b).
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 9
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 10
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Figure 3 Determination of bcr/cfla transporter family transcript levels. The relative expression of three genes involved in resistance
to tetracycline and florfenicol was assessed by RT-qPCR. (a) In the case of the bcr/cfla gene, the three strains show similar transcript
levels at the three analysed times, with higher expression at 2 hpt. (b) In the case of the bcr2/cfla gene, only transcripts from the field
strains and not from the reference strain LF-89 could be visualized. At all times, the IBM-034 strain had the higher levels of tran-
scripts at 2 and 6 hpt. (c) Finally, the bcr3/cfla transporter showed that the IBM-009 strain was the only one to generate transcripts,
with a peak at 4 hpt. We used rpoD as the normalizing gene. We used n = 3; the bars indicate standard error. We considered
P < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and P < 0.05 as significant (*) according to Student’s t-test.
antimicrobials, comparing them with the refer- (Walbaum). In this study, genes described as
ence strain LF-89 (ATCC VR-1361) originally potentially conferring antibiotic resistance were
isolated from coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch analysed at genomic level in field strains of
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 11
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Figure 4 EtBr accumulation assay in strains of Piscirickettsia salmonis. Three strains of P. salmonis were cultivated in the presence of
EtBr (0.5 lg mL 1). Intracellular EtBr accumulation was evaluated over time between 1 and 24 h, measuring emitted fluorescence.
The optical density (OD) was measured at 600 nm for each sample in order to normalize the fluorescence value. We used n = 3;
the bars indicate standard error. We considered P < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and P < 0.05 as significant (*) according to Stu-
dent’s statistical t-test.
P. salmonis (IBM-034 and IBM-009 isolated from developed), which implies important methodologi-
O. mikiss), as well as the strain LF-89, and we cal differences. The IBM-034 strain showed the
were able to identify six putative genes resistant to same MIC values as the type strain for both
these antibiotics. antimicrobials. Finally, the IBM-009 strain
Bioinformatic analyses of nucleotide and ami- showed more resistance to both antibiotics, with a
noacid sequences showed that the various analysed range of 0.5–2 lg mL 1 for oxytetracycline and
genes showed high nucleotidic conservation 2–8 lg mL 1 for florfenicol. The data obtained
between strains. However, through the multiple for the IBM-009 strain indicate that this strain
alignment of amino acid sequences, the presence has a greater range of florfenicol resistance than
of SNPs in the genes in question was determined for oxytetracycline, data comparable with Yan ~ez
(data not shown). The in silico analyses of these et al. (2014), who observed that other field iso-
genomes indicate that these genes are present in lates of P. salmonis were also largely resistant to
the three analysed strains of P. salmonis, which this antimicrobial. Similar data were obtained by
was ratified by RT-qPCR analysis, wherein we Henrıquez et al. (2016), who analysed various
observed these genes’ expressions. Chilean isolates of P. salmonis, and obtained
The MIC was determined for the type LF-89 oxytetracycline and florfenicol resistance ranges
strain, which showed values ranging from 0.08 to similar to those obtained in this study. Note that
0.25 lg mL 1 for oxytetracycline and florfenicol. in the same analysis, they also determined that
Previous studies for the type LF-89 strain made florfenicol resistance ranges were slightly higher
~ez et al. (2014) showed MIC values equiva-
by Yan than those for oxytetracycline in some field iso-
lent to those obtained in this study. Smith et al. lates of P. salmonis.
