FREQUENCIES

VARIABLES=pengetahuan sikap penghargaan pengalaman sumberdaya pelatihan

kinerja
/STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE MEAN MEDIAN MODE
/ORDER= ANALYSIS .

Frequencies
[DataSet1] D:\spss dian.sav

Statistics

pengetahuan sikap penghargaan pengalaman sumberdaya pelatihan k

N Valid 83 83 83 83 83 83
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 1,43 1,07 1,52 2,36 1,73 1,18
Median 1,00 1,00 1,00 2,00 2,00 1,00
Mode 1 1 1 2 2 1
Std. Deviation ,567 ,261 ,549 ,575 ,626 ,387
Variance ,322 ,068 ,301 ,331 ,392 ,150

Frequency Table

pe nge tahuan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Perc ent Percent
Valid KURANG 50 60,2 60,2 60,2
CUKUP 30 36,1 36,1 96,4
BAIK 3 3,6 3,6 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0

sikap

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid NEGATIF 77 92,8 92,8 92,8
POSITIF 6 7,2 7,2 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0
 pe nghargaan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Perc ent Percent
Valid KURANG 42 50,6 50,6 50,6
CUKUP 39 47,0 47,0 97,6
BAIK 2 2,4 2,4 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0

pe nga lam an

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Perc ent Percent
Valid KURANG 4 4,8 4,8 4,8
CUKUP 45 54,2 54,2 59,0
BAIK 34 41,0 41,0 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0

sumbe rda ya

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Perc ent Percent
Valid KURANG 30 36,1 36,1 36,1
CUKUP 45 54,2 54,2 90,4
BAIK 8 9,6 9,6 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0

pelatihan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid TIDAK IKUT 68 81,9 81,9 81,9
IKUT 15 18,1 18,1 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0

kinerj a

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Perc ent Percent
Valid kurang 3 3,6 3,6 3,6
cukup 52 62,7 62,7 66,3
baik 28 33,7 33,7 100,0
Total 83 100,0 100,0
Bivariat

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=pengetahuan sikap penghargaan pengalaman sumberdaya pelatihan BY
kinerja
/FORMAT= AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTIC=CHISQ
/CELLS= COUNT EXPECTED ROW
/COUNT ROUND CELL .

Crosstabs
[DataSet1] D:\spss dian.sav

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
pengetahuan * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%
sikap * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%
penghargaan * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%
pengalaman * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%
sumberdaya * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%
pelatihan * kinerja 83 100,0% 0 ,0% 83 100,0%

sikap * kinerja

Crosstab

kinerja
kurang cukup baik Total
sik ap NEGATIF Count 3 47 27 77
Ex pec ted Count 2,8 48,2 26,0 77,0
% within s ikap 3,9% 61,0% 35,1% 100,0%
POSITIF Count 0 5 1 6
Ex pec ted Count ,2 3,8 2,0 6,0
% within s ikap ,0% 83,3% 16,7% 100,0%
Total Count 3 52 28 83
Ex pec ted Count 3,0 52,0 28,0 83,0
% within s ikap 3,6% 62,7% 33,7% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Te sts

As ymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1,234a 2 ,540
Lik elihood Ratio 1,531 2 ,465
Linear-by-Linear
,409 1 ,522
As soc iation
N of Valid Cases 83
a. 4 c ells (66,7%) have ex pec ted c ount les s than 5. The
minimum expected count is ,22.

penghargaan * kinerja

Crosstab

kinerja
kurang cukup baik Total
penghargaan KURANG Count 1 25 16 42
Ex pec ted Count 1,5 26,3 14,2 42,0
% within penghargaan 2,4% 59,5% 38,1% 100,0%
CUKUP Count 2 26 11 39
Ex pec ted Count 1,4 24,4 13,2 39,0
% within penghargaan 5,1% 66,7% 28,2% 100,0%
BAIK Count 0 1 1 2
Ex pec ted Count ,1 1,3 ,7 2,0
% within penghargaan ,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Total Count 3 52 28 83
Ex pec ted Count 3,0 52,0 28,0 83,0
% within penghargaan 3,6% 62,7% 33,7% 100,0%

Chi-Square Te sts

As ymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1,460a 4 ,834
Lik elihood Ratio 1,522 4 ,823
Linear-by-Linear
,538 1 ,463
As soc iation
N of Valid Cases 83
a. 5 c ells (55,6%) have ex pec ted c ount les s than 5. The
minimum expected count is ,07.

