Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
There are several reasons that necessitate the existence of covering for reinforce-
ment:
b. The need for adequate adhesion between the steel and the concrete.
c. The need for fire precaution. The reinforcement bars are protected by the con-
crete covering them from possible deformations caused in case of excessive
temperature development due to fire in the building,
d. The need to create cable channels without harming the reinforcement. It is very
common for an electrician or plumber to engrave channels in the frame in order to
integrate electric cables or pipes.
It is also possible to use ‘common’ materials for the creation of the covering, e.g
marble particles, that have no procurement cost but require a significant labor cost
for their implementation. What is more, the main drawback of using such materials is
the difficulty to be fitted properly since it should be implemented right after the instal-
lation of reinforcement and just before the concreting process.
In cases that we intent to leave the concrete visible, it is possible to use local or lin-
ear spacers made out of concrete reinforced with fibers or even use steel stands that
have edges made out of concrete reinforced with fibers.
The minimum covering that should be provided for the reinforcement of slabs is:
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
70
The lower reinforcement covering of the above slab is secured by the use of plastic
spacers.
The simplest solution of securing the covering is that of the plastic spacers as illus-
trated in the above picture.
The usage of steel spacers is forbidden since it will almost definitely be oxidized.
When a steel rod is oxidized, it increases its volume and destroys the covering and
then the plaster, thus decreasing the actual life span of the building and endangering
the safety of the residents.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
71
In the above example that the slab is connected with a cantilever, the position of the
upper reinforcement can be secured with the following techniques:
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
72
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
73
In cases that we use a mesh for the In cases that we use bended bars in
upper reinforcement, we can secure the upper support areas, the bending of
the position of the mesh by using an S- the bars will ensure that it will not move
type spacer placed upon the lower re- from its position. Therefore, additional
inforcement, directly along the area of indirect spacers may not be required.
the plastic spacer.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
74
In the area of the left support of the slab’s continuation, we should place two S-type
indirect spacers which are supported by the lower reinforcement mesh. These spac-
ers are placed above and along the plastic spacers.
The side slipping of the reinforcement mesh is avoided by the use of local spacers.
These spacers must be placed after the implementation of the mesh and before se-
curing the reinforcement bars of the slabs. When wheel spacers are used, it is ad-
vised to be placed vertically in order to avoid their drifting during the concreting proc-
ess. Regarding the ‘forehead’ of slabs, it is possible to place the wheel spacers hori-
zontally (as illustrated in the following picture) since the concrete will not be purred
directly over them.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
75
Another optional solution, in cases that we use a lightweight steel mesh for the lower
reinforcement, is to use indirect S-type spacers instead of direct hystools. In these
cases, it is more practical to use a ‘hairpin bend’ mesh spacer within which the mesh
can be adequately fitted.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
76
Finally, even in cases that we use a steel mesh for the lower reinforcement of the
slab or the cantilever, it is possible to use steel hystools instead of the indirect S-type
spacers.
It is strictly forbidden to use spacers made out of steel bars that are supported by the
framework. The use of these old-fashioned extemporary spacers is also the most ex-
pensive solution and should be avoided.
The minimum covering that should be provided for the reinforcement of beams is:
It is suggested that the stirrups in the lower area of the beam should be supported by
the use of a uniform inert bar because all loadings from reinforcement are concen-
trated in this area.
The side covering of the stirrups’ cage is secured by using the appropriate plastic
spacers. In cases that we use industrial stirrup cages, the wheel spacers should be
fitted above the connection bars of the cage in order to secure their position during
the concreting process.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
77
The side spacers have no loadings to support and thus it is not required to use
heavy-duty spacers. It is fitted after the implementation of the stirrup cage in the
beam’s body and before the fixation of both the beam’s longitudinal bars and the ad-
jacent slab’s reinforcement bars.
The usage of longitudinal plastic spacers in the sides of the beam (identical to those
fitted in the lower area of the beam) can create two problems: a) it can obstruct the
proper fitting of the stirrup cage in the beam’s body and b) it can obstruct the proper
concreting process.
If we are using an industrialized stirrup cage than uses longitudinal bars to connect
the stirrups then it is possible to implement small pieces of plastic spacers fitted in a
vertical position.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
78
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
79
process of the spacers and to properly determine the final position of the reinforce-
ment bars.
After the back of the shear wall is created, we should fit plastic rods (usually 2.0m in
length) directly in the formwork.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
80
Then, the outer columns are created and the body’s reinforcement is implemented.
After all reinforcement has been properly fitted we can secure the plastic spacers of
the opposite side directly in the steel mesh. In this way, when the rest of the shear
wall’s framework is fitted, the proper centering of the reinforcement will be ensured.
After all reinforcement has been fitted and before the shear wall is created by the
formwork, the plastic spacers are mounded directly in the internal steel mesh.
The most effective way to ensure the proper positioning of reinforcement in shear
walls is to fit it before the creation of the formwork. In these cases, all spacers are
mounded directly on the steel mesh.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
81
Generally, it is not allowed to construct the foundation directly in the ground’s surface
except for special occasions. The usage of a thick layer of concrete below the foun-
dation has the following advantages:
The covering can be secured with point spacers, or even better with linear spacers.
Due to the weight and loadings involved, it is advisable to use heavy duty spacers.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr
82
The spacers in the sides of the footings are obligatory in order to keep the reinforce-
ment bars in their position. These spacers do not have any loadings to support and
can be sparse and lightweight, fitted vertically in order to avoid disruption during the
concreting process.
Just like in the common slabs of the structure, in the edges of foundation slabs it is
possible to combine ‘hair pin’ reinforcement with open or closed steel mesh.
In the area between the reinforcement we can use steel spacers placed on the lower
steel mesh in order to secure the covering.
The above picture illustrates the steel spacers placed on the lower steel mesh in or-
der to support the upper steel mesh.
Abstracts from the book of Apostolos Konstandinideis called ‘EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS’, Volume A,
chapter 2.6, published in low resolution in the site of pi-SYSTEMS International S.A. www.pi.gr