Sei sulla pagina 1di 44

 

PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA 

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS REPORT

                         CUSTOMER : PT. STP 
        PROJECT   : Light Tower 42M 
  SITE NAME  : PASAR OKAK 
                                SITE ID   : PPN378 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
0  10 April  2017  First Issue 
Rev  Date  Description 
 

 
 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
1. RECOMMENDATION & SUMMARY 
2. ANALYSIS CRITERIA  
3. SOIL TEST 
4. TOWER SUPPORT REACTION 
5. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS  
6. FOUNDATION DRAWING 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECOMMENDATION 
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS SITE: PASAR OKAK 
 
 
 
According to Soil Test Result and Output of Tower Analysis (Tower Support Reaction), 
Foundation  for  Tower  Light  42M  on  site  Pasar  Okak  used  Raft  Bore  Pile  Foundation 
type  with  Pad  depth  0.5  meter,  Pad  dimension  5.0  m  x  5.5  m  and  500  mm  of 
thickness, Pedestal dimension is 600 mm x 600 mm and 1.0 m of height, and Bore Pile 
with diameter 400 mm and 1.2 of height with total quantity 8 unit.  

ACKNOWLED BY, 
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 

PREPARED  BY, 

CHECKED BY  APPROVED BY 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
SUMMARY FOUNDATION ANALYSIS 
SITE: PASAR OKAK 
 
 
 
 
DIMENSION 
Pedestal height  1.0 m 
Pedestal dimension  600 x 600 mm 
Pad Dimension  5.0  x  5.5  m 
Pad thickness  500 mm  
Pile diameter  400 mm 
Pile Quantity  8 unit 
ANALYSIS  
Description  Value  Limits  Remarks 
Uplift Capacity  2.444  >   1.5  OK  ! 
Bearing Capacity  1.79  >   1.0  OK  ! 
Sliding Capacity  2.991  >   1.5  OK  ! 
Punching shear  2.313  >   1.5  OK  ! 
Shear Capacity  1.55  >   1.5  OK  ! 
Rigidity  1.666  >   1.0  OK  ! 
REINFORCEMENT 
Pedestal rebar  28 ‐ D16     
Pedestal stirrup  Ø10 ‐ 150     
Top Pad rebar  D16 ‐ 200     
Bottom Pad rebar  D16 ‐ 200     
Pile rebar  12 ‐ D16     
Pile Stirrup  Ø10 ‐ 150     
Total concrete   17.06  M3   
Total rebar weight   1713.14  kg   
 
 
 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

  2. ANALYSIS CRITERIA
 

   

 
A. STANDARDS 
Indonesia standards used : 
1. Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton untuk Bangunan Gedung (SNI 03‐2847‐1992) 
2. Baja Tulangan Beton (SNI 07‐2052‐2002) 

International standard used : 
1. Standard for Telecommunication Tower (EIA/TIA‐222‐F) 
2. Building Code Requirements for Strucutral Concrete (ACI 318) 
3. Uniform Building Code (UBC) 

Software used : Mathcad v13.0 

B. MATERIAL 
Specification and Building material used on analysis: 
a. Material Density  
‐ Concrete        =  2400  kg/m3 
‐ Steel        =  7850  kg/m3 
‐ Soil         =  according to soil test 
b. Material standard 
‐ Concrete      f’c  =  22.5  MPa  (K‐225) 
‐ Round bar      fy  =  240  MPa  (BJTP U‐24) 
‐ Deformed rebar    fy  =  390  MPa  (BJTD U‐39) 
‐ Steel Profile     fy  =  245  MPa  (SS 400) 
‐ Mild Steel      fy  =  245  MPa  (ASTM A53/ST 37) 
‐ Bolt and Nut    fy  =  800  MPa  (HTB A325 gr. 8.8) 
‐ Anchor      fy  =  240  MPa  (ASTM A307) 
c. Modulus Elastisitas and Shear Modulus  
‐ Steel      Es  =  2 x 105  MPa 
‐ Concrete      Ec  =  4700 f’c   Mpa 

C. INPUT DATA 
1. Soil Test 
Result  of  Soil  Test  used  to  calculate  the  soil  capacity.  The  soil  capacity  is  one  of  the 
parameter to analyze Foundation dimension. Detail Report of Soil Test is enclosed 
2. Support Reaction 
Support Reaction come from the output of Tower analysis. These values show the forces on 
every Leg at the top of Foundation. Detail Support Reaction is enclosed.   

 
D. ANALYSIS 
Foundation will be analyzed by software Mathcad v13.0. The analysis used Support Reaction 
output of Tower analysis. This value are the greater than the others.. This parameter to check 
the result of Foundation analysis: 
 
1. Overturning Capacity  
  Foundation stability can check by this value.  There are 2 condition of Stability Check, from the 
overturning moment and from uplift force. The value must be greater than 1.0 for Uplift force 
and 1.5 for overturning moment. Detail calculation of this capacity is enclosed.    
   
