Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Template
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part I
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
You will be completing this portion of the STEP document using the following
link:
STEP Standard 1, Part II
After completing the e-doc portion, submit the PDF you receive into the Learning
Management System (LMS).
Learning Goal
By the end of this unit the students will be able to count to 10 by using one-to-one
correspondence.
Measurable Objectives
Day 1: I can recognize the number of objects in a collection of 6 or fewer.
Day 2: I can show how to make 10 by using manipulatives.
Day 3: I can identify the number of objects as the last number said when counting to ten.
Day 4: I can create groups of 10 by using the number rack.
Day 5: I can create addition sentences by using objects.
Reference
Kindergarten Common Core Standards for Counting and Cardinality. (2019). Common Core
State Standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/K/CC/
(classplayground.com)
Pre-Assessment Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ knowledge on the topic,
collect and analyze the pre-assessment data to determine if you will need to modify the standards,
learning goal, or measurable objectives that will be addressed during instruction.
Number of Students
Partially Proficient
(70%-79%) 1
Minimally Proficient
(69% and below) 4
Based on the data above, I don’t think I need to make any changes to my learning goal or objectives. I
think I need to keep the 5 students who struggled in mind when teaching the lesson and taking the time to
work one-on-one with them.
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether the student Exceeds, Meets, Approaches, or Falls Far Below the
learning goal and measurable objectives.
For the post assessment, the students will be completing a count and color activity sheet. I am
having them complete both the five frame and ten-frame because I had students who weren’t
quite ready for the ten-frame. I want to see if they have mastered this concept by using both.
(planesandballoons.com)
*https://www.geogebra.org/m/NPDu3rCm#material/nHNjQEhG
This is the website I will use on Wednesday .
Video Recording Link: I have sent it through OneDrive. Let me know if it doesn’t work and I will
try sending it again.
Post-Test Data: Whole Class - Once you have assessed your students’ learning on the topic, collect and
analyze the post-test data to determine the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment.
Number of Students Number of Students
Pre-Test Post-Test
Highly Proficient
(90%-100%) 8 9
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 0
Partially
Proficient
1 3
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
4 2
(69% and below)
Looking back at the pre-assessment results to the post-assessment results, there were a few
students who improved. The students were able to count the number of objects and then color in
the five-frame correctly. During the pre-assessment I had students who miscounted the dots and
they showed me during the post-assessment that they understand how many objects. They still
need to work on placing in the five-frame.
We have really been hitting groups of five for a few weeks. This is something we worked on
during our math lessons and then in center time as well. I was happy to see kids move up on the
data table. They might not be proficient yet, but this tells me that they learned something over the
course of this unit. Most of the students are really starting to grasp cardinality and being able to
subitize, while others are still working on recognizing their numbers 1-5. One student I had to
help one-on-one because she couldn’t tell me the numbers. She could count to 10, but needed
help deciding which number to pick and how many boxes to color.
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup Selection
In my placement class, there is 15 total students. I have two that are on speech IEP’s. One of
these students is also on an IEP for OT. The one student understands and catches on pretty well,
she just doesn’t talk to me a whole lot. The other student really needs help. She counted to 10 for
me, but she couldn’t repeat the total. She does better one-on-one, but still needs a lot of coaching.
On her assessment, I noticed she counted the right number of boxes, but she didn’t start from the
left. I also noticed as I was working with her, she would just circle all the numbers instead of just
one.
Post-Assessment Data: Subgroup (Gender, ELL population, Gifted, students on IEPs or 504s, etc.)
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 0
Partially
Proficient
2 2
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient
3 2
(69% and below)
The subgroup I chose to analyze was my IEP students and students who receive title. The IEP’s
are for speech and OT. Title services are kids who are pulled out for extra help in reading and
math. My 4 highly proficient students are my title kids. These kids got every question right with
no mistakes in the five-frame. The two students in the partly proficient group, struggled with
filling in the five-frame. The one student filled out the right number of boxes, but he didn’t do it
from left to right. The other student missed filling the boxes in right on two of them.
The students have been working with five- and ten-frames since the beginning of the school year.
Different activities every day, but the students were catching on pretty easy, or so I thought. We
did all of this whole group, and you never know how much the student knows until you give them
an assessment. For my one little girl who fell in the minimally proficient group participated every
day during whole group and did her work. Then all of a sudden, she didn’t know any of it. This
student is on an IEP for speech and OT and she is clearly delayed, but this assessment showed me
that she may have been looking at her friends for help. She would count for me, but when it came
to counting the pictures, she didn’t know.
Post-Assessment Data: Remainder of Class
Proficient
(80%-89%) 0 0
Minimally
Proficient
0 0
(69% and below)
The kids in this group are the ones who are always up-front participating in the activities. They
answer questions and ask for help when needed. The one little girl who is in the partially
proficient group knows how to do this. She is one who always wants help and when I told her I
couldn’t help with this, she just hurried through it. Knowing that these kids are active in class and
enjoy the activities, shows me that they are engaging enough for students their age. Kids in the
subgroup have potential. We just need to work on focusing during carpet and participation.
My next step is to keep working with our numbers 1-10, but to introduce new ways to make those
groups. Maybe the five- and ten-frame just wasn’t the visual they needed. We will be working
more with the number rack so they can adjust to that more, but also introduce popsicle sticks for
tallying. Hopefully, one of these methods will click with each student. One objective would be “I
can use different materials to make groups of ten”.
2. Organization inside the classroom There is a lot of materials that we have to use
for our math lessons, and I don’t have them
3. Better planning for individual students I have students who need that one-on-one
time or a different activity. I can use teacher
pay teachers or a different website to look
for different activities that fit their skill level
better.