(1999) studied four strains of P. salmonis, classify- The MIC values correlate with RT-qPCR data,
ing the type LF-89 strain as susceptible, with where the IBM-009 strain expresses a larger num-
MIC ranges for oxytetracycline of 2.5 and ber of genes potentially involved in antibiotic
0.5 lg mL 1 for chloramphenicol (florfenicol resistance than that of reference strain LF- 89. It
analogue). However, that study was performed, bears mentioning that the MIC values were
growing the bacteria in CHSE-214 cells (a liquid determined using the microdilution method in
culture to grow bacteria had not yet been liquid medium (Broth microdilution method)
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 12
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory accumulated intracellular EtBr, compared with the
Standards Institute, CLSI (http://clsi.org/stan- two other studied strains. Previous studies have
dards/); however, we made some modifications to shown that this strain accumulated a significantly
the medium in terms of composition, time and greater quantity of this compound when com-
incubation temperature as described by Yan ~ez pared to another field strain of P. salmonis, and
et al. (2012), due to the fact that this pathogen the ability to expel EtBr increased if it was previ-
has not been reported to grow in the recom- ously stimulated with subinhibitory concentrations
mended medium (Mueller–Hinton). However, of florfenicol, indicating that this ability is due to
our results show that this is an appropriate med- the action of membrane carriers that are stimu-
ium to determine in vitro MIC in strains of lated in the presence of antibiotics (Sandoval et al.
P. salmonis. It has been reported that antimicro- 2016). This result supports the MIC results,
bial resistance mechanisms may be accomplished which effectively show the LF-89 strain to be
by inducing expression for multiple drug resis- more susceptible to the studied antibiotics than
tance genes (Kohanski, DePristo & Collins 2010; the 009 strain. The fact that the accumulation of
Sandoval et al. 2016). It has also been found that this compound is significantly less in the 009 and
subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics can 034 strains may be due to the fact proposed
induce expression for the genes that encode oxyte- above, as these strains possess a greater number of
tracycline carriers (Berens & Hillen 2003) and membrane carriers – possibly MDR (multidrug
florfenicol analogues such as chloramphenicol resistance) type, like the MFS family analysed in
(George & Hall 2002). Thus, we evaluated this study – giving these strains a higher capacity
expression for the putative oxytetracycline resis- to expel toxic compounds such as antibiotics or
tance gene, after performing treatments with EtBr (Viveiros et al. 2008) among others.
subinhibitory concentrations of this antimicrobial
on the bacterium. Expression for the gene tet-C
increased significantly after 2 hpt in the reference Acknowledgements
strain LF-89 and IBM-034 strain. A smaller This work was supported by the grants Innova-
increase was observed in the IBM-009 strain, Corfo 013CN IBM-259, FONDECYT 1130069
which proved to be more resistant to this antimi- and FONDAP 15110027, awarded to the Inter-
crobial; this is probably due to the fact that this disciplinary Centre for Aquaculture Research
strain, according to the in silico analyses, has a (INCAR).
greater number of resistance genes, so the intracel-
lular antibiotic concentration could remain lower
than in the other two strains. In the case of the References
florfenicol putative resistance gene bcr/Cfla, there Baker-Austin C., Wright M., Stepanauskas R. & Mcarthur J.
was a significant increase in expression at 2 hpt (2006) Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance.
with this antimicrobial in all three analysed Trends in Microbiology 14, 176–182.
strains, which descended with time. It could also Berens C. & Hillen W. (2003) Gene regulation by
tetracyclines. Constraints of resistance regulation in bacteria
be noted that the higher the antibiotic concentra-
shape TetR for application in eukaryotes. European Journal
tion, the higher the number of this gene’s tran- of Biochemistry 270, 3109–3121.
scripts detected. This increased expression of Bolhuis H., van Veen H., Poolman B., Driessen A. & Konings
resistance genes could be correlated with the resis- W. (1997) Mechanisms of multidrug transporters. FEMS
tance induction observed by Yan ~ez et al. (2014) Microbiology Reviews 21, 55–84.
for these antimicrobials. They reported that Chi- Branson E. & Diaz-Munoz D. (1991) Description of a new
lean isolates of P. salmonis increased their resis- disease condition occurring in farmed coho salmon,
tance range after previously being exposed to Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum), in South America. Journal
of Fish Diseases 14, 147–156.
subinhibitory concentrations of these antimicro-
bials. Finally, studies to evaluate whether these Bravo S. & Campos M. (1989) Coho salmon syndrome in
Chile. Fish Health Section Newsletter, American Fisheries
genes are functional in the bacterium and whether Society 17, 3.
they are relevant in conferring resistance to one or
Cannon M., Hartford S. & Davies J. (1990) A comparative
multiple antibiotics should be made. The EtBr study on the inhibitory actions of chloramphenicol,
accumulation assay determined that the LF-89 thiamphenicol and some fluorinated derivatives.
strain is significantly the strain which most Antimicrobiology Chemotherapy 26, 307–317.