2. Bearing Capacity 
  Bearing Capacity is to check the soil capacity at the bottom of Foundation.  This value will be 
compare with soil capacity from soil test. The ratio must be greater than 1.0. If the ratio less 
than  1.0,  it’s  means  the  soil  capacity  not  strength  enough  to  hold  foundation.  Detail 
calculation of this capacity is enclosed. 
 
3. Sliding and Punching 
  To check the Foundation strength from shear force, used Sliding ratio with the value must be 
greater than 1.5. And to check Punching shear on the pad of Foundation used Puching Ratio 
with the value must be greater than 1.5. If the value less than 1.5, it’s means the thickness of 
Pad must be increase. Detail calculation of sliding and punching are enclosed. 

 
 

 
3. SOIL TEST  

 
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA
BORING LOG NO TITIK : BH-01
/SST/
SITE ID : PPN 378 LOCATION : PASAR OKAK
TANGGAL : 01 APRIL 2017 INSTITUSI PELAKSANA : gsec
Kedalaman

MUKA AIR

SAMPEL
TANAH
(m)

DESKRIPSI & KLASIFIKASI TANAH & BATUAN

Lempung berpasir berbatu, coklat kekuningan, plastis sedang, konsistensi sedang,


kadar air rendah (0.00-0.80 m)
1.00

2.00

3.00

BOR STOP (BERBATU)

4.00

5.00

6.00
LEGENDA: Elevasi Banjir : - M
Muka Air tanah Tertinggi : -6.00 M
= MUKA AIR TANAH CATATAN : SUMUR WARGA 6.00 M
Bila tidak ditemukan air tanah hingga kedalaman 6m, lihat sumur
= SAMPEL TANAH penduduk sekitar lokasi
Pastikan Muka Air Tanah Tertinggi merupakan elevasi Air Tanah
tertinggi di Site ini. Atau Elevasi Air Sumur tertinggi di sekitar site ini

Soil test telah dilakukan sesuai petunjuk yang telah diberikan oleh DMT

Pelaksana Soil Test PT. MEGA DUTA KONSTRUKSI PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA
CME Regional Manager

(Ir. Simon D. Tarigan, MT ) ( ) ( )

Laporan Penyelidikan Tanah dari Laboratorium diserahkan paling lambat 2 Minggu setelah Soil Test Site ini
dilakukan (Diserahkan 3(Tiga) Rangkap (1 Original Doc + 2 Copy Doc ))
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA
DATA SONDIR NO TITIK : S1
/SST/
SITE ID : PPN 378 LOCATION : PASAR OKAK
TANGGAL : 01 APRIL 2017 INSTITUSI PELAKSANA : gsec

Perlawanan

Perlawanan

Perlawanan
Kedalaman

Kedalaman

Kedalaman
Penetrasi

Penetrasi

Penetrasi
(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)
Jumlah

Jumlah

Jumlah
Konus

Konus

Konus
(m)

(m)

(m)
0.00 0 0
0.20 6 9 10.20 20.20
0.40 9 12 10.40 20.40
0.60 12 16 10.60 20.60
0.80 15 19 10.80 20.80
1.00 20 24 11.00 21.00
1.20 110 114 11.20 21.20
1.40 145 149 11.40 21.40
1.60 185 190 11.60 21.60
1.80 205 210 11.80 21.80
2.00 12.00 22.00
2.20 12.20 22.20
2.40 12.40 22.40
2.60 12.60 22.60
2.80 12.80 22.80
3.00 13.00 23.00
3.20 13.20 23.20
3.40 13.40 23.40
3.60 13.60 23.60
3.80 13.80 23.80
4.00 14.00 24.00
4.20 14.20 24.20
4.40 14.40 24.40
4.60 14.60 24.60
4.80 14.80 24.80
5.00 15.00 25.00
5.20 15.20 25.20
5.40 15.40 25.40
5.60 15.60 25.60
5.80 15.80 25.80
6.00 16.00 26.00
6.20 16.20 26.20
6.40 16.40 26.40
6.60 16.60 26.60
6.80 16.80 26.80
7.00 17.00 27.00
7.20 17.20 27.20
7.40 17.40 27.40
7.60 17.60 27.60
7.80 17.80 27.80
8.00 18.00 28.00
8.20 18.20 28.20
8.40 18.40 28.40
8.60 18.60 28.60
8.80 18.80 28.80
9.00 19.00 29.00
9.20 19.20 29.20
9.40 19.40 29.40
9.60 19.60 29.60
9.80 19.80 29.80
10.00 20.00 30.00
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA
DATA SONDIR NO TITIK : S1
EO Number
SITE ID : PPN 378 LOCATION : PASAR OKAK
TANGGAL : 01 APRIL 2017 INSTITUSI PELAKSANA : gsec

CPT-Test
qc (kg/cm2)

0 50 100 150 200 250


0

qc

0.2 tsf

0.4

0.6

0.8
Depth (m)

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

tsf (kg/cm)
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA
DATA SONDIR NO TITIK : S2
/SST/
SITE ID : PPN 378 LOCATION : PASAR OKAK
TANGGAL : 01 APRIL 2017 INSTITUSI PELAKSANA : gsec

