San Roque National High School

SAN ROQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
NAVOTAS CITY
IN-SERVICE TRAINING 2019 (INSET)

AGENDA FOR DAY 3
Title: #werNaU Place: San Roque Social Hall.

Date: October 23, 2019 (Grade 7 & 12 Teachers) Time: 8:00pm -5:00pm
Agenda:
I. Policy
A. DepEd Order no.42,s. 2017 NATIONAL ADOPTION ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARD FOR

TEACHERS.
B. DepEd Order no.21, s. 2019 POLICY GUIDELINES ON THE K TO 12 BASIC
EDUCATION PROGRAM
C. DepEd Order no. 36, s. 2016 POLICY GUIDELINES ON AWARDS AND RECOGNITION. FOR
THE K TO 12 BASIC EDUCATION PROGRAM.
II. Pedagogy
A. Discussion
B. Write shop
C. Collaboration Coaching
D. Face to Face (Mentoring and Coaching)
III. Content
A. Guidelines in Test Construction

B. PPST Domain 5: Assessment and Reporting
C. PPST Domain 6: Community Linkages
IV. Output
A. Guidelines in test construction
B. Template in Monitoring Learners Progress
B.1 Card Distribution
B.2 Proficiency Report Template
B.3 Students Health Report
C. Engagement Monitoring of Parents (4Ps)
D. Monitoring and Evaluation Template (programs and projects)
Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

Tel. No. 282-4773 : Email. Address: sanroquenavotas@yahoo.com
NAVOTAS CITY
GUIDELINES FOR WRITING MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
1. Options should be homogenous.

2. List each choice in a separate line.
3. Have five choices/options/alternatives.
4. Arrange items according to levels of difficulty.
5. Contextualize, localize, indigenize situations/names/places.
6. Put in the stem any qualifying word that has to be repeated in each option.
7. Put the central problem in the stem. The stem should be longer than the options.
8. Keep questions short and to the point to keep reading time at minimum; Delete
unimportant words in the stem, e.g., “ of the following”etc.
9. State the stem positively; if using negative words capitalize or underline them; put them
together towards the end of the test.
10. Arrange choices-
a. Chronologically for dates
b. According to degree of magnitude
c. Smallest to largest for numbers
d. Alphabetically for one-word choices
e. Shortest to longest for more than one word choices
11. Avoid
a. Textbook words that encourage memorization
b. Use of absolutes, such as “always”, “only”, “never”, etc.
c. Clues to the correct answer, e.g., grammatical error, unequal length
d. Give-away words: words in the stem repeated/ synonymous with a word in the
option
e. “ all of the above”. Use “None of the above” only if an absolute correct answer can
be given.
12. Don’t
a. Use abbreviations.
b. Arrange options in a pattern.
c. Ask two questions in one statement.
13. Write item as a question. It is easier to understand and forces one to be more specific and
less ambiguous. If the stem can be stated more briefly and simply as a statement,
alternatives should come at the end for clarity and to help reduce unnecessary reading; put
all these item towards the end of the test.

NAVOTAS CITY
14. Questions related to specific data with exactly the same options should be separated from
other items by dotted lines, without repeating the options.
ISSUANCE OF CARD
PARENT ATTENDANCE
S.Y. 2019-2020
GRADE /SECTION ______________________Date:________________QUARTER______
No. Name of Student Parent Signature
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
NAVOTAS CITY
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
ISSUANCE OF CARD
SUMMARY OF PARENT ATTENDANCE
S.Y. 2019-2020
Grade/Section Number of Total Number of Class Adviser Signature

Students Parents Attended
1st 2nd 3rd 4th

NAVOTAS CITY
PROFICIENCY REPORT TEMPLATE

S.Y. 2019-2020
Subject Area_______________ Grade Level ______________Teacher_______________

NAVOTAS CITY
No. Name of Students Grades No. Name of Students Grades

1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.
7. 7.
8. 8.
9. 9.
10. 10.
11. 11.
12. 12.
13. 13.
14. 14.
15. 15.
16. 16.
17. 17.
18. 18.
19. 19.
20. 20.
21. 21.
22. 22.
23. 23.
24. 24.
25. 25.
26. 26.
27. 27.
28. 28.
29. 29.
30. 30.
Average Proficiency ___________________________
SUMMARY OF TEACHERS PROFICIENCY REPORT

Department ___________________

NAVOTAS CITY
S.Y. 2019-2020
Rating Signature
Name of Teachers 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
Average Proficiency _________________________

NAVOTAS CITY
SUMMARY OF STUDENTS PROFICIENCY REPORT

Department ___________________
S.Y. 2019-2020
Rating Signature
SECTION 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total

NAVOTAS CITY
TEACHERS MPS REPORT

Department ___________________
S.Y. 2019-2020
Name of Teachers MPS Signature

NAVOTAS CITY
SUMMARY OF TEACHERS MPS REPORT

Department ___________________
S.Y. 2019-2020
Rating Signature
Name of Teachers 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Average MPS

