Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CALIBRATION OF PIPETTE
INTRODUCTION;
The outcome of the comparison can result in no significant error being noted on the
device under test,a significant error being noted but no adjustment made,or an
adjustment made to correct the error to an acceptable level,strictly speaking ,the term
calibration means just the act of comparison ,and does not include any subsequent
adjustment. The calibration standard is normally treceable to a national standard held
by a National Metrological Institute.
One of known size or correctness made or arranged along with on particular device
and another measurement made in as similar way as possible with a second gadget.This
experiment introduces us to pipette calibration.
The density of water is a known constant, the temperature, barometer pressure and
humidity are recorded(Z-factor used in the final mass calculation)and kept within
certain limits and thus the mass of the dispensed sample provides an accurate indication
of the volume dispensed.
Pipette calibration shows the difference between expected and actual volume,which
shall be within a given tolerance.If it is outside tolerance it can produce falsch dilutions
and in the end even wrong analytical results.
A new instrument.
Therefore;
Accuracy is defined as nearness to the true value and precision is a measure of the
reproducibility of a result.
The experiment was to investigate the precision and accuracy of a pipette by making
accurate of a pipette by making accurate determinations of the mass of the water it
delivers in repeated operations.
APPARATUS;
Pipette
Thermometer
Beaker
Analytical balance
Unknown solution
Water
PROCEDURE;
Firstly the pipette and beaker were cleaned, afterwards the mass of the beaker was
obtained by weighing it with an analytical balance as accurately as possible and was
then recorded.
The pipette was carefully filled with water, the water was adjusted to the line and was
then transferred to the already weighed beaker with giving it enough time for the
residue at the tip to drop.
The container together with the water in was then weighed and the value was recorded.
And in retrospect this same procedure was used for unknown solution to get the
mass,volume etc..
PRECAUTION;
3. The balance was treated with care since its a delicate instrument.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION;
Considering the value for the masses taken, there was an error and this could be as a
result of trying to rinse and clean the weighing bottle and some traces of water might
have been left on the weighing bottle which might have increased the mass of the water
in the weighing bottle.And failure to allow the pipette enough time to drain.Though
the values may differ from the expected value but calibration helps to determine the
actual unit of a substance.
=24.892g
=25.037ml
mass
Density=
volume
24.809
0.9942=
V
V=24.954ml
For trial 2;
24.946
0.9942=
V
V=25.092ml
For trial 3;
24.922
0.9942=
V
V =25.067ml
Standard deviation=√ N 1
=√
(0.010814)
2
=0.074
calculatedvalue actualvalue
Percentage relative error=
actualvalue
25.037 10
= *100
10
=15.037%
0.074
= *1000 pt
24.892
=2.973%
REFERENCE;