Perlawanan

Perlawanan

Perlawanan
Kedalaman

Kedalaman

Kedalaman
Penetrasi

Penetrasi

Penetrasi
(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)

(kg/cm2)
Jumlah

Jumlah

Jumlah
Konus

Konus

Konus
(m)

(m)

(m)
0.00 0 0
0.20 6 9 10.20 20.20
0.40 9 12 10.40 20.40
0.60 12 15 10.60 20.60
0.80 16 19 10.80 20.80
1.00 20 23 11.00 21.00
1.20 110 113 11.20 21.20
1.40 115 118 11.40 21.40
1.60 122 125 11.60 21.60
1.80 135 138 11.80 21.80
2.00 150 153 12.00 22.00
2.20 110 113 12.20 22.20
2.40 109 112 12.40 22.40
2.60 100 103 12.60 22.60
2.80 60 63 12.80 22.80
3.00 55 58 13.00 23.00
3.20 51 54 13.20 23.20
3.40 48 51 13.40 23.40
3.60 48 51 13.60 23.60
3.80 56 59 13.80 23.80
4.00 59 62 14.00 24.00
4.20 65 71 14.20 24.20
4.40 72 78 14.40 24.40
4.60 79 85 14.60 24.60
4.80 87 93 14.80 24.80
5.00 95 101 15.00 25.00
5.20 106 112 15.20 25.20
5.40 114 120 15.40 25.40
5.60 120 126 15.60 25.60
5.80 190 196 15.80 25.80
6.00 190 196 16.00 26.00
6.20 198 204 16.20 26.20
6.40 207 213 16.40 26.40
6.60 16.60 26.60
6.80 16.80 26.80
7.00 17.00 27.00
7.20 17.20 27.20
7.40 17.40 27.40
7.60 17.60 27.60
7.80 17.80 27.80
8.00 18.00 28.00
8.20 18.20 28.20
8.40 18.40 28.40
8.60 18.60 28.60
8.80 18.80 28.80
9.00 19.00 29.00
9.20 19.20 29.20
9.40 19.40 29.40
9.60 19.60 29.60
9.80 19.80 29.80
10.00 20.00 30.00
PT. SOLUSI TUNAS PRATAMA

DATA SONDIR NO TITIK : S2


/SST/
SITE ID : PPN 378 LOCATION : PASAR OKAK
TANGGAL : 01 APRIL 2017 INSTITUSI PELAKSANA : gsec

CPT-Test
qc (kg/cm2)
0 50 100 150 200 250
0

qc

tsf

3
Depth (m)

7
0 50 100 150 200 250 300

tsf (kg/cm)
 

 
4. TOWER SUPPORT REACTION  

 
 

 
5. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
 

 
PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

SUMMARY OF RAFT FOUNDATION ANALYSIS


1. Uplift Capacity Check

SF uplift  2.444 Checkuplift  "OK"

2. Bearing Capacity Check

SF bearing  1.79 Checkbearing  "OK"

3. Sliding Capacity Check

SF sliding  2.991 Checksliding  "OK"

4. Punching Shear Capacity Check

SF punch  2.313 Checkpunch  "OK"

SF shear  1.55 Checkshear  "OK"

5. Rigidity Check

SF rigid  1.666 Checkrigid  "OK"

6. Pad Reinforcement
Bottom bar used : D16-200
Top bar used : D16-200

7. Pedestal Reinforcement

Longitudinal Bar used : 28 - D16


Stirrup bar used : 10 - 150

Steelratio  1.564 % Checksteel.ratio  "OK"

8. Bored Pile Reinforcement

Longitudinal Bar used : 8 - D16


Stirrup bar used : 10 - 150

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 22


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

A. TOWER SUPPORT REACTION

Theight  42m

1. Resultant Reaction at Centroid of Tower Case 1 (maximum moment on 1 direction)


fx1  69.493kN M x1  0.323 kN m

fy1  0.028kN M y1  1745.867kN m

fz1  86.243kN M z1  0.158 kN m

2. Resultant Reaction at Centroid of Tower Case 2 (maximum combination moment)


fx2  56.823kN M x2  816.822 kN m

fy2  31.998kN M y2  1431.123kN m

fz2  86.243kN M z2  0.504kN m

3. Maximum Compress and Tension Force


fcmax  592.849kN fxc  21.927kN fyc  38.426kN

ftmax  481.295 kN fxt  18.135kN fyt  31.855kN

4. BTS Foundation and Equipment Loading


Wbts  2000kgf

d bts  3.5m if Theight  70m d bts  2.75 m

3.25m if 50m  Theight  60m

2.75m if 40m  Theight  50m

2.5m if 30m  Theight  40m

2.4m if Theight  30m

M bts  Wbts d bts M bts  53.937 kN m

Concrete Foundation :
Lbts  2.5m Tbts  0.35m Bbts  0.25m

3
Vbts  Lbts Bbts Tbts 4 Vbts  0.875 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 1


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

B. FOUNDATION DIMENSION PROPERTIES

1. Water Table
Wbase  3.80m Width of Tower base
h pb  0.15m Thickness of Paving Block or Gravel
h fs  0m Thickness of Fill Soil
Dwtrlvl  6.0m Depth of water table to original ground level
Dwater  Dwtrlvl  h pb  h fs Depth of water table to new ground level

