Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The case of Prosecutor Reyes vs Judge Julia Reyes is about the five administrative cases
filed against Judge Reyes and one administrative case filed by the respondent against
her Branch Clerk of Court Timoteo Migriño which were consolidated and referred to Judge
Romulo Quimbo (Consultant of the Office of the Court Administrator)
On the 1st Admin Case, Prosecutor Reyes charged Judge Reyes for Violation of the Code
of Judicial Conduct, Knowingly Rendering an Unjust Judgment or Order and Gross
Ignorance of the Law Procedure. Rooting from the incident when she denied the request
of Judge Reyes to conduct inquest on her Branch Clerk of Court Migriño for alleged
violation of PD 1602 (Anti-Gambling Law)
Judge Reyes was charged with residing in the chambers; borrowing money from the staff;
instructing stenographer to collect a minimum amount for ex-parte cases; frequently
bringing some of her staff to nighttime gimmick; unethical conduct; conduct unbecoming
a lady judge; unfriendliness to litigants; anti-public service; inability to control emotions
during hearings; uttering invectives in front of staff and lawyers; conducting staff meeting
in an unsightly attire; and gross inefficiency/laziness.
On this administrative complaint, Judge Reyes showed arrogance against Lagdameo who
is just merely requesting for a copy of a decision of the cases tried on that day and was
cited to contempt by Judge Reyes.
With the facts presented by the petitioners, Judge Reyes was recommended to be
dismissed by Judge Quimbo thus the Court finds Judge Reyes unfit to discharge her
functions as judge. WHEREFORE Judge Reyes is DISMISSED from the service with
forfeiture of all retirement benefits, while Migriño was fined equivalent his one-month
salary and warned that repetition of the same act will be dealt more severely.