NAVOTAS CITY
LEARNERS HEALTH STATUS MASTERLIST

Date Accomplished: __________________ Total Male: ____________
Grade / Section: _____________________ Total Female: __________
Teacher: ___________________________ Total Class Enrollment: _______
4 P's Height (cm.) / School Based Supple- Height (cm.) / WIFA Dewormed
Member Weight (kg.) / Feeding mental Weight (kg.) / Bene-ficiary *Put Check ( / ) if
*Put Nutritional Program Feeding Nutritional *For
Dewormed
Check Status (SBFP) (SFP) Status Female
( / ) if BMI = Beneficiary Beneficiary BMI = Menstruati
Remarks
Member SW, W, N *Put Check *Put Check SW, W, N ng Only
1st Dose 2nd
No. Name (Base Line)
*All Pupils /
( / ) if
Beneficiary
( / ) if
Beneficiary
(End Line)
*All Pupils /
Grade 7 to
Grade 12 (July) Dose
Students Elem. Secondary Students (Jan.)
_____
DATE _____
DATE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
NAVOTAS CITY
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Total 4 P's Member: __________________

BMI Total no. SW _____ W _____ N _____
Total SBFP Beneficiary: _______________
Total SFP Beneficiary: ________________ __________________________
Total WIFA Beneficiary: _______________ ADVISER
No. Dewormed 1st Dose Male: __________
No. Dewormed 1st Dose Female: ________ ___________________________
Total No. Dewormed: __________________ GRADE LEVEL CHAIRMAN
______________________________
JOJI R. FERNANDO
PRINCIPAL IV

NAVOTAS CITY
STAKEHOLDER/ 4P’S / PARENT

ENGAGEMENT MONITORING TEMPLATE
Date: __________________________
Grade Level: ____________________
No. Name of Parent Affiliation Role/ Task Time Time No. Of Signature
In Out Hours
Rendered

NAVOTAS CITY
Monitoring and Evaluation Template

(Programs and Projects)
Name: (optional)______________________________________________________________
Staff______ Stakeholder/Parents______ Students_______
Programs/ Project : ____________________________________________________________
Date : _________________________
Instructions: Put a check that corresponds to your opinion on the effectiveness of the program.
Legend SA - Strongly Agree

A - Agree
DA -Disagree
SDA - Strongly Disagree

NAVOTAS CITY
Criteria SA A DA SDA
I. Materials
1. The materials provided are aligned with the objectives.
2. The materials provided are sufficient .
3. The materials are given/ distributed on- time
II. Implementation of the Program
1. Competency of the persons involve (facilitator, trainers, speaker)
is evident.
2. Task of each participants is accomplished
3. The program is well facilitated/ organized
4. Accountability is established with each participants
5. The objectives of the programs are attained
6. The venue is conducive for the program
III. Outputs
1. A doable and reliable program is created.
2. The activities of the program/s is aligned to the objectives.
3. Feedbacks were given and taken accurately.
4. Sustainability and long term benefits are promoted with the
created program
Suggestions and Recommendation:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
LAC/IN-SET EVALUATION FORM
Topic/ Title: _________________________________________________________

Participant's Name (optional): _______________________________________
Instructions: Put a check that corresponds to your opinion on the effectiveness of the activity.
Legend 4 - Strongly Agree

3- Agree
2 - Disagree
1 - Strongly Disagree
Criteria 1 2 3 4
A. CONTENT
The topic is relevant and useful for the audience/participants.
NAVOTAS CITY
Content presented was applicable to my practice.

Objective of the session were achieved.
The level of my awareness on the topic was improved.
B.SPEAKER
The speaker/discussant is knowledgeable with the content.
The speaker /discussant are consistent with the content objective.
The speaker/discussant clarified content in response to questions
C.MATERIALS
Teaching aids/audiovisuals were used effectively.
The materials provided are useful and sufficient.
The materials are given /distributed on time.
D.FACILITY
Learning environment is conducive for the participants.
Recommendation/Suggestions
_________________________________________________________________________
Thank You! We appreciate your help in evaluating this LAC/INSET SEMINAR.


San Roque National High School

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Descrizione originale:

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

San Roque National High School

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

SAN ROQUE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

IN-SERVICE TRAINING 2019 (INSET)

Title: #werNaU Place: San Roque Social Hall.

A. DepEd Order no.42,s. 2017 NATIONAL ADOPTION ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARD FOR

A. Guidelines in Test Construction

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

GUIDELINES FOR WRITING MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

1. Options should be homogenous.

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

GRADE /SECTION ______________________Date:________________QUARTER______

No. Name of Student Parent Signature

Grade/Section Number of Total Number of Class Adviser Signature

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

PROFICIENCY REPORT TEMPLATE

Subject Area_______________ Grade Level ______________Teacher_______________

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

No. Name of Students Grades No. Name of Students Grades

Average Proficiency ___________________________

SUMMARY OF TEACHERS PROFICIENCY REPORT

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

Average Proficiency _________________________

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

SUMMARY OF STUDENTS PROFICIENCY REPORT

Average Proficiency _________________________

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

TEACHERS MPS REPORT

Name of Teachers MPS Signature

Average Proficiency _________________________

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

SUMMARY OF TEACHERS MPS REPORT

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

LEARNERS HEALTH STATUS MASTERLIST

Total 4 P's Member: __________________

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

STAKEHOLDER/ 4P’S / PARENT

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

Monitoring and Evaluation Template

Staff______ Stakeholder/Parents______ Students_______

Programs/ Project : ____________________________________________________________

Legend SA - Strongly Agree

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

LAC/IN-SET EVALUATION FORM

Topic/ Title: _________________________________________________________

Legend 4 - Strongly Agree

Content presented was applicable to my practice.

Thank You! We appreciate your help in evaluating this LAC/INSET SEMINAR.

Gov. Pascual St. Corner Leongson Sts.,San Roque, Navotas City

Potrebbero piacerti anche

GRADE /SECTION ____________Date:QUARTER

Subject Area_ Grade Level Teacher___

Staff Stakeholder/Parents Students___