Dwater  6.15 m

2. Concrete
h con  1.0m Height pedestal above gravel or paving block
d exc  0.3m Depth of foundation excavationl

h  h pb  h fs  h con  d exc Height of top pedestal to bottom pad


h  1.45 m

3. Soil Data at depth d exc  0.3 m


kgf
q c1.pad  6
2 CPT/Sondir 1 base on Soil Test Report
cm
kgf
q c2.pad  6 CPT/Sondir 2 base on Soil Test Report
2
cm
qc1.pad qc2.pad

2
q all  q all  39.227 kPa
15

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 2


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

4. Pad Foundation
Bpadx  5.0m Width of Pad in X direction
Bpady  5.5m Width of Pad in Y direction
h m  0.5m Thickness of pad at the pedestal face
h p  0.5m Thickness of pad at the edge
h mp  h m  h p h mp  0 m

5. Pedestal
b t  0.6m Width of pedestal at the top
b b  0.6m Width of pedestal at the bottom
n leg  3 Number of Tower leg
h ts  h  h m h ts  0.95 m

 bb  bt 
 1  atan   1  0 deg
 h ts 
bb  bt
ecc  ecc  0 m
2

 h mp 
 2  atan  2  0 deg
 Bpadx bb 
 
 2 
b g  b t  h con tan  1   b g  0.6 m


b w  b t  h con  Dwater  tan  1    b w  0.6 m

   Bpadx  b b h  h con  h p  Dwater 


 
Bw  if Dwater  h  h con  h p  0  if Dwater  h ts  h con  0  b b  2   *
   2  
tan  2

Bw  0 m

6. Tie Beam
b tb  0.00m Width of Tie Beam
h tb  0.00m Height of Tie Beam
h g  0.00m Depth of Tie Beam from Gravel


h s  h  h con  h g  h tb  h m  h s  0.05 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 3


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

7. Earth Frustum Angle

  0deg if 0kPa  q all  50kPa

10deg if 50kPa  q all  100kPa

20deg if 100kPa  q all  192kPa

30deg if q all  192kPa

  0 deg Frustum Angle base on qall

Bpadx  b b  h tb 
Itb1    h s  h mp    tan 
2  2 

Itb1  2.2 m

Bpadx  b b  h tb  h g  Dwater 
Itbw1    h s  h mp    tan 
2  2 
Itbw1  2.2 m

Itb  Wbase  b t Itb  3.2 m

L  Bpadx  2  h  h con  h p  tan 


  L5m

Lw  Bpadx  2  h  h con  h p  Dwater  tan 


 
Lw  5 m

Lg  b tb  2  h g  tan  Lg  0 m

Lgw  if Dwater  h g  if Dwater  0  b tb  2  h g  Dwater  tan   Lg  0


 
   
Lgw  0 m

Bpadx  b b  hg 
Ig     htb  h s  h mp  tan 
2 2 
Ig  2.2 m

  Bpadx  b b  h g  Dwater   
Igw  if Dwater  h g  if Dwater  0    h tb  h s  h mp    tan   Ig  0
  2  2   
Igw  0 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 4


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

C. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Specified Yield Strength for Reinforcement
fys  240MPa for db  13mm
fy  400MPa for db  13mm
Specified Compressive Strength for Concrete according PBI 71 Tabel 4.1.3
kgf
K225  225 fc  0.83 K225 fc  18.314 MPa
2
cm

Unit Weight of Water


kgf kN
 water  1000  water  9.807
3 3
m m

Unit Weight of Steel


kgf kN
 steel  7850  steel  76.982
3 3
m m

Unit weight of concrete according TIA/EIA-222-F, section 7.2.4


kN
 concrete  24
3
m

Unit Weight of Soil


kgf
 soil  1440 if 0kPa  q all  100kPa
3 kN
m  soil  14.122
3
kgf m
1550 if 100kPa  q all  192kPa
3
m
kN
16 if q all  192kPa
3
m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 5


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

D. SOIL BEARING CAPACITY

1. Concrete Pad Footing


h mp
B
2

Vpad  Bpadx Bpady  h p   B
3  padx pady
 Bpadx b b  b b

3
Vpad  13.75 m

Boundary Condition 1 : Dwater <= (hts-h t)


Vpadwl  if Dwater  h ts  h con  Vpad  0 
3
Vpadwl  0 m

Boundary Condition 2 : (hts-h t)< Dwater <= (h-h t-h p )

h  h con  h p  Dwater
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx b b  b b
2

Vpadw2  Bpadx Bpady  h p   3  
3
Vpadw2  50.027 m

 
Vpadwll  if Dwater  h ts  h con  if Dwater  h  h con  h p  Vpadw2  0  0  
3
Vpadwll  0 m

Boundary Condition 3 : (h-ht-hp)< D water <= (h-h t)

