Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Keywords: Microwave drying, Mode stirrer, Uniform heating, Field uniformity.
1. Introduction
Microwave heating is a promising drying technique, due to its possibilities of improving
time and efficiency when compared with convectional alternatives. However, a known
issue in the design of microwave applicators is to obtain a uniform heating pattern on the
exposed material. Non uniformities in heating produce hot spots and non-uniform drying,
which can affect the product quality. Different strategies have been proposed to produce
uniform heating; the most used are: varying the sample position on the cavity, using
several applicators, using on/off cycles, and using mode stirrers.
The proposed two-port multimode cavity is shown in Fig. 1. It is fed by two independent
microwave sources by means of two wave-guide ports. An unsymmetrical cone is used as
mode stirrer. The proposed design modifies the propagation of waves coming from both
ports and the cavity field configuration using just one sitter, similarly as the design
proposed in (Sebera, et al., 2012). The mode-stirrer rotation in the xy plane, in addition to
produce the desired variation in the field configuration, moves the hot spot generated in
the zones closest to the ports (see the hot spot closest to the port 1 in Fig. 2). The stirrer’s
unsymmetrical geometry and the ports’ diagonal layout were selected to excite a larger
number of modes in the cavity, which contributes to heating uniformity (Mehdizadeh,
2009).
Exposed
Port 2
Sample
Mode Stirrer
Multimode Cavity
(Conductive box)
Bogotá, Colombia
Top
Sample
Cavity
Front
Mode stirrer
Sample
Bottom
Sample
Cavity
Fig. 2 Power dissipation simulated for a low moisture sample (εr=10, tanδ=0.15).
The heating uniformity was assessed by calculating the histogram of the volume loss
density with a static and a rotating stirrer. The volume loss density is a measure of the
volumetric power dissipation in the sample. It was calculated using a full-wave
electromagnetic simulation for each stirrer rotation angle. Then, the sample was divided in
volumetric segments and the volume loss density of each segment was calculated. After,
4. Results
The criteria described above are calculated for the proposed multimode cavity loaded with
a low moisture sample with relative permittivity εr=10 and a loss tangent tanδ=0.15. Fig. 3
presents the reflection coefficient of both ports 1 and 2 as a function of the stirrer’s
rotation angle and for different frequencies inside the source frequency band. The figure
shows that both ports are well matched with the cavity since the reflection coefficient is
lower than -10 dB for all cases and for most of cases it is lower than -15 dB. A reflection
coefficient of -10 dB and -15 dB means, respectively, that 10% and 3.2% of the incident
power in each port is reflected to the source.
Fig. 4 shows the transmission coefficient between ports 1 and 2. Since the transmission
coefficient is lower than -16 dB, it is verified that a good decoupling between both ports is
provided by the proposed design.
XY Plot 4 M2 Opti IRIS2 Diag LowMoist XY Plot 6 M2 Opti IRIS2 Diag LowMoist
-10.00 Curve Info -10.00
Curve Info
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
Freq='2.425GHz' Setup1 : Sw eep
Freq='2.425GHz'
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
-15.00 Freq='2.435GHz' -15.00 Setup1 : Sw eep
Freq='2.435GHz'
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
Freq='2.445GHz' Setup1 : Sw eep
Freq='2.445GHz'
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
-20.00 Freq='2.455GHz' -20.00 Setup1 : Sw eep
Freq='2.455GHz'
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
Freq='2.465GHz' Setup1 : Sw eep
dB(S(2,2))
dB(S(1,1))
Freq='2.465GHz'
dB(S(1,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep dB(S(2,2))
Freq='2.475GHz' Setup1 : Sw eep
-25.00 -25.00 Freq='2.475GHz'
-30.00 -30.00
-35.00 -35.00
-40.00 -40.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
angle angle
(a) (b)
Fig. 3 Reflection coefficient of input ports (a) 1 and (b) 2 as a function of the stirrer rotation angle (in
radians) for different frequencies in the source frequency range.
dB(S(2,1))
dB(S(2,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
angle='1.7455'
dB(S(2,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
angle='2.0946'
-22.00 dB(S(2,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
angle='2.4437'
dB(S(2,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
angle='2.7928'
dB(S(2,1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
-24.00 angle='3.1416'
-26.00
2.425 2.438 2.450 2.463 2.475
Freq [GHz]
Fig. 4 Transmission coefficient between ports 1 and 2 as a function of the stirrer rotation angle for different
frequencies in the source frequency range.
Fig. 5 shows the uniformity of the volume loss density. The figure shows the top face of
the sample without and with considering the stirrer rotation. It is shown that the stirrer
movement reduces the size of areas without dissipation (in blue) and the areas of hot spots
(in brown). Following the procedure described in Section 3, the histogram of the volume
loss density without and with considering the stirrer rotation was calculated and it is
shown in Fig. 6. The figure presents three characteristics that show that the stirrer rotation
contributes in the heating uniformity: (i) there are less occurrences of points with low loss
values, corresponding to cold areas, (ii) there are less occurrences of points with high loss
values, corresponding to hot spots, and (iii) there is an increase in the histogram’s medium
region, corresponding to more points with medium dissipation than in the static case.
18
x 10 18
0.4 x 10
0.4
4.5 5
0.35
4 0.35 4.5
0.3 4
3.5 0.3
3.5
0.25 3 0.25
3
0.2 2.5
0.2
y
2.5
y
2
0.15 0.15 2
1.5
1.5
0.1 0.1
1 1
0.05 0.5 0.05
0.5
0 0 0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
(a) (b)
Fig. 5 Volume loss density at the sample’s top face for (a) a static stirrer and (b) a rotating stirrer.
300
Occurrences 250
200
150
100
50
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Normalized Volume Loss Density
Fig. 6 Histogram of the normalized volume loss density for the stirrer static at 0° position and for a rotating
stirrer.
5. Conclusions
A two-port multimode microwave applicator was described and assessed in this document.
Based in the reflection and transmission coefficients, the applicator’s power efficiency
was assessed. In addition, a procedure to assess the heating uniformity, based on
calculating the volume loss density histogram, is proposed. Results show that the proposed
design delivers most of the fed energy to the exposed sample since a good matching
between the input ports and the cavity is achieved and both ports are decoupled. Based in
the proposed approach, it was shown also that the mode stirrer contributes in the heating
uniformity.
6. References
Mehdizadeh, M. (2009). Microwave/RF Applicators and Probes for Material Heating, Sensing, and
Plasma Generation, A Design Guide. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Plaza‐Gonzalez, P., Monzo‐Cabrera, J., Catala‐Civera, J. M., & Sanchez‐Hernandez, D. (2004). New
approach for the prediction of the electric field distribution in multimode microwave‐
heating applicators with mode stirrers. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on, 40(3), 1672‐
1678.
Pozar, D. M. (2005). Microwave engineering: J. Wiley.
Sebera, V., Nasswettrová, A., & Nikl, K. (2012). Finite Element Analysis of Mode Stirrer Impact on
Electric Field Uniformity in a Microwave Applicator. Drying Technology, 30(13), 1388‐
1396.