Programme: UG-B.Tech.

- BME Academic Year: 2018-19

Course: STLD Year – Sem: II Year - II Sem

Faculty: Prof. Ashok Shigli Section: A

ATTAINMENT OF COURSE OUTCOMES

1. List of Course Outcomes - COs

2. Course Delivery Methods

3. List of Program Outcomes - POs

4. List of Program Specific Outcomes - PSOs

5. Program Articulation Matrix

6. Course Articulation Matrix

7. Attainment of COs

Subjective Objective Assignment Part - A Part - B

50 % 25 % 25 % 30 % 70 %

Continuous Internal Evaluation Semester End

CIE – 30 % Examinations
[(0.5 * Descriptive) + (0.25 * Quiz) + (0.25*Assignment)] SEE – 70 %
[(0.30 * Part A) + (0.70 * Part B)]

Overall Course Outcome attainment

[(0.30 * CIE) + (0.70 * SEE)]

8. Attainment of POs and PSOs through COs

Page 1 of 9
 9. Attainment of POs and PSOs through Course
1. Course Outcomes(COs):
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to,
CO 1.
CO 2.
CO 3.
CO 4.
CO 5.
CO 6.

2. Delivery Methods of Course Outcomes

COURSE OUTCOME DELIVERY METHOD

CO1 Lecture with ICT methods
CO2 Lecture with videos
CO3 Lecture with videos
CO4 Lecture with PPT
CO5 Seminars
CO6 Lecture with PPT

3. Program Outcomes( POs):

Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering

PO 1 fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex
engineering problems.
Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze
PO 2 complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering
problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs
PO 3 with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and
PO 4 research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data,
and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
PO 5 modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
PO 6 assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO 7 Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional

Page 2 of 9
 engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and
PO 8 responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member
PO 9 or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with
the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to
PO 10 comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a
PO 11 member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to
PO 12 engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological
change.

4. Program Specific Outcomes(PSOs):

PSO 1

PSO 2

PSO 3

5. Program Articulation Matrix: Correlation between Course and POs & PSOs

Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

C403
Note:
1. Enter correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 as 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3:
Substantial (High)
2. If there is no correlation, put “-”

Page 3 of 9
 6. Course Articulation Matrix: Correlation between COs and POs & PSOs

CO PROGRAM OUTCOMES (PO) PSO

Course Outcome Statement
No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 1 2 3

Note:
1. Enter correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 as 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3:
Substantial (High)
2. If there is no correlation, put “-”

Page 4 of 9
7. Attainment of Course Outcomes
1. Measuring CO attainment through Cumulative Internal Examinations (CIE)
a. Descriptive Marks (50%)
b. Quiz Marks (25%)
c. Assignment Marks (25%)

2. Measuring CO attainment through Semester End Examinations (SEE)

a. Semester End Exam [SEE] Marks Part A (30%)
b. Semester End Exam [SEE] Marks Part B (70%)

Rubric for the CO attainment through CIE:

[(0.5 x Descriptive) + (0.25 x Quiz) + (0.25 x Assignment)]

Rubric for the CO attainment through SEE:

[(0.30 x Part A) + (0.70 x Part B)]

Overall Rubric for the CO Attainment:

[(0.30 x CIE) + (0.70 x SEE)]

7.1 Cumulative Internal Examinations (CIE):

a) Descriptive (% of students who got >= Benchmark) :

Course CO PO(s) Subjective – I Subjective – II % of CO

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Attainment

CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

b) Quiz (% of students who got >= Benchmark)

Objective – I Objective – II % of CO
Course CO PO(s)
Attainment
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6
Page 5 of 9
 c) Assignment (% of students who got >= Benchmark)

Assignment-I Assignment-II % of CO
Course CO PO(s)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q3 Attainment
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6
Note: Benchmark may be stated in terms of percentage of students getting more than class
Average mark (or) Set by the programme

Total CIE = [(0.5 * Descriptive) + (0.25 * Quiz) + (0.25*Assignment)]

% of CO
Course CO PO(s) Subjective Objective Assignment
Attainment
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

7.2 Semester End Examinations SEE:

a) Part A (% of students who got >= Benchmark)

End Exam – Part A (Quest.1)
% of CO
Course CO PO(s) Cleared/Attempted Attainment
a b c d e f g h i j
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

Page 6 of 9
b) Part B (% of students who got >= Benchmark)

End Exam – Part B

% of CO
Course CO PO(s) Cleared/Attempted
Attainment
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

Total SEE = [(0.30 * Part A) + (0.70 * Part B)]

Course CO PO(s) Part A Part B % of CO Attainment

CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

Overall CO Attainment: [(0.3 * CIE) + (0.7 * SEE)]

Overall CO
Attainment Target
Course CO PO(s) CIE SEE
Level
% Level
CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6

Page 7 of 9
Graphical Presentation of CO Attainment

8. Attainment of POs and PSOs through COs:

To calculate the PO attainment through COs, consider the level in the Course Articulation
Matrix and substitute the values as defined below,
For High Correlation - Level 3 : (CO Attainment Value) * 3/3
For Medium Correlation - Level 2 : (CO Attainment Value) * 2/3
For Low Correlation - Level 1 : (CO Attainment Value) * 1/3

CO(s) - PO(s)/PSO9s) PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO PSO

CO 1
CO 2
CO 3
CO 4
CO 5
CO 6
% of PO Attainment =
Average value

Page 8 of 9
9. Attainment of POs and PSOs through Course:
To calculate the PO attainment through Course, Consider the level in the Program
Articulation Matrix and substitute the values as defined below,

 For High Correlation - Level 3 : (PO attainment value through COs) * 3/3
 For Medium Correlation - Level 2 : (PO attainment value through COs) * 2/3
 For Low Correlation - Level 1 : (PO attainment value through COs) * 1/3


Course No /PO-PSO PO PO PO PO PO PO PSO PSO

C203

Course Coordinator Module Coordinator Program Coordinator

Page 9 of 9