 
Vpadw3  Bpadx Bpady  h  h con  Dwater 
3
Vpadw3  156.75 m

 
Vpadwl3  if Dwater  h  h con  h p  if Dwater  h  h con  Vpadw3  0  0  
3
Vpadwl3  0 m
3
Vpadw  Vpadwl  Vpadwll  Vpadwl3 Vpadw  0 m
3
Vpadd  Vpad  Vpadw Vpadd  13.75 m

2. Concrete Pedestal Footing

 hts 2 
Vpedest  n leg    b b  b b  b t  b t 
2
3  
3
Vpedest  1.026 m

Boundary Condition 1 : Dwater <= (-ht)

 
3
Vpedestwl  if Dwater  h con  Vpad  0 Vpedestwl  0 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 6


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Boundary Condition 2 : (-h t)< Dwater <= (h-h t)

 hts  hcon  Dwater  2 2 


Vpedestw2  n leg   b b  b b  b w  b w 
 3  
3
Vpedestw2  6.696 m

 
Vpedestwll  if Dwater  h con  if Dwater  h ts  h con  Vpedestw2  0  0  
3
Vpedestwll  0 m

 
Vpedestw  if Dwater  h ts  h con  0  if Dwater  h con  Vpedestwll  Vpedestwl 
3
Vpedestw  0 m

Vpedestd  Vpedest  Vpedestw


3
Vpedestd  1.026 m

3. Concrete Tie Beam


Vtbeam  n leg b tb h tb Itb  Vtbeam  0 m
3

Boundary Condition 1: Dwater <= (hg )


Vtbeamwl  if Dwater  h g  Vtbeam  0 
3
Vtbeamwl  0 m

Boundary Condition 2: (hg ) < D water <= (hg +htb)


Vtbeamw2  b tb h tb  h g  Dwater  Itb 
3
Vtbeamw2  0 m

 
Vtbeamwll  if Dwater  h g  if Dwater  h g  h tb  Vtbeamw2  0  0  
3
Vtbeamwll  0 m

 
Vtbeamw  if Dwater  h g  h tb  0  if Dwater  h g  Vtbeamwll  Vtbeamwl 
3
Vtbeamw  0 m

Vtbeamd  Vtbeam  Vtbeamw


3
Vtbeamd  0 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 7


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Volume of Concrete
Vconcreted  Vpadd  Vpedestd  Vtbeamd  Vbts
3
Vconcreted  15.651 m
Vconcretew  Vpadw  Vpedestw  Vtbeamw
3
Vconcretew  0 m
Vconcrete  Vconcreted  Vconcretew
3
Vconcrete  15.651 m

Weight of Concrete
Wconcrete  Vconcreted   concrete  Vconcretew   concrete   water  
Wconcrete  375.624 kN

4. Volume Soil above Footing

h  h con  h p b tb  Lg
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx L  L
2
Vsoil1 
3   
2

 h g  Itb  2  Ig 
h mp h ts  h con
B
2
  bb  bb bg  bg
2 2
Vsoil2  B  Bpadx b b  b b 
3  padx pady  3    2  btb h tb Itb1

Vsoil  Vsoil1  Vsoil2


3
Vsoil  1.274 m

Boundary Condition 1 : Dwater <= 0


Vsoilwl  if Dwater  0  0  Vsoil 
3
Vsoilwl  0 m

Boundary Condition 2 : 0 < Dwater <= h g

h  h con  h p  Dwater b tb  Lgw


  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx Lw  Lw
2
Vsoilw21 
3   
2
 
 h g  Dwater  Itb  2  Igw 
h mp h ts  h con  Dwater
B
2
  bb  bb bw  bw
2 2
Vsoilw22  B  Bpadx b b  b b 
3  padx pady  3    2  btb h tb Itb1

Vsoilw2  Vsoilw21  Vsoilw22


3
Vsoilw2  157.935 m

 
Vsoilwll  if Dwater  0  0  if Dwater  h g  0  Vsoilw2 
3
Vsoilwll  0 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 8


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Boundary Condition 3 : hg < Dwater <= (hg + htb)

h  h con  h p  Dwater h mp
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx Lw  Lw
2
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx b b  b b
2
Vsoilw31  
3   3  

h ts  h con  Dwater
  bb  bb bw  bw
2
  2 b tb  h tb  hg  Dwater  Itbw1
2
Vsoilw32 
3 

Vsoilw3  Vsoilw31  Vsoilw32


3
Vsoilw3  157.935 m

 
Vsoilwl3  if Dwater  h g  0  if Dwater  h g  h tb  0  Vsoilw3 
3
Vsoilwl3  0 m

Boundary Condition 4 : (hg + htb) < D water <= (hts - ht)

h  h con  h p  Dwater h mp
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx Lw  Lw
2
B
2
Vsoilw41   B  Bpadx b b  b b
3   3  padx pady 

h ts  h con  Dwater
  bb  bb bw  bw
2 2
Vsoilw42 
3  
Vsoilw4  Vsoilw41  Vsoilw42
3
Vsoilw4  157.935 m

