CMDI REGISTRAR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS)

EVALUATION FORM

PART I
PERSONAL DATA
Name (Optional) : ______________________________
Occupation : Registrar
Student
IT Expert (Industry Practitioner)

PART II
EVALUATION OF SYSTEM

Direction: Check the appropriate box of each criterion based on the level of acceptability
of CMDI Registrar Management System. The scale of accessibility is stated below;
5 – Strongly Accepted 2 – Not Acceptable
4 – Accepted 1 – Strongly Not Accepted
3 – Moderately Accepted

Note: Rest Assured that your responses are kept confidential by the researchers. ‘

FUNCTIONAL SUITABILITY 1 2 3 4 5
1 Functional Completeness
The degree to which the set of functions covers all the specified
tasks and user objectives.
2 Functional Correctness
The degree to which CMDI Registrar management System
provides the correct specified tasks and objectives.
3 Functional Appropriateness
The degree to which the functions facilitate the accomplishment
of specified tasks and objectives.
PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY 1 2 3 4 5
1 Time Behavior
The degree to which the response and processing times and
throughput of CMDI Registrar management System, when
preforming its functions meet the requirements.
2 Resource Utilization
The degree to which the amounts and types of resources used
by CMDI Registrar Management System, when performing its
functions, meet the requirements.
3 Capacity
The degree to which the maximum limits of CMDI RMS
parameter meet the requirements.

USABILITY 1 2 3 4 5
1 Appropriateness Recognizability
The degree to which the users can recognize whether a product
or system is appropriate for their needs.
2 Operability
The degree to which CMDI RMS has attributes that make it easy
to operate and control.
3 Users Error Protection
The degree to which the CMDI RMS protects users against
making errors.

4 User Interface Aesthetics

The degree to which user enables pleasing and satisfying
interaction for the users.
5 Accessibility
The degree to which CMDI RMS can be used by people with the
broadest range of characteristics and capabilities to achieve a
specified goal in a specified context of use.
RELIABILITY 1 2 3 4 5
1 Maturity
The degree to which CMDI RMS meets the needs for reliability
under regular operation.
2 Availability
The degree to which the CMDI RMS is operational and
accessible when required for use.
RELIABILITY 1 2 3 4 5
3 Fault Tolerance
The degree to which CMDI RMS operates as intended despite
the presence of hardware r software faults.
4 Recoverability
The degree to which in the event of an interruption or a failure
the CMDI RMS can recover the data directly affected and re-
establish the desired state of the system.
SECURITY 1 2 3 4 5
1 Confidentiality
The degree to which CMDI RMS ensures that data are
accessible only to those authorized to have access.
2 Integrity
The degree to which CMDI RMS ensures that data are
accessible only to those authorized to have access.
3 Non-Repudiation
The degree to which the actions of an entity can be traced
uniquely to the entity.
4 Accountability
The degree to which the actions of an entity can be traced
uniquely to the entity.
5 Authenticity
The degree to which the identity of a subject or resource can be
proved to be one claimed.

Question: Can the system be improved?

YES
NO
If YES, what are the recommendations you can suggest?

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Thank you very much for your support and cooperation.