Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Abdul Basit
US Pakistan Centre for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E)
University of Engineering & Technology (UET), Peshawar
USPCAS-E 1
Small-Signal stability
• Small-Signal Stability is the ability of a power system to
maintain synchronism when subjected to small
disturbances.
• A disturbance is considered to be small if the equations
describing the resulting response of the system may be
linearized for the purpose of analysis.
• Instability, due to the small disturbances, can be of two
forms:
– Steady increase in the rotor angle due to lack of synchronizing
torque.
– Rotor oscillations of increasing amplitude due to lack of
sufficient damping torque.
• In today’s power systems, the lack of sufficient damping
torque is usually the cause of small-signal stability
problems.
USPCAS-E 2
• The behavior of a dynamic system, such as a power system
may be described by a set of n first order differential
equations:
USPCAS-E 4
Concept of state in state space representation
USPCAS-E 6
Stability of a Dynamic System
• The stability of a linear system is independent of the input,
and the state of a stable system with zero input will always
return to the origin of the state space.
• The stability of a nonlinear system, depends on the type
and magnitude of the input and the initial state.
• In control theory, it is common practice to classify the
stability of a nonlinear system in the following categories:
Local Stability: The system is said to be locally stable about an
equilibrium point if, when subjected to small perturbation, it
remains within a small region surrounding the equilibrium
point.
Finite stability: If the state of the system remains within a
finite region R, it is said to be stable within R.
Global Stability: The system is said to be globally stable if R
includes the entire finite space.
USPCAS-E 7
Stability of Dynamic Systems – Linearization
USPCAS-E 8
Stability of Dynamic Systems – Linearization
USPCAS-E 9
Stability of Dynamic Systems – Linearization
USPCAS-E 10
Stability of Dynamic Systems – Linearization
USPCAS-E 11
Eigenvalues
USPCAS-E 12
Eigenvalues
USPCAS-E 13
Eigenvalues and stability
USPCAS-E 14
Eigenvalues and stability
USPCAS-E 15
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
USPCAS-E 17
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
USPCAS-E 18
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
USPCAS-E 19
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
USPCAS-E 20
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
USPCAS-E 21
Single-Machine Infinite Bus System
(Example 12.2, Page 732, P kundur)
Question:
1. Write the linearized state equations of the system.
2. Determine the eigenvalues, damped frequency of oscillation in
Hz, damping ratio and undamped natural frequency when Kd =
{0,−10, 10}. USPCAS-E 22
Solution – Example
USPCAS-E 23
Solution – Example
USPCAS-E 24
Solution – Example
USPCAS-E 25
Solution – Example
USPCAS-E 26
Solution – Example
USPCAS-E 27
Effects of Synchronous Machine Field Circuit
Dynamics
• In the previous slides, the classical model of the synchronous was used for the
small-signal analysis of the single machine infinite bus system.
• In the following, the level of detail is increased by considering the system
performance when the effect of field flux variations is included.
• The effect of the damper windings is neglected in this case
USPCAS-E 28
Effects of Synchronous Machine Field Circuit
Dynamics
• In order to construct the system matrix that relates the rotor
position to an appropriate reference, the author uses more
that 30 equations on pages 737-744.
• The resulting system matrix when the field flux variations are
taken into consideration can be written as
USPCAS-E 29
Effects of Synchronous Machine Field Circuit
Dynamics
USPCAS-E 31
Effects of Synchronous Machine Field Circuit
Dynamics
USPCAS-E 32
Effects of Synchronous Machine Field Circuit
Dynamics
USPCAS-E 33
Summary so far
• In the previous slides, we have analyzed a single-machine
infinite bus system when the level of detail of the
synchronous machine model has been varied.
• The results from the analysis differ slightly, all dependent
on the detail level of the synchronous machine model.
• It could be seen that the damping of the oscillations was
greater when we considered the field flux dynamics
compared to the classical model.
• When the system model was sufficiently detailed, both an
oscillating mode and a non-oscillating mode appeared.
• In order to avoid small-signal instability, all of the modes in
the system must have a positive damping (that is an
eigenvalue with a negative real part).
USPCAS-E 34
Introduction to Effects of Excitation System
USPCAS-E 35
State space model – Excitation System
• The procedure for the formulation of the state space model is given
on pages 758-761 (P Kundur).
• The resulting state space model, including the excitation system has
the following form:
USPCAS-E 37
Effect of AVR on Synchronizing and Damping
Torque Components
• For low external reactance and low generator output the effect of
the AVR is to introduce a negative synchronizing torque component
and a positive damping torque component.
• The reduction of the synchronizing torque component in such cases
is usually of no concern since the total synchronizing torque is so
high that the reduction has a little effect.
• On the other hand, for high values of external reactance and a high
generator output the AVR introduces a positive synchronizing torque
component and a negative damping torque component.
• In such cases, the AVR has negative effect on the small-signal
stability of the system and could eventually lead to oscillatory
instability.
• An effective way to meet this conflicting performance of the exciter
is to provide a power system stabilizer
USPCAS-E (PSS) in the system 38
Power System Stabilizer (PSS)
USPCAS-E 39
Block Diagram – Power System Stabilizer
USPCAS-E 40
State Space Description – PSS
USPCAS-E 41
Example – effect of PSS
USPCAS-E 42
Example – effect of PSS
USPCAS-E 43
Small Signal Stability Problems – Local, Global
USPCAS-E 44
Local Problems
• Local problem involve a small part of the system. The local
problems may characterized as:
– Local plant oscillations where a single generator oscillates
against the rest of the power system (similar to the oscillations
in single machine infinite bus system).
– Inter-machine or interplant oscillations are associated with
oscillations between few generators, that are located close to
each other.
– Control modes are associated with controls of equipment
such as generator excitation systems, HVDC converters and
static var compensators. The problem associated with control
modes are due to inadequate tuning of the control systems.
• Usually, the local plant oscillations and the inter-machine
oscillations have a frequencies in the range of 0.7Hz to
2.0Hz USPCAS-E 45
Global Problems
• Global Small-Signal stability problems are caused by the
interaction among a large groups of generators and have a
widespread effect.
• The global problem involve oscillations of large group of
generators in one area against a group of generators in
another area. Such oscillation are referred to at Inter area
mode oscillations.
• Large power systems have usually two distinct forms of
inter area oscillations:
a) A very low frequency mode (0.1 − 0.3Hz) where all generators
in the system are involved. The system is practically split into
two parts, were generators in one part swing against the
generators in the other part.
b) Higher frequency modes (0.4 − 0.7Hz) where subgroups of
generators oscillate against other subgroups of generators
USPCAS-E 46