 
Vsoilwl4  if Dwater  h g  h tb  0  if Dwater  h ts  h con  0  Vsoilw4 
3
Vsoilwl4  0 m

Boundary Condition 5 : (hts - ht) < D water <= (h - ht - hp )

h  h con  h p  Dwater
  Bpadx Bpady  Bpadx Lw  Lw
2
Vsoilw51 
3  

h  h con  h p  Dwater
  Bpadx  Bpadx Bw  Bw
2 2
Vsoilw52 
3  

Vsoilw5  Vsoilw51  Vsoilw52


3
Vsoilw5  108.5 m

 
Vsoilwl5  if Dwater  h ts  h con  0  if Dwater  h  h con  h p  0  Vsoilw5 
3
Vsoilwl5  0 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 9


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Vsoilw  Vsoilwl if Dwater  0

Vsoilwll if 0  Dwater  h g

Vsoilwl3 if h g  Dwater  h g  h tb

Vsoilwl4 if h g  h tb  Dwater  h ts  h con

Vsoilwl5 if h ts  h con  Dwater  h  h con  h p

0 if Dwater  h  h con  h p

3
Vsoilw  0 m
3
Vsoild  Vsoil  Vsoilw Vsoild  1.274 m

Weight of Soil Above Footing


Wsoil  Vsoild  soil  Vsoilw  soil   water 
Wsoil  17.986 kN

Maximum Tension Force


Fztmax  ftmax

Fztmax  481.295 kN

5. Bored Pile Properties


d pile  0.4m

Spile  3  d pile  0.60m

Spile  1.8 m

Dpile  1.5m


Lpile  Dpile  h  h pb  h fs  h con 
Lpile  1.2 m

Lpilew  
Lpile if Dwater  h  h pb  h fs  h con 
Dpile  Dwater if Dwater  h  h pb  h fs  h con

0 if Dwater  Dpile

Lpilew  0 m

  
Lpiled  if Dwater  h  h pb  h fs  h con  Lpile  Lpilew  0
 Lpiled  1.2 m

Cpile    d pile Cpile  1.257 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 10


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

2 2
Apile  0.25  d pile Apile  0.126 m

3
Vpilew  Apile  Lpilew Vpilew  0 m
3
Vpiled  Apile  Lpiled Vpiled  0.151 m


Wpile   concrete Vpiled   concrete   water  Vpilew 
Wpile  3.619 kN

 Bpadx   Bpady 
nmaxpilex  trunc 1 nmaxpiley  trunc 1
 Spile
  Spile

nmaxpilex  3 nmaxpiley  4

n pilex  3 Number of pile in X direction

n piley  3 Number of pile in Y direction

n pile  8 n pile  8
Total quatity of pile
 dpile 
 pile  atan   pile  12.529 deg
 Spile 
 pile npilex  1 npiley  npilex npiley  1
 pile  1  
90deg n pilex n piley

 pile  0.814

kgf kgf
q c1  165 fr1  58
2 cm
cm Soil test at depth 1.5 m.
kgf kgf
q c2  118 fr2  50
2 cm
cm

Allowable bearing capacity of pile compression

 qc1  q c2 fr1  fr2 


  Apile  Cpile 
Qpilec   pile   
2 2

 3 5 
Qpilec  484.205 kN

Allowable bearing capacity of pile tension

 fr1  fr2 
  Cpile 
Qpilef   pile   
2
 5 
Qpilef  10.839 kN

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 11


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Maximum distance of pile from center to center

 
Xmax  n pilex  1  Spile  
Ymax  n piley  1  Spile

Xmax  3.6 m Ymax  3.6 m

Total Quadratic distance for number of pile in the direction

2 2
 Xmax   Ymax 
fxmax( n )  n pilex   n  Spile fymax( n )  n piley   n  Spile
 2   2 
npilex 1 npiley 1

 
2 2
fxmax( n )  19.44 m fymax( n )  19.44 m
n 0 n 0

6. Pile Bearing Capacity


Total Weight of Conrete considering the overburden pressure
 2  2
 bt  bg   bt  bg 
Wtotalc    concrete   soil  Vconcrete    h      h
  2  con concrete  2  con
Wtotalc  159.691 kN

Total Maximum Compression Force


Fz1max  Wsoil  Wtotalc  max fz1  fz2  
Fz1max  227.948 kN

Fz2max  Wsoil  Wconcrete  max fz1  fz2  


Fz2max  443.881 kN

Maximum Load applied to pile

Xmax Ymax
Fz1max My1  fx1 h 2
Mx1  fy1 h  Mbts 2
Fmax1   
n pile npiley 1 npiley 1

 fxmax( n )
 fymax( n )
n0 n0

Fmax1  204.438 kN

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 12


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Xmax Ymax
Fz2max My2  fx2 h 2
Mx2  fy2 h  Mbts 2
Fmax2   
n pile npiley 1 npiley 1

