Muhammad Nabil Ezra

NIM. 29118095
MBA-ITB

Risk Management
Risk is the possibility of adverse consequences of happening and risk is the uncertainty of future outcomes. The scope of risk management is to
enable all strategic, management and operational tasks of an organization throughout projects, functions, and processes to be aligned to a common
set of risk management objectives. The process involves identifying, evaluating and defining measures to control risks and enhance opportunities
to achieve its purpose and objectives. This is all done to optimize preventive actions. Therefore, Vutura must conduct a risk assessment and
implementing the risk management to improve performance and anticipate risks that can disrupt the stability of the company's business.
Furthermore, this quetionnaire is used to identifying and analyzing the risks that occur in Vutura using ISO 31000 and AHP method.

Research Objectives
Here are some of the goals to be achieved from the research
1. Identifying risks that can occur in Vutura.
2. Analyzing risks that can occur in Vutura.
3. Make risk mitigation in Vutura.
 Date :
Name :
Position :
Following are the list of criteria and subcriteria of risk in Vutura from several source. On this research, criteria occur to be risk type, while sub-criteria occur
to be risk factor. Please do following direction:
1. Give risk level alternative for likelihood (see levels in Table 1.)
2. Give risk level alternative for impact (see levels in Table 2.)
Table 1. Table 2.
Risk lever for likelihood Risk lever for Impact
Level Numeric Description Level Numeric Description
Very low probability 1 Not worth considering Very low impact 1 Not worth considering
Low probability 2 Unlikely to occur Low impact 2 Unlikely to occur
Medium probability 3 Realistic chance of occur Medium impact 3 Realistic chance of occur
High probability 4 Likely to occur High Impact 4 Likely to occur
Very high probability 5 Almost certain to occur Very high impact 5 Almost certain to occur
In the pairwise comparisons, the respondents are requested to prioritise between two alternative. By comparing factor, Its is possible to identify the extent or
ranking of the compared factors. The respondent compares two factors at once by using the relative scale shown in Table 3. Each alternative is matched one-
on-one with each of the other alternative.
Table 3.
Scale of Importance
Weighted Importance
1 Value both two elements is equally important. Two elements have the same/equally influence
3 Value one element is a bit importance to another
5 Value one element is considerabely importance to another
7 Value one element is considerabely high importance to another
9 Value one element is highly importance to another
2,4,6,8 Value in between two range close one element to another. This value is given when the value
must be compromised in between the range