Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Q: If the State is liable, does it mean that you can already execute the judgment?
A: No. As held in Republic vs. Villasor, every disbursement of public funds shall be covered by a
corresponding appropriation passed by the Legislature. A judgment against the State, in a case
where it consents to be sued, simply implies that the Legislature will recognize the judgment as
final and make provisions for its satisfaction.
Garnishment
General Rule: Whether the money is deposited by way of general or special deposit, it remains as
government funds and may not be subject to garnishment.
Exception: When a law or an ordinance has been enacted appropriating a specific amount to pay
a valid government obligation, then the money can be garnished.
STATE POLICY
Q: What is the State’s policy on the family?
A: The first part of Article II, Section 12 states that “The State recognizes the sanctity of family
life and shall protect and strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution.”
It means that the State is enjoined to strengthen the family or is prohibited from adopting
measures which can impair the solidarity of the Filipino family. Calling the family a “basic”
social institution is an assertion that the family is anterior to the State and is not a creature of the
State. The categorization of the family as “autonomous” is meant to protect the family against
instrumentalization by the State.
Q: Considering the policy on the family, do you think the Congress can enact a law on
divorce?
A: Yes. The constitutional provisions on marriage do not imply that the Legislature cannot enact
a law allowing absolute divorce. While it is fundamental that marriage must be protected, it is
likewise to be acknowledged that there may be certain cases where the parties might have
undergone a marriage ceremony to bind themselves together but, subsequently, no functional
marital life would exist. Hence, there is no marriage to preserve at all. The Legislature has the
plenary power to decide what sort of situations allowing absolute divorce may be recognized
within the limits allowed by the Constitution. (Sta. Maria)
Q: What is the policy of the State with respect to war? Is it contradictory to Section 4 of
Article II which states that “The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the
people. The Government may call upon the people to defend the State and, in the
fulfillment thereof, all citizens may be required, under conditions provided by law, to
render personal, military or civil service.”?
A: Section 2 of Article II states that “The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national
policy xxx.”
No. What is renounced by the Philippines through the Constitution is aggressive war, not
defensive war, because of its membership in the United Nations (UN) whose charter renounces
war as an instrument of national policy of its member-States. As a signatory to the UN Charter,
the Philippines adheres to Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter which states: “All Members shall
refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the
Purposes of the United Nations.”
It does not renounce defensive war because the Government is duty-bound to protect the people,
as provided in Section 4 of Article II. The power to wage a defensive war is the very essence of
sovereignty.
The Philippines is also a signatory to the Kellog-Briand Pact, a treaty renouncing war as an
instrument of national policy of the signatory States.
Q: Can President Aquino write you a letter ordering you to report to the military
headquarters to render military service? Can you refuse?
A: Yes, and I cannot refuse. As held in the case of People vs. Lagman, the duty of the
Government to defend the State cannot be performed except through an army. To leave the
organization of an army to the will of the citizens would be to make this duty of the Government
excusable should there be no sufficient men who volunteer to enlist therein.
Q: Under the incorporation clause, without a law stating that the international law is
incorporated, the law is not incorporated in the land. Is this right?
A: No. Under the incorporation clause, incorporation is automatic.
Filipino women have proven their worth and heroism in various aspects of the country. They
have led battles, led the country in the executive, legislative and judiciary. They have not only
become partners in nation-building; they have become leaders as well. (Albano, Philippine
Government and Constitution)
Social justice cannot be invoked to perpetrate injustice. It cannot be invoked to trample upon the
rights of property owners, who, under the Constitution and laws, are entitled to protection. It is
not meant or intended to take away a right from one and give it to another not entitled thereto
simply because he is poor. It cannot nullify the law on obligations and contracts.
The Constitution recognizes the private sector as a catalyst in the development of the economy,
since the resources of the government are not enough to develop the economy without sacrificing
public service. The private sector through its investments employing a lot of people is a potent
force in the advancement of the State. (Albano, Philippine Government and Constitution)
Q: What is the policy of the State on women and children, especially with regard to the
unborn?
A: Section 12 provides that “The State recognizes the sanctity of family life and shall protect and
strengthen the family as a basic autonomous social institution. It shall equally protect the life of
the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. The natural and primary right and duty of
parents in the rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of the moral
character shall receive the support of the Government.”
Q: What is more important for the State, the life of the mother or the life of the unborn?
A: Both. Section 12, in clear and unequivocal terms, explicitly states that “It shall equally protect
the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception.”
But it does not mean that there is total or absolute separation. The better rule is symbiotic
relations between the Church and State. (Albano, Philippine Government and Constitution) (see
Aglipay vs. Ruiz)
Q: Does it mean that the Church is not allowed to express its opinion regarding the affairs
of the State and vice-versa?
A: No. If the Church issues a statement on public and important issues concerning the State, it is
not a violation of the separation of Church and State. It is a part of the exercise of the freedom of
expression because it is in the open market of ideas that the aims of the State of promoting a
peaceful, honest, safe, educated, humane and just society may be attained. The Church and State
are partners in promoting the common good for the people. (Albano, Philippine Government and
Constitution)
Q: What are the two (2) important aspects of the principle of separation of Church and
State?
A: (1) Non-establishment clause – “No law shall be made respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...” (Sec. 5, Art. III, 1987 Constitution)
(2) Free exercise clause – “The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and
worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed.”
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Q: What is separation?
BTX Notes in Constitutional Law 1
Brotherhood. Trust. Xcellence.
There’s no other way but the BTX Way. Page 21