 fxmax( n )
 fymax( n )
n0 n0

Fmax2  270.559 kN


Fmax  max Fmax1  Fmax2 
Fmax  270.559 kN

Minimum Load applied to pile

 Xmax  Ymax
F My1  fx1 h  Mx1  fy1 h  Mbts
Fmin1   
z2max 2 2

 npile npiley 1  npiley 1
 
  fxmax( n )
  fymax( n )
 n 0  n0

Fmin1  120.527 kN

 Xmax  Ymax
F My2  fx2 h  Mx2  fy2 h  Mbts
Fmin2   
z2max 2 2

 npile npiley 1  npiley 1
 
  fxmax( n )
  fymax( n )
 n 0  n0

Fmin2  159.589 kN


Fmin  min Fmin1  Fmin2 
Fmin  159.589 kN

Safety Factor for Bearing Pile

Qpilec
SF bearing  SF bearing  1.79
Fmax


Checkbearing  if SF bearing  1.0  "OK"  "Not OK"  Checkbearing  "OK"

Safety Factor for Uplift of Pile

Qpilef  Wpile  Wconcrete


SF uplift  SF uplift  2.444
Fmin


Checkuplift  if SF uplift  1.5  "OK"  "Not OK"  Checkuplift  "OK"

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 13


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

7. Reinforcement of Bored Pile


Fmax  270.559 kN maximum compreesion working on pile

M maxpc  10% Fmax m maximum moment working on pile (assumed 10%)

M maxpc  27.056 kN m

Fmin  159.589 kN maximum tension working on pile

M minpc  10% Fmin m maximum moment working on pile (assumed 10%)

M minpc  15.959 kN m

From the interaction diagram :

Reinforcement used as follow : 10 D16 and spiral tied : 10 - 150

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 14


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

E. SLIDING CAPACITY

Total Compression Force :

Fcz1max  Wconcrete  fz1 Fcz1max  461.867 kN

Fcz2max  Wconcrete  fz2 Fcz2max  461.867 kN

Total Lateral Force


:
 2 2 2
Fxycmax  max fx1  fy1  fx2  fy2
2
 

Fxycmax  69.493 kN

Friction Coeficient :  f  0.45

Safety Factor for Sliding :


max Fcz1max  Fcz2max 
SF sliding   f SF sliding  2.991
Fxycmax


Checksliding  if SF sliding  1.5  "OK"  "Not OK"  Checksliding  "OK"

F. PAD REINFORCEMENT

1. Punching Shear
 sh  0.75 Strength reduction factor for shear according SNI 03-2847-2002

Magnified factor for structure under 700 ft or 213 m according


 f  1.33 TIA/EIA-222-F, section 3.1.16.1

bb Ratio of long side to short side according


 c  c  1
bt SNI 03-2847-2002

d bpad  16mm Nominal diameter of pad bar

Ppad  50mm Concrete cover of pad

h m  Ppad  1.5 d bpad


d pad 
h mp Effective depth of section
1
Bpadx  b b

d pad  0.426 m


b o  4  b b  d pad  Perimeter of critical section

b o  4.104 m

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 15


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Fzcmax2   f 
 Wconcrete  
 concrete Vpadd   concrete   water  Vpadw
 fcmax  
 n leg n leg

Fzcmax2  808.716 kN


Fzcpsh  min 1 
2   1  f  MPa  b  d  1  f  MPa b  d   40 d pad  2  f  MPa b  d 
o pad  b  c o pad
c  6
c o pad 3 c
   o  
3
Fzcpsh  2.494  10 kN

Safety factor for Punching Shear :

Fzcpsh
SF punch   sh  SF punch  2.313
Fzcmax2


Checkpunch  if SF punch  1.5  "OK"  "Not OK"  Checkpunch  "OK"

Shear strength of Concrete :


1
Fzcsh   sh   fc MPa  Bpady d pad
6 According SNI 03-2847-2002
3
Fzcsh  1.253  10 kN

Safety factor for wide beam :

Fzcsh
SF shear  SF shear  1.55
Fzcmax2


Checkshear  if SF shear  1.5  "OK"  "Not OK"  Checkshear  "OK"

2. Control Rigidity of Pad refer to "Foundation Analysis & Design", section 5-11
4
Ec  4700 fc MPa Ec  2.011  10 MPa

1 Bpadx 3 4
Ipad    hm Ipad  0.026 m
12 2

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 16


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

 
36
k s   max Fmax1  Fmax2 k s  9.74 MPa
2
m
1
4
 k s Bpadx 
 
 pad 
 m 2 
 pad  0.328
1
 4  Ec Ipad 
  m

1.75
spad  spad  5.33 m
 pad


Checkrigid  if spad  Wbase  b b  "Add thickness of pad"  "OK" 
Checkrigid  "OK" spad
SF rigid  SF rigid  1.666
Wbase  b b