pengalaman * kinerja
 Crosstab

kinerja
kurang cukup baik Total
pengalaman KURANG Count 1 1 2 4
Ex pec ted Count ,1 2,5 1,3 4,0
% within pengalaman 25,0% 25,0% 50,0% 100,0%
CUKUP Count 1 25 19 45
Ex pec ted Count 1,6 28,2 15,2 45,0
% within pengalaman 2,2% 55,6% 42,2% 100,0%
BAIK Count 1 26 7 34
Ex pec ted Count 1,2 21,3 11,5 34,0
% within pengalaman 2,9% 76,5% 20,6% 100,0%
Total Count 3 52 28 83
Ex pec ted Count 3,0 52,0 28,0 83,0
% within pengalaman 3,6% 62,7% 33,7% 100,0%

Chi-Square Te sts

As ymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10,665 a 4 ,031
Lik elihood Ratio 8,189 4 ,085
Linear-by-Linear
2,096 1 ,148
As soc iation
N of Valid Cases 83
a. 5 c ells (55,6%) have ex pec ted c ount les s than 5. The
minimum expected count is ,14.

sumberdaya * kinerja
 Crosstab

kinerja
kurang cukup baik Total
sumberdaya KURANG Count 0 20 10 30
Expected Count 1,1 18,8 10,1 30,0
% within sumberdaya ,0% 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
CUKUP Count 2 25 18 45
Expected Count 1,6 28,2 15,2 45,0
% within sumberdaya 4,4% 55,6% 40,0% 100,0%
BAIK Count 1 7 0 8
Expected Count ,3 5,0 2,7 8,0
% within sumberdaya 12,5% 87,5% ,0% 100,0%
Total Count 3 52 28 83
Expected Count 3,0 52,0 28,0 83,0
% within sumberdaya 3,6% 62,7% 33,7% 100,0%

Chi-Square Te sts

As ymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7,369a 4 ,118
Lik elihood Ratio 10,354 4 ,035
Linear-by-Linear
2,077 1 ,149
As soc iation
N of Valid Cases 83
a. 4 c ells (44,4%) have ex pec ted c ount les s than 5. The
minimum expected count is ,29.

pelatihan * kinerja

Crosstab

kinerja
kurang cukup baik Total
pelatihan TIDAK IKUT Count 3 42 23 68
Ex pec ted Count 2,5 42,6 22,9 68,0
% within pelat ihan 4,4% 61,8% 33,8% 100,0%
IKUT Count 0 10 5 15
Ex pec ted Count ,5 9,4 5,1 15,0
% within pelat ihan ,0% 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
Total Count 3 52 28 83
Ex pec ted Count 3,0 52,0 28,0 83,0
% within pelat ihan 3,6% 62,7% 33,7% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Te sts

As ymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,710a 2 ,701
Lik elihood Ratio 1,243 2 ,537
Linear-by-Linear
,066 1 ,797
As soc iation
N of Valid Cases 83
a. 2 c ells (33,3%) have ex pec ted c ount les s than 5. The
minimum expected count is ,54.

Multivariat

Regression
[DataSet1] D:\spss dian.sav

Variables Entered/Removedb

Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 pelatihan,
pengetahu
an,
pengalam
an, sikap, . Enter
sumberda
ya,
pengharga
a
an
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: kinerja

Model Summary

Adjusted Std. Error of

Model R R Square R Square the Estimate
1 ,396a ,157 ,090 ,510
a. Predictors: (Constant), pelatihan, pengetahuan,
pengalaman, s ikap, sumberdaya, penghargaan
 ANOVAb

Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regres sion 3,680 6 ,613 2,355 ,039a
Residual 19,790 76 ,260
Total 23,470 82
a. Predictors: (Constant), pelatihan, pengetahuan, pengalaman, sikap, sumberdaya,
penghargaan
b. Dependent Variable: kinerja

Coeffi cientsa

Unstandardized St andardiz ed
Coeffic ient s Coeffic ient s
Model B St d. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Const ant) 3,299 ,398 8,296 ,000
pengetahuan -,283 ,104 -,300 -2, 708 ,008
sik ap -,049 ,226 -,024 -,218 ,828
penghargaan ,025 ,119 ,026 ,210 ,834
pengalaman -,179 ,110 -,192 -1, 629 ,108
sumberdaya -,160 ,097 -,188 -1, 659 ,101
pelatihan ,104 ,152 ,075 ,683 ,497
a. Dependent Variable: k inerja