Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The three major focus areas are individuals, societies and cultures, and language and
communication. Although there are many methods of inquiry in qualitative research, the
common assumptions are that knowledge is subjective rather than objective and that
the researcher learns from the participants in order to understand the meaning of their
lives. To ensure rigor and trustworthiness, the researcher attempts to maintain a
position of neutrality while engaged in the research process.
It was during the late 18th century when "the pursuit of knowledge" experienced a
scientific crisis. Other philosophers such as Immanual Kant, William Dilthey, Edmund
Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty believed that life consists of what we experience in
our activities and reflections as we live out our personal histories and that we live in a
matrix of complex relationships with others. Therefore, humans cannot be studied as
isolated units but must be understood in the context of their "lived world" or cultural and
social connections. The seminal work of these philosophers paved the way for the birth
of naturalistic or qualitative inquiry.
While quantitative research values control, qualitative research values openness and
flexibility. The quantitative researcher maintains an objective, detached stance, but the
qualitative researcher is considered to be the key instrument involved closely with the
data collection and analysis. The statistical data of quantitative methods obtained from a
great many people results in a broad, generalizable set of findings that are succinct and
said to be parsimonious. In contrast qualitative methods produce a large amount of
detailed information about a smaller number of people that results in rich understanding
but reduces generalizability.
Qualitative and quantitative methods involve differing strengths and weaknesses and,
therefore, should be seen as alternative but not mutually exclusive strategies for
research.
What is most important for the qualitative researcher is to be familiar with the different
qualitative research approaches. Then, researchers can make informed choices about
what they will use for their studies and why they will use them. When the comparisons
and distinctions among the approaches are clear, the researcher can then design a
more rigorous study.
References
Abram D. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Vintage Books; 1997
Cresswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
Eisner EW. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of
Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall; 1998
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage; 1999.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage; 1990.
Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press; 1983.
Solomon RC, Higgins KM. A Passion for Wisdom: A Very Brief History of
Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
Tarnas R. The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas That Have
Shaped Our World View. New York: Ballantine Books; 1991.
Tart CT, ed. Transpersonal Psychologies. New York: Harper & Row; 1975.