2. Flexure

Bottom Reinforcement

 1  0.85 if fc  30MPa

fc  30MPa
0.85   0.2 if 30MPa  fc  58MPa
28MPa
0.65 if fc  58MPa

 1  0.85

 flek  0.8 Strength reduction factor for flexure according SNI 03-2847-2002

Wconcrete  fcmax
q bot   f Factored uniform load
Bpadx Bpady

kN
q bot  46.839
2
m

Critical section for moment is at the face of pedestal

fcmax Spile
M bot  M bot  266.782 kN m
4
M bot
M nb  M nb  333.478 kN m
 flek

M nb
Rnb  Rnb  367.517 kPa
2
Bpadx d pad

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 17


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

fy
mr  mr  25.696
0.85 fc
 mr 
1  
1 4
 reqb  1  2  Rnb  reqb  9.299  10
mr  
 fy

0.7 3
 min   MPa  min  1.75  10
fy


Areqb  max  reqb   min  Bpadx d pad 
3 2
Areqb  3.728  10 mm

 Areqb 
n barb  round   1 n barb  20
 0.25   d 2 
 bpad 
 Bpadx  Ppad 
Sbarb  min  200mm Sbarb  200 mm
 nbarb  1 

For Reinforcement Bottom bar used : D16-200

Top Reinforcement

Fztmax  Wconcrete
q top   f Factored uniform load
Bpadx Bpady

kN
q top  41.444
2
m
2
 Bpadx  bb 
q top Bpadx  
M top 
 2 
2

M top  501.469 kN m

M top
M nt  M nt  626.836 kN m
 flek

M nt
Rnt  Rnt  690.82 kPa
2
Bpadx d pad

 mr 
1  
1 3
 reqt  1  2  Rnt  reqt  1.69  10
mr  
 fy


Areqt  max  reqt   min  Bpadx d pad  Areqt  3.728  10 mm
3 2

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 18


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

 Areqt 
n bart  round   1 n bart  20
 0.25   d 2 
 bpad 

 Bpadx  Ppad 
Sbart  min  200mm Sbart  200 mm
 n bart  1 

For Reinforcement Top Bar used : D16-200

G. PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT

1. Shear
Diameter of Stirrup
d str  10mm
Diameter of Pedestal bar
d bpedest  16mm

Ppedest  50mm Concrete Cover of Pedestal

n shear  2 Quantity of section

d bpedest
d pedest  b t  Ppedest  d str 
2

d pedest  532 mm Effective depth of section

Axial Tension Condition

Fztmax1   f ftmax

Fztmax1  640.122 kN

Shear strength shall be computed for member subject to shear and axial tension
according SNI 03-2847-2002

 Fztmax1  1
Ftsh   1MPa  0.3    fc 1  b t dpedest
 2  6 MPa
 bt

Ftsh  106.222 kN

  f max fxt  fyt  


Fstr1   Ftsh Fstr1  49.732 kN
  sh 

   d 2 f  d  2 
 4 str ys pedest n shear d pedest 4  d str  fys  d pedest n shear 
ssht  if   0  
 Fstr1 2 Fstr1

ssht  266 mm
Spacing of shear reinforcement in tension

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 19


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Axial Compression Condition


Fzcmax1   f fcmax Fzcmax1  788.489 kN

 Fzcmax1  1 1
Fcsh   1MPa     fc  b t d pedest
 14b t 
2 6 MPa
 
Fcsh  263.286 kN

  f max fxc  fyc  


Fstr2   Fcsh Fstr2  195.144 kN
  sh 

   d 2 f  d  2 
 4 str ys pedest n shear d pedest 4  d str  fys  d pedest n shear 
sshc  if   0  
 Fstr2 2 Fstr2

sshc  266 mm
Spacing of shear reinforcement in compression


Sreq  min ssht  sshc  Sreq  266 mm sact  150mm


sactual  if sact  Sreq  "OK"  "Not OK"  sactual  "OK"

b t sact
Ashmin  Shear reinforcement minimum
1
3  fy 
MPa
2
Ashmin  75 mm

 2
Ashact  n shear  d str
4 User shear reinforcement
2
Ashact  157.08 mm


Aactual  if Ashact  Ashmin  "OK"  "Not OK"  Aactual  "OK"

2. Flexure
Tension Condition

M xt1   f fyt h ts  ftmax ecc M xt1  40.249 kN m

M yt1   f fxt h ts  ftmax ecc M yt1  22.914 kN m


M xmax  max M xt1  M yt1 
M xmax  40.249 kN m Fztmax1  640.122 kN

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 20


PASAR OKAK
Raft Bore Pile Foundation Analysis

Compression Condition

M xc2   f fyc h ts  fcmax ecc M xc2  48.551 kN m

M yc2   f fxc h ts  fcmax ecc M yc2  27.705 kN m


M ymax  max M xc2  M yc2  M ymax  48.551 kN m

Fzcmax1  788.489 kN

n bar  28
Use Reinforcement as Follow :
d bpedest  16 mm

 2
Areabar  n bar    d bpedest 
4  
3 2
Areabar  5.63  10 mm

Areabar
Steelratio  Steelratio  1.564 %
2
bt

Checksteel.ratio  "OK" if Steelratio  1%


according to SNI 03-2847-2002
"Not OK" if Steelratio  1%

Checksteel.ratio  "OK"

PT. ANUGRAH REKA CIPTA Page 21


 

 
6. FOUNDATION DRAWING
 

   

Potrebbero piacerti anche