Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Classification[edit]
Akkadian belongs with the other Semitic languages in the Near Eastern branch of the Afroasiatic
languages, a family native to the Middle East, Arabian Peninsula, the Horn of Africa, parts
of Anatolia, North Africa, Malta, Canary Islands and to parts of West Africa (Hausa). Akkadian and
its successor Aramaic however are only ever attested in Mesopotamia and the Near East.
Within the Near Eastern Semitic languages, Akkadian forms an East Semitic subgroup (with Eblaite).
This group distinguishes itself from the Northwest and South Semitic languages by its subject–
object–verb, while the other Semitic languages usually have either a verb–subject–object or subject–
verb–object order. This novel word order is due to the influence of the Sumerian substratum, which
has an SOV order.[citation needed]
Additionally Akkadian is the only Semitic language to use the prepositions ina and ana (locative
case, English in/on/with, and dative-locative case, for/to, respectively). Other Semitic languages
like Arabic and Aramaic have the prepositions bi/bə and li/lə (locative and dative, respectively). The
origin of the Akkadian spatial prepositions is unknown.
In contrast to most other Semitic languages, Akkadian has only one non-sibilant fricative: ḫ [x].
Akkadian lost both the glottal and pharyngeal fricatives, which are characteristic of the other Semitic
languages. Until the Old Babylonian period, the Akkadian sibilants were exclusively affricated.[3]
Old Akkadian is preserved on clay tablets dating back to c. 2500 BC. It was written using cuneiform,
a script adopted from the Sumerians using wedge-shaped symbols pressed in wet clay. As
employed by Akkadian scribes, the adapted cuneiform script could represent either
(a) Sumerian logograms (i.e., picture-based characters representing entire words), (b) Sumerian
syllables, (c) Akkadian syllables, or (d) phonetic complements. However, in Akkadian the script
practically became a fully fledged syllabic script, and the original logographic nature of cuneiform
became secondary, though logograms for frequent words such as 'god' and 'temple' continued to be
used. For this reason, the sign AN can on the one hand be a logogram for the word ilum ('god') and
on the other signify the god Anu or even the syllable -an-. Additionally, this sign was used as
a determinative for divine names.
Another peculiarity of Akkadian cuneiform is that many signs do not have a well-defined phonetic
value. Certain signs, such as AḪ, do not distinguish between the different vowel qualities. Nor is
there any coordination in the other direction; the syllable -ša-, for example, is rendered by the
sign ŠA, but also by the sign NĪĜ. Both of these are often used for the same syllable in the same
text.
Cuneiform was in many ways unsuited to Akkadian: among its flaws was its inability to represent
important phonemes in Semitic, including a glottal stop, pharyngeals, and emphatic consonants. In
addition, cuneiform was a syllabary writing system—i.e., a consonant plus vowel comprised one
writing unit—frequently inappropriate for a Semitic language made up of triconsonantal roots (i.e.,
three consonants plus any vowels).