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 13
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Chopra I. & Roberts M. (2001) Tetracycline antibiotics: mode replication of Piscirickettsia salmonis in rainbow trout
of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology head kidney macrophages. Fish Shellfish Immunology 25,
of bacterial resistance. Microbiology and Molecular Biology 477–484.
Reviews 65, 232–260. Mikalsen J., Skjaervik O., Wiik-Nielsen J., Wasmuth M. &
Courvalin P. & Trieu-Cuot P. (2001) Minimizing potential Colquhoun D. (2008) Agar culture of Piscirickettsia salmonis,
resistance: the molecular view. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33 a serious pathogen of farmed salmonid and marine fish.
(Suppl. 3), S138–S146. FEMS Microbiology Letters 278, 43–47.
Cvitanich J., Garate N. & Smith E. (1991) The isolation of a Miller R., Walker R., Carson J., Coles M., Coyne R.,
rickettsia-like organism causing disease and mortality in Dalsgaard I., Gieseker C., Hsu H., Mathers J.,
Chilean salmonids and its confirmation by Koch’s postulate. Papapetropoulou M., Petty B., Teitzel C. & Reimschuessel
Journal of Fish Diseases 14, 121–145. R. (2005) Standardization of a broth microdilution
Fryer J. (2002) Clarification of the systematics of Piscirickettsia susceptibility testing method to determine minimum
salmonis. Fish Health Section Newsletter, American Fisheries inhibitory concentrations of aquatic bacteria. Diseases of
Society 30, 23. Aquatic Organisms 64, 211–222.
Fryer J., Lannan C., Giovannoni S. & Wood N. (1992) Pfaffl M. (2001) A new mathematical model for relative
Piscirickettsia salmonis gen., sp. nov., the causative agent of a quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research
epizootic disease in the Salmonid Fishes. International Journal 29, e45.
of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 42, 120–126. Poole K. (2005) Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance.
Furushita M., Shiba T. & Maeda T. (2003) Similarity of Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 56, 20–51.
tetracycline resistance genes isolated from fish farm bacteria Pulgar R., Travisany D., Zu~niga A., Maass A. & Cambiazo V.
to those from clinical isolates. Applied and Environmental (2015) Complete genome sequence of Piscirickettsia
Microbiology 69, 5336–5342. salmonis LF-89 (ATCC VR-1361) a major pathogen
George A. & Hall R. (2002) Efflux of chloramphenicol by the of farmed salmonid fish. Journal of Biotechnology 212,
CmlA1 protein. FEMS Microbiology Letters 209, 209–213. 30–31.
Goldman R., Hasan T., Hall C., Strycharz W. & Cooperman Rojas M., Olivares J., Del Rıo R. & Marshall S. (2007)
B. (1983) Photoincorporation of tetracycline into Escherichia Characterization of a novel and genetically different small
coli ribosomes. Identification of the major proteins infective form of Piscirickettsia salmonis. Microbial
photolabeled by native tetracycline and tetracycline Pathogenesis 44, 370–378.
photoproducts and implications for the inhibitory action of Rojas V., Galanti N., Bols N. & Marshall S. (2009)
tetracycline on protein synthesis. Biochemistry 22, 359–368. Productive infection of Piscirickettsia salmonis in
Henrıquez P., Kaiser M., Bohle H., Bustos P. & Mancilla M. macrophages and monocyte-like cells from rainbow trout, a
(2016) Comprehensive antibiotic susceptibility profiling of possible survival strategy. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Chilean Piscirickettsia salmonis field isolates. Journal of Fish 108, 631–637.
Diseases 39, 441–448. Rozas M. & Enrıquez R. (2014) Piscirickettsiosis and
Kohanski M., DePristo M. & Collins J. (2010) Sublethal Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish: a review. Journal of Fish
antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical- Diseases 37, 163–188.
induced mutagenesis. Molecular Cell 37, 311–320. Sandoval R., Oliver C., Valdivia S., Valenzuela K., Haro R.,
Levin B. & Bergstrom C. (2000) Bacteria are different: Sanchez P., Olavarria V., Valenzuela P., Avenda~ no-Herrera
observations, interpretations, speculations, and opinions R., Romero A., Carcamo J., Figueroa J. & Ya~ nez A. (2016)
about the mechanisms of adaptive evolution in prokaryotes. Resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump acrAB is
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97, modulated by florfenicol and contributes to drug resistance
6981–6985. in the fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. FEMS
Microbiology Letters 363, doi:10.1093/femsle/fnw102.
Levy S. (2001) Antibiotic resistance: consequences of inaction.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 33(Suppl. 3), S124–S129. Schwarz S., Kehrenberg C., Doublet B. & Cloeckaert A.
(2004) Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to
Li X. & Nikaido H. (2009) Efflux-mediated drug resistance in
chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiology Reviews
bacteria: an update. Drugs 69, 1555–1623. 28, 519–542.
Mandakovic D., Glasner B., Maldonado J., Aravena P., Smith P., Pizarro P., Ojeda P., Contreras J., Oyanedel S. &
Gonzalez M., Cambiazo V. & Pulgar R. (2016) Genomic-
Larenas J. (1999) Routes of entry of Piscirickettsia salmonis
based restriction enzyme selection for specific detection of in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Diseases of Aquatic
Piscirickettsia salmonis by 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP. Frontiers Organisms 37, 165–172.
in Microbiology 9, 643. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00643.
Summers A. (2002) Generally overlooked fundamentals of
Mauel M., Ware C. & Smith P. (2008) Culture of bacterial genetics and ecology. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34
Piscirickettsia salmonis on enriched blood agar. Journal of (Suppl. 3), S85–S92.
Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 20, 213–214.
Swartz M. (2002) Human diseases caused by foodborne
McCarthy U., Bron J., Brown L., Pourahmad F., Bricknell I., pathogens of animal origin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34
Thompson K., Adams A. & Ellis A. (2008) Survival and (Suppl. 3), S111–S122.
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 14
Journal of Fish Diseases 2016 C Cartes et al. Genic antibiotic resistance in SRS
Vera T., Isla A., Cuevas A. & Figueroa J. (2012) Un nuevo Supporting Information
medio de cultivo para el patogeno Piscirickettsia salmonis.
Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria 44, 273–277. Additional Supporting Information may be found
Viveiros M., Martins A., Paixao L., Rodrigues L., Martins M., in the online version of this article:
Couto I., F€ahnrich E., Kern W. & Amaral L. (2008) Table S1. Sequence of primers used for RT-
Demonstration of intrinsic efflux activity of Escherichia coli qPCR and expected product.
K-12 AG100 by an automated ethidium bromide
Figure S1. Oxytetracycline and Florfenicol
method. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 31,
458–462. MIC for E. coli (ATCC 25922).
~ez A., Valenzuela K., Silva H., Retamales J., Romero A.,
Yan
Figure S2. Effect of methanol and ethanol on
Enriquez R., Figueroa J., Claude A., Gonzalez J., Avenda~ no- the growth of P. salmonis.
Herrera R. & Carcamo J. (2012) Broth medium for the
successful culture of the fish pathogen P. salmonis. Diseases of Received: 28 July 2016
Aquatic Organisms 97, 197–205. Revision received: 5 October 2016
~ez A., Valenzuela K., Matzner C., Olavarrıa V., Figueroa
Yan Accepted: 11 October 2016
J., Avenda~no-Herrera R. & Carcamo J. (2014) Broth
microdilution protocol for minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) determinations of the intracellular
salmonid pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis to
florfenicol and oxytetracycline. Journal of Fish Diseases 37,
505–509.
Ó 2016
John Wiley & Sons Ltd 15